1
|
Iramina H, Tsuneda M, Okamoto H, Kadoya N, Mukumoto N, Toyota M, Fukunaga J, Fujita Y, Tohyama N, Onishi H, Nakamura M. Multi-institutional questionnaire-based survey on online adaptive radiotherapy performed using commercial systems in Japan in 2023. Radiol Phys Technol 2024:10.1007/s12194-024-00828-4. [PMID: 39028438 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-024-00828-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Revised: 07/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to conduct a survey on the current clinical practice of, staffing for, commissioning of, and staff training for online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) in the institutions that installed commercial oART systems in Japan, and to share the information with institutions that will implement oART systems in future. A web-based questionnaire, containing 107 questions, was distributed to nine institutions in Japan. Data were collected from November to December 2023. Three institutions each with the MRIdian (ViewRay, Oakwood Village, OH, USA), Unity (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), and Ethos (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) systems completed the questionnaire. One institution (MRIdian) had not performed oART by the response deadline. Each institution had installed only one oART system. Hypofractionation, and moderate hypofractionation or conventional fractionation were employed in the MRIdian/Unity and Ethos systems, respectively. The elapsed time for the oART process was faster with the Ethos than with the other systems. All institutions added additional staff for oART. Commissioning periods differed among the oART systems owing to provision of beam data from the vendors. Chambers used during commissioning measurements differed among the institutions. Institutional training was provided by all nine institutions. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first survey about oART performed using commercial systems in Japan. We believe that this study will provide useful information to institutions that installed, are installing, or are planning to install oART systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiraku Iramina
- Adaptive Radiotherapy Working Group (ART-WG), QA/QC Committee, Japan Society of Medical Physics, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto-Shi, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Masato Tsuneda
- Adaptive Radiotherapy Working Group (ART-WG), QA/QC Committee, Japan Society of Medical Physics, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MR Linac ART Division, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba-Shi, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okamoto
- Adaptive Radiotherapy Working Group (ART-WG), QA/QC Committee, Japan Society of Medical Physics, Tokyo, Japan
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Kadoya
- Adaptive Radiotherapy Working Group (ART-WG), QA/QC Committee, Japan Society of Medical Physics, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-Ku, Sendai-Shi, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan
| | - Nobutaka Mukumoto
- Adaptive Radiotherapy Working Group (ART-WG), QA/QC Committee, Japan Society of Medical Physics, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3 Asahi-Machi, Abeno-Ku, Osaka-Shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Masahiko Toyota
- Adaptive Radiotherapy Working Group (ART-WG), QA/QC Committee, Japan Society of Medical Physics, Tokyo, Japan
- Division of Radiology, Department of Clinical Technology, Kagoshima University Hospital, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima-Shi, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan
| | - Junichi Fukunaga
- Adaptive Radiotherapy Working Group (ART-WG), QA/QC Committee, Japan Society of Medical Physics, Tokyo, Japan
- Division of Radiology, Department of Medical Technology, Kyushu University Hospital, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka-Shi, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Yukio Fujita
- Adaptive Radiotherapy Working Group (ART-WG), QA/QC Committee, Japan Society of Medical Physics, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MR Linac ART Division, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba-Shi, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Komazawa University, 1-23-1 Komazawa, Setagaya-Ku, Tokyo, 154-8525, Japan
| | - Naoki Tohyama
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Komazawa University, 1-23-1 Komazawa, Setagaya-Ku, Tokyo, 154-8525, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Onishi
- Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo-Shi, Yamanashi, 409-3898, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Nakamura
- Adaptive Radiotherapy Working Group (ART-WG), QA/QC Committee, Japan Society of Medical Physics, Tokyo, Japan.
