1
|
Fonseca R, Arribas M, Wiedmeier-Nutor JE, Kusne YN, González Vélez M, Kosiorek HE, Butterfield RDJ, Kirsch IR, Mikhael JR, Stewart AK, Reeder C, Larsen J, Bergsagel PL, Fonseca R. Integrated analysis of next generation sequencing minimal residual disease (MRD) and PET scan in transplant eligible myeloma patients. Blood Cancer J 2023; 13:32. [PMID: 36878906 PMCID: PMC9988896 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-023-00794-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Minimal residual disease (MRD) assays allow response assessment in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and negativity is associated with improved survival outcomes. The role of highly sensitive next generation sequencing (NGS) MRD in combination with functional imaging remains to be validated. We performed a retrospective analysis on MM patients who underwent frontline autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Patients were evaluated at day 100 post-ASCT with NGS-MRD and positron emission tomography (PET-CT). Patients with ≥ 2 MRD measurements were included in a secondary analysis for sequential measurements. 186 patients were included. At day 100, 45 (24.2%) patients achieved MRD negativity at a sensitivity threshold of 10-6. MRD negativity was the most predictive factor for longer time to next treatment (TTNT). Negativity rates did not differ according to MM subtype, R-ISS Stage nor cytogenetic risk. PET-CT and MRD had poor agreement, with high rates of PET-CT negativity in MRD-positive patients. Patients with sustained MRD negativity had longer TTNT, regardless of baseline risk characteristics. Our results show that the ability to measure deeper and sustainable responses distinguishes patients with better outcomes. Achieving MRD negativity was the strongest prognostic marker and could help guide therapy-related decisions and serve as a response marker for clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Fonseca
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Mariano Arribas
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Yael N Kusne
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Heidi E Kosiorek
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | | - Ilan R Kirsch
- Translational Medicine, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joseph R Mikhael
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, City of Hope Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - A Keith Stewart
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Craig Reeder
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Jeremy Larsen
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - P Leif Bergsagel
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Rafael Fonseca
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim HY, Yoo IY, Lim DJ, Kim HJ, Kim SH, Yoon SE, Kim SJ, Cho D, Kim K. Clinical Utility of Next-Generation Flow-Based Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Ann Lab Med 2022; 42:558-565. [PMID: 35470273 PMCID: PMC9057816 DOI: 10.3343/alm.2022.42.5.558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Minimal residual disease (MRD) is an important prognostic factor for evaluating a deeper treatment response in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We evaluated the clinical utility of next-generation flow (NGF)-based MRD assessment in a heterogeneous MM patient population. Methods Patients with suspected morphological remission after or during MM treatment were prospectively enrolled. In total, 108 bone marrow samples from 90 patients were analyzed using NGF-based MRD assessment according to the EuroFlow protocol, and progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated according to the International Myeloma Working Group response status, cytogenetic risk, and MRD status. Results The overall MRD-positive rate was 31.5% (34/108 samples), and MRD-positive patients showed a lower PFS than MRD-negative patients (P=0.005). MRD-positive patients showed inferior PFS than MRD-negative in patients with stringent complete remission (sCR)/complete remission (P=0.014) and high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (P=0.016). MRD was assessed twice in 18 patients with a median interval of 12 months. Sustained MRD negativity was only observed in patients with sustained sCR, and their PFS was superior to that of patients who were not MRD-negative (P=0.035). Conclusions Clinical application of NGF-based MRD assessment can provide valuable information for predicting disease progression in patients with MM in remission, including those with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun-Young Kim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Young Yoo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dae Jin Lim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Health and Safety Convergence Science, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee-Jin Kim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun-Hee Kim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Eun Yoon
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok Jin Kim
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Duck Cho
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kihyun Kim
