Radical multimodality therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma

Does hyperthermic povidone-iodine lavage increase the apoptotic rate of residual cancer cell in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma?-a prospective pilot study

Background

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an incurable, late presenting primary cancer, conferring a survival of 8-14 months. Different intrapleural treatments have been tested as part of a multimodality approach to treat a select group of patients with limited disease, increasing survival. Recently, povidone-iodine has been shown to induce apoptosis in microscopic tumour cells in vitro, with no reported complications. This is the first in vivo study assessing the apoptotic rate caused by intraoperative hyperthermic betadine lavage using routine immunohistochemistry combined with transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

Methods

We included surgically fit patients aged >18, undergoing minimally invasive video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pleural biopsy between December 2016 and February 2018, for confirmed or presumed pleural malignancy. Parietal pleural biopsies were obtained at 7.5, 15 and 30 minutes after hyperthermic betadine lavage, and compared to pre-lavage biopsy samples, for apoptotic changes. Viable tumour samples underwent histological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis as well as TEM for features of apoptosis.

Results

N=6. Median age was 76 years. Median overall survival was 26.7 months. There was no statistical impact on survival of side of disease (left vs. right). There was no significant difference in expressions of markers of apoptotic index pre and post betadine treatment upon immunohistochemical analysis. There was no discernible effect on morphological features of apoptosis seen with betadine treatment, on TEM analysis. No side effects were identified post betadine lavage.

Conclusions

Although hyperthermic betadine lavage is a safe antiseptic solution with no toxicity when performed intraoperatively, it confers no effect on apoptotic rate or necrosis. It is therefore unlikely that hyperthermic betadine lavage will have an impact on reducing the microscopic residual disease after pleurectomy decortication and enhancing survival.

Long-term outcomes after lung-sparing surgery for epithelial mesothelioma

Background

This observational study evaluates retrospectively the long-term outcomes after pleurectomy/decortication for pleural mesothelioma, with and without the resection/reconstruction of diaphragm and pericardium.

Methods

Data from 155 consecutive patients undergoing lung-sparing surgery for epithelial pleural mesothelioma were reviewed. Selection criteria for surgery were cT1-3, cN0-1, good performance status, age <80 years. Perioperative Pemetrexed-Platinum regimen was administered as induction in 101 cases (65.2%) and as adjuvant treatment in 54 cases (34.8%). Extended pleurectomy/decortication was performed in 87 cases (56.12%). In 68 patients (43.87%) standard pleurectomy/decortication was performed without resection/reconstruction of diaphragm and pericardium, when tumour infiltration was deemed absent after intraoperative frozen section. The log-rank test and Cox regression model were used to assess the factors affecting overall survival and recurrence free survival.

Results

Median follow-up was 20 months. The 2- and 5-year survival rate was 60.9% and 29.2% with a median survival of 34 months. An improved survival was observed when standard pleurectomy/decortication was carried out (P=0.007). A significant impact on survival was found comparing the TNM-stages (P=0.001), pT (P=0.002) and pN variables (P=0.001). Multivariate analysis identified the pN-status (P=0.003) and standard pleurectomy/decortication (P=0.017) as predictive for longer survival. The recurrence-free survival >12 months was strongly related to the overall survival (P<0.001). The macroscopic complete resection (P=0.001), TNM-stage (P=0.003) and pT-status (P=0.001) are related to relapse.

Conclusions

Within multimodal management of pleural mesothelioma, lung-sparing surgery is a valid option even with more conservative technique. A benefit for a longer survival was observed in the early stage of disease, with pN0 and when pleurectomy/decortication is carried out, preserving diaphragm and pericardium. Recurrence is not affected by the type of surgery, and a recurrence-free interval >12 months is predictive of an increased survival when the macroscopic complete resection is achieved.

Evidence for marked underutilization of insurance billing in malignant pleural mesothelioma in Finland

Background

Substantial variation in health care costs for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has previously been identified.

Materials and Methods

We analyzed the changes in health care costs in MPM in Finland during 2002–2012. Finland has low‐threshold public health care and a mandatory Workers' Compensation scheme that covers all occupational‐related disease expenses. The costs include treatment costs for inpatients, hospice care, medication costs, rehabilitation costs, and travel costs. All costs are expressed in 2012 prices, adjusted using the consumer price index.

