1
|
Viscariello NN, Harms J, Laugeman E, McConnell K, Pogue JA, Popple RA, Ray X, Stanley DN, Cardenas CE. Quantitative Assessment of Full-Time Equivalent Effort for kV-CBCT Guided Online Adaptive RT for Medical Physicists. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024:S1879-8500(24)00217-0. [PMID: 39303779 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 08/15/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With recent clinical adoption of online adaptive radiotherapy and the increased workload associated with adaptive radiotherapy, proper staffing for medical physicists is paramount to safe clinical operation. However, there is currently no consensus on the full-time equivalent (FTE) requirements for safe administration of CBCT-guided online adaptive radiotherapy. This study aims to quantitatively assess medical physics workload and staffing needs of a CBCT-guided online adaptive radiotherapy program. METHODS We conducted a detailed analysis of the CBCT-guided adaptive planning and treatment workflows, encompassing tasks such as patient consultation, treatment planning, plan review, training, quality assurance, and treatment delivery. Utilizing data from machine logs, clinical database queries, and staff surveys, we present a framework for estimating FTE values for different staffing scenarios, considering medical physicists' roles as planners, adaptors, or both. RESULTS FTE calculations, based on an example workload of 100 adaptive and 200 nonadaptive patients per year, for three staffing scenarios were provided: medical physicists as planners and adaptors (2.9 FTE), medical physicists as planners but not adaptors (2.6 FTE), and medical physicists as adaptors but not planners (1.4 FTE). These findings offer calculation guidance and benchmarks for staffing requirements in CBCT-guided online adaptive radiotherapy programs, emphasizing the need for specific staffing models to accommodate the complexities of adaptive radiotherapy. CONCLUSION This study outlines a framework for calculating FTE requirements for medical physicists in a CBCT-guided online adaptive radiotherapy program. By analyzing the processes for three common adaptive radiotherapy workflows, this work can provide effective workforce planning and resource allocation estimates. This analysis can be used either prior to the implementation of an online adaptive radiotherapy program, for program development, or as a review of current practices to ensure operational efficiency and proper staffing levels are maintained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph Harms
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | | | | | - Joel A Pogue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Richard A Popple
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | | | - Dennis N Stanley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
| | - Carlos E Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Borderías-Villarroel E, Barragán-Montero A, Sterpin E. Time is NTCP: Should we maximize patient throughput or perform online adaptation on proton therapy systems? Radiother Oncol 2024; 198:110389. [PMID: 38885906 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared to conventional radiotherapy (XT), proton therapy (PT) may improve normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP). However, PT typically requires higher adaptation rates due to an increased sensitivity to anatomical changes. Systematic online adaptation may address this issue, but it requires additional replanning time, decreasing patient throughput. Therefore, less patients would benefit in such case from PT for a given machine capacity, with results in worse NTCP. AIM To investigate the trade-off between PT patient throughput and NTCP gain as a function of the time needed for adaptation. METHODS A retrospective database of 14 lung patients with two repeated 4DCTs was used to compare NTCP values between XT and PT for NTCP2ym (2-year mortality), NTCPdysphagia and NTCPpneumonitis. Four scenarios were considered for PT: no adaptation using clinical robustness parameters (4D robust optimization, 3 % range error and PTV-equivalent setup errors); systematic online adaptation with clinical robustness parameters; setup errors reduced to 4 mm and to 2 mm. Dose was accumulated on the planning CT. The number of patients treated with PT depended on the extra time needed for adaptation, assuming an 8-hours capacity (assuming 14 patients a day; thus minimum 34.2 min per treatment session if there is no or instantaneous adaptation). RESULTS Baseline NTCP gains (PT against XT without adaptation) equaled 6.9 %, 6.1 %, and 7.7 % for NTCP2ym, NTCPdysphagia and NTCPpneumonitis, respectively. Using instantaneous online adaptation and setup errors of 2 mm, the overall gains were then 10.7 %, 13.6 % and 12.4 %. Taking into account loss of capacity, 13.7 min was the maximum extra-time allowed to complete adaptation and maintain an advantage on all three metrics for the 2-mm setup error scenario. CONCLUSION This study highlights the critical importance of keeping short online adaptation times when using systems with limited capacity like PT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Borderías-Villarroel
- UCLouvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Barragán-Montero
- UCLouvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium
| | - E Sterpin
- UCLouvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium; KU Leuven, Department of Oncology, Laboratory of external radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium; Particle Therapy Interuniversity Center Leuven - PARTICLE, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Duan J, Pogue JA, Boggs DH, Harms J. Enhancing Precision in Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer: A Case Study of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)-Based Online Adaptive Techniques and the Promise of HyperSight™ Iterative CBCT. Cureus 2024; 16:e66943. [PMID: 39280544 PMCID: PMC11401639 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/15/2024] [Indexed: 09/18/2024] Open
Abstract
