1
|
Basiliya K, Pang P, Honing J, di Pietro M, Varghese S, Gbegli E, Corbett G, Carroll NR, Godfrey EM. What can the Interventional Endoscopist Offer in the Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancies? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:464-472. [PMID: 37253647 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
The therapeutic possibilities of endoscopy have rapidly increased in the last decades and now allow organ-sparing treatment of early upper gastrointestinal malignancy as well as an increasing number of options for symptom palliation. This review contains an overview of the interventional endoscopic procedures in upper gastrointestinal malignancies. It describes endoscopic treatment of early oesophageal and gastric cancers, and the palliative options in managing dysphagia and gastric outlet obstruction. It also provides an overview of the therapeutic possibilities of biliary endoscopy, such as retrograde stenting and radiofrequency biliary ablation. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapeutic options are discussed, including biliary drainage, gastrojejunostomy and coeliac axis block. To aid in clinical decision making, the procedures are described in the context of their indication, efficacy, risks and limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Basiliya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.
| | - P Pang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - J Honing
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - M di Pietro
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - S Varghese
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - E Gbegli
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - G Corbett
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - N R Carroll
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - E M Godfrey
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tran KV, Vo NP, Nguyen HS, Vo NT, Thai TBT, Pham VA, Loh EW, Tam KW. Palliative procedures for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a network meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2024. [PMID: 38641337 DOI: 10.1055/a-2309-7683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) remains uncertain. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively investigate the efficacy and safety of four palliative treatments for malignant GOO: gastrojejunostomy, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE), stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy (PGJ), and endoscopic stenting. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing the four treatments for malignant GOO. We included studies that reported at least one of the following clinical outcomes: clinical success, 30-day mortality, reintervention rate, or length of hospital stay. Evidence from RCTs and non-RCTs was naïve combined to perform network meta-analysis through the frequentist approach using an inverse variance model. Treatments were ranked by P score. RESULTS This network meta-analysis included 3617 patients from 4 RCTs, 4 prospective cohort studies, and 32 retrospective cohort studies. PGJ was the optimal approach in terms of clinical success and reintervention (P scores: 0.95 and 0.90, respectively). EUS-GE had the highest probability of being the optimal treatment in terms of 30-day mortality and complications (P scores: 0.82 and 0.99, respectively). Cluster ranking to combine the P scores for 30-day mortality and reintervention indicated the benefits of PGJ and EUS-GE (cophenetic correlation coefficient: 0.94; PGJ and EUS-GE were in the same cluster). CONCLUSION PGJ and EUS-GE are recommended for malignant GOO. PGJ could be the alternative choice in centers with limited resources or in patients who are unsuitable for EUS-GE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khoi Van Tran
- Department of Surgery, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Viet Nam
- International PhD Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Nguyen-Phong Vo
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
| | - Hung Song Nguyen
- Department of Pediatrics, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
- Intensive Care Unit Department, Children's Hospital 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
| | - Nhi Thi Vo
- Faculty of Nursing, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Viet Nam
| | - Thi Bao Trang Thai
- International PhD Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Vu Anh Pham
- Department of Surgery, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Viet Nam
| | - El-Wui Loh
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Ka-Wai Tam
- Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kalsi H, Jue TL. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gastroenterostomy for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Minimally Invasive Alternative to Palliative Surgical Bypass. Cureus 2024; 16:e59084. [PMID: 38803783 PMCID: PMC11128328 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Gastric outlet obstruction is a mechanical obstruction to the flow of gastric contents to the intestines. The most common causes of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO) are pancreatic and gastric cancers. MGOO is associated with reduced quality of life and poor prognosis due to malnourishment from the inability to tolerate oral intake. Surgical gastrojejunostomy and endoscopic placement of enteral stents are palliative options with different advantages and disadvantages. We present a case of MGOO treated with endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy, a minimally invasive alternative to palliative surgical bypass.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harsimran Kalsi
- Internal Medicine, UCF-HCA Florida North Florida Hospital, Gainesville, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tarasov SA, Yartsev PA, Rogal MM, Aksenova SO. [Complicated gastric cancer and modern treatment approaches]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2024:125-140. [PMID: 38634594 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia2024041125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Among all patients with gastric cancer, 40% admit to the hospitals due to cancer-related complications. The most common complications of gastric cancer are bleeding (22-80%), malignant gastric outlet obstruction (26-60%), and perforation (less than 5%). The main treatment methods for gastric cancer complicated by bleeding are various forms of endoscopic hemostasis, transarterial embolization and external beam radiotherapy. Surgical treatment is possible in case of ineffective management. However, surgical algorithm is not standardized. Malignant gastric outlet stenosis requires decompression: endoscopic stenting, palliative gastroenterostomy. Surgical treatment is also possible (gastrectomy, proximal or distal resection of the stomach). The main problem for patients with complicated gastric cancer is the lack of standardized algorithms and abundance of potential surgical techniques. The aim of our review is to systematize available data on the treatment of complicated gastric cancer and to standardize existing methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S A Tarasov
- Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care, Moscow, Russia
| | - P A Yartsev
- Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care, Moscow, Russia
| | - M M Rogal
- Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care, Moscow, Russia
| | - S O Aksenova
- Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Del Nero L, Sheijani AD, De Ceglie A, Bruzzone M, Ceppi M, Filiberti RA, Siersema P, Conio M. A Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Stenting Versus Surgical Treatment for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction. World J Surg 2023; 47:1519-1529. [PMID: 36869171 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-06944-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Surgical gastrojejunostomy (GJJ) and endoscopic stenting (ES) are the two most available treatments for palliation of malignant gastric obstruction (MGOO). The aim of this study is to compare these two techniques regarding efficacy, safety, time of hospitalization and survival. METHODS We performed a literature search from January 2010 to September 2020 to identify available randomized controlled studies and observational studies that compared ES and GJJ for the treatment of MGOO. RESULTS A total of 17 studies were found. ES and GJJ showed similar technical and clinical success rate. ES was superior to obtain early oral re-feeding, shorter length of hospitalization and a lower incidence of complications than GJJ. Surgical palliation had a lower recurrence rate of obstructive symptoms and longer overall survival than ES. CONCLUSIONS Both procedures have advantages and disadvantages. Probably we should not find the best palliation but the best approach based on the patient characteristics and tumor type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Del Nero
- Gastroenterology Department, Santa Corona Hospital, ASL 2 Savonese, Viale 25 Aprile, 38, 17027, Pietra Ligure, SV, Italy.
