Evaluation of a proprietary software application for motion monitoring during stereotactic paraspinal treatment

Deep learning-based target decomposition for markerless lung tumor tracking in radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

In radiotherapy, real-time tumor tracking can verify tumor position during beam delivery, guide the radiation beam to target the tumor, and reduce the chance of a geometric miss. Markerless kV x-ray image-based tumor tracking is challenging due to the low tumor visibility caused by tumor-obscuring structures. Developing a new method to enhance tumor visibility for real-time tumor tracking is essential.

PURPOSE

To introduce a novel method for markerless kV image-based tracking of lung tumors via deep learning-based target decomposition.

METHODS

We utilized a conditional Generative Adversarial Network (cGAN), known as Pix2Pix, to build a patient-specific model and generate the synthetic decomposed target image (sDTI) to enhance tumor visibility on the real-time kV projection images acquired by the onboard kV imager equipped on modern linear accelerators. We used 4DCT simulation images to generate the digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) and DTI image pairs for model training. We augmented the training dataset by randomly shifting the 4DCT in the superior-inferior, anterior-posterior, and left-right directions during the DRR and DTI generation process. We performed real-time 2D tumor tracking via template matching between the DTI generated from the CT simulation and the sDTI generated from the real-time kV projection images. We validated the proposed method using nine patients' datasets with implanted beacons near the tumor.

RESULTS

The sDTI can effectively improve the image contrast around the lung tumors on the kV projection images for the nine patients. With the beacon motion as ground truth, the tracking errors were on average 0.8 ± 0.7 mm in the superior-inferior (SI) direction and 0.9 ± 0.8 mm in the in-plane left-right (IPLR) direction. The percentage of successful tracking, defined as a tracking error less than 2 mm in the SI direction, is 92.2% on the 4312 tested images. The patient-specific model took approximately 12 h to train. During testing, it took approximately 35 ms to generate one sDTI, and 13 ms to perform the tumor tracking using template matching.

CONCLUSIONS

Our method offers the potential solution for nearly real-time markerless lung tumor tracking. It achieved a high level of accuracy and an impressive tracking rate. Further development of 3D lung tumor tracking is warranted.

Toward quantitative intrafractional monitoring in paraspinal SBRT using a proprietary software application: clinical implementation and patient results

Objective.We report on paraspinal motion and the clinical implementation of our proprietary software that leverages Varian's intrafraction motion review (IMR) capability for quantitative tracking of the spine during paraspinal SBRT. The work is based on our prior development and analysis on phantoms.Approach.To address complexities in patient anatomy, digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR's) that highlight only the spine or hardware were constructed as tracking reference. Moreover, a high-pass filter and first-pass coarse search were implemented to enhance registration accuracy and stability. For evaluation, 84 paraspinal SBRT patients with sites spanning across the entire vertebral column were enrolled with prescriptions ranging from 24 to 40 Gy in one to five fractions. Treatments were planned and delivered with 9 IMRT beams roughly equally distributed posteriorly. IMR was triggered every 200 or 500 MU for each beam. During treatment, the software grabbed the IMR image, registered it with the corresponding DRR, and displayed the motion result in near real-time on auto-pilot mode. Four independent experts completed offline manual registrations as ground truth for tracking accuracy evaluation.Main results.Our software detected ≥1.5 mm and ≥2 mm motions among 17.1% and 6.6% of 1371 patient images, respectively, in either lateral or longitudinal direction. In the validation set of 637 patient images, 91.9% of the tracking errors compared to manual registration fell within ±0.5 mm in either direction. Given a motion threshold of 2 mm, the software accomplished a 98.7% specificity and a 93.9% sensitivity in deciding whether to interrupt treatment for patient re-setup.Significance.Significant intrafractional motion exists in certain paraspinal SBRT patients, supporting the need for quantitative motion monitoring during treatment. Our improved software achieves high motion tracking accuracy clinically and provides reliable guidance for treatment intervention. It offers a practical solution to ensure accurate delivery of paraspinal SBRT on a conventional Linac platform.

Exploring the Use of Contour-Based Intrafraction Motion Review for Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Treatments

Purpose

Patient motion during radiation therapy treatment is a concern, especially for spine stereotactic body radiation therapy cases where the sharper dose gradient presents a toxicity threat to the spinal cord. Intrafraction motion review (IMR) is an application used to monitor patient position during treatment. The presence of spinal fixation hardware presents an opportunity for motion tracking to manually pause the beam.

Methods and Materials

A cohort of 17 clinicians were shown a video of the imaging console during a simulated treatment. Participants decided after each triggered image if they would pause the treatment beam, indicating that they believed the phantom to have moved outside of clinical tolerance. A spine phantom with hardware intact was positioned on a motion platform, which was programmed to make shifts ranging in size from 0.5 to 1.5 mm. A 1-mm isotropic expansion contour from the hardware was overlayed on the triggered planar x-ray images using the IMR application.

Results

User perception sensitivity did not exceed 0.5 until there was a physical shift of 1.4 mm, indicating that most users will not be able to reliably discriminate submillimeter shifts using contour-based shift identification.

Conclusions

If adaptations to standard of care are implemented clinically, the proposed method should be evaluated and the role of training and education should be examined before implementation. However, contour-based IMR could still provide beneficial information for larger intrafraction motion during treatment and could be valuable for identifying gross anatomic motion during treatment.

Markerless motion tracking with simultaneous MV and kV imaging in spine SBRT treatment-a feasibility study

Objective. Motion tracking with simultaneous MV-kV imaging has distinct advantages over single kV systems. This research is a feasibility study of utilizing this technique for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) through phantom and patient studies.Approach. A clinical spine SBRT plan was developed using 6xFFF beams and nine sliding-window IMRT fields. The plan was delivered to a chest phantom on a linear accelerator. Simultaneous MV-kV image pairs were acquired during beam delivery. KV images were triggered at predefined intervals, and synthetic MV images showing enlarged MLC apertures were created by combining multiple raw MV frames with corrections for scattering and intensity variation. Digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) templates were generated using high-resolution CBCT reconstructions (isotropic voxel size (0.243 mm)3) as the reference for 2D-2D matching. 3D shifts were calculated from triangulation of kV-to-DRR and MV-to-DRR registrations. To evaluate tracking accuracy, detected shifts were compared to known phantom shifts as introduced before treatment. The patient study included a T-spine patient and an L-spine patient. Patient datasets were retrospectively analyzed to demonstrate the performance in clinical settings.Main results. The treatment plan was delivered to the phantom in five scenarios: no shift, 2 mm shift in one of the longitudinal, lateral and vertical directions, and 2 mm shift in all the three directions. The calculated 3D shifts agreed well with the actual couch shifts, and overall, the uncertainty of 3D detection is estimated to be 0.3 mm. The patient study revealed that with clinical patient image quality, the calculated 3D motion agreed with the post-treatment cone beam CT. It is feasible to automate both kV-to-DRR and MV-to-DRR registrations using a mutual information-based method, and the difference from manual registration is generally less than 0.3 mm.Significance. The MV-kV imaging-based markerless motion tracking technique was validated through a feasibility study. It is a step forward toward effective motion tracking and accurate delivery for spinal SBRT.