Do we need patient-specific QA for adaptively generated plans? Retrospective evaluation of delivered online adaptive treatment plans on Varian Ethos

Clinical implementation of RTT-only CBCT-guided online adaptive focal radiotherapy for bladder cancer

Purpose

The study assesses the clinical implementation of radiation therapist (RTT)-only Conebeam CT (CBCT)-guided online adaptive focal radiotherapy (oART) for bladder cancer, by describing the training program, analyzing the workflow and monitoring patient experience.

Materials and methods

Bladder cancer patients underwent treatment (20 sessions) on a ring-based linac (Ethos, Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company, USA). Commencing April 2021, 14 patients were treated by RTTs supervised by the Radiation Oncologist (RO) and Medical Physics Expert (MPE) in a multidisciplinary workflow. From March 2022, 14 patients were treated solely by RTTs. RTT training included target delineation lessons and practicing oART in a simulation environment. We analyzed the efficiency of the RTT-only workflow regarding session time, adjustments by RTTs, attendance of the RO and MPE at the linac, and qualitative assessment of gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation. Patient experience was monitored through questionnaires.

Results

A training program resulted in a skilled team of RTTs, ROs and MPEs.The RTT-only workflow demonstrated shorter session times compared to the multidisciplinary approach. Among 14 patients treated using the RTT-only workflow, RTTs adjusted 99% of bladder volumes and 44% of GTV. 79% of the sessions proceeded without MPEs and ROs. All GTV delineations were RO-approved, thus considered clinically acceptable, and 87% required minor or no adjustments. Patient satisfaction was reported in 18 of 21 cases.

Conclusions

The RTT-only oART workflow for bladder cancer, complemented by a training program and on-call support from ROs and MPEs, demonstrated success. Patient experience is positive. It is currently introduced as standard in our clinic.

Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Based Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy of Esophageal Cancer: First Clinical Experience and Dosimetric Benefits

Purpose

Radiation therapy (RT) plays a key role in the management of esophageal cancer (EC). However, toxicities caused by proximity of organs at risk (OAR) and daily target coverage caused by interfractional anatomic changes are of concern. Daily online adaptive RT (oART) addresses these concerns and has the potential to increase OAR sparing and improve target coverage. We present the first clinical experience and dosimetric investigations of cone beam CT-based oART in EC using the ETHOS platform.

Methods and Materials

Treatment fractions of the first 10 EC patients undergoing cone beam CT-based oART at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. The prescription dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. The same clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) margins as for nonadaptive treatments were used. For all sessions, the timestamp of each oART workflow step, PTV size, target volume doses, mean heart dose, and lung V20Gy of both the scheduled and the adapted treatment plan were analyzed.

Results

Following automatic propagation, the CTV was adapted by the physician in 164 (59%) fractions. The adapted treatment plan was selected in 276 (99%) sessions. The median time needed for an oART session was 28 minutes (range, 14.8-43.3). Compared to the scheduled plans, a significant relative reduction of 9.5% in mean heart dose (absolute, 1.6 Gy; P = .006) and 16.9% reduction in mean lung V20Gy (absolute, 2.3%; P < .001) was achieved with the adapted treatment plans. Simultaneously, we observed a significant relative improvement in D99%PTV and D99%CTV by 15.3% (P < .001) and 5.0% (P = .008), respectively, along with a significant increase in D95%PTV by 5.1% (P = .003).

Conclusions

Although being resource-intensive, oART for EC is feasible in a reasonable timeframe and results in increased OAR sparing and improved target coverage, even without a reduction of margins. Further studies are planned to evaluate the potential clinical benefits.