| | - Afscin Djahandideh Sheijani
- Gastroenterology Department, Santa Corona Hospital, ASL 2 Savonese, Viale 25 Aprile, 38, 17027, Pietra Ligure, SV, Italy
| | - Antonella De Ceglie
- Gastroenterology Department, Sanremo General Hospital, ASL1 Imperiese, Sanremo, IM, Italy
| | - Marco Bruzzone
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marcello Ceppi
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Peter Siersema
- Gastroenterology Department, Santa Corona Hospital, ASL 2 Savonese, Viale 25 Aprile, 38, 17027, Pietra Ligure, SV, Italy.,Gastroenterology Department, Sanremo General Hospital, ASL1 Imperiese, Sanremo, IM, Italy.,Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Massimo Conio
- Gastroenterology Department, Santa Corona Hospital, ASL 2 Savonese, Viale 25 Aprile, 38, 17027, Pietra Ligure, SV, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Demarest K, Lavu H, Collins E, Batra V. Comprehensive Diagnosis and Management of Malignant Bowel Obstruction: A Review. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 2023; 37:91-105. [PMID: 36377820 DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2022.2106012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Malignant bowel obstruction is a common complication of advanced gastrointestinal, gynecologic, and genitourinary tumors. Patients present with nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and constipation. Cross-sectional imaging is essential to make a diagnosis of bowel obstruction. Initial management is conservative with fluid replacement, electrolyte replacement, bowel rest and sometimes nasogastric decompression. Numerous advanced options exist for definitive management, though none are overly promising but nevertheless may improve quality and quantity of life. Surgical bypass, endoscopic stenting, and endoscopic decompression are some of the options with variable efficacy and are employed in select patients. Chemotherapy may be utilized if the bowel obstruction resolves to reduce tumor burden in a limited number of patients. Parenteral nutrition is an option and should typically be used in surgical patients with good functional and nutritional status with limited tumor burden or curative intent. Palliative care and hospice should be discussed in patients with advanced malignancy who present with peritoneal carcinomatosis or multiple levels of obstruction. Overall prognosis of malignant bowel obstruction is poor, and median survival ranges from 26 to 192 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin Demarest
- Kaitlin Demarest, MD, is with, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Harish Lavu, MD, is with the Department of Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Elizabeth Collins, MD, is with the Department of Family & Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Vivek Batra, MD, is with the Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Harish Lavu
- Kaitlin Demarest, MD, is with, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Harish Lavu, MD, is with the Department of Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Elizabeth Collins, MD, is with the Department of Family & Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Vivek Batra, MD, is with the Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Collins
- Kaitlin Demarest, MD, is with, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Harish Lavu, MD, is with the Department of Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Elizabeth Collins, MD, is with the Department of Family & Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Vivek Batra, MD, is with the Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Vivek Batra
- Kaitlin Demarest, MD, is with, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Harish Lavu, MD, is with the Department of Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Elizabeth Collins, MD, is with the Department of Family & Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Vivek Batra, MD, is with the Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Khamar J, Lee Y, Sachdeva A, Anpalagan T, McKechnie T, Eskicioglu C, Agzarian J, Doumouras A, Hong D. Gastrojejunostomy versus endoscopic stenting for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2022:10.1007/s00464-022-09572-5. [PMID: 36138247 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09572-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Though gastrojejunostomy (GJ) has been a standard palliative procedure for gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), endoscopic stenting (ES) has shown to provide benefits due to its non-invasive approach. The aim of this review is to perform a comprehensive evaluation of ES versus GJ for the palliation of malignant GOO. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched and comparative studies of adult GOO patients undergoing ES or GJ were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcomes were survival time and mortality. Secondary outcomes included technical success, clinical success, reinterventions, days until oral food tolerance, postoperative adjuvant palliative chemotherapy, postoperative morbidities, length of stay (LOS), and costs. Pairwise meta-analyses using inverse-variance random effects were performed. RESULTS After identifying 2222 citations, 39 full-text articles fit the inclusion criteria. In total, 3128 ES patients (41.4% female, age: 68.0 years) and 2116 GJ patients (40.4% female, age: 66.8 years) were included. ES patients experienced a shorter survival time (mean difference -24.77 days, 95% Cl - 45.11 to - 4.43, p = 0.02) and were less likely to undergo adjuvant palliative chemotherapy (risk ratio 0.81, 95% Cl 0.70 to 0.93, p = 0.004). The ES group had a shorter LOS, shorter time to oral intake of liquids and solids, and less surgical site infections (risk ratio 0.30, 95% Cl 0.12 to 0.75, p = 0.01). The patients in the ES group were at greater risk of requiring reintervention (risk ratio 2.60, 95% Cl 1.87 to 3.63, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION ES results in less postoperative morbidity and shorter LOS when compared to GJ, however, this may be at the cost of decreased initiation of adjuvant palliative chemotherapy and overall survival, as well as increased risk of reintervention. Both techniques are likely appropriate in select clinical scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jigish Khamar
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Yung Lee
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Ave. East, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Anjali Sachdeva
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Tharani Anpalagan
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Tyler McKechnie
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Ave. East, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Cagla Eskicioglu
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Ave. East, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - John Agzarian
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Ave. East, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Aristithes Doumouras
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Ave. East, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Dennis Hong
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Ave. East, Hamilton, ON, Canada. .,Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Maetani I. How to successfully administer palliative treatment with a stent for malignant gastric outlet obstruction? Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:967740. [PMID: 36017000 PMCID: PMC9395687 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.967740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Although endoscopic stenting (ES) has been widely used as a less-invasive palliation method for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), recent reports have highlighted issues related to the procedure. For successful treatment, various aspects must be assessed before considering the practices. First, it is necessary to eliminate cases with contraindications such as coexistence of distal small-bowel obstruction or perforation. Other factors potentially related to clinical failure (i.e., peritoneal carcinomatosis) may require consideration but remain controversial. ES has better short-term outcomes than surgical gastrojejunostomy (GJ). GJ has recently been considered preferable in cases with longer life expectancy because of superior sustainability. Various types of stents are now commercially available, but their ideal structure and mechanical properties have not yet been clarified. Covered metal stent may reduce stent obstruction but is prone to increase stent migration, and its significance remains uncertain. Subsequent chemotherapy after stenting should be considered, as it is expected to prolong patient survival without increasing the risk of adverse events. Furthermore, it may be helpful in preventing tumor ingrowth. In cases with GOO combined with biliary obstruction, biliary intervention is often difficult. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been widely used as an alternative procedure for endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage (ETBD). Despite the lack of consensus as to whether ETBD or EUS-BD is preferred, EUS-BD is useful as a salvage technique for cases where ETBD is difficult. To perform stent placement successfully, it is important to pay attention to the above points; however, many remaining issues need to be clarified in the future.
