Botulinum toxin antibody testing: comparison between the mouse protection assay and the mouse lethality assay

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Liztox® versus Botox® in Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity

Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injection is a commonly used therapeutic intervention for upper limb spasticity in stroke patients. This study was designed as a randomized, active-drug-controlled, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Liztox® in comparison to onabotulinum toxin A (Botox®) for individuals with post-stroke upper limb spasticity. The primary outcome was the alteration in wrist flexor muscle tone from the initial assessment to the fourth week, evaluated using the modified Ashworth scale (MAS). Secondary outcomes included MAS score changes for the wrist at weeks 8 and 12 from baseline; MAS score changes for finger and elbow flexors; and changes in the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS), Subject's Global Assessment (SGA), the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), and Caregiver Burden Scale (CBS) at weeks 4, 8, and 12 from baseline. The MAS score for wrist flexor spasticity decreased by -1.14 ± 0.59 in the Liztox® group and -1.22 ± 0.59 in the Botox® group from baseline to week 4. The difference [97.5% confidence interval (CI)] between the test and control groups was 0.08 [-∞, 0.26], confirming the non-inferiority of the test group compared to the control group. Furthermore, there were consistent improvements in the IGA, SGA, and CBS scores across all assessment intervals, with no statistically significant variances detected between the two groups. No safety-related concerns were reported during the study. In conclusion, Liztox® injection proved to be a secure and efficacious intervention for managing upper extremity spasticity in post-stroke patients.

Botulinum toxin antibody titres: measurement, interpretation, and practical recommendations

Botulinum toxin (BT) therapy may be blocked by antibodies (BT-AB) resulting in BT-AB induced therapy failure (ABF). BT-AB may be detected by the mouse lethality assay (MLA), the mouse diaphragm assay (MDA) and the sternocleidomastoid test (SCMT). For the first time, we wanted to compare all three BT-AB tests and correlate them to subjective complaint of complete or partial secondary therapy failure in 37 patients with cervical dystonia (25 females, 12 males, age 51.2 ± 11.4 years, disease duration 12.4 ± 6.3 years). Complaint of therapy failure was not correlated with any of the BT-AB tests. MDA and MLA are closely correlated, indicating that the MDA might replace the MLA as the current gold standard for BT-AB measurement. The SCMT is closely correlated with MDA and MLA confirming that BT-AB titres and BT's paretic effect are in a functional balance: low BT-AB titres are reducing BT's paretic effect only marginally, whereas high BT-AB titres may completely block it. When therapy failure is classified as secondary and permanent, BT-AB evaluation is recommended and any BT-AB test may be applied. For MDA > 10 mU/ml, MLA > 3 and SCMT < 25%, ABF is highly likely. MDA < 0.6 mU/ml are therapeutically irrelevant. They are neither correlated with pathologic MLA nor with pathologic SCMT. They should not be the basis for treatment decisions, such as switching dystonia therapy to deep brain stimulation. All other results are intermediate results. Their interactions with therapy efficacy is unpredictable. In these cases, BT-AB tests should be repeated or one or two additional test methods should be applied.

Alternative Methods for Testing Botulinum Toxin: Current Status and Future Perspectives

Botulinum toxins are neurotoxic modular proteins composed of a heavy chain and a light chain connected by a disulfide bond and are produced by Clostridium botulinum. Although lethally toxic, botulinum toxin in low doses is clinically effective in numerous medical conditions, including muscle spasticity, strabismus, hyperactive urinary bladder, excessive sweating, and migraine. Globally, several companies are now producing products containing botulinum toxin for medical and cosmetic purposes, including the reduction of facial wrinkles. To test the efficacy and toxicity of botulinum toxin, animal tests have been solely and widely used, resulting in the inevitable sacrifice of hundreds of animals. Hence, alternative methods are urgently required to replace animals in botulinum toxin testing. Here, the various alternative methods developed to test the toxicity and efficacy of botulinum toxins have been briefly reviewed and future perspectives have been detailed.