- Department of Advanced Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 53 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto-Shi, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wegener S, Weick S, Schindhelm R, Tamihardja J, Sauer OA, Razinskas G. Feasibility of Ethos adaptive treatments of lung tumors and associated quality assurance. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14311. [PMID: 38386919 PMCID: PMC11244680 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
MOTIVATION Online adaptive radiotherapy with Ethos is based on the anatomy determined from daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Dose optimization and computation are performed on the density map of a synthetic CT (sCT), a deformable registration of the initial planning CT (pCT) onto the current CBCT. Large density changes as present in the lung region are challenging the system. METHODS Treatment plans for Ethos were created and delivered for 1, 2, and 3 cm diameter lung lesions in an anthropomorphic phantom, combining different insets in the pCT and during adaptive and non-adaptive treatment sessions. Primary and secondary dose calculations as well as back-projected dose from portal images were evaluated. RESULTS Density changes due to changed insets were not considered in the sCTs. This resulted in errors in the dose; for example, -15.9% of the mean dose for a plan when changing from a 3 cm inset in the pCT to 1 cm at the time of treatment. Secondary dose calculation is based on the sCT and could therefore not reveal these dose errors. However, dose calculation on the CBCT, either as a recalculation in the treatment planning system or as pre-treatment quality assurance (QA) before the treatment, indicated the differences. EPID in-vivo QA also reported discrepancies between calculated and delivered dose distributions. CONCLUSIONS An incorrect density distribution in the sCT has an impact on the dose calculation accuracy in the adaptive treatment workflow with the Ethos system. Additional quality checks of the sCT can detect such errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Wegener
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation OncologyUniversity of WurzburgWurzburgGermany
| | - Stefan Weick
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation OncologyUniversity of WurzburgWurzburgGermany
| | - Robert Schindhelm
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation OncologyUniversity of WurzburgWurzburgGermany
| | - Jörg Tamihardja
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation OncologyUniversity of WurzburgWurzburgGermany
| | - Otto A. Sauer
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation OncologyUniversity of WurzburgWurzburgGermany
| | - Gary Razinskas
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation OncologyUniversity of WurzburgWurzburgGermany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pogue JA, Harms J, Cardenas CE, Ray X, Viscariello N, Popple RA, Stanley DN, Boggs DH. Unlocking the adaptive advantage: correlation and machine learning classification to identify optimal online adaptive stereotactic partial breast candidates. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:115050. [PMID: 38729212 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4a1c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Online adaptive radiotherapy (OART) is a promising technique for delivering stereotactic accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), as lumpectomy cavities vary in location and size between simulation and treatment. However, OART is resource-intensive, increasing planning and treatment times and decreasing machine throughput compared to the standard of care (SOC). Thus, it is pertinent to identify high-yield OART candidates to best allocate resources.Approach.Reference plans (plans based on simulation anatomy), SOC plans (reference plans recalculated onto daily anatomy), and daily adaptive plans were analyzed for 31 sequential APBI targets, resulting in the analysis of 333 treatment plans. Spearman correlations between 22 reference plan metrics and 10 adaptive benefits, defined as the difference between mean SOC and delivered metrics, were analyzed to select a univariate predictor of OART benefit. A multivariate logistic regression model was then trained to stratify high- and low-benefit candidates.Main results.Adaptively delivered plans showed dosimetric benefit as compared to SOC plans for most plan metrics, although the degree of adaptive benefit varied per patient. The univariate model showed high likelihood for dosimetric adaptive benefit when the reference plan ipsilateral breast V15Gy exceeds 23.5%. Recursive feature elimination identified 5 metrics that predict high-dosimetric-benefit adaptive patients. Using leave-one-out cross validation, the univariate and multivariate models classified targets with 74.2% and 83.9% accuracy, resulting in improvement in per-fraction adaptive benefit between targets identified as high- and low-yield for 7/10 and 8/10 plan metrics, respectively.Significance.This retrospective, exploratory study demonstrated that dosimetric benefit can be predicted using only ipsilateral breast V15Gy on the reference treatment plan, allowing for a simple, interpretable model. Using multivariate logistic regression for adaptive benefit prediction led to increased accuracy at the cost of a more complicated model. This work presents a methodology for clinics wishing to triage OART resource allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel A Pogue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Joseph Harms
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Carlos E Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Xenia Ray
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States of America
| | - Natalie Viscariello
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Richard A Popple
