1
|
Patterson E, Powers M, Metcalfe PE, Cutajar D, Oborn BM, Baines JA. Electron streaming dose measurements and calculations on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14370. [PMID: 38661097 PMCID: PMC11244671 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the accuracy of different dosimeters and the treatment planning system (TPS) for assessing the skin dose due to the electron streaming effect (ESE) on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance (MR)-linac. METHOD Skin dose due to the ESE on an MR-linac (Unity, Elekta) was investigated using a solid water phantom rotated 45° in the x-y plane (IEC61217) and centered at the isocenter. The phantom was irradiated with 1 × 1, 3 × 3, 5 × 5, 10 × 10, and 22 × 22 cm2 fields, gantry at 90°. Out-of-field doses (OFDs) deposited by electron streams generated at the entry and exit surface of the angled phantom were measured on the surface of solid water slabs placed ±20.0 cm from the isocenter along the x-direction. A high-resolution MOSkin™ detector served as a benchmark due to its shallower depth of measurement that matches the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended depth for skin dose assessment (0.07 mm). MOSkin™ doses were compared to EBT3 film, OSLDs, a diamond detector, and the TPS where the experimental setup was modeled using two separate calculation parameters settings: a 0.1 cm dose grid with 0.2% statistical uncertainty (0.1 cm, 0.2%) and a 0.2 cm dose grid with 3.0% statistical uncertainty (0.2 cm, 3.0%). RESULTS OSLD, film, the 0.1 cm, 0.2%, and 0.2 cm, 3.0% TPS ESE doses, underestimated skin doses measured by the MOSkin™ by as much as -75.3%, -7.0%, -24.7%, and -41.9%, respectively. Film results were most similar to MOSkin™ skin dose measurements. CONCLUSIONS These results show that electron streams can deposit significant doses outside the primary field and that dosimeter choice and TPS calculation settings greatly influence the reported readings. Due to the steep dose gradient of the ESE, EBT3 film remains the choice for accurate skin dose assessment in this challenging environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Patterson
- Centre for Medical and Radiation PhysicsUniversity of WollongongWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Marcus Powers
- College of Science and EngineeringJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
- Townsville Cancer CentreTownsville Hospital and Health ServiceTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| | - Peter E. Metcalfe
- Centre for Medical and Radiation PhysicsUniversity of WollongongWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
- Illawarra Health Medical Research InstituteUniversity of WollongongWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Dean Cutajar
- Centre for Medical and Radiation PhysicsUniversity of WollongongWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Radiation OncologySt George Cancer Care CentreWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Bradley M. Oborn
- Centre for Medical and Radiation PhysicsUniversity of WollongongWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
- Institute of Radiooncology‐ OncoRayHelmholtz‐Zentrum Dresden‐Rossendorf, RadiooncologyDresdenGermany
- Illawarra Cancer Care CentreWollongong HospitalWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
| | - John A. Baines
- College of Science and EngineeringJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
- Townsville Cancer CentreTownsville Hospital and Health ServiceTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Patterson E, Stokes P, Cutajar D, Rosenfeld A, Baines J, Metcalfe P, Powers M. High-resolution entry and exit surface dosimetry in a 1.5 T MR-linac. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023; 46:787-800. [PMID: 36988905 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01251-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
The magnetic field of a transverse MR-linac alters electron trajectories as the photon beam transits through materials, causing lower doses at flat entry surfaces and increased doses at flat beam-exiting surfaces. This study investigated the response of a MOSFET detector, known as the MOSkin™, for high-resolution surface and near-surface percentage depth dose measurements on an Elekta Unity. Simulations with Geant4 and the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS), and EBT-3 film measurements, were also performed for comparison. Measured MOSkin™ entry surface doses, relative to Dmax, were (9.9 ± 0.2)%, (10.1 ± 0.3)%, (11.3 ± 0.6)%, (12.9 ± 1.0)%, and (13.4 ± 1.0)% for 1 × 1 cm2, 3 × 3 cm2, 5 × 5 cm2, 10 × 10 cm2, and 22 × 22 cm2 fields, respectively. For the investigated fields, the maximum percent differences of Geant4, TPS, and film doses extrapolated and interpolated to a depth suitable for skin dose assessment at the beam entry, relative to MOSkin™ measurements at an equivalent depth were 1.0%, 2.8%, and 14.3%, respectively, and at a WED of 199.67 mm at the beam exit, 3.2%, 3.7% and 5.7%, respectively. The largest measured increase in exit dose, due to the electron return effect, was 15.4% for the 10 × 10 cm2 field size using the MOSkin™ and 17.9% for the 22 × 22 cm2 field size, using Geant4 calculations. The results presented in the study validate the suitability of the MOSkin™ detector for transverse MR-linac surface dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Patterson
- Centre of Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
| | - P Stokes
- Townsville Cancer Centre, Townsville Hospital and Health Service, Townsville, QLD, Australia
| | - D Cutajar
- Centre of Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - A Rosenfeld
- Centre of Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
- Illawarra Health Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - J Baines
- Townsville Cancer Centre, Townsville Hospital and Health Service, Townsville, QLD, Australia
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia
| | - P Metcalfe
- Centre of Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
- Illawarra Health Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - M Powers
- Townsville Cancer Centre, Townsville Hospital and Health Service, Townsville, QLD, Australia
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|