Liu Y, Zhang P, Hong J, Alam S, Kuo L, Hu YC, Lu W, Cerviño L. Geometric evaluation and quantifying dosimetric impact of diverse deformable image registration algorithms on abdomen images with biomechanically modeled deformations.
J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024:e14511. [PMID:
39258711 DOI:
10.1002/acm2.14511]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE
Deformable image registration (DIR) has been increasingly used in radiation therapy (RT). The accuracy of DIR algorithms and how it impacts on the RT plan dosimetrically were examined in our study for abdominal sites using biomechanically modeled deformations.
METHODS
Five pancreatic cancer patients were enrolled in this study. Following the guidelines of AAPM TG-132, a patient-specific quality assurance (QA) workflow was developed to evaluate DIR for the abdomen using the TG-132 recommended virtual simulation software ImSimQA (Shrewsbury, UK). First, the planning CT was deformed to simulate respiratory motion using the embedded biomechanical model in ImSimQA. Additionally, 5 mm translational motion was added to the stomach, duodenum, and small bowel. The original planning CT and the deformed CT were then imported into Eclipse and MIM to perform DIR. The output displacement vector fields (DVFs) were compared with the ground truth from ImSimQA. Furthermore, the original treatment plan was recalculated on the ground-truth deformed CT and the deformed CT (with Eclipse and MIM DVF). The dose errors were calculated on a voxel-to-voxel basis.
RESULTS
Data analysis comparing DVF from Eclipse versus MIM show the average mean DVF magnitude errors of 2.8 ± 1.0 versus 1.1 ± 0.7 mm for stomach and duodenum, 5.2 ± 4.0 versus 2.5 ± 1.0 mm for small bowel, and 4.8 ± 4.1 versus 2.7 ± 1.1 mm for the gross tumor volume (GTV), respectively, across all patients. The mean dose error on stomach+duodenum and small bowel were 2.3 ± 0.6% for Eclipse, and 1.0 ± 0.3% for MIM. As the DIR magnitude error increases, the dose error range increase, for both Eclipse and MIM.
CONCLUSION
In our study, an initial assessment was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of DIR and its dosimetric impact on radiotherapy. A patient-specific DIR QA workflow was developed for pancreatic cancer patients. This workflow exhibits promising potential for future implementation as a clinical workflow.
Collapse