1
|
Fletcher EM, Ballester F, Beaulieu L, Morrison H, Poher A, Rivard MJ, Sloboda RS, Vijande J, Thomson RM. Generation and comparison of 3D dosimetric reference datasets for COMS eye plaque brachytherapy using model-based dose calculations. Med Phys 2024; 51:694-706. [PMID: 37665982 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 08/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A joint Working Group of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the Australasian Brachytherapy Group (ABG) was created to aid in the transition from the AAPM TG-43 dose calculation formalism, the current standard, to model-based dose calculations. This work establishes the first test cases for low-energy photon-emitting brachytherapy using model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs). ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION METHODS Five test cases are developed: (1) a single model 6711 125 I brachytherapy seed in water, 13 seeds (2) individually and (3) in combination in water, (4) the full Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) 16 mm eye plaque in water, and (5) the full plaque in a realistic eye phantom. Calculations are done with four Monte Carlo (MC) codes and a research version of a commercial treatment planning system (TPS). For all test cases, local agreement of MC codes was within ∼2.5% and global agreement was ∼2% (4% for test case 5). MC agreement was within expected uncertainties. Local agreement of TPS with MC was within 5% for test case 1 and ∼20% for test cases 4 and 5, and global agreement was within 0.4% for test case 1 and 10% for test cases 4 and 5. DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES Dose distributions for each set of MC and TPS calculations are available online (https://doi.org/10.52519/00005) along with input files and all other information necessary to repeat the calculations. POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS These data can be used to support commissioning of MBDCAs for low-energy brachytherapy as recommended by TGs 186 and 221 and AAPM Report 372. This work additionally lays out a sample framework for the development of test cases that can be extended to other applications beyond eye plaque brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth M Fletcher
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics, Physics Department, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Facundo Ballester
- Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Universitat de Valencia (UV), Burjassot, Spain
- Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Radiofísica e Instrumentación Nuclear en Medicina (IRIMED), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS-La Fe)-Universitat de Valencia (UV), Burjassot, Spain
| | - Luc Beaulieu
- Service de physique médicale et Axe oncologie du Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, CHU de Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada
- Département de Physique, de Génie Physique et d'Optique et Centre de Recherche sur le Cancer, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Hali Morrison
- Department of Oncology and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Audran Poher
- Service de physique médicale et Axe oncologie du Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, CHU de Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada
- Département de Physique, de Génie Physique et d'Optique et Centre de Recherche sur le Cancer, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Mark J Rivard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Ron S Sloboda
- Department of Medical Physics, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Javier Vijande
- Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Universitat de Valencia (UV), Burjassot, Spain
- Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Radiofísica e Instrumentación Nuclear en Medicina (IRIMED), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS-La Fe)-Universitat de Valencia (UV), Burjassot, Spain
- Instituto de Física Corpuscular, IFIC (UV-CSIC), Burjassot, Spain
| | - Rowan M Thomson
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics, Physics Department, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Beaulieu L, Ballester F, Granero D, Tedgren ÅC, Haworth A, Lowenstein JR, Ma Y, Mourtada F, Papagiannis P, Rivard MJ, Siebert FA, Sloboda RS, Smith RL, Thomson RM, Verhaegen F, Fonseca G, Vijande J. AAPM WGDCAB Report 372: A joint AAPM, ESTRO, ABG, and ABS report on commissioning of model-based dose calculation algorithms in brachytherapy. Med Phys 2023; 50:e946-e960. [PMID: 37427750 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The introduction of model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) in brachytherapy provides an opportunity for a more accurate dose calculation and opens the possibility for novel, innovative treatment modalities. The joint AAPM, ESTRO, and ABG Task Group 186 (TG-186) report provided guidance to early adopters. However, the commissioning aspect of these algorithms was described only in general terms with no quantitative goals. This report, from the Working Group on Model-Based Dose Calculation Algorithms in Brachytherapy, introduced a field-tested approach to MBDCA commissioning. It is based on a set of well-characterized test cases for which reference Monte Carlo (MC) and vendor-specific MBDCA dose distributions are available in a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine-Radiotherapy (DICOM-RT) format to the clinical users. The key elements of the TG-186 commissioning workflow are now described in detail, and quantitative goals are provided. This approach leverages the well-known Brachytherapy Source Registry jointly managed by the AAPM and the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) Houston Quality