Collapse
|
9
|
Oliveira JFD, Franco MC, Rodela G, Maluf-Filho F, Martins BC. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (gastroenteric anastomosis). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION 2022. [DOI: 10.18528/ijgii220024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gustavo Rodela
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Nipo-Brasileiro, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fauze Maluf-Filho
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo ICESP, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Bruno Costa Martins
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo ICESP, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Khorobrykh TV, Abdulkhakimov NM, Agadzhanov VG, Aghayan DL, Kazaryan AM. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer complicated with bleeding and/or stenosis: short- and long-term outcomes. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20:216. [PMID: 35752852 PMCID: PMC9233806 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02674-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic surgery has justified its efficacy in the treatment of early gastric cancer. There are limited data indicating the eligibility of laparoscopic interventions in locally advanced gastric cancer. Publications describing the safety of laparoscopic techniques in the treatment of local and metastatic gastric cancer complicated by bleeding and stenosis are scarce. Methods The study included patients with histologically confirmed locally advanced and disseminated gastric cancer and complicated with bleeding and/or stenosis who underwent gastrectomy with vital indications between February 2012 and August 2018. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic surgery (laparoscopic surgery) and open surgery (OS) were compared. Results In total, 127 patients (LS, n = 52; OS, n = 75) were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Forty-four total gastrectomies with resection of the abdominal part of the esophagus, 63 distal subtotal (43 Billroth-I and 20 Billroth-II), and 19 proximal gastrectomies were performed. The median duration of surgery was significantly longer in the LS group, 253 min (interquartile range [IQR], 200–295) versus 210 min (IQR, 165–220) (p < 0.001), while median intraoperative blood loss in the LS group was significantly less, 180 ml (IQR, 146—214) versus 320 ml (IQR, 290–350), (p < 0.001). Early postoperative complications occurred in 35% in the LS group and in 45 % of patients in the OS group (p = 0.227). There was no difference in postoperative mortality rates between the groups (3 [6 %] versus 5 (7 %), p = 1.00). Median intensive care unit stay and median postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter after laparoscopy, 2 (IQR, 1–2) versus 4 (IQR, 3–4) days, and 8 (IQR, 7–9) versus 10 (IQR, 8–12) days, both p < 0.001. After laparoscopy, patients started adjuvant chemotherapy significantly earlier than those after open surgery, 20 vs. 28 days (p < 0.001). However, overall survival rates were similar between the group. Three-year overall survival was 24% in the LS group and 27% in the OS groups. Conclusions Despite the technical complexity, in patients with complicated locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer, laparoscopic gastrectomies were associated with longer operation time, reduced intraoperative blood loss, shorter reconvalescence, and similar morbidity, mortality rates and long-term oncologic outcomes compared to conventional open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatyana V Khorobrykh
- Department of Faculty Surgery №2, I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Nuriddin M Abdulkhakimov
- Department of Faculty Surgery №2, I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Vadim G Agadzhanov
- Department of Faculty Surgery №2, I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Davit L Aghayan
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Airazat M Kazaryan
- Department of Faculty Surgery №2, I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia. .,The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. .,Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia. .,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway. .,Department of Surgery, Helse Fonna Hospital Trust, Odda, Norway. .,Institute for Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Laitamäki M, Tyrväinen T, Lehto JT, Laukkarinen J, Ukkonen M. Endoscopic duodenal stenting is efficient, but has higher rate of reoperations than gastrojejunostomy in palliative treatment for gastric outlet obstruction. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:2509-2515. [PMID: 35648229 PMCID: PMC9468122 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02565-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical gastrojejunostomy has traditionally been the palliative treatment of choice for patients with advanced malignancies and gastric outlet obstruction syndrome. Recently, palliative endoscopic duodenal stenting has increased in popularity. We report outcomes after gastrojejunostomy and duodenal stenting when used for palliative indications. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing palliative gastrojejunostomy or palliative endoscopic duodenal stenting in a Finnish tertiary referral center between January 2015 and December 2020 were included. The postoperative outcomes of these two palliative interventions were compared. The main outcome measures were mortality and morbidity, rate of reoperations, postoperative oral intake ability, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS A total of 88 patients, 46 (52%) patients underwent palliative gastrojejunostomy and 42 (48%) duodenal stenting. All patients had malignant disease, most typically hepatopancreatic cancer. Nineteen (44%) patients in duodenal stenting group and 4 (8.7%) patients in gastrojejunostomy group required subsequent interventions due to persisting or progressing symptoms (p < 0.001). Median delay until first oral intake was 2 days (1-24) after gastrojejunostomy and 0 days (0-3) after stenting (p < 0.001). Postoperative morbidity was 30% after gastrojejunostomy and 45% after stenting (p < 0.001). Median length of hospital stay was 7 days (1-27) after surgery and 5 days (0-20) after endoscopy (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing endoscopic duodenal stenting are more able to initiate rapid oral intake and have shorter hospital stay. On the other hand, there are significantly more reoperations in stenting group. If the patient's life expectancy is short, we recommend stenting, but for patients whose life expectancy is longer, gastrojejunostomy could be a better procedure, for the reasons mentioned above.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matti Laitamäki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Kuntokatu 2, 33520, ElämänaukioTampere, Finland.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
| | - Tuula Tyrväinen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Kuntokatu 2, 33520, ElämänaukioTampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Juho T Lehto
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Palliative Care Centre and Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Johanna Laukkarinen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Kuntokatu 2, 33520, ElämänaukioTampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Mika Ukkonen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Kuntokatu 2, 33520, ElämänaukioTampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Campana LG, Fish R, Dickinson OT, McNamara MG, O'Dwyer ST, Laasch HU. Distal migration of a partially covered duodenal stent requiring emergency surgical extraction. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION 2022. [DOI: 10.18528/ijgii210044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Giovanni Campana
