1
|
Don S, Moore QT, Hensley P. Commentary: Achieving ALARA in scoliosis examinations by using body measurements to set techniques and eliminating physical anti-scatter grids. Pediatr Radiol 2024; 54:154-156. [PMID: 38047922 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-023-05810-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Don
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Quentin T Moore
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. FDA, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Pam Hensley
- Radiologic Technology, St. Louis Community College Forest Park, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Al-Dasuqi K, Taylor E, Ehrlich L, Cooperman D, Socci A, Tuason D, Hoerner M, Staib L, Silva CT. Performance and reliability assessment of a lower dose, task-based scoliosis radiography protocol in pediatric patients. Pediatr Radiol 2024; 54:146-153. [PMID: 38010426 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-023-05812-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Follow-up scoliosis radiographs are performed to assess the degree of spinal curvature and skeletal maturity, which can be done at lower radiation exposures than those in standard-dose radiography. OBJECTIVE Describe and evaluate a protocol that reduced the radiation in follow-up frontal-view scoliosis radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS We implemented a postero-anterior lower dose modified-technique for scoliosis radiography with task-based definition of adequate image quality and use of technique charts based on target exposure index and patient's height and weight. We subsequently retrospectively evaluated 40 consecutive patients who underwent a follow-up radiograph using the modified-technique after an initial standard-technique radiograph. We evaluated comparisons of proportions for subjective assessment with chi-squared tests, and agreements of reader's scores with intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots. We determined incident air kerma, exposure index, deviation index/standard deviation, dose-area product (DAP), and effective dose for each radiograph. We set statistical significance at P<0.05. RESULTS Forty patients (65% female), aged 4-17 years. Median effective dose was reduced from 39 to 10 µSv (P<0.001), incident air kerma from 139 to 29 µSv (P<0.001), and DAP from 266 to 55 mGy*cm2 (P<0.001). All modified-technique parameters were rated with a mean score of acceptable or above. All modified-technique measurements obtained inter- and intra-observer correlation coefficient agreements of 0.86 ("Good") or greater. CONCLUSION Substantial dose reduction on follow-up scoliosis imaging with existing radiography units is achievable through task-based definition of adequate image quality and tailoring of radiation to each patient's height and weight, while still allowing for reliable assessment and reproducible measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid Al-Dasuqi
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
- Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erin Taylor
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
- Advanced Diagnostic Imaging, St. Vincent's Medical Center, Hartford Healthcare, Bridgeport, CT, USA
| | - Lauren Ehrlich
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Daniel Cooperman
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Adrienne Socci
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Dominick Tuason
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Matthew Hoerner
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Lawrence Staib
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale School of Engineering, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Yale School of Engineering, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Cicero T Silva
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
| |
Collapse
|