Assurance Center (with associated links at ESTRO) to provide open access to test cases as well as step-by-step user guides. While the current report is limited to the two most widely commercially available MBDCAs and only for 192 Ir-based afterloading brachytherapy at this time, this report establishes a general framework that can easily be extended to other brachytherapy MBDCAs and brachytherapy sources. The AAPM, ESTRO, ABG, and ABS recommend that clinical medical physicists implement the workflow presented in this report to validate both the basic and the advanced dose calculation features of their commercial MBDCAs. Recommendations are also given to vendors to integrate advanced analysis tools into their brachytherapy treatment planning system to facilitate extensive dose comparisons. The use of the test cases for research and educational purposes is further encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luc Beaulieu
- Service de Physique Médicale et Radioprotection et Axe Oncologie du Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
- Département de Physique, de Génie Physique et d'Optique et Centre de Recherche sur le Cancer, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Facundo Ballester
- Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, IRIMED, IIS-La Fe-Universitat de Valencia, Burjassot, Spain
| | - Domingo Granero
- Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, IRIMED, IIS-La Fe-Universitat de Valencia, Burjassot, Spain
| | - Åsa Carlsson Tedgren
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences (HMV), Radiation Physics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Jessica R Lowenstein
- Department of Radiation Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yunzhi Ma
- Service de Physique Médicale et Radioprotection et Axe Oncologie du Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
- Département de Physique, de Génie Physique et d'Optique et Centre de Recherche sur le Cancer, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Firas Mourtada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Panagiotis Papagiannis
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Mark J Rivard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Frank-André Siebert
- Clinic of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ron S Sloboda
- Department of Medical Physics, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ryan L Smith
- Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rowan M Thomson
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics, Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Frank Verhaegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Gabriel Fonseca
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Javier Vijande
- Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, IRIMED, IIS-La Fe-Universitat de Valencia, Burjassot, Spain
- Instituto de Física Corpuscular, IFIC (UV-CSIC), Burjassot, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bi S, Chen Z, Sun X, Dai Z. Dosimetric comparison of AcurosBV with AAPM TG43 dose calculation formalism in cervical intraductal high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy using three different applicators. PRECISION RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/pro6.1170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Su‐yan Bi
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Shenzhen China
| | - Zhi‐jian Chen
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Shenzhen China
| | - Xing‐ru Sun
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Shenzhen China
| | - Zhi‐tao Dai
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Shenzhen China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yousif YAM, Osman AFI, Halato MA. A review of dosimetric impact of implementation of model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) for HDR brachytherapy. Phys Eng Sci Med 2021; 44:871-886. [PMID: 34142317 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-021-01029-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
To obtain dose distributions more physically representative to the patient anatomy in brachytherapy, calculation algorithms that can account for heterogeneity are required. The current standard AAPM Task Group No 43 (TG-43) dose calculation formalism has some clinically relevant dosimetric limitations. Lack of tissue heterogeneity and scattered dose corrections are the major weaknesses of the TG-43 formalism and could lead to systematic dose errors in target volumes and organs at risk. Over the last decade, model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) have been clinically offered as complementary algorithms beyond the TG43 formalism for high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment planning. These algorithms provide enhanced dose calculation accuracy by using the information in the patient's computed tomography images, which allows modeling the patient's geometry, material compositions, and the treatment applicator. Several researchers have investigated the implementation of MBDCAs in HDR brachytherapy for dose optimization, but moving toward using them as primary algorithms for dose calculations is still lagging. Therefore, an overview of up-to-date research is needed to familiarize clinicians with the current status of the MBDCAs for different cancers in HDR brachytherapy. In this paper, we review the MBDCAs for HDR brachytherapy from a dosimetric perspective. Treatment sites covered include breast, gynecological, lung, head and neck, esophagus, liver, prostate, and skin cancers. Moreover, we discuss the current status of implementation of MBDCAs and the challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yousif A M Yousif
- Department of Radiation Oncology, North West Cancer Centre-Tamworth Hospital, Tamworth, Australia.