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre (CPOC), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Rebecca Fish
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre (CPOC), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Mairéad Geraldine McNamara
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Theresa O'Dwyer
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre (CPOC), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Hans-Ulrich Laasch
- Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Minnova Medical Foundation CIC, Wilmslow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Papanikolaou IS, Siersema PD. Gastric Outlet Obstruction: Current Status and Future Directions. Gut Liver 2022; 16:667-675. [PMID: 35314520 PMCID: PMC9474481 DOI: 10.5009/gnl210327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a relatively common condition in which mechanical obstruction of the pylorus, distal stomach, or duodenum causes severe symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and early satiety. Its etiology includes both benign and malignant disorders. Currently, GOO has many treatment options, including initial conservative therapeutic protocols and more invasive procedures, such as surgical gastroenterostomy, stent placement and, the most recently implemented procedure, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE). Each procedure has its merits, with surgery often prevailing in patients with longer life expectancy and stents being used most often in patients with malignant gastric outlet stenosis. The newly developed EUS-GE combines the immediate effect of stents and the long-term efficacy of gastroenterostomy. However, this novel method is a technically demanding process that requires expert experience and special facilities. Thus, the true clinical effectiveness, as well as the duration of the effects of EUS-GE, still need to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis S Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Attikon University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kim M, Rai M, Teshima C. Interventional Endoscopy for Palliation of Luminal Gastrointestinal Obstructions in Management of Cancer: Practical Guide for Oncologists. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11061712. [PMID: 35330037 PMCID: PMC8953341 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Self-expanding metal stents placed during endoscopy are increasingly the first-line treatment for luminal obstruction caused by esophageal, gastroduodenal, and colorectal malignancies in patients who are not candidates for definitive surgical resection. In this review, we provide a practical guide for clinicians to optimise patient and procedure selection for endoscopic stenting in malignant gastrointestinal obstructions. The role of endoscopic stenting in each of the major anatomical systems (esophageal, gastroduodenal, and colorectal) is presented with regard to pre-procedural patient evaluation, procedural techniques, clinical outcomes, and potential complications, as well as post-procedure aftercare.
Collapse
|
15
|
Lee SE, Han SS, Kang CM, Kwon W, Paik KY, Song KB, Yang JD, Chung JC, Jeong CY, Kim SW. Korean Surgical Practice Guideline for Pancreatic Cancer 2021: A summary of evidence-based surgical approaches. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2022; 26:1-16. [PMID: 35220285 PMCID: PMC8901981 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.22-009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is the eighth most common cancer and the fifth most common cause of cancer-related deaths in Korea. Despite the increasing incidence and high mortality rate of pancreatic cancer, there are no appropriate surgical practice guidelines for the current domestic medical situation. To enable standardization of management and facilitate improvements in surgical outcome, a total of 10 pancreatic surgical experts who are members of Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery have developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date, evidence-based research findings and expert opinions. This is an English version of the Korean Surgical Practice Guideline for Pancreatic Cancer 2021. This guideline includes 13 surgical questions and 15 statements. Due to the lack of high-level evidence, strong recommendation is almost impossible. However, we believe that this guideline will help surgeons understand the current status of evidence and suggest what to investigate further to establish more solid recommendations in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Eun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Sik Han
- Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Chang Moo Kang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwang Yeol Paik
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki Byung Song
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Do Yang
- Department of Surgery, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Jun Chul Chung
- Department of Surgery, Soon Chun Hyang University School of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Chi-Young Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Sun-Whe Kim
- Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wang C, Zhang X, Lin S, Yang C, Zhou B, Mi Y, Ye R, Chen Y, Chen W, Lin X, Tan S, Zhou Y, Li W. Superiority of Laparoscopic Gastrojejunostomy Combined With Multimodality Therapy for Gastric Outlet Obstruction Caused by Advanced Gastric Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:814283. [PMID: 35155250 PMCID: PMC8832489 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.814283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data are limited concerning the survival outcomes of patients with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) caused by advanced gastric cancers according to laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (LGJ) combined with multimodality therapy (MMT). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility and efficacy of these therapies. METHODS This single-centered, retrospective analysis included data of 184 patients with GOO due to advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Treatment models were: laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy combined with multimodality therapy (LGJ+MMT), endoscopic metal stent placement combined with multimodality therapy (EMSP+MMT), and multimodality therapy (MMT). RESULTS Improved oral intake, better nutritional indices, and better response to chemotherapy were observed in the LGJ+MMT group. Subsequent gastrectomy was performed in 43 (61.4%) patients in the LGJ+MMT group, 23 (37.7%) in the EMSP+MMT group, and 11 (20.8%) in the MMT group (P<0.001). LGJ+MMT was associated with better long-term prognosis. As confirmed by propensity scores and multivariate analyses, the 3-year survival rates in the three treatment models were 31.4% with LGJ+MMT, 0% with EMSP+MMT, and 0% with MMT in conversion therapy, and 50.0% with LGJ+MMT, 33.3% with EMSP+MMT, and 23.5% with MMT in NAC. A forest plot revealed that LGJ+MMT was related to a decreased risk of death. CONCLUSIONS LGJ combined with MMT was associated with better nutritional status, higher rates of subsequent gastrectomy, and good prognosis. LGJ combined with MMT may improve the long-term survival of patients with GOO caused by AGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuandong Wang
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiaojuan Zhang
- Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Radiology, 900th Hospital Logistic Support Forces of PLA, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shengtao Lin