This study explores the dosimetric benefits of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based online adaptive radiation therapy (oART) for a non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient exhibiting significant tumor shrinkage during ChemoRT. The patient was prescribed 60 Gray (Gy) in 30 fractions and was initially treated with conventional RT. After the delivery of the first four treatment fractions, the patient's treatment course was converted to oART due to tumor shrinkage seen on CBCT. Current oART dose calculations use a synthetic CT (sCT) image derived from deformable image registration (DIR) of the planning CT to the daily CBCT, and, as the tumor regressed, the discrepancy between the CBCT and the sCT increased, leading to a re-simulation after the delivery of the ninth fraction. In this case report, we first investigated dosimetric differences leveraged by converting this patient from conventional RT to oART. With oART using sCT, the patient's target coverage remained consistent with the reference plan while simultaneously changing lung V20 by 7.8 ± 1.4% and heart mean by 3.4 ± 1.5 Gy. Then, using this new simulation CT and comparing it with iterative CBCT (iCBCT) images acquired with the new HyperSight™ (HS) (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) imaging system on the Ethos, we investigated the impact of direct dose calculation on HS-iCBCT as compared to sCT. The HS-iCBCT generated a dose distribution similar to the CT reference, achieving a 96.01% gamma passing rate using Task Group-218 (TG-218) criteria. Results indicate that HS-iCBCT has the potential to better reflect daily anatomical changes, resulting in improved dosimetric accuracy. This study highlights the advantages of oART in the presence of tumor response to therapy and underscores HS-iCBCT's potential to provide CT-level dose calculation accuracy in oART for NSCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingwei Duan
- Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - Joel A Pogue
- Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - Drexell H Boggs
- Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - Joseph Harms
- Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kang KH, Price AT, Reynoso FJ, Laugeman E, Morris ED, Samson PP, Huang J, Badiyan SN, Kim H, Brenneman RJ, Abraham CD, Knutson NC, Henke LE. A Pilot Study of Simulation-Free Hippocampal-Avoidance Whole Brain Radiation Therapy Using Diagnostic MRI-Based and Online Adaptive Planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:1422-1428. [PMID: 38580083 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.03.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to demonstrate the clinical feasibility and safety of simulation-free hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT) in a pilot study (National Clinical Trial 05096286). METHODS AND MATERIALS Ten HA-WBRT candidates were enrolled for treatment on a commercially available computed tomography (CT)-guided linear accelerator with online adaptive capabilities. Planning structures were contoured on patient-specific diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which were registered to a CT of similar head shape, obtained from an atlas-based database (AB-CT). These patient-specific diagnostic MRI and AB-CT data sets were used for preplan calculation, using NRG-CC001 constraints. At first fraction, AB-CTs were used as primary data sets and deformed to patient-specific cone beam CTs (CBCT) to give patient-matched density information. Brain, ventricle, and brain stem contours were matched through rigid translation and rotation to the corresponding anatomy on CBCT. Lens, optic nerve, and brain contours were manually edited based on CBCT visualization. Preplans were then reoptimized through online adaptation to create final, simulation-free plans, which were used if they met all objectives. Workflow tasks were timed. In addition, patients underwent CT-simulation to create immobilization devices and for prospective dosimetric comparison of simulation-free and simulation-based plans. RESULTS Median time from MRI importation to completion of "preplan" was 1 weekday (range, 1-4). Median on-table workflow duration was 41 minutes (range, 34-70). NRG-CC001 constraints were achieved by 90% of the simulation-free plans. One patient's simulation-free plan failed a planning target volume coverage objective (89% instead of 90% coverage); this was deemed acceptable for first-fraction delivery, with an offline replan used for subsequent fractions. Both simulation-free and simulation CT-based plans otherwise met constraints, without clinically meaningful differences. CONCLUSIONS Simulation-free HA-WBRT using online adaptive radiation therapy is feasible, safe, and results in dosimetrically comparable treatment plans to simulation CT-based workflows while providing convenience and time savings for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylie H Kang
- Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Alex T Price
- University Hospitals, Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Francisco J Reynoso
- Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Eric Laugeman
- Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Eric D Morris
- Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Pamela P Samson
- Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jiayi Huang
- Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Shahed N Badiyan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dallas, Texas
| | - Hyun Kim
- Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Randall J Brenneman
- Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center at Banner North Colorado Medical Center, Greeley, Colorado
| | - Christopher D Abraham
- Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Nels C Knutson
- Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Lauren E Henke
- University Hospitals, Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wegener S, Käthner P, Weick S, Schindhelm R, Breuer K, Stark S, Hutzel H, Lutyj P, Zimmermann M, Tamihardja J, Wittig A, Exner F, Razinskas G. Re-evaluation of the prospective risk analysis for artificial-intelligence driven cone beam computed tomography-based online adaptive radiotherapy after one year of clinical experience. Z Med Phys 2024; 34:397-407. [PMID: 38852003 PMCID: PMC11384936 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2024.