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roschewski M, Rossi D, Kurtz DM, Alizadeh AA, Wilson WH. Circulating Tumor DNA in Lymphoma: Principles and Future Directions. Blood Cancer Discov 2022; 3:5-15. [PMID: 35015693 PMCID: PMC9245363 DOI: 10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-21-0029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Lymphomas are heterogeneous tumors with striking genetic diversity and variable outcomes even within pathologic diagnoses. Treatment response assessment relies on radiologic and nuclear scans, which cannot detect disease at the molecular level. Molecular tumor analyses require invasive tissue biopsies that cannot accurately capture spatial tumor heterogeneity within each patient. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a minimally invasive and highly versatile biomarker that overcomes fundamental limitations of imaging scans and tissue biopsies and may aid clinical decision-making in lymphoma. In this review, we highlight the key established principles regarding ctDNA in lymphoma and emphasize the important research questions and future directions. SIGNIFICANCE: ctDNA is an emerging biomarker for lymphomas that noninvasively provides genotypic information and can measure the effectiveness of treatment by detecting the presence of minimal residual disease. Key principles have emerged related to ctDNA for lymphoma, but further studies are needed to standardize its use and establish clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Roschewski
- Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Davide Rossi
- Experimental Hematology, Institute of Oncology Research, Hematology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - David M Kurtz
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Ash A Alizadeh
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine; Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Wyndham H Wilson
- Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bravo-Pérez C, Sola M, Teruel-Montoya R, García-Malo MD, Ortuño FJ, Vicente V, de Arriba F, Jerez A. Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Something Old, Something New. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4332. [PMID: 34503142 PMCID: PMC8430644 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The game-changing outcome effect, due to the generalized use of novel agents in MM, has cre-ated a paradigm shift. Achieving frequent deep responses has placed MM among those neoplasms where the rationale for assessing MRD is fulfilled. However, its implementation in MM has raised specific questions: how might we weight standard measures against deep MRD in the emerging CAR-T setting? Which high sensitivity method to choose? Are current response criteria still useful? In this work, we address lessons learned from the use of MRD in other neoplasms, the steps followed for the harmonization of current methods for comprehensively measuring MRD, and the challenges that new therapies and concepts pose in the MM clinical field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Bravo-Pérez
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB, 30003 Murcia, Spain; (C.B.-P.); (M.S.); (M.D.G.-M.); (F.J.O.); (V.V.); (F.d.A.); (A.J.)
| | - María Sola
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB, 30003 Murcia, Spain; (C.B.-P.); (M.S.); (M.D.G.-M.); (F.J.O.); (V.V.); (F.d.A.); (A.J.)
| | - Raúl Teruel-Montoya
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB, 30003 Murcia, Spain; (C.B.-P.); (M.S.); (M.D.G.-M.); (F.J.O.); (V.V.); (F.d.A.); (A.J.)
- CB15/00055-CIBERER, 30003 Murcia, Spain
| | - María Dolores García-Malo
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB, 30003 Murcia, Spain; (C.B.-P.); (M.S.); (M.D.G.-M.); (F.J.O.); (V.V.); (F.d.A.); (A.J.)
| | - Francisco José Ortuño
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB, 30003 Murcia, Spain; (C.B.-P.); (M.S.); (M.D.G.-M.); (F.J.O.); (V.V.); (F.d.A.); (A.J.)
| | - Vicente Vicente
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB, 30003 Murcia, Spain; (C.B.-P.); (M.S.); (M.D.G.-M.); (F.J.O.); (V.V.); (F.d.A.); (A.J.)
- CB15/00055-CIBERER, 30003 Murcia, Spain
| | - Felipe de Arriba
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB, 30003 Murcia, Spain; (C.B.-P.); (M.S.); (M.D.G.-M.); (F.J.O.); (V.V.); (F.d.A.); (A.J.)
| | - Andrés Jerez
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB, 30003 Murcia, Spain; (C.B.-P.); (M.S.); (M.D.G.-M.); (F.J.O.); (V.V.); (F.d.A.); (A.J.)
- CB15/00055-CIBERER, 30003 Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
A large meta-analysis establishes the role of MRD negativity in long-term survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood Adv 2021; 4:5988-5999. [PMID: 33284948 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 196] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated in a large cohort of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) using a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Medline and EMBASE databases were searched for articles published up to 8 June 2019, with no date limit on the indexed database. Clinical end points stratified by MRD status (positive or negative) were extracted, including hazard ratios (HRs) on PFS and OS, P values, and confidence intervals (CIs). HRs were estimated based on reconstructed patient-level data from published Kaplan-Meier curves. Forty-four eligible studies with PFS data from 8098 patients, and 23 studies with OS data from 4297 patients were identified to assess the association between MRD status and survival outcomes. Compared with MRD positivity, achieving MRD negativity improved PFS (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.29-0.37; P < .001) and OS (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.39-0.51; P < .001). MRD negativity was associated with significantly improved survival outcomes regardless of disease setting (newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory MM), MRD sensitivity thresholds, cytogenetic risk, method of MRD assessment, depth of clinical response at the time of MRD measurement, and MRD assessment premaintenance and 12 months after start of maintenance therapy. The strong prognostic value of MRD negativity and its association with favorable outcomes in various disease and treatment settings sets the stage to adopt MRD as a treatment end point, including development of therapeutic strategies. This large meta-analysis confirms the utility of MRD as a relevant surrogate for PFS and OS in MM.