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Changshun Yang
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - BiaoHuan Zhou
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yulong Mi
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Rong Ye
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yifan Chen
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Weijie Chen
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiaojun Lin
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Song Tan
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yuhang Zhou
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Weihua Li
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sundaram S, Harindranath S, Rao PK, Ramani N, Kale A, Patkar S. Concomitant endoscopic biliary, duodenal and colonic stent placement for advanced carcinoma of gall bladder. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION 2021. [DOI: 10.18528/ijgii210020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sridhar Sundaram
- Department of Gastroenterology, King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College, Mumbai, India
| | - Sidharth Harindranath
- Department of Gastroenterology, King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College, Mumbai, India
| | - Praveen Kumar Rao
- Department of Gastroenterology, King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College, Mumbai, India
| | - Nitin Ramani
- Department of Gastroenterology, King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College, Mumbai, India
| | - Aditya Kale
- Department of Gastroenterology, King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College, Mumbai, India
| | - Shraddha Patkar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fung BM, Kadera BE, Tabibian JH. Gastrointestinal Luminal Stenting: The Early US Experience with the Duodenal HANAROSTENT. Gastrointest Tumors 2021; 8:1-7. [PMID: 34568291 DOI: 10.1159/000510350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are frequently utilized for palliation of malignant gastric and/or duodenal outlet obstruction (GDOO). Re-establishing luminal patency with accurate SEMS positioning while limiting migration and adjacent tissue injury is an important technical consideration and aim. The duodenal HANAROSTENT® was introduced in the USA in 2019 and developed with these challenges in mind. As the first center in the USA to deploy the duo-denal HANAROSTENT® in clinical practice, we herein examine our early experience with its use. Specifically, we describe 7 consecutive cases of malignant GDOO in which a duodenal HANAROSTENT® was placed for on-label use, defined as palliative treatment of malignant gastric and/or duodenal obstruction. All stents were 22 mm in diameter, with 5 being 90 mm and 2 being 120 mm in length. Technical and clinical success with duodenal HANAROSTENT® placement were achieved in all 7 cases (100%). In no case was stent adjustment required post-deployment. There were no stent-related adverse events, and no subsequent endoscopic procedures were necessary in any of the patients during a mean follow-up of 5 months (range 1-12 months). In summary, the duodenal HANAROSTENT® appears to perform well and be a promising alternative to other available duodenal SEMSs. As experience in the USA with this newly introduced duodenal SEMS grows, multicenter prospective data should be collected to better establish its relative safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian M Fung
- Department of Medicine, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, California, USA.,David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Brian E Kadera
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Surgery, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, California, USA
| | - James H Tabibian
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Stefanovic S, Draganov PV, Yang D. Endoscopic ultrasound guided gastrojejunostomy for gastric outlet obstruction. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:620-632. [PMID: 34354796 PMCID: PMC8316851 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i7.620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a clinical syndrome secondary to luminal obstruction at the level of the stomach and/or duodenum. GOO can be caused by either benign or malignant etiologies, often resulting in early satiety, nausea, vomiting and poor oral intake. GOO is associated with decreased quality of life and has been shown to significantly impact survival in patients with advanced malignancies. Traditional treatment options for GOO can be broadly divided into surgical [surgical gastrojejunostomy (GJ)] and endoscopic interventions (dilation and/or placement of luminal self-expanding metal stents). While surgical GJ has been shown to provide a more lasting relief of symptoms when compared to luminal stenting, it has also been associated with a higher rate of adverse events. Furthermore, many patients with advanced metastatic disease are not good surgical candidates. More recently, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided GJ has emerged as a potential alternative to traditional surgical and endoscopic approaches. This review focuses on the new advances and technical aspects of EUS-GJ and clinical outcomes in the management of both benign and malignant disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Stefanovic
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32608, United States
| | - Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32608, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Scatimburgo MVCV, Ribeiro IB, de Moura DTH, Sagae VMT, Hirsch BS, Boghossian MB, McCarty TR, dos Santos MEL, Franzini TAP, Bernardo WM, de Moura EGH. Biliary drainage in inoperable malignant biliary distal obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:493-506. [PMID: 34122738 PMCID: PMC8167848 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i5.493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic drainage remains the treatment of choice for unresectable or inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO).
AIM To compare the safety and efficacy of plastic stent (PS) vs self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) placement for treatment of MDBO.
METHODS This meta-analysis was developed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed in MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, and grey literature to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing clinical success, adverse events, stent dysfunction rate, reintervention rate, duration of stent patency, and mean survival. Risk difference (RD) and mean difference (MD) were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses were performed by SEMS type.
RESULTS Twelve RCTs were included in this study, totaling 1005 patients. There was no difference in clinical success (RD = -0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.01, 0.07; I2 = 0%), rate of adverse events (RD = -0.03, 95%CI: -0.10, 0.03; I2 = 57%), and mean patient survival (MD = -0.63, 95%CI: -18.07, 19.33; I2 = 54%) between SEMS vs PS placement. However, SEMS placement was associated with a lower rate of reintervention (RD = -0.34, 95%CI: -0.46, -0.22; I2 = 57%) and longer duration of stent patency (MD = 125.77 d, 95%CI: 77.5, 174.01). Subgroup analyses revealed both covered and uncovered SEMS improved stent patency compared to PS (RD = 152.25, 95%CI: 37.42, 267.07; I2 = 98% and RD = 101.5, 95%CI: 38.91, 164.09; I2 = 98%; respectively). Stent dysfunction was higher in the covered SEMS group (RD = -0.21, 95%CI: -0.32, -0.1; I² = 205%), with no difference in the uncovered SEMS group (RD = -0.08, 95%CI: -0.56, 0.39; I² = 87%).
