Comparative dosimetry of radiography device, MSCT device and two CBCT devices in the elbow region

Twin Robotic Gantry-Free Cone-Beam CT in Acute Elbow Trauma

Background Posttraumatic CT imaging of the elbow can be challenging when patient mobility is limited. Gantry-free cone-beam CT (CBCT) with a twin robotic radiography system offers greater degrees of positioning freedom for three-dimensional elbow scans over gantry-based multidetector CT (MDCT), but studies analyzing their clinical value remain lacking. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic performance of gantry-free CBCT versus two-dimensional radiography in adults and children with acute elbow trauma. Materials and Methods In a retrospective study, consecutive patients with elbow trauma and positioning difficulty in a gantry-based MDCT who underwent three-dimensional elbow imaging with a gantry-free CBCT after radiography were enrolled between January 2021 and April 2022 at a tertiary care university hospital. Imaging data sets were independently analyzed for fracture presence, articular involvement, and multi-fragment injuries by three radiologists. Diagnostic performance was calculated individually with surgical reports serving as the reference standard. Differences between radiography and CBCT were compared with the McNemar test. Diagnostic confidence was estimated subjectively by each reader, and results were compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results Elbow examinations of 23 adults and children (mean age ± SD, 49 years ± 23; seven women) were included with individual assessment of humerus, radius, and ulna (69 bones; 36 fractured). Multi-fragmentary fracture patterns and involvement of articular surfaces were ascertained in 28 and 30 bones, respectively. CBCT allowed for similar or higher sensitivity compared with radiography in the assessment of fractures (range for three readers, 94%-100% vs 72%-81%; respectively, P ≤ .06-.008), articular surface involvement (90%-97% vs 73%-87%; P ≤ .25), and multi-fragmentary patterns (96%-96% vs 68%-75%; P ≤ .03). Readers' diagnostic confidence improved considerably with access to CBCT data sets versus radiographs (all P ≤ .001). For CBCT, the median dose-length product was 70.9 mGy · cm, and the volume CT dose index was 4.4 mGy. Conclusion In acute elbow injuries, gantry-free cone-beam CT enabled improved detection of fractures, articular involvement, and multi-fragmentary patterns compared with two-dimensional radiography. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Radiation exposure to fetus from extremity CBCT examinations

PURPOSE

To evaluate fetal doses from extremity CBCT examinations at different stages of pregnancy and to investigate different methods of fetal dose optimization.

METHOD

Fetal doses were measured in an anthropomorphic phantom for two CBCT examination protocols - knee and elbow. The measurements were made at three different heights representing the three trimesters during pregnancy and three different depths in the phantom. The effect of soft tissue layer, tube voltage, add-on device shield and body angulation on fetal dose were investigated.

RESULTS

The fetal doses in clinical examination protocols were in the range of 3.4 to 6.0 µGy during knee examinations and 2.9 to 7.7 µGy during elbow examinations depending on the depth of the fetus and the stage of pregnancy. A soft tissue layer representing variative body composition above abdomen region decreased the fetal dose up to 19 % in knee and up to 21 % in elbow examinations. Using lower tube voltage decreased the fetal doses up to 45 % (knee) and 51 % (elbow). An add-on device shield decreased the fetal doses up to 91 % (knee) and up to 75 % (elbow). Turning the body away from the device bore reduced the fetal doses up to 62 %. The conversion factor to convert an entrance surface dose to the fetal dose ranged from 0.4 to 0.6.

CONCLUSIONS

The fetal doses from CBCT examinations of extremities are low and do not produce a concern about radiation detriment to the fetus. The most efficient way found to reduce the fetal dose was to use the add-on device shielding.