Pharmacological interventions for self‐harm in adults

Navigating the Shadows: A Comprehensive Review of Suicide in the Geriatric Population

This review critically examines the complex landscape of suicide within the geriatric population, defined as individuals aged 65 and older. By synthesizing existing research, we elucidate critical findings related to the prevalence, risk factors, and challenges associated with suicide in this demographic. Social isolation, mental health issues, and the intricate psychosocial dimensions of ageing emerge as pivotal factors contributing to the vulnerability of older individuals. The conclusion underscores a compelling call to action, urging collaborative efforts from healthcare professionals, policymakers, and communities to implement targeted prevention strategies. Our vision for the future involves building a supportive and resilient community for the geriatric population, emphasizing age-friendly policies, robust social support networks, and destigmatizing mental health discussions. Through this comprehensive exploration, we aim to contribute to a deeper understanding of suicide in the geriatric population and inspire effective interventions that prioritize the well-being and dignity of older individuals.

Harm minimisation for self-harm: a cross-sectional survey of British clinicians' perspectives and practices

OBJECTIVE

Harm minimisation for self-harm is an alternative to preventive strategies and focuses on maximising safety when self-harming. We explored the views of clinicians on harm minimisation for self-harm to describe reported use and acceptability in clinical practice.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study using an online survey consisting of fixed-choice and open-ended questions.

SETTING

Primary and secondary care practices in England, Scotland and Wales.

PARTICIPANTS

Snowball sampling of UK-based clinicians (n=90; 67% female) working with people who self-harm and who have or have not previously recommended harm minimisation methods to patients.

RESULTS

Of the 90 clinicians sampled, 76 (84%) reported having recommended harm minimisation techniques to people in their care who self-harm. Commonly recommended techniques were snapping rubber bands on one's wrist and squeezing ice. Other techniques, such as teaching use of clean instruments when self-harming, were less likely to be recommended. Perceived client benefits included harm reduction and promotion of the therapeutic relationship. Perceived potential limitations of a harm minimisation approach for self-harm were (a) potential worsening of self-harm outcomes; (b) ethical reservations; (c) doubts about its effectiveness and appropriateness; and (d) lack of training and clear policies within the workplace.

CONCLUSIONS

In our sample of UK-based clinicians in various settings, harm minimisation for self-harm was broadly recommended for clients who self-harm due to perceived client benefits. However, future policies on harm minimisation must address clinicians' perceived needs for training, well-defined guidelines, and clear evidence of effectiveness and safety to mitigate some clinician concerns about the potential for further harm.