CONCLUSION While both stent types possessed a similar clinical success rate, complication rate, and patient-associated mean survival for treatment of MDBO, SEMS were associated with a longer duration of stent patency compared to PS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Igor Braga Ribeiro
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-010, Brazil
| | - Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-010, Brazil
| | - Vitor Massaro Takamatsu Sagae
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-010, Brazil
| | - Bruno Salomão Hirsch
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-010, Brazil
| | - Mateus Bond Boghossian
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-010, Brazil
| | - Thomas R McCarty
- Division of Gasteoenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Marcos Eduardo Lera dos Santos
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-010, Brazil
| | - Tomazo Antonio Prince Franzini
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-010, Brazil
| | - Wanderley Marques Bernardo
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-010, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Recinos LM, Mohapatra S, Santharaman A, Patel N, Broder A. Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma Presenting With Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction and Acute Pancreatitis: A Case Report. Cureus 2021; 13:e12775. [PMID: 33628647 PMCID: PMC7891802 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLPS) are rare, high-grade malignancies that usually originate in the retroperitoneum. Frequently, they present as asymptomatic masses, abdominal distention, abdominal pain, and weight loss. They tend to grow significantly and are usually large in size at the time of diagnosis. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment; however, local recurrence is common. When unresectable, they can invade local structures and produce a significant mass effect on the adjacent organs. Here we present the first case of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO) and acute pancreatitis from a retroperitoneal DDLPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luisa M Recinos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Peter's University Hospital/Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, USA
| | - Sonmoon Mohapatra
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Peter's University Hospital/Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, USA
| | - Aadhithyaraman Santharaman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Peter's University Hospital/Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, USA
| | - Neil Patel
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, USA
| | - Arkady Broder
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Peter's University Hospital/Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kastelijn JB, Van der Voort V, Bijlsma A, Moons LMG, Schwartz MP, Vleggaar FP. Early Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent Dysfunction Complicating Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gastroenterostomy: A Report of Two Cases. Clin Endosc 2021; 54:603-607. [PMID: 33434963 PMCID: PMC8357596 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2020.201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent has emerged as a novel technique in the palliative treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy seems to have the potential to provide long-lasting patency in a minimally invasive manner. Low reintervention rates have been described. We report two cases with early lumen-apposing metal stent dysfunction, compromising patency. One case showed food impaction after three weeks, and hyperplastic tissue overgrowth with a buried distal flange six weeks after stent placement. The latter was successfully treated by argon plasma coagulation, stent removal, and deployment of a larger-diameter lumen-apposing metal stent. The second case showed a narrowed luminal diameter of the stent and jejunal pressure ulcerations after three weeks. The narrowing was successfully treated by balloon dilation. Eight weeks later, hyperplastic tissue overgrowth at the distal flange of the stent and a gastro-colonic fistula were diagnosed, followed by extensive reconstructive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine B Kastelijn
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Veronique Van der Voort
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Alderina Bijlsma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Diaz LI, Mony S, Klapman J. Narrative review of the role of gastroenterologist in the diagnosis, treatment and palliation in gastric and gastroesophageal cancer. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:1106. [PMID: 33145325 PMCID: PMC7575985 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Esophageal cancer (EC) and gastric cancer (GC) carry a high mortality rate. Unfortunately, a majority of patients are asymptomatic and at the time of diagnosis, the disease may invariably be in its advanced stages with limited curative options. Thus, it is imperative to recognize certain risk factors including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), male gender, pre-existing Barrett’s esophagus, smoking history, obesity, Helicobacter pylori infection, atrophic gastritis among others for both EC and GC, intervene on time with screening and surveillance modalities if indicated and optimize treatment plans. With advances in endoscopic techniques, early neoplastic lesions are increasingly managed by gastroenterologists, offering an alternative to surgery. The gold standard for diagnosis of EC and GC is high definition endoscopy with adequate targeted biopsies. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a key in the staging of early cancers dictating the pathway for treatment options. We also play a key role in palliation cases with the aim to reduce the symptoms like nausea, vomiting and even when possible, restore oral intake and improve nutrition in both advanced GC and EC. This review article discusses the risk factors, diagnostic and endoscopic treatment modalities of early EC and GC and palliation of advanced cancer where gastroenterologists play a key role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liege I Diaz
- Department of Endoscopic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Shruti Mony
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jason Klapman
- Department of Endoscopic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Baldaque-Silva F. Stent-in-Stent for Malign Obstruction: Should We Go Back to a Place Where We Were Happy? GE PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2020; 27:375-377. [PMID: 33251285 PMCID: PMC7670327 DOI: 10.1159/000510739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Baldaque-Silva
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Keane MG, Khashab MA. Malignant GOO: Are duodenal stenting and surgical gastrojejunostomy obsolete? Endosc Int Open 2020; 8:E1455-E1457. [PMID: 33043113 PMCID: PMC7541185 DOI: 10.1055/a-1231-5011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret G. Keane
- Johns Hopkins Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Mouen A. Khashab