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Dennis N Stanley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - D Hunter Boggs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bassiri N, Bayouth J, Chuong MD, Kotecha R, Weiss Y, Mehta MP, Gutierrez AN, Mittauer KE. Quality assurance of an established online adaptive radiotherapy program: patch and software upgrade. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1358487. [PMID: 38863634 PMCID: PMC11165228 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1358487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The ability to dynamically adjust target contours, derived Boolean structures, and ultimately, the optimized fluence is the end goal of online adaptive radiotherapy (ART). The purpose of this work is to describe the necessary tests to perform after a software patch installation and/or upgrade for an established online ART program. Methods A patch upgrade on a low-field MR Linac system was evaluated for post-software upgrade quality assurance (QA) with current infrastructure of ART workflow on (1) the treatment planning system (TPS) during the initial planning stage and (2) the treatment delivery system (TDS), which is a TPS integrated into the delivery console for online ART planning. Online ART QA procedures recommended for post-software upgrade include: (1) user interface (UI) configuration; (2) TPS beam model consistency; (3) segmentation consistency; (4) dose calculation consistency; (5) optimizer robustness consistency; (6) CT density table consistency; and (7) end-to-end absolute ART dose and predicted dose measured including interruption testing. Differences of calculated doses were evaluated through DVH and/or 3D gamma comparisons. The measured dose was assessed using an MR-compatible A26 ionization chamber in a motion phantom. Segmentation differences were assessed through absolute volume and visual inspection. Results (1) No UI configuration discrepancies were observed. (2) Dose differences on TPS pre-/post-software upgrade were within 1% for DVH metrics. (3) Differences in segmentation when observed were small in general, with the largest change noted for small-volume regions of interest (ROIs) due to partial volume impact. (4) Agreement between TPS and TDS calculated doses was 99.9% using a 2%/2-mm gamma criteria. (5) Comparison between TPS and online ART plans for a given patient plan showed agreement within 2% for targets and 0.6 cc for organs at risk. (6) Relative electron densities demonstrated comparable agreement between TPS and TDS. (7) ART absolute and predicted measured end-to-end doses were within 1% of calculated TDS. Discussion An online ART QA program for post-software upgrade has been developed and implemented on an MR Linac system. Testing mechanics and their respective baselines may vary across institutions, but all necessary components for a post-software upgrade QA have been outlined and detailed. These outlined tests were demonstrated feasible for a low-field MR Linac system; however, the scope of this work may be applied and adapted more broadly to other online ART platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nema Bassiri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, United States
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States
| | - John Bayouth
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Michael D. Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, United States
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, United States
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Yonatan Weiss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, United States
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Minesh P. Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, United States
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Alonso N. Gutierrez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, United States
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Kathryn E. Mittauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, United States
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang YF, Price MJ, Elliston CD, Munbodh R, Spina CS, Horowitz DP, Kachnic LA. Enhancing Safety in AI-Driven Cone Beam CT-based Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy: Development and Implementation of an Interdisciplinary Workflow. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101399. [PMID: 38292890 PMCID: PMC10823112 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The emerging online adaptive radiation therapy (OART) treatment strategy based on cone beam computed tomography allows for real-time replanning according to a patient's current anatomy. However, implementing this procedure requires a new approach across the patient's care path and monitoring of the "black box" adaptation process. This study identifies high-risk failure modes (FMs) associated with AI-driven OART and proposes an interdisciplinary workflow to mitigate potential medical errors from highly automated processes, enhance treatment efficiency, and reduce the burden on clinicians. Methods and Materials An interdisciplinary working group was formed to identify safety concerns in each process step using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). Based on the FMEA results, the team designed standardized procedures and safety checklists to prevent errors and ensure successful task completion. The Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) for the top twenty FMs were calculated before and after implementing the proposed workflow to evaluate its effectiveness. Three hundred seventy-four adaptive sessions across 5 treatment sites were performed, and each session was evaluated for treatment safety and FMEA assessment. Results The OART workflow has 4 components, each with 4, 8, 13, and 4 sequentially executed tasks and safety checklists. Site-specific template preparation, which includes disease-specific physician directives and Intelligent Optimization Engine template testing, is one of the new procedures introduced. The interdisciplinary workflow significantly reduced the RPNs of the high-risk FMs, with an average decrease of 110 (maximum reduction of 305.5 and minimum reduction of 27.4). Conclusions This study underscores the importance of addressing high-risk FMs associated with AI-driven OART and emphasizes the significance of safety measures in its implementation. By proposing a structured interdisciplinary workflow and integrated checklists, the study provides valuable insights into ensuring the safe and efficient delivery of OART while facilitating its effective integration into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Fang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center