Experience with patient-specific quality assurance of dosimetrist-led online adaptive prostate SBRT

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to assess the results of the local pre-treatment verifications of online adaptive prostate SBRT plans performed by dosimetrists METHODS AND MATERIALS: Prostate SBRT treatments are planned in our department using an online adaptive method developed and validated by our group. The adaptive plans were computed on the daily CBCT scan using the Acuros XB v. 16.1 algorithm of the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system. Adaptive plans consisted of a single VMAT with 6 MV flattening-filter-free (FFF) energy performed on a Varian TrueBeam linac. Pre-treatment verification of the adaptive "plan-of-the-day" (POD) created in each treatment session was performed using the Mobius 3D v. 3.1 secondary dose calculation program (M3D). Commissioning of M3D included the tuning of the dosimetric leaf gap correction (DLGc) parameter. Generic and specific DLGc values were then derived using a set of plans for typical sites (prostate, head and neck, brain, lung and bone palliative) and another set were determined for specific online SBRT PODs (gDLGc and sDLGc, respectively). The first 50 prostate patients treated with the PACE-B schedule (5 × 7.25 Gy) were included, i.e., 250 adaptive SBRT PODs were collected in this study. For each online adaptive POD, a global 3D gamma comparison between the Eclipse 3D dose and the M3D dose in the patient CBCT was performed. Gamma passing rates (GPRs) for the whole external patient contour (Body) and the PTV were recorded, using the 5 % global /3 mm criteria. The target mean dose and target coverage differences between the Eclipse and M3D doses were also analyzed (ΔDmean and ΔD90 %, respectively). The accuracy of M3D was assessed against PRIMO Monte Carlo software. Twenty-five online prostate SBRT PODs were randomly selected from the set of 250 adaptive plans and simulated with PRIMO.

RESULTS

Values of -1 mm and -0.14 mm were found as optimal gDLGc and sDLGc, respectively. Over the 250 online adaptive PODs, excellent GPR values ∼ 100 % were obtained for the Body and PTV structures, regardless the type of DLGc used. The use of the sDLGc instead of the gDLGc provided better results for ΔDmean (0.1 % ± 0.5% vs. -1.9 ± 0.7 %) and ΔD90 % (-1.0 % ± 0.5 %. vs. -3.5 % ± 0.8 %). This issue was also observed when M3D calculations were compared to PRIMO simulations.

CONCLUSIONS

M3D can be effectively used for independent pre-treatment verifications of online adaptive prostate SBRT plans. The use of a specific DLGc value is advised for this SBRT online adaptive technique.

Validation of MLC leaf open time calculation methods for PSQA in adaptive radiotherapy with tomotherapy units

BACKGROUND

Treatment delivery safety and accuracy are essential to control the disease and protect healthy tissues in radiation therapy. For usual treatment, a phantom-based patient specific quality assurance (PSQA) is performed to verify the delivery prior to the treatment. The emergence of adaptive radiation therapy (ART) adds new complexities to PSQA. In fact, organ at risks and target volume re-contouring as well as plan re-optimization and treatment delivery are performed with the patient immobilized on the treatment couch, making phantom-based pretreatment PSQA impractical. In this case, phantomless PSQA tools based on multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf open times (LOTs) verifications provide alternative approaches for the Radixact® treatment units. However, their validity is compromised by the lack of independent and reliable methods for calculating the LOT performed by the MLC during deliveries.

PURPOSE

To provide independent and reliable methods of LOT calculation for the Radixact® treatment units.

METHODS

Two methods for calculating the LOTs performed by the MLC during deliveries have been implemented. The first method uses the signal recorded by the build-in detector and the second method uses the signal recorded by optical sensors mounted on the MLC. To calibrate the methods to the ground truth, in-phantom ionization chamber LOT measurements have been conducted on a Radixact® treatment unit. The methods were validated by comparing LOT calculations with in-phantom ionization chamber LOT measurements performed on two Radixact® treatment units.

RESULTS

The study shows a good agreement between the two LOT calculation methods and the in-phantom ionization chamber measurements. There are no notable differences between the two methods and the same results were observed on the different treatment units.

CONCLUSIONS

The two implemented methods have the potential to be part of a PSQA solution for ART in tomotherapy.