Collapse
|
6
|
Maclachlan KH, Came N, Diamond B, Roshal M, Ho C, Thoren K, Mayerhoefer ME, Landgren O, Harrison S. Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: defining the role of next generation sequencing and flow cytometry in routine diagnostic use. Pathology 2021; 53:385-399. [PMID: 33674146 DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2021.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
For patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM) there have been significant treatment advances over the past decade, reflected in an increasing proportion of patients achieving durable remissions. Clinical trials repeatedly demonstrate that achieving a deep response to therapy, with a bone marrow assessment proving negative for minimal residual disease (MRD), confers a significant survival advantage. To accurately assess for minute quantities of residual cancer requires highly sensitive methods; either multiparameter flow cytometry or next generation sequencing are currently recommended for MM response assessment. Under optimal conditions, these methods can detect one aberrant cell amongst 1,000,000 normal cells (a sensitivity of 10-6). Here, we will review the practical use of MRD assays in MM, including challenges in implementation for the routine diagnostic laboratory, standardisation across laboratories and clinical trials, the clinical integration of MRD status assessment into MM management and future directions for ongoing research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylee H Maclachlan
- Myeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Haematology Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, Australia.
| | - Neil Came
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, Australia; Pathology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Benjamin Diamond
- Myeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mikhail Roshal
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Caleb Ho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katie Thoren
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marius E Mayerhoefer
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ola Landgren
- Myeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Myeloma Program, Department of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Simon Harrison
- Haematology Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Diamond BT, Rustad E, Maclachlan K, Thoren K, Ho C, Roshal M, Ulaner GA, Landgren CO. Defining the undetectable: The current landscape of minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma and goals for future clarity. Blood Rev 2021; 46:100732. [PMID: 32771227 PMCID: PMC9928431 DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2020.100732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Multiple Myeloma, the second most prevalent hematologic malignancy, yet lacks an established curative therapy. However, overall response rate to modern four-drug regimens approaches 100%. Major efforts have thus focused on the measurement of minute quantities of residual disease (minimal residual disease or MRD) for prognostic metrics and therapeutic response evaluation. Currently, MRD is assessed by flow cytometry or by next generation sequencing to track tumor-specific immunoglobulin V(D)J rearrangements. These bone marrow-based methods can reach sensitivity thresholds of the identification of one neoplastic cell in 1,000,000 (10-6). New technologies are being developed to be used alone or in conjunction with established methods, including peripheral blood-based assays, mass spectrometry, and targeted imaging. Data is also building for MRD as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival. Here, we will address the currently utilized MRD assays, challenges in validation across labs and clinical trials, techniques in development, and future directions for successful clinical application of MRD in multiple myeloma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Caleb Ho
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Boer EN, Johansson LF, de Lange K, Bosga-Brouwer AG, van den Berg E, Sikkema-Raddatz B, van Diemen CC. Detection of Fusion Genes to Determine Minimal Residual Disease in Leukemia Using Next-Generation Sequencing. Clin Chem 2020; 66:1084-1092. [DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Measuring minimal residual disease (MRD), the persistence of leukemic cells after treatment, is important for monitoring leukemia recurrence. The current methods for monitoring MRD are flow cytometry, to assess aberrant immune phenotypes, and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), to target genetic aberrations such as single-nucleotide variants and gene fusions. We present the performance of an RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) method for MRD gene fusion detection compared with ddPCR. This method may have advantages, including the capacity to analyze different genetic aberrations and patients in 1 experiment. In particular, detection at the RNA level may be highly sensitive if the genetic aberration is highly expressed.
Methods
We designed a probe-based NGS panel targeting the breakpoints of 11 fusion genes previously identified in clinical patients and 2 fusion genes present in cell lines. Blocking probes were added to prevent nonspecific enrichment. Each patient RNA sample was diluted in background RNA, depleted for rRNA and globin mRNA, converted to cDNA, and prepared for sequencing. Unique sequence reads, identified by unique molecular identifiers, were aligned directly to reference transcripts. The same patient and cell-line samples were also analyzed with ddPCR for direct comparison.