Results

A total of 907 MPM patients were included in the study. Mean duration of inpatient episodes increased 7% per year from 2002 to 2012, correlating with total costs (R² = 0.861, p < 0.05). The annual total costs for treatment increased from 1.7 to 4.3 m€ during the study period and the cost per patient from 27 000 to 43 000 €. The overall costs increased progressively by the number of procedures performed. In patients who had been compensated for occupational cause by Workers' Compensation Center, only 36% of the overall care costs were billed from the insurance company. Billing of inpatient costs was 86% in these patients.

Conclusion

During the study period, we found that the costs of MPM increased more than the average health care costs. This may be because of advanced diagnostic workup or more costly treatment (e.g., pemetrexed). Moreover, only one‐third of all health care costs are charged to Workers' Compensation Insurance.

Hairpin Oligonucleotide Can Functionalize Gold Nanorods for in Vivo Application Delivering Cytotoxic Nucleotides and Curcumin: A Comprehensive Study in Combination with Near-Infrared Laser

We prepared a multimodality nanocomplex by functionalizing gold nanorods (GNRs) with a cytotoxic nucleoside, 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FdU) containing a DNA hairpin, along with complexation of pleiotropic molecule curcumin. Conjugates were investigated for anti-tumor activity using an Ehrlich carcinoma model in combination with 808 nm laser irradiation. We demonstrated that hairpin-functionalized GNRs are suitable for intravenous administration, including delivery of cytotoxic nucleotides and curcumin. Curcumin binding with FdU-hairpin-functionalized GNRs displayed improved anti-tumor activity in part by inducing a lymphocyte-mediated immune response. The complex showed notable photothermal activity in vitro; however, 808 nm laser irradiation of the tumor following treatment with the complex did not increase the anti-tumor effect significantly. Biodistribution studies depicted that the nanoconjugates localized primarily in the sinusoidal structures of the liver and spleen with minimal tumor accumulation. Curcumin complexation alleviated the reduction in the RBC count that was observed for the conjugate without curcumin, especially in combination with laser irradiation. Localization of FdU-hairpin-GNR conjugates in the liver and spleen evoked an inflammatory response, which was mitigated by curcumin complexation. However, no functional abnormality was found in the liver in any case. Curcumin binding also notably decreased nanoconjugate accumulation in lungs and significantly reduced inflammation. Biodistribution studies were consistent with previous reports, suggesting that optimization of the GNR size and surface coating is required for more efficient tumor localization via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Our studies demonstrate that DNA/RNA hairpins are suitable for GNR surface functionalization and enable delivery of cytotoxic nucleotides as well as curcumin in vivo with potential for synergistic anti-cancer therapy.

ALPPL2 Is a Highly Specific and Targetable Tumor Cell Surface Antigen

Identification of tumor-specific cell surface antigens has proven challenging, as the vast majority of tumor-associated antigens are also expressed in normal tissues. In mesothelioma, we identified a highly specific tumor cell surface antigen that can be targeted for therapy development. Mesothelioma is caused by malignant transformation of the mesothelium, is incurable, and can be categorized into three histologic subtypes: epithelioid, biphasic, and sarcomatoid. To identity novel mesothelioma cell surface antigens with broad subtype coverage and high tissue specificity, we have previously selected phage antibody display libraries on live mesothelioma cells and tissues following counterselection on normal cells and identified a panel of human antibodies that bind all subtypes of mesothelioma, but not normal mesothelium. One of the antibodies, M25, showed high specificity against an antigen we identify here as ALPPL2. IHC on normal human tissues found that ALPPL2 is expressed only on placental trophoblasts, but not on any other normal tissues. This significant tissue specificity and broad tumor type coverage suggest that ALPPL2 could be an excellent cell surface target for therapeutic development against mesothelioma. To evaluate therapeutic potential of ALPPL2 targeting, an ALPPL2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate was developed and demonstrated potent and specific tumor killing in vitro and in vivo against both epithelioid and sarcomatoid mesothelioma. Thus, ALPPL2 belongs to a rare class of cell surface antigens classified as truly tumor specific and is well suited for therapy development against ALPPL2-expressing tumors. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings identify ALPP2 as a true tumor-specific cell surface antigen whose tissue specificity enables the development of novel therapies.