Immunogenicity Associated with Botulinum Toxin Treatment

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) has been used for the treatment of a variety of neurologic, medical and cosmetic conditions. Two serotypes, type A (BoNT-A) and type B (BoNT-B), are currently in clinical use. While considered safe and effective, their use has been rarely complicated by the development of antibodies that reduce or negate their therapeutic effect. The presence of antibodies has been attributed to shorter dosing intervals (and booster injections), higher doses per injection cycle, and higher amounts of antigenic protein. Other factors contributing to the immunogenicity of BoNT include properties of each serotype, such as formulation, manufacturing, and storage of the toxin. Some newer formulations with purified core neurotoxin devoid of accessory proteins may have lower overall immunogenicity. Several assays are available for the detection of antibodies, including both structural assays such as ELISA and mouse-based bioassays, but there is no consistent correlation between these antibodies and clinical response. Prevention and treatment of antibody-associated non-responsiveness is challenging and primarily involves the use of less immunogenic formulations of BoNT, waiting for the spontaneous disappearance of the neutralizing antibody, and switching to an immunologically alternate type of BoNT.

Immunogenicity induced by botulinum toxin injections for limb spasticity: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The imputability of neutralizing antibodies (NABs) in secondary non-response (SnR) to botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections for limb spasticity is still debated.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic literature review aimed to determine the prevalence of NABs after BoNT injections for limb spasticity and analyze their determinants and their causal role in SnR.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases for articles published during 1990-2018. Two independent reviewers extracted the data and assessed the quality of studies with a specific scale (according to PRISMA and STROBE guidelines). Because the techniques used to detect NABs did not influence the results, we calculated the global (all studies) sensitivity and specificity of NAB positivity to reveal SnR.

RESULTS

We included 14 articles published from 2002 to 2018 (including an epublication) describing 5 randomized controlled trials and 5 interventional and 4 observational studies. The quality was satisfactory (mean score 18/28 arbitrary units). NAB detection was the primary criterion in 5 studies and a secondary criterion in 9. In total, 1234 serum samples for 1234 participants (91% with stroke) were tested after injection. NAB prevalence was about 1%, with no significant difference among formulations. NAB positivity seemed favoured by long-duration therapy with high doses and a short interval between injections. The identification of non-response by NAB positivity had poor global sensitivity (56%) but very high specificity (99.6%). No consensual criteria were used to diagnose non-response to BoNT injection.

CONCLUSIONS

NAB prevalence is much lower after BoNT treatment for limb spasticity than cervical dystonia. Consensual criteria must be defined to diagnose non-response to BoNT injection. Because immunogenicity is not the most common cause of non-response to BoNT injection, NABs should be sought in individuals with SnR with no other cause explaining the treatment inefficacy. A test with 100% specificity is recommended. In cases for which immunogenicity is the most likely cause of non-response to BoNT injections, some biological arguments suggest trying another BoNT, but no clinical evidence supports this strategy.

Antibody-induced failure of botulinum toxin therapy: re-start with low-antigenicity drugs offers a new treatment opportunity

Botulinum toxin (BT) can stimulate formation of BT antibodies (BTAB) thus producing Antibody-Induced Therapy Failure (ABTF). BTAB titres may drop eventually. When BT therapy is then re-started with conventional BT drugs, BTAB titres re-increase promptly. We wanted to study whether the use of the low-antigenicity BT drug incobotulinumtoxinA (INCO) can prevent this re-increase. 8 patients with cervical dystonia and ABTF with maximal BTAB titres (6 women, 2 men, age 41.4 ± 12.1 years, disease duration 6.6 ± 4.7 years) were studied. ABTF ocurred under onabotulinumtoxinA (ONA) in five patients and under abobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) in 3 after 8.8 ± 3.8 injection series and a treatment time of 962.0 ± 473.2 days. After 3881.5 ± 2468.3 days without BT, all BTAB titres had dropped to insignificant levels before BT therapy was re-started with INCO. Treatment parameters before and after re-start were as follows: single dose 219.2 ± 90.7 MU vs 252.6 ± 109.0 MU (ns), interinjection interval 119.7 ± 18.4 vs 104.5 ± 14.7 days (ns), cumulative dose 1893.8 ± 1161.6 MU vs 5130.4 ± 3602.5 MU (ns), treatment time 962.0 ± 505.9 vs 1895.4 ± 1211.4 days (ns) and number of injection series 8.8 ± 3.8 vs 19.3 ± 11.8 (ns). Repeated BTAB measurements and clinical examinations did not reveal any signs of ABTF after re-start. INCO offers a new and long-term treatment opportunity for ABTF patients when their BTAB titres have dropped. Our observations also confirm lower antigenicity of INCO compared to conventional BT drugs.

Long-term stability of reconstituted incobotulinumtoxinA: how can we reduce costs of botulinum toxin therapy?