Multi-institutional questionnaire-based survey on online adaptive radiotherapy performed using commercial systems in Japan in 2023

In this study, we aimed to conduct a survey on the current clinical practice of, staffing for, commissioning of, and staff training for online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) in the institutions that installed commercial oART systems in Japan, and to share the information with institutions that will implement oART systems in future. A web-based questionnaire, containing 107 questions, was distributed to nine institutions in Japan. Data were collected from November to December 2023. Three institutions each with the MRIdian (ViewRay, Oakwood Village, OH, USA), Unity (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), and Ethos (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) systems completed the questionnaire. One institution (MRIdian) had not performed oART by the response deadline. Each institution had installed only one oART system. Hypofractionation, and moderate hypofractionation or conventional fractionation were employed in the MRIdian/Unity and Ethos systems, respectively. The elapsed time for the oART process was faster with the Ethos than with the other systems. All institutions added additional staff for oART. Commissioning periods differed among the oART systems owing to provision of beam data from the vendors. Chambers used during commissioning measurements differed among the institutions. Institutional training was provided by all nine institutions. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first survey about oART performed using commercial systems in Japan. We believe that this study will provide useful information to institutions that installed, are installing, or are planning to install oART systems.

MU variability in CBCT-guided online adaptive radiation therapy

PURPOSE

CBCT-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy (oART) systems have been made possible by using artificial intelligence and automation to substantially reduce treatment planning time during on-couch adaptive sessions. Evaluating plans generated during an adaptive session presents significant challenges to the clinical team as the planning process gets compressed into a shorter window than offline planning. We identified MU variations up to 30% difference between the adaptive plan and the reference plan in several oART sessions that caused the clinical team to question the accuracy of the oART dose calculation. We investigated the cause of MU variation and the overall accuracy of the dose delivered when MU variations appear unnecessarily large.

METHODS

Dosimetric and adaptive plan data from 604 adaptive sessions of 19 patients undergoing CBCT-guided oART were collected. The analysis included total MU per fraction, planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) volumes, changes in PTV-OAR overlap, and DVH curves. Sessions with MU greater than two standard deviations from the mean were reoptimized offline, verified by an independent calculation system, and measured using a detector array.

RESULTS

MU variations relative to the reference plan were normally distributed with a mean of -1.0% and a standard deviation of 11.0%. No significant correlation was found between MU variation and anatomic changes. Offline reoptimization did not reliably reproduce either reference or on-couch total MUs, suggesting that stochastic effects within the oART optimizer are likely causing the variations. Independent dose calculation and detector array measurements resulted in acceptable agreement with the planned dose.

CONCLUSIONS

MU variations observed between oART plans were not caused by any errors within the oART workflow. Providers should refrain from using MU variability as a way to express their confidence in the treatment planning accuracy. Clinical decisions during on-couch adaptive sessions should rely on validated secondary dose calculations to ensure optimal plan selection.

Adaptive Salvage Radiation Therapy for Stage IIIB Prostate Adenocarcinoma Status Post-prostatectomy

The prostate and post-prostatectomy surgical bed can shift in anatomical position due to changes in the bladder and rectum size. This mobility of the prostate and prostatic bed, along with that of the bladder and rectum, poses a challenge in devising a single radiation therapy plan capable of delivering the desired dose to each organ across all treatment fractions. Adaptive radiation therapy (ART) represents a significant advancement in cancer treatment. The EthosTM ART system (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) streamlines the adaptive therapy workflow, enabling the efficient creation of superior radiation treatment plans based on anatomical orientation at the time of treatment. This case report aims to discuss how the online ART workflow was utilized in a 72-year-old male with recurrent prostate cancer post-prostatectomy. Our results demonstrated the advantage of having the flexibility to choose between scheduled and adapted plans based on daily images, providing improved radiotherapy plan quality for prostate cancer treatment post-prostatectomy.