| | - Michael J. Price
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center
| | - Carl D. Elliston
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center
| | - Reshma Munbodh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center
| | - Catherine S. Spina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center
| | - David P. Horowitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center
| | - Lisa A. Kachnic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pogue JA, Cardenas CE, Stanley DN, Stanley C, Hotsinpiller W, Veale C, Soike MH, Popple RA, Boggs DH, Harms J. Improved Dosimetry and Plan Quality for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy: A Single Institutional Study. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101414. [PMID: 38292886 PMCID: PMC10823088 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an attractive treatment modality for eligible patients as it has been shown to result in similar local control and improved cosmetic outcomes compared with whole breast radiation therapy. The use of online adaptive radiation therapy (OART) for APBI is promising as it allows for a reduction of planning target volume margins because breast motion and lumpectomy cavity volume changes are accounted for in daily imaging. Here we present a retrospective, single-institution evaluation on the adequacy of kV-cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) OART for APBI treatments. Methods and Materials Nineteen patients (21 treatment sites) were treated to 30 Gy in 5 fractions between January of 2022 and May of 2023. Time between simulation and treatment, change in gross tumor (ie, lumpectomy cavity) volume, and differences in dose volume histogram metrics with adaption were analyzed. The Wilcoxon paired, nonparametric test was used to test for dose volume histogram metric differences between the scheduled plans (initial plans recalculated on daily CBCT anatomy) and delivered plans, either the scheduled or adapted plan, which was reoptimized using daily anatomy. Results Median (interquartile range) time from simulation to first treatment was 26 days (21-32 days). During this same time, median gross tumor volume reduction was 16.0% (7.3%-23.9%) relative to simulation volume. Adaptive treatments took 31.3 minutes (27.4-36.6 minutes) from start of CBCT to treatment session end. At treatment, the adaptive plan was selected for 86% (89/103) of evaluable fractions. In evaluating plan quality, 78% of delivered plans met all target, organs at risk, and conformity metrics evaluated, compared with 34% of scheduled plans. Conclusions Use of OART for stereotactic linac-based APBI allowed for safe, high-quality treatments in this cohort of 21 treatment courses. Although treatment delivery times were longer than traditional stereotactic body treatments, there were notable improvements in plan quality for APBI using OART.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel A. Pogue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Carlos E. Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Dennis N. Stanley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Courtney Stanley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Whitney Hotsinpiller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Christopher Veale
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Michael H. Soike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Richard A. Popple
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Drexell H. Boggs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Joseph Harms
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Elmpt W, Trier Taasti V, Redalen KR. Current and future developments of synthetic computed tomography generation for radiotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 28:100521. [PMID: 38058591 PMCID: PMC10696097 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter van Elmpt
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Vicki Trier Taasti
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lemus OMD, Tanny S, Cummings M, Webster M, Wancura J, Jung H, Zhou Y, Yoon J, Pacella M, Zheng D. Influence of air mapping errors on the dosimetric accuracy of prostate CBCT-guided online adaptive radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14057. [PMID: 37276082 PMCID: PMC10562036 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE CBCT-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) plans presently utilize daily synthetic CTs (sCT) that are automatically generated using deformable registration algorithms. These algorithms may have poor performance at reproducing variable volumes of gas present during treatment. Therefore, we have analyzed the air mapping error between the daily CBCTs and the corresponding sCT and explored its dosimetric effect on oART plan calculation. METHODS Abdominopelvic air volume was contoured on both the daily CBCT images and the corresponding synthetic images for 207 online adaptive pelvic treatments. Air mapping errors were tracked over all fractions. For two case studies representing worst case scenarios, dosimetric effects of air mapping errors were corrected in the sCT images using the daily CBCT air contours, then recalculating dose. Dose volume histogram statistics and 3D gamma passing rates were used to compare the original and air-corrected sCT-based dose calculations. RESULTS All analyzed patients showed observable air pocket contour differences between the sCT and the CBCT images. The largest air volume difference observed in daily CBCT images for a given patient was 276.3 cc, a difference of more than 386% compared to the sCT. For the two case studies, the largest observed change in DVH metrics was a 2.6% reduction in minimum PTV dose, with all other metrics varying by less than 1.5%. 