No endospore formation confirmed in members of the phylum Proteobacteria

Endospore formation is used by members of the phylum Firmicutes to withstand extreme environmental conditions. Several recent studies have proposed endospore formation in species outside of Firmicutes, particularly in Rhodobacter johrii and Serratia marcescens, members of the phylum Proteobacteria. Here, we aimed to investigate endospore formation in these two species by using advanced imaging and analytical approaches. Examination of the phase-bright structures observed in R. johrii and S. marcescens using cryo-electron tomography failed to identify endospores or stages of endospore formation. We determined that the phase-bright objects in R. johrii cells were triacylglycerol storage granules and those in S. marcescens were aggregates of cellular debris. In addition, R. johrii and S. marcescens containing phase-bright objects do not possess phenotypic and genetic features of endospores, including enhanced resistance to heat, presence of dipicolinic acid, or the presence of many of the genes associated with endospore formation. Our results support the hypothesis that endospore formation is restricted to the phylum Firmicutes.Importance: Bacterial endospore formation is an important process that allows the formation of dormant life forms called spores. As such, organisms able to sporulate can survive harsh environmental conditions for hundreds of years. Here, we follow up on previous claims that two members of Proteobacteria, Serratia marcescens and Rhodobacter johrii, are able to form spores. We conclude that those claims were incorrect and show that the putative spores in R. johrii and S. marcescens are storage granules and cellular debris, respectively. This study concludes that endospore formation is still unique to the phylum Firmicutes.

Global gene expression analysis of the Myxococcus xanthus developmental time course

To accurately identify the genes and pathways involved in the initiation of the Myxococcus xanthus multicellular developmental program, we have previously reported a method of growing vegetative populations as biofilms within a controllable environment. Using a modified approach to remove up to ~90% rRNAs, we report a comprehensive transcriptional analysis of the M. xanthus developmental cycle while comparing it with the vegetative biofilms grown in rich and poor nutrients. This study identified 1522 differentially regulated genes distributed within eight clusters during development. It also provided a comprehensive overview of genes expressed during a nutrient-stress response, specific development time points, and during development initiation and regulation. We identified several differentially expressed genes involved in key central metabolic pathways suggesting their role in regulating myxobacterial development. Overall, this study will prove an important resource for myxobacterial researchers to delineate the regulatory and functional pathways responsible for development from those of the general nutrient stress response.

Colony Expansion of Socially Motile Myxococcus xanthus Cells Is Driven by Growth, Motility, and Exopolysaccharide Production

Myxococcus xanthus, a model organism for studies of multicellular behavior in bacteria, moves exclusively on solid surfaces using two distinct but coordinated motility mechanisms. One of these, social (S) motility is powered by the extension and retraction of type IV pili and requires the presence of exopolysaccharides (EPS) produced by neighboring cells. As a result, S motility requires close cell-to-cell proximity and isolated cells do not translocate. Previous studies measuring S motility by observing the colony expansion of cells deposited on agar have shown that the expansion rate increases with initial cell density, but the biophysical mechanisms involved remain largely unknown. To understand the dynamics of S motility-driven colony expansion, we developed a reaction-diffusion model describing the effects of cell density, EPS deposition and nutrient exposure on the expansion rate. Our results show that at steady state the population expands as a traveling wave with a speed determined by the interplay of cell motility and growth, a well-known characteristic of Fisher’s equation. The model explains the density-dependence of the colony expansion by demonstrating the presence of a lag phase–a transient period of very slow expansion with a duration dependent on the initial cell density. We propose that at a low initial density, more time is required for the cells to accumulate enough EPS to activate S-motility resulting in a longer lag period. Furthermore, our model makes the novel prediction that following the lag phase the population expands at a constant rate independent of the cell density. These predictions were confirmed by S motility experiments capturing long-term expansion dynamics.

Collective motility is a key mechanism bacteria use to self-organize into multicellular structures and to adapt to various environments. An important example of such behavior is social (S) motility in the gram-negative bacterium Myxococcus xanthus. S-motile cells are restricted to movement in groups and do not move as individual cells. S-motility is powered by type IV pili (TFP)–multi-subunit filaments, which extrude from the cell poles, adhere to the substrate and retract, pulling the cell forward. TFP retraction or adhesion is suggested to be triggered by extracellular exopolysaccharides (EPS) deposited by cells on the substrate. As individual cells synthesize both pili and EPS, it is unclear why S-motile cells only exhibit group movement. Moreover, the experimentally observed initial cell-density dependence of S-motility remains unexplained. To understand these phenomena, we developed a mathematical model for the colony expansion of S-motile cells. Our model hypothesizes that the EPS level regulates the TFP activity that initiates collective cell movements. With this assumption, the model quantitatively matches the density-dependent expansion rate. Moreover, the model predicts two phases during colony expansion: an initial density-dependent lag phase with a slow expansion rate, followed by a faster expansion phase with a density-independent rate. These model predictions were confirmed by long-term colony expansion experiments.