Feasibility of simulation free abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy using an expedited pre-plan workflow

Background and Purpose

Improved hounsfield-unit accuracy of on-board imaging may lead to direct-to-unit treatment approaches We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of using only a diagnostic (dx) computed tomography (CT)-defined target pre-plan in an in silico study of simulation-free abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (ART).

Materials and Methods

Eight patients with abdominal treatment sites (five pancreatic cancer, three oligometastases) were treated using an integrated adaptive O-Ring gantry system. Each patient's target was delineated on a dxCT. The target only pre-plan served primarily to seed the ART process. During the ART session, all structures were delineated. All simulated cases were treated to 50 Gy in 5 fractions to a planning target optimization structure (PTV_OPT) to allow for dose escalation within the planning target volume. Timing of steps during this workflow was recorded. Plan quality was compared between ART treatment plans and a plan created on a CT simulation scan using the traditional planning workflow.

Results

The workflow was feasible in all attempts, with organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints met in all fractions despite lack of initial OAR contours. Median absolute difference between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan for the PTV_Opt V95% was 2.0 %. Median absolute difference in the D0.5 cm3 between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan was -0.9 Gy for stomach, 1.2 Gy for duodenum, -5.3 Gy for small bowel, and 0.3 Gy for large bowel. Median end-to-end workflow time was 63 min.

Conclusion

The workflow was feasible for a dxCT-defined target-only pre-plan approach to stereotactic abdominal ART.

Unlocking the adaptive advantage: correlation and machine learning classification to identify optimal online adaptive stereotactic partial breast candidates

Objective.Online adaptive radiotherapy (OART) is a promising technique for delivering stereotactic accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), as lumpectomy cavities vary in location and size between simulation and treatment. However, OART is resource-intensive, increasing planning and treatment times and decreasing machine throughput compared to the standard of care (SOC). Thus, it is pertinent to identify high-yield OART candidates to best allocate resources.Approach.Reference plans (plans based on simulation anatomy), SOC plans (reference plans recalculated onto daily anatomy), and daily adaptive plans were analyzed for 31 sequential APBI targets, resulting in the analysis of 333 treatment plans. Spearman correlations between 22 reference plan metrics and 10 adaptive benefits, defined as the difference between mean SOC and delivered metrics, were analyzed to select a univariate predictor of OART benefit. A multivariate logistic regression model was then trained to stratify high- and low-benefit candidates.Main results.Adaptively delivered plans showed dosimetric benefit as compared to SOC plans for most plan metrics, although the degree of adaptive benefit varied per patient. The univariate model showed high likelihood for dosimetric adaptive benefit when the reference plan ipsilateral breast V15Gy exceeds 23.5%. Recursive feature elimination identified 5 metrics that predict high-dosimetric-benefit adaptive patients. Using leave-one-out cross validation, the univariate and multivariate models classified targets with 74.2% and 83.9% accuracy, resulting in improvement in per-fraction adaptive benefit between targets identified as high- and low-yield for 7/10 and 8/10 plan metrics, respectively.Significance.This retrospective, exploratory study demonstrated that dosimetric benefit can be predicted using only ipsilateral breast V15Gy on the reference treatment plan, allowing for a simple, interpretable model. Using multivariate logistic regression for adaptive benefit prediction led to increased accuracy at the cost of a more complicated model. This work presents a methodology for clinics wishing to triage OART resource allocation.

Investigating the Dosimetric Leaf Gap Correction Factor of Mobius3D Dose Calculation for Volumetric-modulated Arc Radiotherapy Plans

Aims

The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) is a parameter for correcting radiation transmission through the round leaf end of multileaf collimators. The purpose of this study was to determine and investigate the optimal DLG correction factor for 6 MV volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) plan dose calculations in Mobius3D.