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based online adaptation is increasingly being introduced into many clinics. Upon implementation of a new treatment technique, a prospective risk analysis is required and enhances workflow safety. We conducted a risk analysis using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) upon the introduction of an online adaptive treatment programme (Wegener et al., Z Med Phys. 2022). A prospective risk analysis, lacking in-depth clinical experience with a treatment modality or treatment machine, relies on imagination and estimates of the occurrence of different failure modes. Therefore, we systematically documented all irregularities during the first year of online adaptation, namely all cases in which quality assurance detected undesired states potentially leading to negative consequences. Additionally, the quality of automatic contouring was evaluated. Based on those quantitative data, the risk analysis was updated by an interprofessional team. Furthermore, a hypothetical radiation therapist-only workflow during adaptive sessions was included in the prospective analysis, as opposed to the involvement of an interprofessional team performing each adaptive treatment. A total of 126 irregularities were recorded during the first year. During that time period, many of the previously anticipated failure modes (almost) occurred, indicating that the initial prospective risk analysis captured relevant failure modes. However, some scenarios were not anticipated, emphasizing the limits of a prospective risk analysis. This underscores the need for regular updates to the risk analysis. The most critical failure modes are presented together with possible mitigation strategies. It was further noted that almost half of the reported irregularities applied to the non-adaptive treatments on this treatment machine, primarily due to a manual plan import step implemented in the institution's workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Wegener
- University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Paul Käthner
- University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Weick
- University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Robert Schindhelm
- University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Kathrin Breuer
- University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Silke Stark
- University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Heike Hutzel
- University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Paul Lutyj
- University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marcus Zimmermann
- University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Tamihardja
- University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Wittig
- University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Florian Exner
- University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Gary Razinskas
- University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pogue JA, Harms J, Cardenas CE, Ray X, Viscariello N, Popple RA, Stanley DN, Boggs DH. Unlocking the adaptive advantage: correlation and machine learning classification to identify optimal online adaptive stereotactic partial breast candidates. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:115050. [PMID: 38729212 PMCID: PMC11412112 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4a1c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Online adaptive radiotherapy (OART) is a promising technique for delivering stereotactic accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), as lumpectomy cavities vary in location and size between simulation and treatment. However, OART is resource-intensive, increasing planning and treatment times and decreasing machine throughput compared to the standard of care (SOC). Thus, it is pertinent to identify high-yield OART candidates to best allocate resources.Approach.Reference plans (plans based on simulation anatomy), SOC plans (reference plans recalculated onto daily anatomy), and daily adaptive plans were analyzed for 31 sequential APBI targets, resulting in the analysis of 333 treatment plans. Spearman correlations between 22 reference plan metrics and 10 adaptive benefits, defined as the difference between mean SOC and delivered metrics, were analyzed to select a univariate predictor of OART benefit. A multivariate logistic regression model was then trained to stratify high- and low-benefit candidates.Main results.Adaptively delivered plans showed dosimetric benefit as compared to SOC plans for most plan metrics, although the degree of adaptive benefit varied per patient. The univariate model showed high likelihood for dosimetric adaptive benefit when the reference plan ipsilateral breast V15Gy exceeds 23.5%. Recursive feature elimination identified 5 metrics that predict high-dosimetric-benefit adaptive patients. Using leave-one-out cross validation, the univariate and multivariate models classified targets with 74.2% and 83.9% accuracy, resulting in improvement in per-fraction adaptive benefit between targets identified as high- and low-yield for 7/10 and 8/10 plan metrics, respectively.Significance.This retrospective, exploratory study demonstrated that dosimetric benefit can be predicted using only ipsilateral breast V15Gy on the reference treatment plan, allowing for a simple, interpretable model. Using multivariate logistic regression for adaptive benefit prediction led to increased accuracy at the cost of a more complicated model. This work presents a methodology for clinics wishing to triage OART resource allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel A Pogue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Joseph Harms
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Carlos E Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Xenia Ray
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States of America
| | - Natalie Viscariello
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Richard A Popple
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Dennis N Stanley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - D Hunter Boggs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Robar JL, Cherpak A, MacDonald RL, Yashayaeva A, McAloney D, McMaster N, Zhan K, Cwajna S, Patil N, Dahn H. Novel Technology Allowing Cone Beam Computed Tomography in 6 Seconds: A Patient Study of Comparative Image Quality. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:277-286. [PMID: 37939844 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this study was to evaluate the image quality provided by a novel cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) platform (HyperSight, Varian Medical Systems), a platform with enhanced reconstruction algorithms as well as rapid acquisition times. Image quality was compared with both status quo CBCT for image guidance, and to fan beam CT (FBCT) acquired on a CT simulator (CTsim). METHODS AND MATERIALS In a clinical study, 30 individuals were recruited for whom either deep inspiration (DIBH) or deep exhalation breath hold (DEBH) was used during imaging and radiation treatment of tumors involving liver, lung, breast, abdomen, chest wall, and pancreatic sites. All subjects were imaged during breath hold with CBCT on a standard image guidance platform (TrueBeam 2.7, Varian Medical Systems) and FBCT CT (CTsim, GE Optima). HyperSight imaging with both breath hold (HSBH) and free breathing (HSFB) was performed in a single session. The 