| | - Alexander F I Osman
- Department of Medical Physics, Al-Neelain University, 11121, Khartoum, Sudan.
| | - Mohammed A Halato
- Department of Medical Physics, Al-Neelain University, 11121, Khartoum, Sudan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kanani A, Owrangi AM, Mosleh-Shirazi MA. Comprehensive methodology for commissioning modern 3D-image-based treatment planning systems for high dose rate gynaecological brachytherapy: A review. Phys Med 2020; 77:21-29. [PMID: 32768917 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.07.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Correct commissioning of treatment planning systems (TPSs) is important for reducing treatment failure events. There is currently no comprehensive and robust methodology available for TPS commissioning in modern brachytherapy. This review aimed to develop a comprehensive template for commissioning modern 3D-image-based brachytherapy TPSs for high dose rate (HDR) gynaecological applications. METHODS The literature relevant to TPS commissioning, including both external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy, as well as guidelines by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) were searched, studied and appraised. The applied relevant EBRT TPS commissioning tests were applied to brachytherapy. The developed template aimed to cover all dosimetric and non-dosimetric issues. RESULTS The essential commissioning items could be categorized into six parts: geometry, dose calculation, plan evaluation tools, plan optimization, TPS output, and end-to-end verification. The final template consists of 43 items. This paper presents the purpose and role of each test, as well as tolerance limits, to facilitate the use of the template. CONCLUSION The information and recommendations available in a collection of publications over many years have been reviewed in order to develop a comprehensive template for commissioning complex modern 3D-image-based brachytherapy TPSs for HDR gynaecological applications. The up-to-date and concise information contained in the template can aid brachytherapy physicists during TPS commissioning as well as devising a regular quality assurance program and allocation of time and resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abolfazl Kanani
- Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Research Center, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Amir M Owrangi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 2280 Inwood Rd, EC2.242, Dallas, TX 75235, USA
| | - Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi
- Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Research Center, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Physics Unit, Department of Radio-oncology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz 71936-13311, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abe K, Kadoya N, Sato S, Hashimoto S, Nakajima Y, Miyasaka Y, Ito K, Umezawa R, Yamamoto T, Takahashi N, Takeda K, Jingu K. Impact of a commercially available model-based dose calculation algorithm on treatment planning of high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with cervical cancer. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2018; 59:198-206. [PMID: 29378024 PMCID: PMC5951107 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrx081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2017] [Revised: 10/26/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
We evaluated the impact of model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) on high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) treatment planning for patients with cervical cancer. Seven patients with cervical cancer treated using HDR-BT were studied. Tandem and ovoid applicators were used in four patients, a vaginal cylinder in one, and interstitial needles in the remaining two patients. MBDCAs were applied to the Advanced Collapsed cone Engine (ACE; Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden). All plans, which were originally calculated using TG-43, were re-calculated using both ACE and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. Air was used as the rectal material. The mean difference in the rectum D2cm3 between ACErec-air and MCrec-air was 8.60 ± 4.64%, whereas that in the bladder D2cm3 was -2.80 ± 1.21%. Conversely, in the small group analysis (n = 4) using water instead of air as the rectal material, the mean difference in the rectum D2cm3 between TG-43 and ACErec-air was 11.87 ± 2.65%, whereas that between TG-43 and ACErec-water was 0.81 ± 2.04%, indicating that the use of water as the rectal material reduced the difference in D2cm3 between TG-43 and ACE. Our results suggested that the differences in the dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters of TG-43 and ACE were large for the rectum when considerable air (gas) volume was present in it, and that this difference was reduced when the air (gas) volume was reduced. Also, ACE exhibited better dose calculation accuracy than that of TG-43 in this situation. Thus, ACE may be able to calculate the dose more accurately than TG-43 for HDR-BT in treating cervical cancers, particularly for patients with considerable air (gas) volume in the rectum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kota Abe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Kadoya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| | - Shinya Sato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| | - Shimpei Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22, Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677, Japan
| | - Yujiro Nakajima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22, Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677, Japan