Results
Our NGS method reached a maximum sensitivity of 1 aberrant cell in 10 000 cells and was mostly within a factor of 10 compared with ddPCR.
Conclusions
Our detection limit was below the threshold of 1:1000 recommended by European Leukemia Net. Further optimizations are easy to implement and are expected to boost the sensitivity of our method to diagnostically obtained ddPCR thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eddy N de Boer
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Lennart F Johansson
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Kim de Lange
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Anneke G Bosga-Brouwer
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Eva van den Berg
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Cleo C van Diemen
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Analytical evaluation of the clonoSEQ Assay for establishing measurable (minimal) residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and multiple myeloma. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:612. [PMID: 32605647 PMCID: PMC7325652 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07077-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The clonoSEQ® Assay (Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation, Seattle, USA) identifies and tracks unique disease-associated immunoglobulin (Ig) sequences by next-generation sequencing of IgH, IgK, and IgL rearrangements and IgH-BCL1/2 translocations in malignant B cells. Here, we describe studies to validate the analytical performance of the assay using patient samples and cell lines. Methods Sensitivity and specificity were established by defining the limit of detection (LoD), limit of quantitation (LoQ) and limit of blank (LoB) in genomic DNA (gDNA) from 66 patients with multiple myeloma (MM), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and three cell lines. Healthy donor gDNA was used as a diluent to contrive samples with specific DNA masses and malignant-cell frequencies. Precision was validated using a range of samples contrived from patient gDNA, healthy donor gDNA, and 9 cell lines to generate measurable residual disease (MRD) frequencies spanning clinically relevant thresholds. Linearity was determined using samples contrived from cell line gDNA spiked into healthy gDNA to generate 11 MRD frequencies for each DNA input, then confirmed using clinical samples. Quantitation accuracy was assessed by (1) comparing clonoSEQ and multiparametric flow cytometry (mpFC) measurements of ALL and MM cell lines diluted in healthy mononuclear cells, and (2) analyzing precision study data for bias between clonoSEQ MRD results in diluted gDNA and those expected from mpFC based on original, undiluted samples. Repeatability of nucleotide base calls was assessed via the assay’s ability to recover malignant clonotype sequences across several replicates, process features, and MRD levels. Results LoD and LoQ were estimated at 1.903 cells and 2.390 malignant cells, respectively. LoB was zero in healthy donor gDNA. Precision ranged from 18% CV (coefficient of variation) at higher DNA inputs to 68% CV near the LoD. Variance component analysis showed MRD results were robust, with expected laboratory process variations contributing ≤3% CV. Linearity and accuracy were demonstrated for each disease across orders of magnitude of clonal frequencies. Nucleotide sequence error rates were extremely low. Conclusions These studies validate the analytical performance of the clonoSEQ Assay and demonstrate its potential as a highly sensitive diagnostic tool for selected lymphoid malignancies.
Collapse
|
10
|
Yao Q, Bai Y, Orfao A, Kumar S, Chim CS. Upgraded Standardized Minimal Residual Disease Detection by Next-Generation Sequencing in Multiple Myeloma. J Mol Diagn 2020; 22:679-684. [PMID: 32151713 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2019] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Minimal residual disease (MRD) is one of the most powerful prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Therefore, standardization and easy operation of MRD testing are crucial. Previously, we validated the sensitivity of 10-5 with spike in of plasmid controls for a standardized next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach based on triplicate measurements of bone marrow by LymphoTrack-MiSeq platform. To improve the technique, we replaced spike-in plasmid controls by genomic DNA from myeloma cells. A spike-in control of 0.001% was consistently detected in all 19 samples tested, confirming a uniform sensitivity of 10-5 of this upgraded protocol. MRD was detected in 14 of 19 patients (78%), with a significant (P = 0.04) impact on progression-free survival based on high versus low MRD levels. Reproducibility of detection was confirmed by the extremely small interrun variation tested in three patients. In nine patients, MRD was tested in parallel by allele-specific oligonucleotide real-time quantitative PCR. NGS showed an improved sensitivity and provided quantification of MRD for cases assigned positive but not quantifiable by real-time quantitative PCR, obviating the need of patient-specific probes/primers. In summary, the use of genomic DNA as spike-in control simplifies NGS detection of MRD while preserving the sensitivity of 10-5. Validity and reproducibility of the standardized procedure were verified, and the prognostic impact of NGS-based MRD in myeloma was confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiumei Yao
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Yinlei Bai
- Institute for Immunology and School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Alberto Orfao
- Department of Medicine and Cytometry Service (Nucleus), Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Salamanca-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Shaji Kumar
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Chor S Chim
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rustad EH, Boyle EM. Monitoring minimal residual disease in the bone marrow using next generation sequencing. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2020; 33:101149. [PMID: 32139014 DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2020.101149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2019] [Revised: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Achieving minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the bone marrow is one of the strongest prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Consequently, MRD testing is routinely performed in clinical trials and moving towards standard of care. This review focuses on the role of next generation sequencing (NGS) of tumor-specific immunoglobulin V(D)J sequences for MRD tracking. The immunoglobulin variable regions are ideal targets for tracking, because every tumor cell shares an identical gene sequence, which is stable over time and generally distinct from the immunoglobulin sequences of normal B-cells. Several excellent assays for NGS-based MRD testing are available, both commercial and community-based, including one that is FDA-approved. These assays can achieve the gold standard analytical sensitivity of one tumor cell per million (10-6), requiring a minimum input of 3 million bone marrow cells. On-going clinical trials will outline how MRD testing should be used to inform dynamic risk-adopted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Even H Rustad
- Myeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Eileen M Boyle
- Myeloma Research Program, NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYC, NY, 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ho M, Bianchi G, Anderson KC. Proteomics-inspired precision medicine for treating and understanding multiple myeloma. EXPERT REVIEW OF PRECISION MEDICINE AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT 2020; 5:67-85. [PMID: 34414281 DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2020.1732205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Remarkable progress in molecular characterization methods has led to significant improvements in how we manage multiple myeloma (MM). The introduction of novel therapies has led to significant improvements in overall survival over the past 10 years. However, MM remains incurable and treatment choice is largely based on outdated risk-adaptive strategies that do not factor in improved treatment outcomes in the context of modern therapies. Areas covered This review discusses current risk-adaptive strategies in MM and the clinical application of proteomics in the monitoring of treatment response, disease progression, and minimal residual disease (MRD). We also discuss promising biomarkers of disease progression, treatment response, and chemoresistance. Finally, we will discuss an immunomics-based approach to monoclonal antibody (mAb), vaccine, and CAR-T cell development. Expert opinion It is an exciting era in oncology with basic scientific knowledge translating in novel therapeutic approaches to improve patient outcomes. With the advent of effective immunotherapies and targeted therapies, it has become crucial to identify biomarkers to aid in the stratification of patients based on anticipated sensitivity to chemotherapy. As a paradigm of diseases highly dependent on protein homeostasis, multiple myeloma provides the perfect opportunity to investigate the use of proteomics to aid in precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Ho
- UCD School of Medicine, College of Health and Agricultural Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Giada Bianchi
- LeBow Institute for Myeloma Therapeutics and Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kenneth C Anderson
- LeBow Institute for Myeloma Therapeutics and Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
D’Agostino M, Bertamini L, Oliva S, Boccadoro M, Gay F. Pursuing a Curative Approach in Multiple Myeloma: A Review of New Therapeutic Strategies. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:E2015. [PMID: 31847174 PMCID: PMC6966449 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11122015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Revised: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is still considered an incurable hematologic cancer and, in the last decades, the treatment goal has been to obtain a long-lasting disease control. However, the recent availability of new effective drugs has led to unprecedented high-quality responses and prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival. The improvement of response rates has prompted the development of new, very sensitive methods to measure residual disease, even when monoclonal components become undetectable in patients' serum and urine. Several scientific efforts have been made to develop reliable and validated techniques to measure minimal residual disease (MRD), both within and outside the bone marrow. With the newest multidrug combinations, a good proportion of MM patients can achieve MRD negativity. Long-lasting MRD negativity may prove to be a marker of "operational cure", although the follow-up of the currently ongoing studies is still too short to draw conclusions. In this article, we focus on results obtained with new-generation multidrug combinations in the treatment of high-risk smoldering MM and newly diagnosed MM, including the potential role of MRD and MRD-driven treatment strategies in clinical trials, in order to optimize and individualize treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Francesca Gay
- Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Comprehensive detection of recurring genomic abnormalities: a targeted sequencing approach for multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J 2019; 9:101. [PMID: 31827071 PMCID: PMC6906304 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-019-0264-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Revised: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent genomic research efforts in multiple myeloma have revealed clinically relevant molecular subgroups beyond conventional cytogenetic classifications. Implementing these advances in clinical trial design and in routine patient care requires a new generation of molecular diagnostic tools. Here, we present a custom capture next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel designed to identify rearrangements involving the IGH locus, arm level, and focal copy number aberrations, as well as frequently mutated genes in multiple myeloma in a single assay. We sequenced 154 patients with plasma cell disorders and performed a head-to-head comparison with the results from conventional clinical assays, i.e., fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray. Our custom capture NGS panel had high sensitivity (>99%) and specificity (>99%) for detection of IGH translocations and relevant chromosomal gains and losses in multiple myeloma. In addition, the assay was able to capture novel genomic markers associated with poor outcome such as bi-allelic events involving TP53. In summary, we show that a multiple myeloma designed custom capture NGS panel can detect IGH translocations and CNAs with very high concordance in relation to FISH and SNP microarrays and importantly captures the most relevant and recurrent somatic mutations in multiple myeloma rendering this approach highly suitable for clinical application in the modern era.