- Johns Hopkins Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kastelijn JB, Moons LM, Garcia-Alonso FJ, Pérez-Miranda M, Masaryk V, Will U, Tarantino I, van Dullemen HM, Bijlsma R, Poley JW, Schwartz MP, Vleggaar FP. Patency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy in the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8:E1194-E1201. [PMID: 32904815 PMCID: PMC7458745 DOI: 10.1055/a-1214-5659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) with a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) is a novel, minimally invasive technique in the palliative treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Several studies have demonstrated feasibility and safety of EUS-GE, but evidence on long-term durability is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate patency of EUS-GE in treatment of malignant GOO. Patients and Methods An international multicenter study was performed in seven centers in four European countries. Patients who underwent EUS-GE with a LAMS between March 2015 and March 2019 for palliative treatment of symptomatic malignant GOO were included retrospectively. Our main outcome was recurrent obstruction due to LAMS dysfunction; other outcomes of interest were technical success, clinical success, adverse events (AEs), and survival. Results A total of 45 patients (mean age 69.9 ± 12.3 years and 48.9 % male) were included. Median duration of follow-up was 59 days (interquartile range [IQR] 41-128). Recurrent obstruction occurred in two patients (6.1 %), after 33 and 283 days of follow-up. Technical success was achieved in 39 patients (86.7 %). Clinical success was achieved in 33 patients (73.3 %). AEs occurred in 12 patients (26.7 %), of which five were fatal. Median overall survival was 57 days (IQR 32-114). Conclusions EUS-GE showed a low rate of recurrent obstruction. The relatively high number of fatal AEs underscores the importance of careful implementation of EUS-GE in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine B. Kastelijn
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M.G. Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Manuel Pérez-Miranda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Viliam Masaryk
- Department of Gastroenterology and General Internal Medicine, SRH Wald-Klinikum, Gera, Germany
| | - Uwe Will
- Department of Gastroenterology and General Internal Medicine, SRH Wald-Klinikum, Gera, Germany
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (IsMeTT), Palermo, Italy
| | - Hendrik M. van Dullemen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rina Bijlsma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P. Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P. Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bryce A, Wohlgemut JM, Coyle T, Hannay J. Safety and efficacy of duodenal stent insertion for gastric outlet obstruction: characterisation of a regional district general hospital service. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2020; 102:689-692. [PMID: 32538119 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Placement of a duodenal or pyloric stent is a recognised palliative procedure for symptomatic relief of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. This procedure can be associated with significant complications, reinterventions and poor long-term relief of obstructive symptoms. However, there may be a faster return to diet and shorter hospital stay in comparison to other palliative procedures (eg gastrojejunostomy). The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of duodenal stenting in our regional district general hospital in comparison to that of larger tertiary centres. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients with gastric outlet obstruction who had duodenal stent placement attempted in our region between 1 August 2013 and 31 July 2018 were identified by retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained coding databases and medical notes. Patient demographics, safety outcomes and efficacy outcomes were then extracted. Results were interpreted with respect to data from best available published evidence from larger tertiary centres. RESULTS Of 43 duodenal stent insertion attempts, 84% had a successful return to diet, 18% underwent reintervention, 18% suffered adverse events, mean length of stay post-intervention was 8.6 days and mean survival post-intervention was 132 days. CONCLUSIONS Patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction in whom duodenal stent placement was attempted had similar outcomes to published data from larger tertiary centres. Duodenal stent placement remains an acceptable treatment option for these patients in our region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bryce
- Department of General Surgery, Inverclyde Royal Hospital, Greenock, Scotland, UK
| | - J M Wohlgemut
- Department of General Surgery, Inverclyde Royal Hospital, Greenock, Scotland, UK
| | - T Coyle
- Department of Radiology, Inverclyde Royal Hospital, Greenock, Scotland, UK
| | - J Hannay
- Department of General Surgery, Inverclyde Royal Hospital, Greenock, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Martin-Perez E, Domínguez-Muñoz JE, Botella-Romero F, Cerezo L, Matute Teresa F, Serrano T, Vera R. Multidisciplinary consensus statement on the clinical management of patients with pancreatic cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2020; 22:1963-1975. [PMID: 32318964 PMCID: PMC7505812 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02350-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) remains one of the most aggressive tumors with an increasing incidence rate and reduced survival. Although surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for PC, only 15–20% of patients are resectable at diagnosis. To select the most appropriate treatment and thus improve outcomes, the diagnostic and therapeutic strategy for each patient with PC should be discussed within a multidisciplinary expert team. Clinical decision-making should be evidence-based, considering the staging of the tumor, the performance status and preferences of the patient. The aim of this guideline is to provide practical and evidence-based recommendations for the management of PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Martin-Perez
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Diego de Leon 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
| | - J E Domínguez-Muñoz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - F Botella-Romero
- Department of Endocrinology, Hospital General Universitario, Albacete, Spain
| | - L Cerezo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - F Matute Teresa
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - T Serrano
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.,Oncology Program, CIBEREHD National Biomedical Research Institute on Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Vera
- Department of Medical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Big End Double-Layer Stents for the Treatment of Gastric Outlet Obstruction Caused by Stomach Cancer. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2019; 2019:8093091. [PMID: 31354809 PMCID: PMC6636570 DOI: 10.1155/2019/8093091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Revised: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study is aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of the big end double-layer uncovered self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) for the treatment of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) caused by distal stomach cancer. Methods Seventy three patients receiving big end double-layer uncovered SEMS for the treatment of GOO caused by distal gastric cancer will be included in this multicenter prospective clinical trial. The main outcome measures included the functional outcome, the complications, the reinterventional rates, the average treatment charges, and the mean survival time. Monthly telephone calls were needed to assess the food intake until the patients died. Results The technical and the clinical success rates were 98.6%. The stent obstruction caused by tumor ingrowth was observed in one patient (1.4%). The incidence of food impaction was 2.9% (2/70) and the reinterventional rate was 4.3% (3/70). However, stent migration and obstruction caused by overgrowth were not observed. No perforation and severe bleeding were observed. The median cost of endoscopic stenting and total hospitalization (including reinterventions) for the big end double-layer uncovered SEMS in this study was $2945 and $3408, respectively. The mean survival time was 212.5 days. Conclusions The placement of big end double-layer uncovered SEMS is a safe and effective modality and has the potential to be one of the options for the treatment of GOO caused by the distal gastric cancer.
