Applying Advanced Practice Nurses in Rural Japan: A Mixed-Methods Perspective

Introduction Rural hospitals, particularly those in geographically isolated regions like Shimane Prefecture, Japan, face significant healthcare delivery challenges. These include limited resources, an aging population, and a scarcity of healthcare professionals. Advanced practice nurses (APNs) have emerged as pivotal in addressing these gaps, offering specialized patient assessment, diagnosis, and management skills. This study aimed to evaluate the demand for APNs in rural community hospitals, focusing on the specific educational needs and clinical competencies required to improve healthcare outcomes in these settings. Method Employing a mixed-methods approach, this research combined qualitative insights from stakeholder interviews with quantitative data analysis of electronic health records (EHRs) at Unnan City Hospital. This sequential exploratory design aimed to capture comprehensive educational needs and outcomes, integrating the depth of qualitative data with the breadth of quantitative evidence to tailor a curriculum for APNs in rural healthcare contexts. Results The study revealed a critical demand for APNs skilled in managing common medical issues in rural settings, such as infections, circulatory failures, and respiratory problems. Stakeholder interviews highlighted the necessity for a curriculum that enhances clinical competencies and emphasizes soft skills like communication and leadership. An analysis of EHRs identified 21 specific diseases across six categories, underlining the importance of targeted education on these prevalent conditions. Conclusion The findings underscore the urgent need for specialized education programs for APNs in rural hospitals to address these communities' unique healthcare challenges. Developing a curriculum that focuses on clinical and soft skills essential for rural healthcare delivery can significantly enhance the quality of care. This study advocates for implementing such tailored educational programs to empower APNs, thereby contributing to healthcare equity and improving patient outcomes in rural settings.

A Preliminary Study on the Cultural Competence of Nurse Practitioners and Its Affecting Factors

Cultural competence refers to a healthcare provider’s ability to consider cultural factors that affect an individual’s health and attitudes toward disease and disability. Nurse practitioners (NPs) are increasingly important in healthcare, practicing culturally competent care strategies to improve the quality of patient care. The aim of this study was to explore cultural competence and its related factors among NPs. A cross sectional study design with a structured questionnaire survey was used. Purposive sampling was employed, for which 86 NPs were recruited from a medical center in northern Taiwan. A T-test, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient were used for data analysis. The results were as follows: (1) overall, the total score for cultural competence was above-average, with a score of 3.75; (2) years of experience as a NP was found to have a statistically significant correlation with overall clinical competence, with r = 0.23, p < 0.05; (3) there were significant differences in clinical awareness and cultural sensitivity related to the clinical ladder system (t = −2.42, p = 0.01; t = −2.04, p = 0.04). The findings of this study can provide information for directors of medical institutions to design an in-service educational program for NPs to enhance their cultural competence and nursing quality.

A novel inpatient PA staffing model for a community hospital

OBJECTIVE

We sought to create a novel physician assistant (PA) and physician hospital medicine co-management strategy, employing a 3:1 PA:physician structure, under which the physician oversees all PA patients, but without a separate independent panel.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort pre-post design, comparing metrics for a traditional physician-only hospitalist model with a PA-physician team model. Outcomes included length of stay (LOS), readmissions, discharge destination, patient satisfaction, and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

LOS for patients under the PA-physician model (74 hours) was lower than for the physician-only model (83 hours; P < .001). The PA-physician model team discharged more patients home than to another facility (PA-physician 77.6%, physician-only 74.3%; P = .03). Thirty-day readmissions were about 10% (P = .97) and patients reported respectful treatment in about 80% (P = .53) of cases in each cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Our 3:1 PA-physician model team showed equal to superior outcomes compared with the physician-only hospitalist model.

An integrative review to identify evidence of nurse practitioner-led changes to health-care delivery and the outcomes of such changes

AIMS

This study aimed to identify evidence of nurse practitioner-led changes to health-care delivery and the outcomes of such changes.

BACKGROUND

Changing health-care delivery is synonymous with the nurse practitioner role. The literature is critical of the lack of research by nurse practitioners, reporting the effects of a change to health-care delivery.

DESIGN

This study used a systematic integrative review by using Torraco's approach.

DATA SOURCES

Databases Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE, Web of Science and SCOPUS were searched for peer-reviewed publications from 2000 to 2019.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic approach was used to screen and analyse the literature. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied, and quality appraisal was undertaken by two reviewers.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles were selected. The research projects were across the community and acute care settings. Research methodologies varied including preintervention and postintervention studies, evaluation of quality improvement projects, randomized controlled trial and descriptive studies. Multiple data collection tools were used. Two major themes were identified including evidence-based practice champions and improved patient outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The nurse practitioner role is pertinent toward improving evidence-based practice in clinical settings. Positive patient outcomes and praise for clinical leadership are evident in the literature. Research by nurse practitioners to date has focused on individual services.