1
|
Labiano I, Huerta AE, Alsina M, Arasanz H, Castro N, Mendaza S, Lecumberri A, Gonzalez-Borja I, Guerrero-Setas D, Patiño-Garcia A, Alkorta-Aranburu G, Hernández-Garcia I, Arrazubi V, Mata E, Gomez D, Viudez A, Vera R. Building on the clinical applicability of ctDNA analysis in non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Sci Rep 2024; 14:16203. [PMID: 39003322 PMCID: PMC11246447 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67235-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma represents one of the solid tumors showing the worst prognosis worldwide, with a high recurrence rate after adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. Circulating tumor DNA analysis raised as a promising non-invasive tool to characterize tumor genomics and to assess treatment response. In this study, surgical tumor tissue and sequential blood samples were analyzed by next-generation sequencing and were correlated with clinical and pathological characteristics. Thirty resectable/borderline pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients treated at the Hospital Universitario de Navarra were included. Circulating tumoral DNA sequencing identified pathogenic variants in KRAS and TP53, and in other cancer-associated genes. Pathogenic variants at diagnosis were detected in patients with a poorer outcome, and were correlated with response to neoadjuvant therapy in borderline pancreatic ductal adneocarcinoma patients. Higher variant allele frequency at diagnosis was associated with worse prognosis, and thesum of variant allele frequency was greater in samples at progression. Our results build on the potential value of circulating tumor DNA for non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients, by complementing tissue genetic information and as a non-invasive tool for treatment decision. Confirmatory studies are needed to corroborate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibone Labiano
- Oncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ana E Huerta
- Oncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Maria Alsina
- Oncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
| | - Hugo Arasanz
- Oncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Natalia Castro
- Oncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Saioa Mendaza
- Oncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Arturo Lecumberri
- Oncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Iranzu Gonzalez-Borja
- Oncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - David Guerrero-Setas
- Molecular Pathology of Cancer Group, Navarrabiomed, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ana Patiño-Garcia
- Department of Pediatrics and Clinical Genetics, Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CUN), Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CCUN), Program in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA) and Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Irene Hernández-Garcia
- Oncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Virginia Arrazubi
- Oncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Elena Mata
- Oncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - David Gomez
- Oncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Antonio Viudez
- Oncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ruth Vera
- Oncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eckhoff AM, Kanu E, Fletcher A, Bao M, Aushev VN, Spickard E, Nussbaum DP, Allen PJ. Initial Report: Personalized Circulating Tumor DNA and Survival in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1444-1446. [PMID: 38170407 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14751-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is highly lethal with up to 80% of resected patients experiencing disease recurrence within 2 years (Watanabe, Nakamura, Kimura et al in Int J Mol Sci 23(19):11521, 2022). Cross-sectional imaging and serum tumor markers are used for monitoring post-operative recurrence; however, both have significant limitations (Edland, Tjensvoll, Oltedal et al in Mol Oncol 17:1857-1870, 2023). Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a valuable prognostic tool to measure molecular residual disease (MRD) and predict recurrence in solid tumors (Watanabe, Nakamura, Kimura et al in Int J Mol Sci 23(19):11521, 2022). In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of a personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay to detect recurrence prior to standard surveillance tools in patients with PDAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval (Pro00106870), we assessed serial ctDNA measurements (n = 177) from 35 patients with resectable PDAC treated by either upfront resection or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Plasma samples (median 4 ml, interquartile range 0.6-5.9 ml) were isolated from blood collected in EDTA tubes and banked at diagnosis, during neoadjuvant therapy if applicable, on the day of surgery, and every 2-3 months postoperatively. A tumor-informed assay (Signatera™, Natera, Inc.) that tracks up to 16 individual-specific, somatic single nucleotide variants in the corresponding patient's plasma samples were used for ctDNA detection. Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and significance was determined with the log-rank test. RESULTS: Personalized ctDNA assays were successfully designed for all patients (with 32/35 patients having 16-plex assays). Median follow-up from initial treatment was 13 months (range 1-26 months; Table 1). ctDNA-positivity at any time point was observed in 40% (14/35) of patients. During the follow-up period, 18 patients (51%) developed radiographic evidence of recurrence after a median of 9 months of follow-up (range 1-26 months). At the time of radiographic recurrence, 50% (9/18) of patients were ctDNA-positive. During the immediate postoperative period (up to 9 weeks post-surgery), RFS and OS were significantly inferior in patients who were ctDNA-positive versus ctDNA-negative (RFS 97 versus 297 days, p < 0.001; OS 110 versus 381 days, p < 0.001; Fig. 1). Table 1 Cohort demographics (N = 35); patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and survival Gender (%) Female 17 (49%) Male 18 (51%) Median age (IQR) 70 years (65-75 years) Neoadjuvant treatment (%) 11 (31%) Median sample plasma volume (IQR) 4.0 mL (0.6-5.9 mL) Median follow-up (range) 13 months (1-26 months) Median initial CA 19-9 in U/mL (IQR) 56 (18-160) Median tumor size in cm (IQR) 2.5 (1.8-3.3) Median number of positive lymph nodes (IQR) 1 (0-3) Median recurrence-free survival 9.4 months Median overall survival N/A (not reached) Fig. 1 a Overview plot showing longitudinal ctDNA status, treatment regimen, and clinical outcomes for each patient (N = 35); median follow-up from the start of the neoadjuvant therapy/surgery was 13 months (range 1-26 months); ctDNA at any time point was 40% (14/35); out of the 35 patients, 18 (51%) developed radiographic evidence of recurrence (median RFS: 9 months), and of these 18 patients with clinical recurrence, 9 (50%) were ctDNA-positive and the remaining ctDNA-negative; notably, all ctDNA-negative patients with recurrence had suboptimal plasma volume available for ctDNA analysis; b, c Kaplan-Meier estimates representing the association of ctDNA status with (b) RFS and (c) OS, at MRD time point (9 weeks post-surgery) DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of tumor-informed ctDNA-based MRD testing in resectable PDAC and shows that MRD detected by ctDNA within the immediate postoperative period portends a dismal prognosis. This information is valuable for both patients and clinicians in setting prognostic expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elishama Kanu
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Matthew Bao
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Peter J Allen
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang L, Lv Y, Guan S, Yan H, Han L, Wang Z, Han Q, Dai G, Shi Y. High somatic mutations in circulating tumor DNA predict response of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to first-line nab-paclitaxel plus S-1: prospective study. J Transl Med 2024; 22:184. [PMID: 38378604 PMCID: PMC10877900 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-04989-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS We previously showed that the nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (NPS) regimen had promising effects against metastatic pancreatic ducal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), whose efficacy however could not be precisely predicted by routine biomarkers. This prospective study aimed to investigate the values of mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and their dynamic changes in predicting response of mPDAC to NPS chemotherapy. METHODS Paired tumor tissue and blood samples were prospectively collected from patients with mPDAC receiving first-line NPS chemotherapy, and underwent next-generation sequencing with genomic profiling of 425 genes for ctDNA. High mutation allelic frequency (MAF) was defined as ≥ 30% and ≥ 5% in tumor tissue and blood, respectively. Kappa statistics were used to assess agreement between mutant genes in tumor and ctDNA. Associations of mutations in ctDNA and their dynamic changes with tumor response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method, multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression, and longitudinal data analysis. RESULTS 147 blood samples and 43 paired tumor specimens from 43 patients with mPDAC were sequenced. The most common driver genes with high MAF were KRAS (tumor, 35%; ctDNA, 37%) and TP53 (tumor, 37%; ctDNA, 33%). Mutation rates of KRAS and TP53 in ctDNA were significantly higher in patients with liver metastasis, with baseline CA19-9 ≥ 2000 U/mL, and/or without an early CA19-9 response. κ values for the 5 most commonly mutated genes between tumor and ctDNA ranged from 0.48 to 0.76. MAFs of the genes mostly decreased sequentially during subsequent measurements, which significantly correlated with objective response, with an increase indicating cancer progression. High mutations of KRAS and ARID1A in both tumor and ctDNA, and of TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 in ctDNA but not in tumor were significantly associated with shorter survival. When predicting 6-month OS, AUCs for the 5 most commonly mutated genes in ctDNA ranged from 0.59 to 0.84, larger than for genes in tumor (0.56 to 0.71) and for clinicopathologic characteristics (0.51 to 0.68). Repeated measurements of mutations in ctDNA significantly differentiated survival and tumor response. Among the 31 patients with ≥ 2 ctDNA tests, longitudinal analysis of changes in gene MAF showed that ctDNA progression was 60 and 58 days ahead of radiologic and CA19-9 progression for 48% and 42% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS High mutations of multiple driving genes in ctDNA and their dynamic changes could effectively predict response of mPDAC to NPS chemotherapy, with promising reliable predictive performance superior to routine clinicopathologic parameters. Inspiringly, longitudinal ctDNA tracking could predict disease progression about 2 months ahead of radiologic or CA19-9 evaluations, with the potential to precisely devise individualized therapeutic strategies for mPDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Huang
- Medical Center on Aging of Ruijin Hospital, MCARJH, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China.
- Department of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
| | - Yao Lv
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Shasha Guan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Huan Yan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Lu Han
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Zhikuan Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China.
| | - Quanli Han
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China.
| | - Guanghai Dai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China.
| | - Yan Shi
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Seventh People's Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 358 Datong Road, Gaoqiao Town, Shanghai, 200137, China.
| |
Collapse
|