Botulinum neurotoxin (BNT), the biologically active component of botulinum toxin (BT), is a large double-stranded protein susceptible to various physical and chemical influences. All BT type A (BT-A) drugs are stored as powders allowing shelf lives from 24 to 36 months. After reconstitution, the specified shelf life is reduced to 8-24 h. Some studies, however, suggest longer shelf life. We wanted to test the long-term stability of reconstituted BT-A drugs in the hemidiaphragm assay (HDA), a high quality BT potency test. For this incobotulinumtoxinA (INCO) was reconstituted and stored in at 4-8 °C, whilst at various points of time probes of it were taken and potency tested with the HDA. Altogether 18 measurements were performed throughout a period of 52.1 weeks. The paralysis time in the HDA was 67.3 ± 5.2 min (min. 59 min, max. 76 min). The linear regression line was described by y = -0.0163x + 67.582. The paralysis time measured during the first 10 weeks (n = 11) was 67.5 ± 5.3 min, during the last 10 weeks (n = 7) 67.1 ± 4.9 min. Reconstituted INCO does not show reduction of potency throughout 52 weeks as tested by the high quality HDA. Lack of complexing proteins does not de-stabilise INCO. Our data allow un-used reconstituted INCO to be stored for further use. This may have a considerable impact on the costs of BT therapy. Further studies will have to demonstrate sterility of the reconstituted BT drug beyond the so far reported 6 weeks.

Overview of Botulinum Toxins for Aesthetic Uses

Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) can be used for facial aesthetics. The 3 currently available BTA types include onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox; Botox Cosmetic, Allergan, Irvine, CA), abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport; Ipsen, Ltd, Berkshire, UK), and incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin; Merz Pharmaceuticals, Frankfurt, Germany). The mechanism of action and clinical uses for treatment of dynamic lines of the forehead, brow, glabella, lateral orbit, nose, and lips are presented, as well as treatment of masseter hypertrophy, platysmal bands, and improvements of the perioral region. Specific BTA injection sites and suggested doses are presented.

Botulinum Neurotoxins: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Using the Mouse Phrenic Nerve Hemidiaphragm Assay (MPN)

The historical method for the detection of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is represented by the mouse bioassay (MBA) measuring the animal survival rate. Since the endpoint of the MBA is the death of the mice due to paralysis of the respiratory muscle, an ex vivo animal replacement method, called mouse phrenic nerve (MPN) assay, employs the isolated N. phrenicus-hemidiaphragm tissue. Here, BoNT causes a dose-dependent characteristic decrease of the contraction amplitude of the indirectly stimulated muscle. Within the EQuATox BoNT proficiency 13 test samples were analysed using the MPN assay by serial dilution to a bath concentration resulting in a paralysis time within the range of calibration curves generated with BoNT/A, B and E standards, respectively. For serotype identification the diluted samples were pre-incubated with polyclonal anti-BoNT/A, B or E antitoxin or a combination of each. All 13 samples were qualitatively correctly identified thereby delivering superior results compared to single in vitro methods like LFA, ELISA and LC-MS/MS. Having characterized the BoNT serotype, the final bath concentrations were calculated using the calibration curves and then multiplied by the respective dilution factor to obtain the sample concentration. Depending on the source of the BoNT standards used, the quantitation of ten BoNT/A containing samples delivered a mean z-score of 7 and of three BoNT/B or BoNT/E containing samples z-scores <2, respectively.

Aesthetic Uses of Neuromodulators: Current Uses and Future Directions

BACKGROUND

The introduction of neuromodulators for aesthetic facial improvements greatly expanded the limits of nonsurgical facial rejuvenation. Although many current uses are considered "off-label," the widespread acceptance and favorable safety profile of properly used botulinum toxins have made them one of the most common aesthetic treatments available.

METHODS

A literature review of current facial aesthetic uses of various botulinum toxin preparations was done, and general concepts were identified.

RESULTS

Currently, Food and Drug Administration-approved botulinum toxin preparations onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox), abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport), and incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) have similar off-label indications and clinical uses.

CONCLUSIONS

Although not considered interchangeable, administration and clinical outcomes are not much different between the 3 commonly used botulinum products. The impact of botulinum products currently in development has yet to be determined.

