1
|
Zhao F, Zhou ZY, Wang YQ, Jiang YT, Wang YXJ, Yu H, Yu HG, Bu LY, Lu ZJ, Yao GR, Yan SX. A Convenient and Effective Preoxygenation Technique for Prolonging Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold Duration With a Venturi Mask With a 50% Oxygen Concentration. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:e87-e96. [PMID: 37871850 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Voluntary deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is commonly used in radiation therapy (RT), but the short duration of a single breath-hold, estimated to be around 20 to 40 seconds, is a limitation. This prospective study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of using a simple preoxygenation technique with a Venturi mask to prolong voluntary DIBH. METHODS AND MATERIALS The study included 33 healthy volunteers and 21 RT patients. Preoxygenation was performed using a Venturi mask with a 50% oxygen concentration. Paired t tests compared the duration of a single DIBH in room air and after 5, 15, and 30 minutes of preoxygenation in healthy volunteers. Sustainability of breath-hold and tolerability of heart rate and blood pressure were assessed for multiple DIBH durations in both volunteers and patients. RESULTS In healthy volunteers, a 15-minute preoxygenation significantly prolonged the duration of a single DIBH by 24.95 seconds compared with 5-minute preoxygenation (89 ± 27.76 vs 113.95 ± 30.63 seconds; P < .001); although there was a statistically significant increase in DIBH duration after 30-minute preoxygenation, it was only extended by 4.95 seconds compared with 15-minute preoxygenation (113.95 ± 30.63 vs 118.9 ± 29.77 seconds; P < .01). After 15-minute preoxygenation, a single DIBH lasted over 100 seconds in healthy volunteers and over 80 seconds in RT patients, with no significant differences among 6 consecutive cycles of DIBH. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in heart rate or blood pressure after DIBHs, including DIBH in room air and 6 consecutive DIBHs after 15-minute preoxygenation (all P > .05). CONCLUSIONS Preoxygenation with a 50% oxygen concentration for 15 minutes effectively prolongs the duration of 6 cycles of DIBH both in healthy volunteers and RT patients. The utilization of a Venturi mask to deliver 50% oxygen concentration provides a solution characterized by its convenience, good tolerability, and effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China; Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
| | - Zi-Yang Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China; Graduate School, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi-Qi Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China; Graduate School, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan-Ting Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China; Graduate School, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi-Xiang J Wang
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China; Graduate School, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao-Gang Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China; Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Lu-Yi Bu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China; Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhong-Jie Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China; Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Guo-Rong Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China; Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
| | - Sen-Xiang Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China; Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
A Critical Overview of Predictors of Heart Sparing by Deep-Inspiration-Breath-Hold Irradiation in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143477. [PMID: 35884538 PMCID: PMC9319386 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Adjuvant radiotherapy could damage the heart in left-sided breast cancer patients. The deep-inspiration-breath-hold technique may limit the heart exposure to radiation. As non-beneficiaries exist, there is some need to do an upfront cost-effective selection. Some easy-to-use anatomical predictors may help insiders in the treatment decision. The awareness of such findings may improve the efficiency of practitioners’ workflows. Abstract Radiotherapy represents an essential part of the therapeutic algorithm for breast cancer patients after conservative surgery. The treatment of left-sided tumors has been associated with a non-negligible risk of developing late-onset cardiovascular disease. The cardiac risk perception has especially increased over the last years due to the prolongation of patients’ survival owing to the advent of new drugs and an ever earlier cancer detection through screening programs. Improvements in radiation delivery techniques could reduce the treatment-related heart toxicity. The deep-inspiration-breath-hold (DIBH) irradiation is one of the most advanced treatment approaches, which requires specific technical equipment and uses inspiration to displace the heart from the tangential radiation fields. However, not all patients benefit from its use. Moreover, DIBH irradiation needs patient compliance and accurate training. Therefore, such a technique may be unjustifiably cumbersome and time-consuming as well as unnecessarily expensive from a mere healthcare cost point of view. Hence the need to early select only the true beneficiaries while tailoring more effective heart-sparing techniques for the others and streamlining the workflow, especially in high-volume radiation oncology departments. In this literature overview, we collected some possible predictors of cardiac dose sparing in DIBH irradiation for left breast treatment in an effort to provide an easy-to-consult summary of simple instruments to insiders for identifying patients actually benefitting from this technique. We critically reviewed the reliability and weaknesses of each retrieved finding, aiming to inspire new insights and discussions on this much-debated topic.