Materials and Methods

Seventeen VMAT plans were selected for the DLG correction factor optimization process. The optimal DLG correction factor was defined as the minimum difference between the measured dose and the Mobius3D-calculated dose on the Mobius Verification Phantom™ with different DLG correction factors. Subsequently, the optimal DLG correction factor was applied for Mobius3D dose calculation, and accuracy was assessed by comparing the measured and calculated doses. For verification and validation, the 17 previous plans and 10 newly selected plans underwent Mobius3D calculations with the optimal DLG correction factor, and gamma analysis was performed to compare them to the treatment planning system (TPS). Gamma analysis was also performed between the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and the TPS for cross-comparison between systems.

Results

The DLG correction factor was optimized to -1.252, which reduced the average percentage differences between measured and Mobius3D-calculated doses from 2.23% ±1.21% to 0.03% ±1.82%. The cross-comparison between Mobius3D/TPS and EPID/TPS revealed a similar trend in gamma passing rate (>95%) in both the verification and validation plans.

Conclusion

The DLG correction factor strongly influences the accuracy of Mobius3D-calculated doses. Applying the optimal DLG correction factor can increase dose agreement and gamma passing rate between calculation and delivered doses of VMAT plans, which emphasizes the importance of optimizing this factor during the commissioning process.

Clinical Workflow of Cone Beam Computer Tomography-Based Daily Online Adaptive Radiotherapy with Offline Magnetic Resonance Guidance: The Modular Adaptive Radiotherapy System (MARS)

PURPOSE

The Ethos (Varian Medical Systems) radiotherapy device combines semi-automated anatomy detection and plan generation for cone beam computer tomography (CBCT)-based daily online adaptive radiotherapy (oART). However, CBCT offers less soft tissue contrast than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This work aims to present the clinical workflow of CBCT-based oART with shuttle-based offline MR guidance.

METHODS

From February to November 2023, 31 patients underwent radiotherapy on the Ethos (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) system with machine learning (ML)-supported daily oART. Moreover, patients received weekly MRI in treatment position, which was utilized for daily plan adaptation, via a shuttle-based system. Initial and adapted treatment plans were generated using the Ethos treatment planning system. Patient clinical data, fractional session times (MRI + shuttle transport + positioning, adaptation, QA, RT delivery) and plan selection were assessed for all fractions in all patients.

RESULTS

In total, 737 oART fractions were applied and 118 MRIs for offline MR guidance were acquired. Primary sites of tumors were prostate (n = 16), lung (n = 7), cervix (n = 5), bladder (n = 1) and endometrium (n = 2). The treatment was completed in all patients. The median MRI acquisition time including shuttle transport and positioning to initiation of the Ethos adaptive session was 53.6 min (IQR 46.5-63.4). The median total treatment time without MRI was 30.7 min (IQR 24.7-39.2). Separately, median adaptation, plan QA and RT times were 24.3 min (IQR 18.6-32.2), 0.4 min (IQR 0.3-1,0) and 5.3 min (IQR 4.5-6.7), respectively. The adapted plan was chosen over the scheduled plan in 97.7% of cases.

CONCLUSION

This study describes the first workflow to date of a CBCT-based oART combined with a shuttle-based offline approach for MR guidance. The oART duration times reported resemble the range shown by previous publications for first clinical experiences with the Ethos system.

Enhancing Safety in AI-Driven Cone Beam CT-based Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy: Development and Implementation of an Interdisciplinary Workflow

Purpose

The emerging online adaptive radiation therapy (OART) treatment strategy based on cone beam computed tomography allows for real-time replanning according to a patient's current anatomy. However, implementing this procedure requires a new approach across the patient's care path and monitoring of the "black box" adaptation process. This study identifies high-risk failure modes (FMs) associated with AI-driven OART and proposes an interdisciplinary workflow to mitigate potential medical errors from highly automated processes, enhance treatment efficiency, and reduce the burden on clinicians.

Methods and Materials

An interdisciplinary working group was formed to identify safety concerns in each process step using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). Based on the FMEA results, the team designed standardized procedures and safety checklists to prevent errors and ensure successful task completion. The Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) for the top twenty FMs were calculated before and after implementing the proposed workflow to evaluate its effectiveness. Three hundred seventy-four adaptive sessions across 5 treatment sites were performed, and each session was evaluated for treatment safety and FMEA assessment.

