Interfractional robustness of scanning carbon ion radiotherapy for prostate cancer: An analysis based on dose distribution from daily in-room CT images

Preliminary result of combined treatment with scanning carbon-ion radiotherapy and image-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical adenocarcinoma

Although there is growing evidence of the efficacy of carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for locally advanced cervical adenocarcinoma, reports on combined treatment with CIRT and image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) are scarce. We retrospectively analyzed patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2008) stage II-IVA locally advanced cervical adenocarcinoma who received combined scanning CIRT (sCIRT) and IGBT between April 2019 and March 2022. sCIRT consisted of whole-pelvic irradiation with 36 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) in 12 fractions and subsequent local boost irradiation with 19.2 Gy (RBE) in 4 fractions. Three sessions of IGBT were administered after completion of sCIRT. Concurrent chemotherapy using weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2/week) was also administered. Efficacy, toxicity and dose-volume parameters were analyzed. Fifteen patients were included in the analysis. The median follow-up period was 25 months. The 2-year overall survival, progression-free survival and local control rates were 92.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 77.8-100%), 52.5% (95% CI = 26.9-78.1%) and 84.8% (95% CI = 65.2-100%), respectively. Neither severe acute toxicity necessitating treatment cessation nor grade 3 or higher late toxicity were observed. The sigmoid D2cm3 of the patient who developed grade 2 late sigmoid hemorrhage was 65.6 Gy, which exceeded the standard deviation and target dose. The combination of sCIRT and IGBT for locally advanced cervical adenocarcinoma showed acceptable efficacy and safety. Further large-scale and long-term studies are warranted to confirm the efficacy and safety of this treatment.

Optimizing 3DCT image registration for interfractional changes in carbon-ion prostate radiotherapy

To perform setup procedures including both positional and dosimetric information, we developed a CT-CT rigid image registration algorithm utilizing water equivalent pathlength (WEPL)-based image registration and compared the resulting dose distribution with those of two other algorithms, intensity-based image registration and target-based image registration, in prostate cancer radiotherapy using the carbon-ion pencil beam scanning technique. We used the data of the carbon ion therapy planning CT and the four-weekly treatment CTs of 19 prostate cancer cases. Three CT-CT registration algorithms were used to register the treatment CTs to the planning CT. Intensity-based image registration uses CT voxel intensity information. Target-based image registration uses target position on the treatment CTs to register it to that on the planning CT. WEPL-based image registration registers the treatment CTs to the planning CT using WEPL values. Initial dose distributions were calculated using the planning CT with the lateral beam angles. The treatment plan parameters were optimized to administer the prescribed dose to the PTV on the planning CT. Weekly dose distributions using the three different algorithms were calculated by applying the treatment plan parameters to the weekly CT data. Dosimetry, including the dose received by 95% of the clinical target volume (CTV-D95), rectal volumes receiving > 20 Gy (RBE) (V20), > 30 Gy (RBE) (V30), and > 40 Gy (RBE) (V40), were calculated. Statistical significance was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Interfractional CTV displacement over all patients was 6.0 ± 2.7 mm (19.3 mm maximum standard amount). WEPL differences between the planning CT and the treatment CT were 1.2 ± 0.6 mm-H₂O (< 3.9 mm-H₂O), 1.7 ± 0.9 mm-H₂O (< 5.7 mm-H₂O) and 1.5 ± 0.7 mm-H₂O (< 3.6 mm-H₂O maxima) with the intensity-based image registration, target-based image registration, and WEPL-based image registration, respectively. For CTV coverage, the D95 values on the planning CT were > 95% of the prescribed dose in all cases. The mean CTV-D95 values were 95.8 ± 11.5% and 98.8 ± 1.7% with the intensity-based image registration and target-based image registration, respectively. The WEPL-based image registration was CTV-D95 to 99.0 ± 0.4% and rectal Dmax to 51.9 ± 1.9 Gy (RBE) compared to 49.4 ± 9.1 Gy (RBE) with intensity-based image registration and 52.2 ± 1.8 Gy (RBE) with target-based image registration. The WEPL-based image registration algorithm improved the target coverage from the other algorithms and reduced rectal dose from the target-based image registration, even though the magnitude of the interfractional variation was increased.

Creation, evolution, and future challenges of ion beam therapy from a medical physicist's viewpoint (Part 2). Chapter 2. Biophysical model, treatment planning system and image guided radiotherapy

When an ion beam penetrates deeply into the body, its kinetic energy decreases, and its biological effect increases due to the change of the beam quality. To give a uniform biological effect to the target, it is necessary to reduce the absorbed dose with the depth. A bio-physical model estimating the relationship between ion beam quality and biological effect is necessary to determine the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of the ion beam that changes with depth. For this reason, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS) and GSI have each developed their own model at the starting of the ion beam therapy. Also, NIRS developed a new model at the starting of the scanning irradiation. Although the Local Effect Model (LEM) at the GSI and the modified Microdosimetric Kinetic Model (MKM) at the NIRS, the both are currently used, can similarly predict radiation quality-induced changes in surviving fraction of cultured cell, the clinical RBE-weighted doses for the same absorbed dose are different. This is because the LEM uses X-rays as a reference for clinical RBE, whereas the modified MKM uses carbon ion beam as a reference and multiplies it by a clinical factor of 2.41. Therefore, both are converted through the absorbed dose. In PART 2, I will describe the development of such a bio-physical model, as well as the birth and evolution of a treatment planning system and image guided radiotherapy.

Long-term experience in quality assurance of on-rail computed tomography systems for image-guided radiotherapy using in-house multifunctional phantoms

To report the long-term quality assurance (QA) experience of an on-rail computed tomography (CT) system for image-guided radiotherapy using an in-house phantom. An on-rail CT system combining the Elekta Synergy and Canon Aquilion LB was used. The treatment couch was shared by the linear accelerators and CT, and the couch was rotated by 180° when using the on-rail-CT system to ensure that the CT direction was toward the head. All QA analyses were performed by radiation technologists on CBCT or on-rail CT images of the in-house phantom. The CBCT center accuracy from the linac laser, couch rotational accuracy (CBCT center vs. on-rail CT center), horizontal accuracy by CT gantry shift, and remote couch shift accuracy were evaluated. This study reported the QA status of the system during the period 2014-2021. The absolute mean accuracy of couch rotation was 0.4 ± 0.28 mm, 0.44 ± 0.36 mm, and 0.37 ± 0.27 mm in the SI, RL, and AP directions, respectively. Horizontal and remote movement accuracies of the treatment couch were also within 0.5 mm of the absolute mean value. A decrease in the accuracy of couch rotation was also observed due to aging deterioration of related parts caused by the frequent use of couch rotation. The three-dimensional accuracy of on-rail CT systems derived mainly from treatment couches can be maintained within 0.5 mm with appropriate accuracy assurance for at least > 8 years.