Experimental Design in Synthesis Planning and Structure‐Property Correlations

Methods for combinatorial and parallel library design

Diversity has historically played a critical role in design of combinatorial libraries, screening sets and corporate collections for lead discovery. Large library design dominated the field in the 1990s with methods ranging anywhere from purely arbitrary through property based reagent selection to product based approaches. In recent years, however, there has been a downward trend in library size. This was due to increased information about the desirable targets gleaned from the genomics revolution and to the ever growing availability of target protein structures from crystallography and homology modeling. Creation of libraries directed toward families of receptors such as GPCRs, kinases, nuclear hormone receptors, proteases, etc., replaced the generation of libraries based primarily on diversity while single target focused library design has remained an important objective. Concurrently, computing grids and cpu clusters have facilitated the development of structure based tools that screen hundreds of thousands of molecules. Smaller "smarter" combinatorial and focused parallel libraries replaced those early un-focused large libraries in the twenty-first century drug design paradigm. While diversity still plays a role in lead discovery, the focus of current library design methods has shifted to receptor based methods, scaffold hopping/bio-isostere searching, and a much needed emphasis on synthetic feasibility. Methods such as "privileged substructures based design" and pharmacophore based design still are important methods for parallel and small combinatorial library design. This chapter discusses some of the possible design methods and presents examples where they are available.

Beware of q2!

Validation is a crucial aspect of any quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling. This paper examines one of the most popular validation criteria, leave-one-out cross-validated R2 (LOO q2). Often, a high value of this statistical characteristic (q2 > 0.5) is considered as a proof of the high predictive ability of the model. In this paper, we show that this assumption is generally incorrect. In the case of 3D QSAR, the lack of the correlation between the high LOO q2 and the high predictive ability of a QSAR model has been established earlier [Pharm. Acta Helv. 70 (1995) 149; J. Chemomet. 10(1996)95; J. Med. Chem. 41 (1998) 2553]. In this paper, we use two-dimensional (2D) molecular descriptors and k nearest neighbors (kNN) QSAR method for the analysis of several datasets. No correlation between the values of q2 for the training set and predictive ability for the test set was found for any of the datasets. Thus, the high value of LOO q2 appears to be the necessary but not the sufficient condition for the model to have a high predictive power. We argue that this is the general property of QSAR models developed using LOO cross-validation. We emphasize that the external validation is the only way to establish a reliable QSAR model. We formulate a set of criteria for evaluation of predictive ability of QSAR models.

Chemical information management in drug discovery: optimizing the computational and combinatorial chemistry interfaces

Structure-property relationships, central to many of today's drug discovery strategies, are not straightforward to deal with when trying to predict drug efficacy, that is, the combined outcome of target affinity, pharmacodynamic behavior, pharmacokinetic properties, and metabolic fate. In this article, we discuss the handling of chemical property information in reagents-for-synthesis selection, enumeration, and virtual library construction. We describe the use of diversity assessment and/or experimental design in selection of compound-libraries-to-be-synthesized. Our overall objective was to identify good-quality drug candidates through reliable structure-activity relationship data, with the minimum number of compounds synthesized and tested. Chemical filters, property filters, scoring functions, and utilization of interactive visualization tools are discussed. The concept of chemical diversity and aspects of chemical space navigation employing a proprietary tool, Chemical Global Positioning System (ChemGPS), for mapping the drug-related chemical space are examined. Guidelines and workflow recommendations for the practicing medicinal chemist are proposed.