4 image sets thus acquired were registered and compared using metrics quantifying artifact index, image nonuniformity, contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio, and difference of Hounsfield unit (HU) from CTsim. RESULTS HSBH provided less severe artifacts compared with both HSFB and TrueBeam. The severity of artifacts in HSBH images was similar to that in CTsim images, with statistically similar artifact index values. CTsim provided the best image uniformity; however, HSBH provided improved uniformity compared with both HSFB and TrueBeam. CTsim demonstrated elevated contrast compared with HyperSight imaging, but both HSBH and HSFB imaging showed superior contrast-to-noise ratio characteristics compared with TrueBeam. The median HU difference of HSBH from CTsim was within 1 HU for muscle/fat tissue, 12 HU for bone, and 14 HU for lung. CONCLUSIONS The HyperSight system provides 6-second CBCT acquisition with image artifacts that are significantly reduced compared with TrueBeam and comparable to those in CTsim FBCT imaging. HyperSight breath hold imaging was of higher quality compared with free breathing imaging on the same system. The median HU value in HyperSight breath hold imaging is within 15 HU of that in CTsim imaging for muscle, fat, bone, and lung tissue types, indicating the utility of image data for direct dose calculation in adaptive workflows.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James L Robar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, QE2 Cancer Centre, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Canada; Departments of Radiation Oncology; Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
| | - Amanda Cherpak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, QE2 Cancer Centre, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Canada; Departments of Radiation Oncology; Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Robert Lee MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, QE2 Cancer Centre, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Canada; Departments of Radiation Oncology; Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | | | - David McAloney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, QE2 Cancer Centre, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Canada
| | - Natasha McMaster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, QE2 Cancer Centre, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Canada
| | - Kenny Zhan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, QE2 Cancer Centre, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Canada
| | - Slawa Cwajna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, QE2 Cancer Centre, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Canada; Departments of Radiation Oncology
| | - Nikhilesh Patil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, QE2 Cancer Centre, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Canada; Departments of Radiation Oncology
| | - Hannah Dahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, QE2 Cancer Centre, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Canada; Departments of Radiation Oncology
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim JY, Tawk B, Knoll M, Hoegen-Saßmannshausen P, Liermann J, Huber PE, Lifferth M, Lang C, Häring P, Gnirs R, Jäkel O, Schlemmer HP, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J, Weykamp F. Clinical Workflow of Cone Beam Computer Tomography-Based Daily Online Adaptive Radiotherapy with Offline Magnetic Resonance Guidance: The Modular Adaptive Radiotherapy System (MARS). Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1210. [PMID: 38539544 PMCID: PMC10969008 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16061210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Ethos (Varian Medical Systems) radiotherapy device combines semi-automated anatomy detection and plan generation for cone beam computer tomography (CBCT)-based daily online adaptive radiotherapy (oART). However, CBCT offers less soft tissue contrast than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This work aims to present the clinical workflow of CBCT-based oART with shuttle-based offline MR guidance. METHODS From February to November 2023, 31 patients underwent radiotherapy on the Ethos (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) system with machine learning (ML)-supported daily oART. Moreover, patients received weekly MRI in treatment position, which was utilized for daily plan adaptation, via a shuttle-based system. Initial and adapted treatment plans were generated using the Ethos treatment planning system. Patient clinical data, fractional session times (MRI + shuttle transport + positioning, adaptation, QA, RT delivery) and plan selection were assessed for all fractions in all patients. RESULTS In total, 737 oART fractions were applied and 118 MRIs for offline MR guidance were acquired. Primary sites of tumors were prostate (n = 16), lung (n = 7), cervix (n = 5), bladder (n = 1) and endometrium (n = 2). The treatment was completed in all patients. The median MRI acquisition time including shuttle transport and positioning to initiation of the Ethos adaptive session was 53.6 min (IQR 46.5-63.4). The median total treatment time without MRI was 30.7 min (IQR 24.7-39.2). Separately, median adaptation, plan QA and RT times were 24.3 min (IQR 18.6-32.2), 0.4 min (IQR 0.3-1,0) and 5.3 min (IQR 4.5-6.7), respectively. The adapted plan was chosen over the scheduled plan in 97.7% of cases. CONCLUSION This study describes the first workflow to date of a CBCT-based oART combined with a shuttle-based offline approach for MR guidance. The oART duration times reported resemble the range shown by previous publications for first clinical experiences with the Ethos system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Young Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bouchra Tawk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Knoll
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter E. Huber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Radiooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mona Lifferth
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Clemens Lang
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Häring
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Regula Gnirs