Immunotherapy for mesothelioma: a critical review of current clinical trials and future perspectives

At the clinical level the role of immunotherapy in cancer is currently at a pivotal point. Therapies such as checkpoint inhibitors are being approved at many levels in cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Mesothelioma is a rare orphan disease associated with prior exposure to asbestos, with a dismal prognosis. Various clinical trials for checkpoint inhibitors have been conducted in this rare disease, and suggest that such therapies may play a role as a treatment option for a proportion of patients with this cancer. Most recently approved as a salvage therapy in mesothelioma was granted in Japan, regulatory approval for their use in the clinic elsewhere lags. In this article we review the current pertinent clinical trials of immunotherapies in malignant mesothelioma, discuss the current issues that may affect the clinical outcomes of such therapies and further evaluate potential candidate new avenues that may become future targets for immunotherapy in this cancer.

Current treatment strategies in malignant pleural mesothelioma with a treatment algorithm

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is arare disease with apoor prognosis. The main therapeutic options for MPM include surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy (RT). Although multimodality therapy has been reported to improve survival, not every medically operable patient is able to undergo all recommended therapy. With improvements in surgical techniques and systemic therapies, as well as advancements in RT, there has been apotential new paradigm in the management of this disease. In this review, we discuss the current literature on MPM management and propose afunctional treatment algorithm.

Multimodality treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease of the pleura and is largely related to asbestos exposure. Despite recent advancements in technologies and a greater understanding of the disease, the prognosis of MPM remains poor; the median overall survival rate is about 6 to 9 months in untreated patients. The main therapeutic strategies for MPM are surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy (RT). The two main surgical approaches for MPM are extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), in which the lung is removed en bloc, and pleurectomy/decortication, in which the lung stays in situ. Chemotherapy usually consists of a platinum-based chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, often combined with a folate antimetabolite, such as pemetrexed. More recently, immunotherapy has emerged as a possible therapeutic strategy for MPM. Evidence suggests that single-modality treatments are not an effective therapeutic approach for MPM. Therefore, researchers have started to explore different multimodality treatment approaches, in which often combinations of surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and RT are investigated. There is still no definitive answer to the question of which multimodality treatment combinations are most effective in improving the poor prognosis of MPM. Research into the effects of trimodality treatment approaches have found that radical approaches such as EPP and hemithoracic RT post-EPP are less effective than was previously assumed. In general, there are still a great number of unanswered questions and unknown factors regarding the ideal treatment approach for MPM. Hopefully, more research into multimodality therapy will provide insight into which combination of treatment modalities is most effective.

Combined modality treatment in mesothelioma: a systemic literature review with treatment recommendations

In spite of recent progress, malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains synonymous with poor prognosis. A selected minority (<10%) of patients is eligible for a radical treatment with a combination of systemic chemotherapy (CT) and/or surgery and/or radiotherapy (RT), in an effort to maintain locoregional tumor control after achieving a macroscopically complete resection (MCR). However, as of yet there is no standard of care for this so-called multimodality treatment. As its potential gain is still limited (approximately one year added to overall survival), we must balance its efficacy with its cumulative toxicity. Several combined modality treatment trials are currently ongoing using novel techniques in surgery, RT and/or CT in an attempt to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with older multimodality treatment protocols. Guidelines are following suit and are now including or mentioning this treatment option. In this systematic review, we analyze the available data in order to address the following questions: Is combined modality better than single modality? What is the optimal regimen within each modality? What is the optimal sequence of combined modality?

A randomized phase II study of pleurectomy/decortication preceded or followed by (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early stage malignant pleural mesothelioma (EORTC 1205)

Radical multimodality treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is controversial, with intense debate (but lack of data) about which surgical procedure to perform [extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) or pleurectomy/decortication (PD)], if any. In order to perform a randomized comparison, the most optimal sequence of surgery and chemotherapy should be determined. EORTC 1205 is a clinical trial randomizing between upfront surgery, followed by chemotherapy (cisplatin plus pemetrexed) and deferred surgery, following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early stage (T1-3 N0-2 M0) MPM (irrespective of histological subtype). The surgical procedure performed is (extended) pleurectomy/decortication (e-PD), which is promoted as an alternative for EPP, but lacks standardization. Primary outcome parameter is successful completion of multimodality treatment; secondary outcome parameters are surgical quality parameters (in order to standardize the procedure), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), treatment-failure free survival, operative morbidity and mortality, toxicity and safety.