Collapse
|
15
|
Rustad EH, Misund K, Bernard E, Coward E, Yellapantula VD, Hultcrantz M, Ho C, Kazandjian D, Korde N, Mailankody S, Keats JJ, Akhlaghi T, Viny AD, Mayman DJ, Carroll K, Patel M, Famulare CA, Bruinink DH, Hutt K, Jacobsen A, Huang Y, Miller JE, Maura F, Papaemmanuil E, Waage A, Arcila ME, Landgren O. Stability and uniqueness of clonal immunoglobulin CDR3 sequences for MRD tracking in multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol 2019; 94:1364-1373. [PMID: 31571261 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Revised: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Minimal residual disease (MRD) tracking, by next generation sequencing of immunoglobulin sequences, is moving towards clinical implementation in multiple myeloma. However, there is only sparse information available to address whether clonal sequences remain stable for tracking over time, and to what extent light chain sequences are sufficiently unique for tracking. Here, we analyzed immunoglobulin repertoires from 905 plasma cell myeloma and healthy control samples, focusing on the third complementarity determining region (CDR3). Clonal heavy and/or light chain expression was identified in all patients at baseline, with one or more subclones related to the main clone in 3.2%. In 45 patients with 101 sequential samples, the dominant clonal CDR3 sequences remained identical over time, despite differential clonal evolution by whole exome sequencing in 49% of patients. The low frequency of subclonal CDR3 variants, and absence of evolution over time in active multiple myeloma, indicates that tumor cells at this stage are not under selective pressure to undergo antibody affinity maturation. Next, we establish somatic hypermutation and non-templated insertions as the most important determinants of light chain clonal uniqueness, identifying a potentially trackable sequence in the majority of patients. Taken together, we show that dominant clonal sequences identified at baseline are reliable biomarkers for long-term tracking of the malignant clone, including both IGH and the majority of light chain clones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Even H. Rustad
- Department of Medicine, Myeloma Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway
| | - Kristine Misund
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway
| | - Elsa Bernard
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York
| | - Eivind Coward
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway
| | - Venkata D. Yellapantula
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York
| | - Malin Hultcrantz
- Department of Medicine, Myeloma Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York
| | - Caleb Ho
- Department of Pathology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York
| | - Dickran Kazandjian
- Myeloma Program, Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland
| | - Neha Korde
- Department of Medicine, Myeloma Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York
| | - Sham Mailankody
- Department of Medicine, Myeloma Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York
| | | | - Theresia Akhlaghi
- Department of Medicine, Myeloma Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York
| | - Aaron D. Viny
- Department of Medicine, Leukemia Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York
- Human Oncology & Pathogenesis Program Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York
| | - David J. Mayman
- Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Division Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York
| | - Kaitlin Carroll
- Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Division Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York
| | - Minal Patel
- Center for Hematological Malignancies, Department of Medicine Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York
| | - Christopher A. Famulare
- Center for Hematological Malignancies, Department of Medicine Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Francesco Maura
- Department of Medicine, Myeloma Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York
| | - Elli Papaemmanuil
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York
| | - Anders Waage
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway
| | - Maria E. Arcila
- Department of Pathology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York
| | - Ola Landgren
- Department of Medicine, Myeloma Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York
| |
Collapse
|