Results

The OART workflow has 4 components, each with 4, 8, 13, and 4 sequentially executed tasks and safety checklists. Site-specific template preparation, which includes disease-specific physician directives and Intelligent Optimization Engine template testing, is one of the new procedures introduced. The interdisciplinary workflow significantly reduced the RPNs of the high-risk FMs, with an average decrease of 110 (maximum reduction of 305.5 and minimum reduction of 27.4).

Conclusions

This study underscores the importance of addressing high-risk FMs associated with AI-driven OART and emphasizes the significance of safety measures in its implementation. By proposing a structured interdisciplinary workflow and integrated checklists, the study provides valuable insights into ensuring the safe and efficient delivery of OART while facilitating its effective integration into clinical practice.

Improved Dosimetry and Plan Quality for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy: A Single Institutional Study

Purpose

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an attractive treatment modality for eligible patients as it has been shown to result in similar local control and improved cosmetic outcomes compared with whole breast radiation therapy. The use of online adaptive radiation therapy (OART) for APBI is promising as it allows for a reduction of planning target volume margins because breast motion and lumpectomy cavity volume changes are accounted for in daily imaging. Here we present a retrospective, single-institution evaluation on the adequacy of kV-cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) OART for APBI treatments.

Methods and Materials

Nineteen patients (21 treatment sites) were treated to 30 Gy in 5 fractions between January of 2022 and May of 2023. Time between simulation and treatment, change in gross tumor (ie, lumpectomy cavity) volume, and differences in dose volume histogram metrics with adaption were analyzed. The Wilcoxon paired, nonparametric test was used to test for dose volume histogram metric differences between the scheduled plans (initial plans recalculated on daily CBCT anatomy) and delivered plans, either the scheduled or adapted plan, which was reoptimized using daily anatomy.

Results

Median (interquartile range) time from simulation to first treatment was 26 days (21-32 days). During this same time, median gross tumor volume reduction was 16.0% (7.3%-23.9%) relative to simulation volume. Adaptive treatments took 31.3 minutes (27.4-36.6 minutes) from start of CBCT to treatment session end. At treatment, the adaptive plan was selected for 86% (89/103) of evaluable fractions. In evaluating plan quality, 78% of delivered plans met all target, organs at risk, and conformity metrics evaluated, compared with 34% of scheduled plans.

Conclusions

Use of OART for stereotactic linac-based APBI allowed for safe, high-quality treatments in this cohort of 21 treatment courses. Although treatment delivery times were longer than traditional stereotactic body treatments, there were notable improvements in plan quality for APBI using OART.

Is it necessary to perform measurement-based patient-specific quality assurance for online adaptive radiotherapy with Elekta Unity MR-Linac?

