In vitro glatiramer acetate treatment of brain endothelium does not reduce adhesion phenomena

[Effect of different groups of first line DMT on endothelial damage in multiple sclerosis]

INTRODUCTION

Vascular changes, including destabilization of the blood-brain barrier, are common pathological signs in multiple sclerosis (MS). There are prerequisites, which indicate the direct effects of disease modifying therapy (DMT) on the state of the vascular wall and reduce the damage to the endothelium in MS.

AIM OF THIS STUDY

Was to identify and evaluate the relationship of endothelial dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis with used DMT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 85 patients with a reliable diagnosis of MS according to the McDonald criteria of 2010 (56 women, 29 men) aged from 17 to 62 years (average age 36.3±1.2 years). All patients underwent a comprehensive clinical and neurological examination, laboratory tests (blood serum analysis for the content of adhesion molecules sICAM-1, sPECAM-1, sE-selectin, sP-selectin, for the content of homocysteine and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMR-9) by ELISA; blood plasma analysis for Von Willebrand factor antigen (vWf) by ELISA).

The results of the study indicate a decrease of endothelial damage in MS during interferon therapy. Its also allow the use of indicators such as von Willebrand factor antigen, sPECAM-1, sE-selectin levels as potential markers of the effectiveness of DMT.

Inflammatory potential and migratory capacities across human brain endothelial cells of distinct glatiramer acetate-reactive T cells generated in treated multiple sclerosis patients

We asked whether GA-reactive T cells with distinct cytokine profiles (Th2 versus Th1/Th0), induced during GA therapy of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, have different migratory capacities across human brain endothelial cells (HBECs), and distinct effects on inflammatory responses at the level of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). We confirmed that GA therapy induces a range of GA-reactive T cells defined by distinct profiles of cytokine expression. Supernatants from Th0/Th1 GA-reactive cells significantly upregulated pro-inflammatory chemokine and adhesion molecule expression in HBECs. Post-treatment Th2-polarized GA-reactive cells were significantly less pro-inflammatory but did not suppress the effects induced by Th1 cells. All lines migrated across a HBEC/fibronectin-based model of the BBB with similar efficiencies. We conclude that the spectrum of GA-reactive T cells induced in treated MS patients may differentially impact inflammatory responses at the BBB level. Future studies will determine whether this could contribute to variable clinical response to GA therapy.