| | - Yuya Miyasaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, 2-2-2, Iidani, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan
| | - Kengo Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| | - Rei Umezawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| | - Takaya Yamamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| | - Noriyoshi Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| | - Ken Takeda
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Morrison H, Menon G, Larocque MP, van Veelen B, Niatsetski Y, Weis E, Sloboda RS. Initial evaluation of Advanced Collapsed cone Engine dose calculations in water medium for I-125 seeds and COMS eye plaques. Med Phys 2018; 45:1276-1286. [PMID: 29383721 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Revised: 11/15/2017] [Accepted: 01/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the dose calculation accuracy in water medium of the Advanced Collapsed cone Engine (ACE) for three sizes of COMS eye plaques loaded with low-energy I-125 seeds. METHODS A model of the Oncura 6711 I-125 seed was created for use with ACE in Oncentra® Brachy (OcB) using primary-scatter separated (PSS) point dose kernel and Task Group (TG) 43 datasets. COMS eye plaque models of diameters 12, 16, and 20 mm were introduced into the OcB applicator library based on 3D CAD drawings of the plaques and Silastic inserts. To perform TG-186 level 1 commissioning, treatment plans were created in OcB for a single source in water and for each COMS plaque in water for two scenarios: with only one centrally loaded seed, or with all seed positions loaded. ACE dose calculations were performed in high accuracy mode with a 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 mm3 calculation grid. The resulting dose data were evaluated against Monte Carlo (MC) calculated doses obtained with MCNP6, using both local and global percent differences. RESULTS ACE doses around the source for the single seed in water agreed with MC doses on average within < 5% inside a 6 × 6 × 6 cm3 region, and within < 1.5% inside a 2 × 2 × 2 cm3 region. The PSS data were generated at a higher resolution within 2 cm from the source, resulting in this improved agreement closer to the source due to fewer approximations in the ACE dose calculation. Average differences in both investigated plaque loading patterns in front of the plaques and on the plaque central axes were ≤ 2.5%, though larger differences (up to 12%) were found near the plaque lip. CONCLUSIONS Overall, good agreement was found between ACE and MC dose calculations for a single I-125 seed and in front of the COMS plaques in water. More complex scenarios need to be investigated to determine how well ACE handles heterogeneous patient materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hali Morrison
- Department of Medical Physics, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Geetha Menon
- Department of Medical Physics, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Matthew P Larocque
- Department of Medical Physics, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Ezekiel Weis
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ron S Sloboda
- Department of Medical Physics, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cawston-Grant B, Morrison H, Sloboda RS, Menon G. Experimental assessment of the Advanced Collapsed-cone Engine for scalp brachytherapy treatments. Brachytherapy 2017; 17:489-499. [PMID: 29239813 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Revised: 10/17/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To experimentally assess the performance of the Advanced Collapsed-cone Engine (ACE) for 192Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning of nonmelanoma skin cancers of the scalp. METHODS AND MATERIALS A layered slab phantom was designed to model the head (skin, skull, and brain) and surface treatment mold using tissue equivalent materials. Six variations of the phantom were created by varying skin thickness, skull thickness, and size of air gap between the mold and skin. Treatment planning was initially performed using the Task Group 43 (TG-43) formalism with CT images of each phantom variation. Doses were recalculated using standard and high accuracy modes of ACE. The plans were delivered to Gafchromic EBT3 film placed between different layers of the phantom. RESULTS Doses calculated by TG-43 and ACE and those measured by film agreed with each other at most locations within the phantoms. For a given phantom variation, average TG-43- and ACE-calculated doses were similar, with a maximum difference of (3 ± 12)% (k = 2). Compared to the film measurements, TG-43 and ACE overestimated the film-measured dose by (13 ± 12)% (k = 2) for one phantom variation below the skull layer. CONCLUSIONS TG-43- and ACE-calculated and film-measured doses were found to agree above the skull layer of the phantom, which is where the tumor would be located in a clinical case. ACE appears to underestimate the attenuation through bone relative to that measured by film; however, the dose to bone is below tolerance levels for this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brie Cawston-Grant
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Hali Morrison
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Department of Medical Physics, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ron S Sloboda
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Department of Medical Physics, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Geetha Menon
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Department of Medical Physics, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|