This study aimed to investigate the necessity of measurement-based patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) for online adaptive radiotherapy by analyzing measurement-based PSQA results and calculation-based 3D independent dose verification results with Elekta Unity MR-Linac. There are two workflows for Elekta Unity enabled in the treatment planning system: adapt to position (ATP) and adapt to shape (ATS). ATP plans are those which have relatively slighter shifts from reference plans by adjusting beam shapes or weights, whereas ATS plans are the new plans optimized from the beginning with probable re-contouring targets and organs-at-risk. PSQA gamma passing rates were measured using an MR-compatible ArcCHECK diode array for 78 reference plans and corresponding 208 adaptive plans (129 ATP plans and 79 ATS plans) of Elekta Unity. Subsequently, the relationships between ATP, or ATS plans and reference plans were evaluated separately. The Pearson's r correlation coefficients between ATP or ATS adaptive plans and corresponding reference plans were also characterized using regression analysis. Moreover, the Bland-Altman plot method was used to describe the agreement of PSQA results between ATP or ATS adaptive plans and reference plans. Additionally, Monte Carlo-based independent dose verification software ArcherQA was used to perform secondary dose check for adaptive plans. For ArcCHECK measurements, the average gamma passing rates (ArcCHECK vs. TPS) of PSQA (3%/2 mm criterion) were 99.51% ± 0.88% and 99.43% ± 0.54% for ATP and ATS plans, respectively, which were higher than the corresponding reference plans 99.34% ± 1.04% (p < 0.05) and 99.20% ± 0.71% (p < 0.05), respectively. The Pearson's r correlation coefficients were 0.720 between ATP and reference plans and 0.300 between ATS and reference plans with ArcCHECK, respectively. Furthermore, >95% of data points of differences between both ATP and ATS plans and reference plans were within ±2σ (standard deviation) of the mean difference between adaptive and reference plans with ArcCHECK measurements. With ArcherQA calculation, the average gamma passing rates (ArcherQA vs. TPS) were 98.23% ± 1.64% and 98.15% ± 1.07% for ATP and ATS adaptive plans, separately. It might be unnecessary to perform measurement-based PSQA for both ATP and ATS adaptive plans for Unity if the gamma passing rates of both measurements of corresponding reference plans and independent dose verification of adaptive plans have high gamma passing rates. Periodic machine QA and verification of adaptive plans were recommended to ensure treatment safety.

Review of cone beam computed tomography based online adaptive radiotherapy: current trend and future direction

Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) was introduced in the late 1990s to improve the accuracy and efficiency of therapy and minimize radiation-induced toxicities. ART combines multiple tools for imaging, assessing the need for adaptation, treatment planning, quality assurance, and has been utilized to monitor inter- or intra-fraction anatomical variations of the target and organs-at-risk (OARs). Ethos™ (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) based radiotherapy treatment system that uses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to perform ART, was introduced in 2020. Since then, numerous studies have been done to examine the potential benefits of Ethos™ CBCT-guided ART compared to non-adaptive radiotherapy. This review will explore the current trends of Ethos™, including improved CBCT image quality, a feasible clinical workflow, daily automated contouring and treatment planning, and motion management. Nevertheless, evidence of clinical improvements with the use of Ethos™ are limited and is currently under investigation via clinical trials.

A roadmap for implementation of kV-CBCT online adaptive radiation therapy and initial first year experiences

PURPOSE

Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy (oART) follows a different treatment paradigm than conventional radiotherapy, and because of this, the resources, implementation, and workflows needed are unique. The purpose of this report is to outline our institution's experience establishing, organizing, and implementing an oART program using the Ethos therapy system.

METHODS

We include resources used, operational models utilized, program creation timelines, and our institutional experiences with the implementation and operation of an oART program. Additionally, we provide a detailed summary of our first year's clinical experience where we delivered over 1000 daily adaptive fractions. For all treatments, the different stages of online adaption, primary patient set-up, initial kV-CBCT acquisition, contouring review and edit of influencer structures, target review and edits, plan evaluation and selection, Mobius3D 2nd check and adaptive QA, 2nd kV-CBCT for positional verification, treatment delivery, and patient leaving the room, were analyzed.

RESULTS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 97 patients treated from August 2021-August 2022. One thousand six hundred seventy seven individual fractions were treated and analyzed, 632(38%) were non-adaptive and 1045(62%) were adaptive. Seventy four of the 97 patients (76%) were treated with standard fractionation and 23 (24%) received stereotactic treatments. For the adaptive treatments, the generated adaptive plan was selected in 92% of treatments. On average(±std), adaptive sessions took 34.52 ± 11.42 min from start to finish. The entire adaptive process (from start of contour generation to verification CBCT), performed by the physicist (and physician on select days), was 19.84 ± 8.21 min.

CONCLUSION

We present our institution's experience commissioning an oART program using the Ethos therapy system. It took us 12 months from project inception to the treatment of our first patient and 12 months to treat 1000 adaptive fractions. Retrospective analysis of delivered fractions showed that the average overall treatment time was approximately 35 min and the average time for the adaptive component of treatment was approximately 20 min.