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Radiooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang YF, Price MJ, Elliston CD, Munbodh R, Spina CS, Horowitz DP, Kachnic LA. Enhancing Safety in AI-Driven Cone Beam CT-based Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy: Development and Implementation of an Interdisciplinary Workflow. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101399. [PMID: 38292890 PMCID: PMC10823112 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The emerging online adaptive radiation therapy (OART) treatment strategy based on cone beam computed tomography allows for real-time replanning according to a patient's current anatomy. However, implementing this procedure requires a new approach across the patient's care path and monitoring of the "black box" adaptation process. This study identifies high-risk failure modes (FMs) associated with AI-driven OART and proposes an interdisciplinary workflow to mitigate potential medical errors from highly automated processes, enhance treatment efficiency, and reduce the burden on clinicians. Methods and Materials An interdisciplinary working group was formed to identify safety concerns in each process step using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). Based on the FMEA results, the team designed standardized procedures and safety checklists to prevent errors and ensure successful task completion. The Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) for the top twenty FMs were calculated before and after implementing the proposed workflow to evaluate its effectiveness. Three hundred seventy-four adaptive sessions across 5 treatment sites were performed, and each session was evaluated for treatment safety and FMEA assessment. Results The OART workflow has 4 components, each with 4, 8, 13, and 4 sequentially executed tasks and safety checklists. Site-specific template preparation, which includes disease-specific physician directives and Intelligent Optimization Engine template testing, is one of the new procedures introduced. The interdisciplinary workflow significantly reduced the RPNs of the high-risk FMs, with an average decrease of 110 (maximum reduction of 305.5 and minimum reduction of 27.4). Conclusions This study underscores the importance of addressing high-risk FMs associated with AI-driven OART and emphasizes the significance of safety measures in its implementation. By proposing a structured interdisciplinary workflow and integrated checklists, the study provides valuable insights into ensuring the safe and efficient delivery of OART while facilitating its effective integration into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Fang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center
| | - Michael J. Price
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center
| | - Carl D. Elliston
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center
| | - Reshma Munbodh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center
| | - Catherine S. Spina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center
| | - David P. Horowitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center
| | - Lisa A. Kachnic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pogue JA, Cardenas CE, Stanley DN, Stanley C, Hotsinpiller W, Veale C, Soike MH, Popple RA, Boggs DH, Harms J. Improved Dosimetry and Plan Quality for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy: A Single Institutional Study. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101414. [PMID: 38292886 PMCID: PMC10823088 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an attractive treatment modality for eligible patients as it has been shown to result in similar local control and improved cosmetic outcomes compared with whole breast radiation therapy. The use of online adaptive radiation therapy (OART) for APBI is promising as it allows for a reduction of planning target volume margins because breast motion and lumpectomy cavity volume changes are accounted for in daily imaging. Here we present a retrospective, single-institution evaluation on the adequacy of kV-cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) OART for APBI treatments. Methods and Materials Nineteen patients (21 treatment sites) were treated to 30 Gy in 5 fractions between January of 2022 and May of 2023. Time between simulation and treatment, change in gross tumor (ie, lumpectomy cavity) volume, and differences in dose volume histogram metrics with adaption were analyzed. The Wilcoxon paired, nonparametric test was used to test for dose volume histogram metric differences between the scheduled plans (initial plans recalculated on daily CBCT anatomy) and delivered plans, either the scheduled or adapted plan, which was reoptimized using daily anatomy. Results Median (interquartile range) time from simulation to first treatment was 26 days (21-32 days). During this same time, median gross tumor volume reduction was 16.0% (7.3%-23.9%) relative to simulation volume. Adaptive treatments took 31.3 minutes (27.4-36.6 minutes) from start of CBCT to treatment session end. At treatment, the adaptive plan was selected for 86% (89/103) of evaluable fractions. In evaluating plan quality, 78% of delivered plans met all target, organs at risk, and conformity metrics evaluated, compared with 34% of scheduled plans. Conclusions Use of OART for stereotactic linac-based APBI allowed for safe, high-quality treatments in this cohort of 21 treatment courses. Although treatment delivery times were longer than traditional stereotactic body treatments, there were notable improvements in plan quality for APBI using OART.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel A. Pogue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Carlos E. Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Dennis N. Stanley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Courtney Stanley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Whitney Hotsinpiller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Christopher Veale
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Michael H. Soike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Richard A. Popple
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Drexell H. Boggs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Joseph Harms
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhuang T, Parsons D, Desai N, Gibbard G, Keilty D, Lin MH, Cai B, Nguyen D, Chiu T, Godley A, Pompos A, Jiang S. Simulation and pre-planning omitted radiotherapy (SPORT): a feasibility study for prostate cancer. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2024; 10:025019. [PMID: 38241733 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad20aa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