Collapse
|
30
|
Mintziras I, Miligkos M, Wächter S, Manoharan J, Bartsch DK. Palliative surgical bypass is superior to palliative endoscopic stenting in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2019; 33:3153-3164. [PMID: 31332564 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06955-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are the two most common palliative treatment options for patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Randomised trials and retrospective studies have shown discrepant results, so that there is still a controversy regarding the optimal treatment of GOO. METHODS Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies comparing GJ to SEMS in patients with malignant GOO. Primary outcomes were survival and postoperative mortality. Secondary outcomes were frequency of re-interventions, major complications, time to oral intake and length of hospital stay. RESULTS Twenty-seven studies, with a total of 2.354 patients, 1.306 (55.5%) patients in the SEMS and 1.048 (44.5%) patients in the GJ group, were considered suitable for inclusion. GJ was associated with significantly longer survival than SEMS (mean difference 43 days, CI 12.00, 73.70, p = 0.006). Postoperative mortality (OR 0.55, CI 0.27, 1.16, p = 0.12) and major complications (OR 0.73, CI 0.5, 1.06, p = 0.10) were similar in both groups. The frequency of re-interventions, however, was almost three times higher in the SEMS group (OR 2.95, CI: 1.70, 5.14, p < 0.001), whereas the mean time to oral intake and length of hospital stay were shorter in the SEMS group (mean differences - 5 days, CI - 6.75, - 3.05 days, p < 0.001 and - 10 days, CI - 11.6, - 7.9 days, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Patients with malignant GOO and acceptable performance status should be primarily considered for a palliative GJ rather than SEMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Mintziras
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
| | - Michael Miligkos
- Laboratory of Biomathematics, University of Thessaly School of Medicine, Larissa, Greece
| | - Sabine Wächter
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Jerena Manoharan
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Detlef Klaus Bartsch
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Perinel J, Adham M. Palliative therapy in pancreatic cancer-palliative surgery. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4:28. [PMID: 31231695 DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2019.04.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal disease with a dismal prognosis. It will probably become the second leading cause of cancer-related death within the next decade in Western countries. Over 80% of patients undergo palliative treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer due to locally advanced disease or metastases. Those patients often develop gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), obstructive jaundice and pain during the course of their disease. Symptoms such as vomiting, anorexia, pruritus and jaundice will impact the quality of life (QOL) and could delay the administration of the chemotherapy. Palliative therapy in pancreatic cancer aims to relieve the symptoms durably and to improve the QOL. Palliative surgery was traditionally considered as a gold standard with the "double by-pass" including biliary-digestive and gastro-jejunal anastomosis. However, since the development of endoscopic stenting and minimally invasive surgery, the choice of the best modalities remains debated. While there is still a place for surgical gastrojejunostomy (GJ) in case of duodenal or GOO, endoscopic biliary stenting during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is now accepted as the gold standard in case of obstructive jaundice. In pain management, endoscopic ultrasound guided or percutaneous celiac plexus neurolysis is recommended. The selection of the best technique should consider the effectiveness and the morbidity of the treatment, the performance status of the patient and the disease stage. While endoscopic stenting is associated with earlier recovery and shorter length of stay, recurrence of symptoms and reintervention are less frequent after palliative surgery. Finally, controversy exists on whether to perform prophylactic palliative surgery in the absence of symptoms when unresectable disease is discovered during surgical exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Perinel
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Lyon Sud Faculty of Medicine, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1 (UCBL1), Lyon, France
| | - Mustapha Adham
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Lyon Sud Faculty of Medicine, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1 (UCBL1), Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Upchurch E, Ragusa M, Cirocchi R. Stent placement versus surgical palliation for adults with malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 5:CD012506. [PMID: 29845610 PMCID: PMC6494580 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012506.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant gastric outlet obstruction is the clinical and pathological consequence of cancerous disease causing a mechanical obstruction to gastric emptying. It usually occurs when malignancy is at an advanced stage; therefore, people have a limited life expectancy. It is of paramount importance to restore oral intake to improve quality of life for the person in a manner that has a minimal risk of complications and a short recovery period. OBJECTIVES To assess the benefits and harms of endoscopic stent placement versus surgical palliation for people with symptomatic malignant gastric outlet obstruction. SEARCH METHODS In May 2018 we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase and Ovid CINAHL. We screened reference lists from included studies and review articles. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials comparing stent placement with surgical palliation for people with gastric outlet obstruction secondary to malignant disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted study data. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for binary outcomes, mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI for continuous outcomes and the hazard ratio (HR) for time-to-event outcomes. We performed meta-analyses where meaningful. We assessed the quality of evidence using GRADE criteria. MAIN RESULTS We identified three randomised controlled trials with 84 participants. Forty-one participants underwent surgical palliation and 43 participants underwent duodenal stent placement. There may have been little or no difference in the technical success of the procedure (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.09; low-quality evidence), or whether the time to resumption of oral intake was quicker for participants who had undergone duodenal stent placement (MD -3.07 days, 95% CI -4.76 to -1.39; low-quality evidence).Due to very low-quality evidence, we were uncertain whether surgical palliation improved all-cause mortality and median survival postintervention.The time to recurrence of obstructive symptoms may have increased slightly following duodenal stenting (RR 5.08, 95% CI 0.96 to 26.74; moderate-quality evidence).Due to very low-quality evidence, we were uncertain whether surgical palliation improved serious and minor adverse events. The heterogeneity for adverse events was moderately high (serious adverse events: Chi² = 1.71; minor adverse events: Chi² = 3.08), reflecting the differences in definitions used and therefore, may have impacted the outcomes. The need for reintervention may have increased following duodenal stenting (RR 4.71, 95% CI 1.36 to 16.30; very low-quality evidence).The length of hospital stay may have been shorter (by approximately 4 to 10 days) following stenting (MD -6.70 days, 95% CI -9.41 to -3.98; moderate-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The use of duodenal stent placement in malignant gastric outlet obstruction has the benefits of a quicker resumption of oral intake and a reduced inpatient hospital stay; however, this is balanced by an increase in the recurrence of symptoms and the need for further intervention.It is impossible to draw further conclusions on these and the other measured outcomes, primarily due to the low number of eligible studies and small number of participants which resulted in low-quality evidence. It was not possible to analyse the impact on quality of life each intervention had for these participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Upchurch
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustDepartment of Colorectal and Upper Gastrointestinal SurgerySandford RoadCheltenhamGloucestershireUKGL53 7AN
| | | | - Roberto Cirocchi
- University of PerugiaDepartment of General SurgeryTerniItaly05100
| | | |
Collapse
|