Five French (5 Fr) guiding catheters for percutaneous coronary angioplasty and stent placement: An initial feasibility study

Feasibility and safety of a virtual 3-Fr sheathless-guiding system for percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of a virtual 3-Fr system [5-Fr sheathless-guiding catheter (GC)] for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

The use of miniaturized devices for PCI is gaining popularity because of increased patient comfort and decreased risk of access site complications.

METHODS

From July 2010 to December 2012, consecutive patients who underwent elective PCI (planned or ad hoc PCI) at our hospital were enrolled. PCI using the virtual 3-Fr system was attempted as our initial strategy, unless a 6-Fr or larger GC was considered to be suitable [lesions with heavy calcification, large (>2 mm) side branches, or chronic total occlusion].

RESULTS

Five hundred sixty-six patients underwent elective PCI during the study period, and 132 patients who met the criteria underwent PCI using the virtual 3-Fr system. Procedures using the virtual 3-Fr system were successful in 126 patients (95%); 111 (84%) were performed using the transradial approach, 110 (83%) were ad hoc procedures, and 45 (31%) were complex coronary lesions (type B2 or C). Six patients required conversion to a conventional 5- or 6-Fr sheath and catheter system. No intraoperative complications occurred, and radial artery patency was achieved in all patients who underwent transradial procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

PCI using the virtual 3-Fr system is a feasible and viable alternative to conventional procedures that use a sheath and GC in appropriately selected patients. This small-caliber system may minimize endovascular trauma, particularly during transradial coronary procedures.

All comers 5 French transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention without sheath

BACKGROUND

There is an interest to keep the arterial access site for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) small. Using sheaths for introduction of arterial catheters is standard. The effective outer diameter of the usual introducer sheaths is about 1.5 French (F) larger than the labeled size. Omitting the sheath affords a smaller access without loss of working lumen.

METHODS

PCI was performed with sheathless 5 F guiding catheters in 503 consecutive all comers via femoral access. Diagnostic assessment of the coronary arteries was performed at the beginning using 4 F diagnostic catheters with 4 F sheaths in 293 patients (58%). In the remaining patients, a sheathless 5 F Amplatz left 2 (AL2) guiding catheter was used for both diagnostic study and PCI. Data analysis was performed retrospectively using catheterization reports and hospital summaries.

RESULTS

PCI without sheath was successful in 500 of 503 patients (99%).Balloon coronary angioplasty only was performed in 155 (31%) patients, and stenting in 346 (69%). In six patients, a 6 F sheath and catheter were used additionally for various reasons. Femoral closure devices were used in 23 patients (5%). The femoral access complication rate was 5% with a major hematoma in 2%. In-hospital mortality and Q-wave myocardial infarction rate were both 0.2% (one patient each). A single AL2 guiding catheter with 17 exceptions and an average of 1.1 coronary guidewires per case were used. No direct complications regarding the 5 F access without a sheath were noted. Mean hospitalization time was 2.2 ± 1.5 (range 1-25) days.

CONCLUSION

The 5 F PCI without sheath can be performed safely in all comers. Vascular access bleeding complication rates were comparable, if not lower than with the conventional 6 F interventions with or without closure devices. The savings in material are substantial.

Percutaneous coronary intervention using a virtual 3-Fr guiding catheter

BACKGROUND

We have recently reported a novel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) system using a hydrophilic-coated sheathless guiding catheter (Virtual 3-Fr, Medikit, Tokyo, Japan), which provides us with less invasive angioplasty and a puncture site injury equivalent to a conventional 3-Fr introducer sheath. Here, we report the initial results of PCI using this novel system.

METHODS

A total of 36 coronary artery lesions of 27 patients were treated by using a virtual 3-Fr PCI system. Procedural outcomes of virtual 3-Fr PCI were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean age was 73.0 +/- 8.7 years (range, 46-84 years), and 15 were men (56%). Access sites included the radial artery in 18 patients (67%), the brachial artery in eight patients (30%), and the femoral artery in 1 patients (4%). Among 36 lesions, seven were chronic total occlusions, and a virtual 3-Fr PCI was successful in 33 lesions (92%). Among the successfully treated 33 lesions, coronary stents were deployed in 32 (97%), and intravascular ultrasound examination was performed in 19 (58%). Hemostasis was achieved immediately after PCIs in all cases. No access-site related complications including radial artery occlusion were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of a virtual 3-Fr PCI system appears to be comparable to one using a regular 5-Fr guiding catheter while the puncture-site damage remains equivalent to that of a 3-Fr introducer sheath. Virtual 3-Fr PCI may have a potential to serve as a minimally invasive strategy for the treatment of coronary artery diseases.

A 5Fr Catheter Approach Reduces Patient Discomfort during Transradial Coronary Intervention Compared with a 6Fr Approach: A Prospective Randomized Study

Smaller guiding catheters can help reduce local complications and patient morbidity during transradial coronary intervention (TRI). This study was designed to compare the patient's morbidity, success rate, and the operator's convenience between 5-French (5Fr) and 6-French (6Fr) TRIs. This is a single-center prospective randomized study. Patients who underwent TRI, in 2003, were prospectively randomized to either 5Fr or 6Fr catheter groups (100 patients in each group). Procedure-related patient morbidity as well as clinical and procedural characteristics was scored and analyzed. Procedural success rate was not significantly different between the groups. The number of unsatisfactory supports (6% in 5Fr group, 3% in 6Fr group; P=0.31) and the incidence of local wound complications were not significantly different between the groups. Local wound pain scores were significantly lower in the 5Fr group compared with the 6Fr group, particularly during sheath insertion and removal, and during procedures. Pain scores were higher in female patients than in male patients during sheath removal (male: 1.3+/-1.3, female: 1.7+/-1.5; P=0.049). Radial artery diameter was well correlated with local pain score during sheath removal (r=0.31, P<0.001), and with the height and weight of the patients (height: r=0.33, P<0.001; weight: r=0.27, P<0.001). In conclusion, using a 5Fr catheter during TRI reduce, local access site pain, particularly in female patients with smaller body size, whereas the success and local complication rates were similar to a 6Fr approach.

Percutaneous arterial closure devices

Advances in interventional angiography such as covered stent technology and adjunctive anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy for arterial recanalization have reached the margins of percutaneous application. In these circumstances, compression methods of arterial closure require prolonged compression or long arterial sheath dwell times that increase procedural time, complication rates, and patient discomfort. Percutaneous arterial closure devices offer the potential of rapid hemostasis and shorter times to ambulation and discharge. These benefits have costs, in terms of the price of the devices and complications of their use. A Web search identified approved and pending devices. A Medline search identified device studies that were reviewed to assess the efficacy and complication rates of device-mediated closure versus the gold standard of manual compression. Studies that compared devices were evaluated to determine if any particular device was superior. The arterial closure devices were equivalent to manual compression in the establishment of hemostasis in the diagnostic population. However, complication rates were higher. In the therapeutic populations, the devices were as efficacious as manual compression, without correction of anticoagulation, and the complication rates were similar. No individual device was clearly superior.