This study explored the feasibility of on-couch intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning for prostate cancer (PCa) on a cone-beam CT (CBCT)-based online adaptive RT platform without an individualized pre-treatment plan and contours. Ten patients with PCa previously treated with image-guided IMRT (60 Gy/20 fractions) were selected. In contrast to the routine online adaptive RT workflow, a novel approach was employed in which the same preplan that was optimized on one reference patient was adapted to generate individual on-couch/initial plans for the other nine test patients using Ethos emulator. Simulation CTs of the test patients were used as simulated online CBCT (sCBCT) for emulation. Quality assessments were conducted on synthetic CTs (sCT). Dosimetric comparisons were performed between on-couch plans, on-couch plans recomputed on the sCBCT and individually optimized plans for test patients. The median value of mean absolute difference between sCT and sCBCT was 74.7 HU (range 69.5-91.5 HU). The average CTV/PTV coverage by prescription dose was 100.0%/94.7%, and normal tissue constraints were met for the nine test patients in on-couch plans on sCT. Recalculating on-couch plans on the sCBCT showed about 0.7% reduction of PTV coverage and a 0.6% increasing of hotspot, and the dose difference of the OARs was negligible (<0.5 Gy). Hence, initial IMRT plans for new patients can be generated by adapting a reference patient's preplan with online contours, which had similar qualities to the conventional approach of individually optimized plan on the simulation CT. Further study is needed to identify selection criteria for patient anatomy most amenable to this workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingliang Zhuang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, United States of America
| | - David Parsons
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, United States of America
| | - Neil Desai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, United States of America
| | - Grant Gibbard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, United States of America
| | - Dana Keilty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, United States of America
| | - Mu-Han Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, United States of America
| | - Bin Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, United States of America
| | - Dan Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, United States of America
| | - Tsuicheng Chiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, United States of America
| | - Andrew Godley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, United States of America
| | - Arnold Pompos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, United States of America
| | - Steve Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kawamura M, Kamomae T, Yanagawa M, Kamagata K, Fujita S, Ueda D, Matsui Y, Fushimi Y, Fujioka T, Nozaki T, Yamada A, Hirata K, Ito R, Fujima N, Tatsugami F, Nakaura T, Tsuboyama T, Naganawa S. Revolutionizing radiation therapy: the role of AI in clinical practice. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2024; 65:1-9. [PMID: 37996085 PMCID: PMC10803173 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrad090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
This review provides an overview of the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiation therapy (RT) from a radiation oncologist's perspective. Over the years, advances in diagnostic imaging have significantly improved the efficiency and effectiveness of radiotherapy. The introduction of AI has further optimized the segmentation of tumors and organs at risk, thereby saving considerable time for radiation oncologists. AI has also been utilized in treatment planning and optimization, reducing the planning time from several days to minutes or even seconds. Knowledge-based treatment planning and deep learning techniques have been employed to produce treatment plans comparable to those generated by humans. Additionally, AI has potential applications in quality control and assurance of treatment plans, optimization of image-guided RT and monitoring of mobile tumors during treatment. Prognostic evaluation and prediction using AI have been increasingly explored, with radiomics being a prominent area of research. The future of AI in radiation oncology offers the potential to establish treatment standardization by minimizing inter-observer differences in segmentation and improving dose adequacy evaluation. RT standardization through AI may have global implications, providing world-standard treatment even in resource-limited settings. However, there are challenges in accumulating big data, including patient background information and correlating treatment plans with disease outcomes. Although challenges remain, ongoing research and the integration of AI technology hold promise for further advancements in radiation oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariko Kawamura
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumaicho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kamomae
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumaicho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yanagawa
- Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Koji Kamagata
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan
| | - Shohei Fujita
- Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Daiju Ueda
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Yusuke Matsui
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kitaku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Fushimi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawaharacho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Fujioka
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan
| | - Taiki Nozaki
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Akira Yamada
- Department of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan
| | - Kenji Hirata
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita15, Nishi7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Rintaro Ito
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumaicho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Fujima
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita15, Nishi7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Fuminari Tatsugami
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Takeshi Nakaura
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tsuboyama
- Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Shinji Naganawa