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen CP, Lin CY, Kuo CC, Chen TH, Lin SC, Tseng KH, Cheng HW, Chao HL, Yen SH, Lin RY, Feng CJ, Lu LS, Chiou JF, Hsu SM. Skin Surface Dose for Whole Breast Radiotherapy Using Personalized Breast Holder: Comparison with Various Radiotherapy Techniques and Clinical Experiences. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133205. [PMID: 35804977 PMCID: PMC9264904 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Breast immobilization with personalized breast holder (PERSBRA) is a promising approach for normal organ protection during whole breast radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the skin surface dose for breast radiotherapy with PERSBRA using different radiotherapy techniques. Materials and methods: We designed PERSBRA with three different mesh sizes (large, fine and solid) and applied them on an anthropomorphic(Rando) phantom. Treatment planning was generated using hybrid, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques to deliver a prescribed dose of 5000 cGy in 25 fractions accordingly. Dose measurement with EBT3 film and TLD were taken on Rando phantom without PERSBRA, large mesh, fine mesh and solid PERSBRA for (a) tumor doses, (b) surface doses for medial field and lateral field irradiation undergoing hybrid, IMRT, VMAT techniques. Results: The tumor dose deviation was less than five percent between the measured doses of the EBT3 film and the TLD among the different techniques. The application of a PERSBRA was associated with a higher dose of the skin surface. A large mesh size of PERSBRA was associated with a lower surface dose. The findings were consistent among hybrid, IMRT, or VMAT techniques. Conclusions: Breast immobilization with PERSBRA can reduce heart toxicity but leads to a build-up of skin surface doses, which can be improved with a larger mesh design for common radiotherapy techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiu-Ping Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan; (C.-P.C.); (C.-Y.L.); (C.-C.K.); (H.-L.C.); (S.-H.Y.)
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan; (R.-Y.L.); (C.-J.F.)
| | - Chi-Yeh Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan; (C.-P.C.); (C.-Y.L.); (C.-C.K.); (H.-L.C.); (S.-H.Y.)
| | - Chia-Chun Kuo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan; (C.-P.C.); (C.-Y.L.); (C.-C.K.); (H.-L.C.); (S.-H.Y.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan; (T.-H.C.); (L.-S.L.)
- School of Health Care Administration, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- Ph.D. Program for Cancer Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University and Academia Sinica, Taipei 110, Taiwan
| | - Tung-Ho Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan; (T.-H.C.); (L.-S.L.)
| | - Shao-Chen Lin
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Materials and Tissue Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan;
| | - Kuo-Hsiung Tseng
- Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan;
| | - Hao-Wen Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan;
- School of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
| | - Hsing-Lung Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan; (C.-P.C.); (C.-Y.L.); (C.-C.K.); (H.-L.C.); (S.-H.Y.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan
| | - Sang-Hue Yen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan; (C.-P.C.); (C.-Y.L.); (C.-C.K.); (H.-L.C.); (S.-H.Y.)
| | - Ruo-Yu Lin
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan; (R.-Y.L.); (C.-J.F.)
| | - Chen-Ju Feng
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan; (R.-Y.L.); (C.-J.F.)
| | - Long-Sheng Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan; (T.-H.C.); (L.-S.L.)
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Materials and Tissue Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan;
- TMU Research Center of Cancer Translational Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- International Ph.D. Program in Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- International Ph.D. Program for Cell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
| | - Jeng-Fong Chiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan; (T.-H.C.); (L.-S.L.)
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (J.-F.C.); (S.-M.H.)
| | - Shih-Ming Hsu
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan; (R.-Y.L.); (C.-J.F.)
- Correspondence: (J.-F.C.); (S.-M.H.)
| |
Collapse
|