Very early reduction in efficacy of botulinum toxin therapy for cervical dystonia in patients with subsequent secondary treatment failure: a retrospective analysis

The objective of this study was to estimate the probability of development of partial secondary treatment failure (PSTF) in patients with cervical dystonia (CD) who had been treated over up to 9 years with repetitive intramuscular injections of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A). The temporal course of treatment response in patients in whom PSTF was detected retrospectively was compared to patients with a normal clinical response. For this purpose, charts of all CD patients treated in our outpatient clinic between 1988 and 2001 were retrospectively analyzed. Extracted data included time of all injections, dose per visit, disease severity measured by TSUI scores, and time of determination of neutralizing antibodies. Final data analysis using a special formal definition of PSTF was based on charts of 568 patients having exclusively been treated with abobotulinumtoxinA. PSTF onset was observed in our CD cohort during the entire treatment period analyzed, with no clustering at any time point. Probability to develop PSTF was 14.5 % in 9 years. Thus, mean PSTF incidence was 1.6 % per year. The mean TSUI score of patients with retrospectively defined PSTF (n = 33) became already significantly worse after the second injection when compared with the group without PSTF (n = 535). Our data indicate that clinical response in patients developing PSTF later on differs from that of patients without PSTF already very early in the course of botulinum neurotoxin type A treatment, and that PSTF remains undetected at this early stage. Reduced response may therefore be present in a number of CD patients who think they still respond normally to continuous BoNT/A treatment.

Botulinum toxin for the treatment of movement disorders

After botulinum toxin was initially used to treat strabismus in the 1970s, others started using it to treat movement disorders including blepharospasm, hemifacial spasm, cervical dystonia, spasmodic dysphonia, and oromandibular dystonia. It was discovered that botulinum toxin can be an effective treatment for focal movement disorders with limited side effects. Over the past three decades, various formulations of botulinum toxin have been developed and the therapeutic use of these toxins has expanded in movement disorders and beyond. We review the history and mechanism of action of botulinum toxin, as well as describe different formulations available and their potential therapeutic uses in movement disorders.

Results of a BoNT/A antibody study in children and adolescents after onabotulinumtoxin A (Botox®) detrusor injection

BACKGROUND

Onabotulinumtoxin A (OnaBoNT/A, Botox®) is effective in the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity, however this therapy can fail. In a prospective study, we analyzed patient serum for BoNT/A antibodies (BoNT/A-AB) as a possible cause of therapy failure.

METHODS

17 patients (average age 14.5 years) who had neurogenic detrusor overactivity were admitted for repeated OnaBoNT/A injection into the detrusor muscle. We analyzed their serum for BoNT/A-AB. The clinical findings were correlated with the incidence of BoNT/A-AB.

RESULTS

Positive BoNT/A-AB were clearly or marginally determined in 6 patients. Therapy had failed in all 6. In 4 of the 6, therapy might have failed because of a low-compliance bladder (3 patients) or tethered-cord syndrome (1), but BoNT/A-AB were found as the only possible cause in 2 patients. Thus, the incidence of BoNT/A-AB in the 17 patients was 35%, and the antibodies were clinically significant in 12%. All patients with BoNT/A-AB had a history of recurrent urinary tract infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who show a failure of therapy after OnaBoNT/A injections for which no other causes can be determined should have their serum checked for BoNT/A-AB. Recurrent urinary tract infection might be a predisposing factor for BoNT/A-AB.

Botulinum neurotoxin type A in urology: antibodies as a cause of therapy failure

OBJECTIVES

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) proved very effective in therapy for hyperactive detrusor or sphincter dysfunction of neurogenic and non-neurogenic origin. However, therapy may fail. In a search for possible reasons, we investigated the presence of BoNT/A antibodies (BoNT/A-AB) in patients who were treated more than once and correlated the presence of antibodies with clinical findings.

METHODS

In 25 patients (aged 11-75 years; average, 48.3 years) who had experienced at least one previous BoNT/A detrusor and/or sphincter injection, BoNT/A-AB was detected with the mouse diaphragm assay before and within 3 months after the current injection. Clinically, subjective and objective outcomes of this injection session were determined on an efficacy scale.

RESULTS

In eight patients, BoNT/A-AB was detected; titers were clearly positive in four patients and were borderline in four patients. The subjective and objective outcomes indicated complete therapy failure in three of four patients who were positive for BoNT/A-AB. In two patients, BoNT/A-AB developed after just one injection session.

