Revisiting the scissor-like mechanism of activation for the erythropoietin receptor

Discovering immunoreceptor coupling and organization motifs

The recently determined cryo-EM structures of the T cell antigen receptor (TCR) and B cell antigen receptor (BCR) show in molecular details the interactions of the ligand-binding part with the signaling subunits but they do not reveal the signaling mechanism of these antigen receptors. Without knowing the molecular basis of antigen sensing by these receptors, a rational design of optimal vaccines is not possible. The existence of conserved amino acids (AAs) that are not involved in the subunit interaction suggests that antigen receptors form higher complexes and/or have lateral interactors that control their activity. Here, I describe evolutionary conserved leucine zipper (LZ) motifs within the transmembrane domains (TMD) of antigen and coreceptor components that are likely to be involved in the oligomerization and lateral interaction of antigen receptor complexes on T and B cells. These immunoreceptor coupling and organization motifs (ICOMs) are also found within the TMDs of other important receptor types and viral envelope proteins. This discovery suggests that antigen receptors do not function as isolated entities but rather as part of an ICOM-based interactome that controls their nanoscale organization on resting cells and their dynamic remodeling on activated lymphocytes.

Do All X-ray Structures of Protein-Ligand Complexes Represent Functional States? EPOR, a Case Study

Based on differences between the x-ray crystal structures of ligand-bound and unbound forms, the activation of the erythropoietin receptor (EPOR) was initially proposed to involve a cross-action scissorlike motion. However, the validity of the motions involved in the scissorlike model has been recently challenged. Here, atomistic molecular dynamics simulations are used to examine the structure of the extracellular domain of the EPOR dimer in the presence and absence of erythropoietin and a series of agonistic or antagonistic mimetic peptides free in solution. The simulations suggest that in the absence of crystal packing effects, the EPOR chains in the different dimers adopt very similar conformations with no clear distinction between the agonist and antagonist-bound complexes. This questions whether the available x-ray crystal structures of EPOR truly represent active or inactive conformations. The study demonstrates the difficulty in using such structures to infer a mechanism of action, especially in the case of membrane receptors where just part of the structure has been considered in addition to potential confounding effects that arise from the comparison of structures in a crystal as opposed to a membrane environment. The work highlights the danger of assigning functional significance to small differences between structures of proteins bound to different ligands in a crystal environment without consideration of the effects of the crystal lattice and thermal motion.