Evaluation of the correlation between dosimetric, geometric, and technical parameters of radiosurgery planning for multiple brain metastases

Insights into the dosimetric and geometric characteristics of stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

GammaKnife (GK) and CyberKnife (CK) have been the mainstay stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) solution for multiple brain metastases (MBM) for several years. Recent technological advancement has seen an increase in single-isocentre C-arm linac-based SRS. This systematic review focuses on dosimetric and geometric insights into contemporary MBM SRS and thereby establish if linac-based SRS has matured to match the mainstay SRS delivery systems.

METHODS

The PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were interrogated which yielded 891 relevant articles that narrowed to 20 articles after removing duplicates and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary studies which reported the use of SRS for treatment of MBM SRS and reported the technical aspects including dosimetry were included. The review was limited to English language publications from January 2015 to August 2023. Only full-length papers were included in the final analysis. Opinion papers, commentary pieces, letters to the editor, abstracts, conference proceedings and editorials were excluded. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. The reporting of conformity indices (CI) and gradient indices, V12Gy, monitor units and the impact of translational and rotational shifts were extracted and analysed.

RESULTS

The single-isocentre technique for MBM dominated recent SRS studies and the most studied delivery platforms were Varian. The C-arm linac-based SRS plan quality and normal brain tissue sparing was comparable to GK and CK and in some cases better. The most used nominal beam energy was 6FFF, and optimised couch and collimator angles could reduce mean normal brain dose by 11.3%. Reduction in volume of the healthy brain receiving a certain dose was dependent on the number and size of the metastases and the relative geometric location. GK and CK required 4.5-8.4 times treatment time compared with linac-based SRS. Rotational shifts caused larger changes in CI in C-arm linac-based single-isocentre SRS.

CONCLUSION

C-arm linac-based SRS produced comparable MBM plan quality and the delivery is notably shorter compared to GK and CK SRS.

Treatment of patients with multiple brain metastases by isolated radiosurgery: Toxicity and survival

BACKGROUND

Radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases has been more reported recently without using whole-brain radiotherapy. Nevertheless, the sparsity of the data still claims more information about toxicity and survival and their association with both dosimetric and geometric aspects of this treatment.

AIM

To assess the toxicity and survival outcome of radiosurgery in patients with multiple (four or more lesions) brain metastases.

METHODS

In a single institution, data were collected retrospectively from patients who underwent radiosurgery to treat brain metastases from diverse primary sites. Patients with 4-21 brain metastases were treated with a single fraction with a dose of 18 Gy or 20 Gy. The clinical variables collected were relevant to toxicity, survival, treatment response, planning, and dosimetric variables. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Log-rank test were used according to the type of variable and outcomes.

RESULTS

From August 2017 to February 2020, 55 patients were evaluated. Headache was the most common complaint (38.2%). The median overall survival (OS) for patients with karnofsky performance status (KPS) > 70 was 8.9 mo, and this was 3.6 mo for those with KPS ≤ 70 (P = 0.047). Patients with treated lesions had a median progression-free survival of 7.6 mo. There were no differences in OS (19.7 vs 9.5 mo) or progression-free survival (10.6 vs 6.3 mo) based on prior irradiation. There was no correlation found between reported toxicities and planning, dosimetric, and geometric variables, implying that no additional significant toxicity risks appear to be added to the treatment of multiple (four or more) lesions.

CONCLUSION

No associations were found between the evaluated toxicities and the planning dosimetric parameters, and no differences in survival rates were detected based on previous treatment status.

Evaluation of the correlation between dosimetric, geometric, and technical parameters of radiosurgery planning for multiple brain metastases

Purpose

To evaluate the correlation between dosimetric, geometric, and technical parameters for radiosurgery planning of multiple brain metastasis treatments treated with a linear accelerator with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique.

Materials and methods

Data were collected retrospectively from 55 patients who underwent radiosurgery in a single institution from August 2017 to February 2020. Patients presented 4–21 brain metastases were treated with a single fraction with doses between 18 and 20 Gy. Dosimetric variables were collected including V5Gy, V8Gy, V10Gy, V12Gy, V14Gy, conformity index (CI), heterogeneity index (HI), maximum dose (Dmax), and the CI_R50. Geometric variables including the number of lesions, target volumes, the smallest target volume, the largest target volume, and the distance between the isocenter and the most distant lesion (DIL) and technical variables such as the numbers of total arcs, noncoplanar arcs, and isocenters were collected for analysis.

Results

The number of lesions had a moderate positive correlation with V5Gy, V8Gy, V10Gy, V12Gy, V14Gy, HI, Dmax, and with the number of total arcs. The target volumes had a positive medium–high correlation with V5Gy, V8Gy, V10Gy, V12Gy, V14Gy, and moderate positive correlation with HI, Dmax, number of arcs and noncoplanar arcs. The CI and CI_R50 had a negative correlation with all volumes related to the target: the target volumes, the smallest, and the largest lesion. A positive correlation was observed between the distance of the isocenter and the most DIL with V5Gy, V8Gy, V10Gy, V12Gy, V14Gy, HI, Dmax, and the number of isocenters.

Conclusion

It was found that the number of lesions and the target volumes are good predictors of dosimetric indexes of plan evaluation and that the distance between the isocenter and the most DIL harms them.