CONCLUSIONS

Botulinum toxin type A antibodies can develop after injection of BoNT/A for urologic disorders and the antibodies can lead to therapy failure. In patients with clinically complete therapy failure in whom no obvious other causes can be determined (such as a progressive disease in a patient with multiple sclerosis), screening for BoNT/A-AB should be carried out.

Neurologic uses of botulinum neurotoxin type A

This article reviews the current and most neurologic uses of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A), beginning with relevant historical data, neurochemical mechanism at the neuromuscular junction. Current commercial preparations of BoNT-A are reviewed, as are immunologic issues relating to secondary failure of BoNT-A therapy. Clinical uses are summarized with an emphasis on controlled clinical trials (as appropriate), including facial movement disorders, focal neck and limb dystonias, spasticity, hypersecretory syndromes, and pain.

Antibodies Against Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A as a Cause of Treatment Failure After the First Detrusor Injection

Botulinum neurotoxins are increasingly used in treatment for hyperactive detrusor and sphincter function. Although reported results are promising, conditions in some patients are refractory. We report what we believe to be the first urologic case of therapy failure possibly induced by botulinum toxin antibodies after just one injection and discuss treatment alternatives based on experience in other fields.

Secondary nonresponsiveness to botulinum toxin A in cervical dystonia: the role of electromyogram-guided injections, botulinum toxin A antibody assay, and the extensor digitorum brevis test

We studied 20 patients with cervical dystonia who had started to respond poorly to botulinum toxin A (BTXA) injections after an initial good response. All patients had extensor digitorum brevis (EDB) tests performed in addition to BTXA immunoprecipition assay (IPA) and mouse bioassay (MBA) antibody testing. The patients were reexamined and then treated with carefully placed electromyogram (EMG)-guided BTXA. Nine patients had a good clinical response to EMG-guided injections and all of these patients showed an obvious decrement on the EDB test. All were BTXA blocking antibodies (Abs)-negative via IPA and MBA (apart from one patient who had low BTXA antibodies titers using IPA but no antibodies by MBA). In the other 11 patients, there was a poor clinical response to EMG-guided BTXA injections. Seven of these 11 had small EDB decrement and BTXA antibodies using IPA, suggesting resistance to BTXA. Of the remaining four patients, two had obvious EDB decrement and low antibody titers via IPA (one of them had no antibodies via MBA), while the other two patients showed obvious decrement on the EDB test and no antibodies via IPA. This study shows that the EDB test correlates better with the clinical response than the antibody assays and that EDB decrement does not always correlate quantitatively with the BTXA antibody titers. In patients with secondary nonresponsiveness, it is recommended that an EDB test is the initial investigation of choice. In those patients where the EDB test does not demonstrate resistance to BTXA, a reexamination of the patients and carefully placed injections under EMG guidance may improve results.

Mouse diaphragm assay for detection of antibodies against botulinum toxin type B

With the advent of a commercial preparation of botulinum toxin type B (BT-B) for treatment of cervical dystonia detection of antibodies against BT-B (BT-B-AB) becomes necessary. For this purpose, we carried out a mouse diaphragm assay (MDA) by continuous measurement of the twitch force of a mouse hemidiaphragm preparation elicited by electric stimulation of its phrenic nerve. After exposing the preparation to BT-B 3 ng/ml the time to half-maximal twitch force reduction (paralysis time [PT]) was 69 +/- 4 min (n = 25). Addition of sera from patients with antibodies against BT-A produced a PT of 68 +/- 5 min (n = 24), whereas addition of sera from controls with antibodies against tetanus toxoid produced a PT of 67 +/- 6 min (n = 30). When defined amounts of BT-B-AB were added to the MDA, PT was prolonged. This prolongation was correlated closely to the amount of BT-B-AB added, thus producing a calibration curve. The threshold for BT-B-AB detection was 0.4 mU/ml. When sera from 7 patients (4 women, 3 men; age 50.6 +/- 14.2 years) with cervical dystonia (Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale score, 18.9 +/- 2.9) and complete secondary failure of BT-B therapy (NeuroBloc; Elan Pharmaceuticals, Shannon, Ireland; 12,229 +/- 2,601 MU/injection series, 1.86 +/- 0.69 injection series before complete secondary therapy failure; 100.4 +/- 15.8 days between injection series with normal therapeutic effect) were tested, BT-B-AB titers of more than 10 mU/ml were found in all of them. The MDA can be used to measure neutralizing BT-B-AB titers quantitatively and with adequate sensitivity and specificity. Further studies are necessary to understand the role of intermediate BT-B-AB titers in partial BT-B therapy failure.