New Perspectives on Diagnosis and Therapy of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare, but severe form of cancer, with an incidence that varies significantly within and among different countries around the world. It develops in about one to two persons per million of the general population, leading to thousands of deaths every year worldwide. To date, the MPM is mostly associated with occupational asbestos exposure. Asbestos represents the predominant etiological factor, with approximately 70% of cases of MPM with well-documented occupational exposure to asbestos, with the exposure time, on average greater than 40 years. Environmental exposure to asbestos is increasingly becoming recognized as a cause of mesothelioma, together with gene mutations. The possible roles of other cofactors, such as viral infection and radiation exposure, are still debated. MPM is a fatal tumor. This cancer arises during its early phase without clinical signs. Consequently, its diagnosis occurs at advanced stages. Standard clinical therapeutic approaches include surgery, chemo- and radiotherapies. Preclinical and clinical researches are making great strides in the field of this deadly disease, identifying new biomarkers and innovative therapeutic approaches. Among the newly identified markers and potential therapeutic targets, circulating microRNAs and the Notch pathway represent promising avenues that could result in the early detection of the tumor and novel therapeutic approaches.

Radical multimodality therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an almost always fatal tumour, for which palliative platinum-based chemotherapy is currently the standard treatment. Multimodal therapeutic strategies incorporating surgery, radiation therapy or photodynamic therapy and chemotherapy have been recommended for selected patients but there is no consensus about their effectiveness.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of radical multimodal treatment options (including radical surgery ± radical radiotherapy ± photodynamic therapy ± systemic therapy) compared to each other or to palliative treatments, for people with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

SEARCH METHODS

We reviewed data from the Cochrane Lung Cancer group's Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase. We also checked reference lists of primary original studies, review articles and relevant conference proceedings manually for further related articles up to 21 March 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included parallel-group randomised controlled trials of multimodal therapy for people with malignant pleural mesothelioma (stages I, II or III) that measured at least one of the following endpoints: overall survival, health-related health-related quality of life, adverse events or progression-free survival. We considered studies regardless of language or publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted relevant information on participant characteristics, interventions, study outcomes, and data on the outcomes for this review, as well as information on the design and methodology of the studies. Two review authors assessed the risk of bias in the included trials using pre-defined 'Risk of bias' domains. We assessed the methodological quality using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We conducted this review in accordance with the published Cochrane protocol. Two randomised clinical trials with 104 participants fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Both trials were at high risk of bias (for outcomes other than overall survival), and we rated the evidence as moderate quality for overall survival and low quality for all other outcomes. One trial compared combined extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) plus neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy plus postoperative high-dose hemithoracic radiotherapy with combined EPP plus platinum-based chemotherapy. The other trial compared EPP plus postoperative hemithoracic radiotherapy with standard (non-radical) therapy alone following platinum-based chemotherapy (patients in the standard therapy arm received continued oncological management according to local policy, which could include further chemotherapy or palliative radiotherapy).For the first trial, median overall survival calculated from registration was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 14.4 to 27.8) in the no-radiotherapy group and 19.3 months (95% CI 11.5 to 21.8) in the radiotherapy group. For the second trial, median overall survival was 14.4 months (95% CI 5.3 to 18.7) for patients allocated to EPP and 19.5 months (95% CI 13.4 to time not yet reached) for patients randomised to standard non-radical therapy. In the second trial, 12 serious adverse events were reported during the study period: ten in the EPP group and two in the non-radical therapy group. Overall health-related quality of life scores were not different between the two arms in either study. We could not perform a meta-analysis of the two included trials due to clinical heterogeneity. We also identified three ongoing trials evaluating the topic of our review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The overall strength of the evidence gathered in this review is low and there is a lack of available evidence to support the use of radical multimodality therapy in routine clinical practice (particularly as one trial suggests greater harm). Given the added cost of multimodality treatment and the possible increase in risk of adverse effects, the lack of evidence of their effectiveness probably means that these interventions should currently be limited to clinical trials alone.