3D gamma passing rates using 1%/1 mm criteria were above 90% when comparing the uncorrected and corrected dose distributions. CONCLUSION Current CBCT-based oART workflow can lead to inaccuracies in the mapping of abdominopelvic air pockets from daily CBCT to the sCT images used for the optimization and calculation of the adaptive plan. Despite the large observed mapping errors, the dosimetric effects of such differences on the accuracy of the adapted plan dose calculation are unlikely to cause differences greater than 3% for prostate treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga M. Dona Lemus
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Sean Tanny
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Michael Cummings
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Matthew Webster
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Joshua Wancura
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Hyunuk Jung
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Yuwei Zhou
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Jihyung Yoon
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Matthew Pacella
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Dandan Zheng
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liu H, Schaal D, Curry H, Clark R, Magliari A, Kupelian P, Khuntia D, Beriwal S. Review of cone beam computed tomography based online adaptive radiotherapy: current trend and future direction. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:144. [PMID: 37660057 PMCID: PMC10475190 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02340-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) was introduced in the late 1990s to improve the accuracy and efficiency of therapy and minimize radiation-induced toxicities. ART combines multiple tools for imaging, assessing the need for adaptation, treatment planning, quality assurance, and has been utilized to monitor inter- or intra-fraction anatomical variations of the target and organs-at-risk (OARs). Ethos™ (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) based radiotherapy treatment system that uses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to perform ART, was introduced in 2020. Since then, numerous studies have been done to examine the potential benefits of Ethos™ CBCT-guided ART compared to non-adaptive radiotherapy. This review will explore the current trends of Ethos™, including improved CBCT image quality, a feasible clinical workflow, daily automated contouring and treatment planning, and motion management. Nevertheless, evidence of clinical improvements with the use of Ethos™ are limited and is currently under investigation via clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hefei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
- Varian Medical Systems Inc, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Ryan Clark
- Varian Medical Systems Inc, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Sushil Beriwal
- Varian Medical Systems Inc, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
- Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wegener S, Schindhelm R, Tamihardja J, Sauer OA, Razinskas G. Evaluation of the Ethos synthetic computed tomography for bolus-covered surfaces. Phys Med 2023; 113:102662. [PMID: 37572393 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Ethos allows online adaption of radiotherapy treatment plans. Dose is calculated on synthetic computed tomographies (sCT), CT-like images generated by deforming planning CTs (pCT) onto daily cone beam CTs (CBCT) acquired during treatment sessions. Errors in sCT density distribution may lead to dose calculation errors. sCT correctness was investigated for bolus-covered surfaces. METHODS pCTs were recorded of a slab phantom covered with bolus of different thicknesses and with air gaps introduced by spacer rings of variable diameters and heights. Treatment plans were irradiated following the adaptive workflow with different bolus configurations present in the pCT and CBCT. sCT densities were compared to those of the pCT for the same air gap size. Additionally, the neck region of an anthropomorphic phantom was imaged using a plane standard bolus versus an individual bolus adapted to the phantom's outer contour. RESULTS Varying bolus thickness by 5 mm between pCT and CBCT was reproduced in the sCT within 2 mm accuracy. Different air gaps in pCT and CBCT resulted in highly variable bolus thickness in the sCT with a typical error of 5 mm or more. In extreme cases, air gaps were filled with bolus material density in the sCT or the phantom was unrealistically deformed near changed bolus geometries. Changes in bolus thickness and deformation also occurred in the anthropomorphic phantom. CONCLUSION sCTs must be critically examined and included in plan-specific quality assurance. The use of tight-fitting air gap-free bolus should be preferred to increase the similarity between sCT and CBCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Wegener
- University Hospital Wurzburg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany.
| | - Robert Schindhelm
- University Hospital Wurzburg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Tamihardja
- University Hospital Wurzburg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Otto A Sauer
- University Hospital Wurzburg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Gary Razinskas
- University Hospital Wurzburg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|