Novel application of an in vitro technique to the detection and quantification of botulinum neurotoxin antibodies

Detection of Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) neutralising antibodies is currently achieved using the mouse lethality assay (MLA). This technique has provided the majority of the data for vaccine development and, with the increasing use of BoNT as a therapeutic agent, the MLA is the assay of choice to evaluate 'non-responder' antisera. However, the MLA is semi-quantitative and has an animal consumption rate that raises ethical concerns. The development of an alternative is therefore desirable. Here, we describe an in vitro neuronal release assay that may represent such an alternative in terms of both its sensitivity and ability to produce quantitative data. Initially recognised in the course of assessing a novel vaccine candidate, the suitability of this assay has been further explored using an International standard. The results support the conclusion that the detection of neutralising antibodies in human sera should be attempted using this method.

Clinical presentation and management of antibody-induced failure of botulinum toxin therapy

Therapy with botulinum toxin (BT) can fail due to numerous reasons, including failure due to formation of antibodies against BT (BT-AB, AB-TF). AB-TF is a secondary therapy failure, i.e. it occurs during the course of an ongoing BT therapy. It can be subjective or objective, temporary or permanent, and partial or complete. Complete AB-TF is usually preceded by injection series with partial AB-TF in which the therapeutic effect is reduced in its intensity and duration. AB-TF usually occurs within 2 or 3 years after initiation of BT therapy. After 4 years it is rare. BT-AB are neutralising or blocking by definition, i.e. they are directly interfering with BT's biological mechanism of action. Non-neutralizing or non-blocking antibodies occur. BT-AB can be detected by the mouse diaphragm assay, the mouse protection assay, and by patient-based tests such as the sternocleidomastoid test, the extensor digitorum brevis test, and the frowning test. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) have a low specificity and a low sensitivity for detection of BT-AB. BT-AB titres drop spontaneously after cessation of BT therapy but latencies are too long to be compatible with an effective BT therapy. BT dosage increase can be successful to overcome AB-TF when AB-TF is partial and when BT-AB titres are low. Usage of alternative BT type A preparations fail to overcome AB-TF. Alternative BT types, such as BT type B and BT type F, are initially successful in AB-TF, but stimulate formation of antibodies against the alternative BT types after few applications. BT-AB reduction with immunosuppressants and inactivation of BT-AB by intravenous immunoglobuline application has not yet been achieved. Extraction of BT-AB by plasmapheresis and immunoadsorption is possible but is associated with substantial logistic problems. Prevention of BT-AB formation, therefore, is of paramount importance. Identified risk factors for BT-AB formation must be taken into account when BT therapy is planned. The most interesting perspective seems to be the development of new BT preparations with reduced antigenicity.

Ninhydrin sweat test: A simple method for detecting antibodies neutralizing botulinum toxin type A

Approximately 5% of patients with cervical dystonia receiving repeated botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) injections develop secondary loss of treatment benefit. Currently available tests to directly detect neutralizing BoNT/A antibodies (BoNT/A-AB) are either expensive or time consuming. To establish a simple, clinically useful test for antibody detection, we adapted the ninhydrin sweat test (NST). Eighteen dystonic patients with secondary nonresponse and clinically suspected BoNT/A-AB formation were tested for BoNT/A-AB in the mouse diaphragm test (MDT). In addition, the size of the anhidrotic area was determined by the NST 21 days after an intradermal dose of 10 U Dysport into the hypothenar region of the left palm. In nine patients, positive BoNT-AB titers were found in the MDT. There was a significant correlation between the BoNT/A-AB titers and the anhidrotic area (Spearman's rho = -0.9, P < 0.0001). Both tests provided comparably good results with respect to qualitative antibody detection. In the clinical situation of secondary nonresponse to BoNT/A therapy, the economical NST may be a helpful tool to detect neutralizing BoNT/A-AB.

Treatment of cervical dystonia with botulinum toxin

Cervical dystonia (CD) is the most common form of dystonia encountered in a movement disorders clinic. The treatment of this focal dystonia has improved markedly with the advent on botulinum toxin (BTX) injections, which has now become the treatment of choice. Initial studies, even double-blind controlled trials, failed to show robust effect, largely as a result of poor design, often using fixed dosage and site of administration. When the BTX treatment is customized to the needs of the individual patients and the most involved muscles are targeted, the effects can be quite dramatic and the improvement usually lasts 3 to 4 months. Experience and improved skills can largely prevent the adverse effects such as dysphagia and neck weakness. Although there is no evidence that BTX slows the progression of the disease, as a result of early intervention with BTX, many of the long-term complications of CD, such as contractures and radiculopathy, have been largely eliminated.