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumaicho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Knäusl B, Belotti G, Bertholet J, Daartz J, Flampouri S, Hoogeman M, Knopf AC, Lin H, Moerman A, Paganelli C, Rucinski A, Schulte R, Shimizu S, Stützer K, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Czerska K. A review of the clinical introduction of 4D particle therapy research concepts. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100535. [PMID: 38298885 PMCID: PMC10828898 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Many 4D particle therapy research concepts have been recently translated into clinics, however, remaining substantial differences depend on the indication and institute-related aspects. This work aims to summarise current state-of-the-art 4D particle therapy technology and outline a roadmap for future research and developments. Material and methods This review focused on the clinical implementation of 4D approaches for imaging, treatment planning, delivery and evaluation based on the 2021 and 2022 4D Treatment Workshops for Particle Therapy as well as a review of the most recent surveys, guidelines and scientific papers dedicated to this topic. Results Available technological capabilities for motion surveillance and compensation determined the course of each 4D particle treatment. 4D motion management, delivery techniques and strategies including imaging were diverse and depended on many factors. These included aspects of motion amplitude, tumour location, as well as accelerator technology driving the necessity of centre-specific dosimetric validation. Novel methodologies for X-ray based image processing and MRI for real-time tumour tracking and motion management were shown to have a large potential for online and offline adaptation schemes compensating for potential anatomical changes over the treatment course. The latest research developments were dominated by particle imaging, artificial intelligence methods and FLASH adding another level of complexity but also opportunities in the context of 4D treatments. Conclusion This review showed that the rapid technological advances in radiation oncology together with the available intrafractional motion management and adaptive strategies paved the way towards clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Knäusl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gabriele Belotti
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Juliane Daartz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Mischa Hoogeman
- Department of Medical Physics & Informatics, HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Antje C Knopf
- Institut für Medizintechnik und Medizininformatik Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW, Muttenz, Switzerland
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Astrid Moerman
- Department of Medical Physics & Informatics, HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Chiara Paganelli
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Antoni Rucinski
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland
| | - Reinhard Schulte
- Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University
| | - Shing Shimizu
- Department of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kristin Stützer
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology – OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ye Zhang
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Katarzyna Czerska
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lin J, Chen M, Lai Y, Trivedi Z, Wu J, Foo T, Gonzalez Y, Reynolds R, Park C, Yan Y, Godley A, Jiang S, Jia X, Lin MH, Pompos A, Lu W. ART2Dose: A comprehensive dose verification platform for online adaptive radiotherapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:18-30. [PMID: 37856190 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) involves the development of adaptable treatment plans that consider patient anatomical data obtained right prior to treatment administration, facilitated by cone-beam computed tomography guided adaptive radiotherapy (CTgART) and magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART). To ensure accuracy of these adaptive plans, it is crucial to conduct calculation-based checks and independent verification of volumetric dose distribution, as measurement-based checks are not practical within online workflows. However, the absence of comprehensive, efficient, and highly integrated commercial software for secondary dose verification can impede the time-sensitive nature of online ART procedures. PURPOSE The main aim of this study is to introduce an efficient online quality assurance (QA) platform for online ART, and subsequently evaluate it on Ethos and Unity treatment delivery systems in our clinic. METHODS To enhance efficiency and ensure compliance with safety standards in online ART, ART2Dose, a secondary dose verification software, has been developed and integrated into our online QA workflow. This implementation spans all online ART treatments at our institution. The ART2Dose infrastructure comprises four key components: an SQLite database, a dose calculation server, a report generator, and a web portal. Through this infrastructure, file transfer, dose calculation, report generation, and report approval/archival are seamlessly managed, minimizing the need for user input when exporting RT DICOM files and approving the generated QA report. ART2Dose was compared with Mobius3D in pre-clinical evaluations on secondary dose verification for 40 adaptive plans. Additionally, a retrospective investigation was conducted utilizing 1302 CTgART fractions from ten treatment sites and 1278 MRgART fractions from seven treatment sites to evaluate the practical accuracy and efficiency of ART2Dose in routine clinical use. RESULTS With dedicated infrastructure and an integrated workflow, ART2Dose achieved gamma passing rates that were comparable to or higher than those of Mobius3D. Additionally, it significantly reduced the time required to complete pre-treatment checks by 3-4 min for each plan. In the retrospective analysis of clinical CTgART and MRgART fractions, ART2Dose demonstrated average gamma passing rates of 99.61 ± 0.83% and 97.75 ± 2.54%, respectively, using the 3%/2 mm criteria for region greater than 10% of prescription dose. The average calculation times for CTgART and MRgART were approximately 1 and 2 min, respectively. CONCLUSION Overall, the streamlined implementation of ART2Dose notably enhances the online ART workflow, offering reliable and efficient online QA while reducing time pressure in the clinic and minimizing labor-intensive work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingying Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Mingli Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Youfang Lai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Zipalkumar Trivedi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Junjie Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Tim Foo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Yesenia Gonzalez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Robert Reynolds