Considering the immune response to botulinum toxin

The immune system is unable to determine whether material it encounters is deleterious, benign, or even beneficial to the organism. This presents a significant challenge when protein-based biological therapies, such as botulinum toxin, are administered to patients. Many factors combine to influence the likelihood and the magnitude of an immune response if a response is elicited. Those factors intrinsic to antigens that heighten their immunogenicity include nonhuman origin, larger molecules, and aggregated forms of the protein. Extrinsic factors also must be considered, such as the presence of adjuvants in the formulation, either intended or unintended; increasing amounts of antigen within specific dosing ranges; frequent dosing; and, finally, the genetic predisposition of the patient. Once present, not all immune responses preclude the biological therapy from being clinically effective. Only antibodies that bind botulinum toxin in a manner that neutralizes its biological activity will attenuate its effect on the neuromuscular junction. The majority of anti-toxin antibodies do not affect its function. Finally, although crossreactivity has been reported among the seven botulinum toxin serotypes, non-neutralizing antibodies are present that recognize regions of similarity among the serotypes. No cross-neutralizing antibodies have been described in patients administered any of the toxin serotypes.

Sudomotor testing predicts the presence of neutralizing botulinum A toxin antibodies

The increasing number of patients being treated with botulinum toxin A complex (BoNT/A) has led to a higher incidence of neutralizing anti-BoNT/A antibodies (ABAs). Because BoNT/A is known to inhibit sweating, here we report sudometry as a possibility for predicting the presence of ABA. Sixteen patients suffering from spasmodic torticollis were selected: in 2 patients, BoNT/A treatment continued to be effective, in 9 patients, the treatment effect was impaired, and in 5 patients, secondary treatment failure developed. BoNT/A (100 mouse units, Dysport; Ipsen Pharma, Berkshire, United Kingdom) was injected subcutaneously into the lateral calves. Sweating was visualized with iodine starch staining. In addition, quantitative sudomotor axon reflex testing was performed at the injection site. Individual ABA titers were determined with a mouse bioassay. Results of sudometry significantly correlated with the BoNT/A treatment success. The quantitative sudomotor axon reflex testing was 0.58 +/- 0.63 fraction of the normal mean in patients with treatment failure, 0.18 +/- 0.13 fraction of the normal mean in those who responded partially, and 0 in responders (p < 0.01). Accordingly, the areas of the anhidrotic skin after subcutaneous injections were 4.5 +/- 10.3 cm(2), 32.7 +/- 16.5 cm(2), and 62 cm(2) (p < 0.01). Discrimination analysis indicated that the presence of ABA (6 ABA-positive and 10 ABA-negative) could be predicted correctly in all patients from the results of sudometry. Therefore, sudometry is a useful tool for identifying patients with neutralizing ABAs and might be helpful for identifying reasons for BoNT/A treatment failure.

Cervical dystonia pathophysiology and treatment options

Dystonia is a syndrome of sustained involuntary muscle contractions, frequently causing twisting and repetitive movements or abnormal posturing. Cervical dystonia (CD) is a form of dystonia that involves neck muscles. However, CD is not the only cause of neck rotation. Torticollis may be caused by orthopaedic, musculofibrotic, infectious and other neurological conditions that affect the anatomy of the neck, and structural causes. It is estimated that there are between 60,000 and 90,000 patients with CD in the US. The majority of the patients present with a combination of neck rotation (rotatory torticollis or rotatocollis), flexion (anterocollis), extension (retrocollis), head tilt (laterocollis) or a lateral or sagittal shift. Neck posturing may be either tonic, clonic or tremulous, and may result in permanent and fixed contractures. Sensory tricks ('geste antagonistique') often temporarily ameliorate dystonic movements and postures. Commonly used sensory tricks by patients with CD include touching the chin, back of the head or top of the head. Patients with CD are classified according to aetiology into two groups: primary CD (idiopathic--may be genetic or sporadic) or secondary CD (symptomatic). Patients with primary CD have no evidence by history, physical examination or laboratory studies (except primary dystonia gene) of any secondary cause for the dystonic symptoms. CD is a part of either generalised or focal dystonic syndrome which may have a genetic basis, with an identifiable genetic association. Secondary or symptomatic CD may be caused by central or peripheral trauma, exposure to dopamine receptor antagonists (tardive), neurodegenerative disease, and other conditions associated with abnormal functioning of the basal ganglia. In the majority of patients with CD, the aetiology is not identifiable and the disorder is often classified as primary. Unless the aetiological investigation reveals a specific therapeutic intervention, therapy for CD is symptomatic. It includes supportive therapy and counselling, physical therapy, pharmacotherapy, chemodenervation [botulinum toxin (BTX), phenol, alcohol], and central and peripheral surgical therapy. The most widely used and accepted therapy for CD is local intramuscular injections of BTX-type A. Currently, both BTX type A and type B are commercially available, and type F has undergone testing. Pharmacotherapy, including anticholinergics, dopaminergic depleting and blocking agents, and other muscle relaxants can be used alone or in combination with other therapeutic interventions. Surgery is usually reserved for patients with CD in whom other forms of treatment have failed.

Botulinum toxin antibody type A titres after cessation of botulinum toxin therapy

In some patients, therapy with botulinum toxin type A (BT-A) becomes ineffective due to formation of antibodies (BT-A-AB). The time course of BT-A-AB titres after cessation of BT-A therapy was quantitatively studied to determine whether and when they might drop. Thirteen patients (eight women, five men) with various dystonic syndromes and complete secondary therapy failure (CSTF) were included in this study (age at initiation of BT-A therapy, 48.2 +/- 11.3 years; number of injection series, 7.7 +/- 2.9; treatment time, 678.8 +/- 385.6 days; mean interinjection interval, 90.4 +/- 35.5 days; mean single dose, 546.7 +/- 336.9 EMU; cumulative dose, 4185.1 +/- 3375.7 EMU [1 EMU = 1 botox MU = 3 dysport MU]). During a monitoring period of at least 750 days after occurrence of CSTF, two or more BT-A-AB tests using the quantitative mouse diaphragm assay were performed. Eight of 13 BT-A-AB titres decreased. The onset of decrease could be detected after between approximately 500 and 1,750 days. After 1,250 to 2,250 days they had dropped below a level of 0.002 U/ml, where CSTF is unlikely. Five of 13 BT-A-AB titres did not decrease. For three of these five, the monitoring period was less than 1,500 days; a chance to drop remained. The other two were monitored for up to 2,400 days. Patients with decreasing and nondecreasing BT-A-AB titres did not exhibit statistically significant differences in either clinical characteristics or treatment parameters. When BT-A therapy was stopped the majority of BT-A-AB titres eventually decreased, allowing reinitiation of BT-A therapy. Application of new BT-A preparations with low antigenic potency might then become an interesting treatment option.

Clostridium botulinum and its neurotoxins: a metabolic and cellular perspective

Clostridium botulinum comprises a diverse assemblage of clostridia that have the common property of producing a distinctive protein neurotoxin (BoNT) of similar pharmacological activity and extraordinary potency. BoNTs are produced in culture as molecular complexes consisting of BoNT, hemagglutinin (HA) and associated subcomponent proteins, nontoxic nonhemagglutinin (NTNH), and RNA. The genes encoding the protein components reside as a cluster on the chromosome, on bacteriophages, or on plasmids depending on the C. botulinum serotype. A gene BotR coding for a regulatory protein has been detected in toxin gene clusters from certain strains, as well as ORFs coding for uncharacterized components. The gene encoding TeNT is located on a large plasmid, and expression of the structural gene is controlled by the regulatory gene, TetR, located immediately upstream of the TeNT structural gene. TeNT is not known to be assembled into a protein/nucleic acid complex in culture. Cellular synthesis of BoNT and TeNT have been demonstrated to be positively regulated by the homologous proteins, BotR/A and TetR. Evidence suggests that negative regulatory factors and general control cascades such as those involved in nitrogen regulation and carbon catabolite repression also regulate synthesis of BoNTs. Neurotoxigenic clostridia have attracted considerable attention from scientists and clinicians during the past decade, and many excellent reviews are available on various aspects of these organisms and their neurotoxins. However, certain areas have not been well-studied, including metabolic regulation of toxin formation and genetic tools to study neurotoxigenic clostridia. These topics are the focus of this review.