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Chunjoo Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Yulong Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Andrew Godley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Steve Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Xun Jia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Mu-Han Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Arnold Pompos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Weiguo Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stanley DN, Covington E, Harms J, Pogue J, Cardenas CE, Popple RA. Evaluation and correlation of patient movement during online adaptive radiotherapy with CBCT and a surface imaging system. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14133. [PMID: 37643456 PMCID: PMC10691620 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE With the clinical implementation of kV-CBCT-based daily online-adaptive radiotherapy, the ability to monitor, quantify, and correct patient movement during adaptive sessions is paramount. With sessions lasting between 20-45 min, the ability to detect and correct for small movements without restarting the entire session is critical to the adaptive workflow and dosimetric outcome. The purpose of this study was to quantify and evaluate the correlation of observed patient movement with machine logs and a surface imaging (SI) system during adaptive radiation therapy. METHODS Treatment machine logs and SGRT registration data log files for 1972 individual sessions were exported and analyzed. For each session, the calculated shifts from a pre-delivery position verification CBCT were extracted from the machine logs and compared to the SGRT registration data log files captured during motion monitoring. The SGRT calculated shifts were compared to the reported shifts of the machine logs for comparison for all patients and eight disease site categories. RESULTS The average (±STD) net displacement of the SGRT shifts were 2.6 ± 3.4 mm, 2.6 ± 3.5 mm, and 3.0 ± 3.2 in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions, respectively. For the treatment machine logs, the average net displacements in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions were 2.7 ± 3.7 mm, 2.6 ± 3.7 mm, and 3.2 ± 3.6 mm. The average difference (Machine-SGRT) was -0.1 ± 1.8 mm, 0.2 ± 2.1 mm, and -0.5 ± 2.5 mm for the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions. On average, a movement of 5.8 ± 5.6 mm and 5.3 ± 4.9 mm was calculated prior to delivery for the CBCT and SGRT systems, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient between CBCT and SGRT shifts was r = 0.88. The mean and median difference between the treatment machine logs and SGRT log files was less than 1 mm for all sites. CONCLUSION Surface imaging should be used to monitor and quantify patient movement during adaptive radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis N. Stanley
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Elizabeth Covington
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
- Department of Radiation OncologyMichigan MedicineAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Joseph Harms
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Joel Pogue
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Carlos E. Cardenas
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Richard A. Popple
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Oku Y, Toyota M, Saigo Y. Characteristics of detection accuracy of the patient setup using InBore optical patient positioning system. Radiol Phys Technol 2023; 16:532-542. [PMID: 37812309 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-023-00741-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the detection accuracy of the AlignRT-InBore system in surface-guided radiation therapy using a phantom and to determine the feasibility of the system by conducting a comparative analysis with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) registration. The AlignRT-InBore system integrated with the ETHOS Therapy was used. A phantom and a QUASAR phantom were employed to examine the specific areas of interest relevant to clinical cases. The evaluation involved monitoring translations for approximately 30 min and assessing the position detection accuracy for static and moving objects. Fifty clinical cases were used to evaluate the position detection accuracy and its relationship with the localization accuracy of CBCT before treatment. The detection accuracy of static and moving objects was within 1.0 mm using the phantom. However, the longitudinal direction tended to be larger than the other directions. Regarding the accuracy of localization in clinical cases, a strong and statistically significant (p < 0.01) correlation was observed in each direction. A detection accuracy within 1.0 mm is possible for static and moving objects. The detection accuracy of the patient setup using the InBore optical patient positioning system was extremely high, and the patient could be detected with high precision, suggesting its usefulness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshifumi Oku
- Division of Radiology, Department of Clinical Technology, Kagoshima University Hospital, 8-35-1, Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima-City, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan.
| | - Masahiko Toyota
- Division of Radiology, Department of Clinical Technology, Kagoshima University Hospital, 8-35-1, Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima-City, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan
| | - Yasumasa Saigo
- Division of Radiology, Department of Clinical Technology, Kagoshima University Hospital, 8-35-1, Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima-City, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lin M, Kavanaugh JA, Kim M, Cardenas CE, Rong Y. Physicists should perform reference planning for CBCT guided online adaptive radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14163. [PMID: 37776261 PMCID: PMC10562033 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mu‐Han Lin
- Radiation OncologyUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallasTexasUSA
| | | | - Minsun Kim
- Radiation OncologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Carlos E. Cardenas
- Radiation OncologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Yi Rong
- RadiationOncologyMayo ClinicPhoenixArizonaUSA
| |
Collapse
|