Improving synthetic CT accuracy by combining the benefits of multiple normalized preprocesses

Pseudo-medical image-guided technology based on 'CBCT-only' mode in esophageal cancer radiotherapy

Purpose To minimize the various errors introduced by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) in the application of esophageal cancer treatment, this study proposes a novel technique based on the 'CBCT-only' mode of pseudo-medical image guidance. Methods The framework of this technology consists of two pseudo-medical image synthesis models in the CBCT→CT and the CT→PET direction. The former utilizes a dual-domain parallel deep learning model called AWM-PNet, which incorporates attention waning mechanisms. This model effectively suppresses artifacts in CBCT images in both the sinogram and spatial domains while efficiently capturing important image features and contextual information. The latter leverages tumor location and shape information provided by clinical experts. It introduces a PRAM-GAN model based on a prior region aware mechanism to establish a non-linear mapping relationship between CT and PET image domains.  As a result, it enables the generation of pseudo-PET images that meet the clinical requirements for radiotherapy. Results The NRMSE and multi-scale SSIM (MS-SSIM) were utilized to evaluate the test set, and the results were presented as median values with lower quartile and upper quartile ranges. For the AWM-PNet model, the NRMSE and MS-SSIM values were 0.0218 (0.0143, 0.0255) and 0.9325 (0.9141, 0.9410), respectively. The PRAM-GAN model produced NRMSE and MS-SSIM values of 0.0404 (0.0356, 0.0476) and 0.9154 (0.8971, 0.9294), respectively. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) between these models and others. The numerical results of dose metrics, including D98 %, Dmean, and D2 %, validated the accuracy of HU values in the pseudo-CT images synthesized by the AWM-PNet. Furthermore, the Dice coefficient results confirmed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in GTV delineation between the pseudo-PET images synthesized using the PRAM-GAN model and other compared methods. Conclusion The AWM-PNet and PRAM-GAN models have the capability to generate accurate pseudo-CT and pseudo-PET images, respectively. The pseudo-image-guided technique based on the 'CBCT-only' mode shows promising prospects for application in esophageal cancer radiotherapy.

Effect of metal implants and metal artifacts on back-projected two-dimensional entrance fluence determined by EPID dosimetry

PURPOSE

To evaluate the errors caused by metal implants and metal artifacts in the two-dimensional entrance fluences reconstructed using the back-projection algorithm based on electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images.

METHODS

The EPID in the Varian VitalBeam accelerator was used to acquire portal dose images (PDIs), and then commercial EPID dosimetry software was employed to reconstruct the two-dimensional entrance fluences based on computed tomography (CT) images of the head phantoms containing interchangeable metal-free/titanium/aluminum round bars. The metal-induced errors in the two-dimensional entrance fluences were evaluated by comparing the γ results and the pixel value errors in the metal-affected regions. We obtained metal-artifact-free CT images by replacing the voxel values of non-metal inserts with those of metal inserts in metal-free CT images to evaluate the metal-artifact-induced errors.

RESULTS

The γ passing rates (versus PDIs obtained without a phantom in the beam field (PDIair ), 2%/2 mm) for the back-projected two-dimensional entrance fluences of phantoms containing titanium or aluminum (BPTi /BPAl ) were reduced from 92.4% to 90.5% and 90.6%, respectively, relative to the metal-free phantom (BPmetal-free ). Titanium causes more severe metal artifacts in CT images than aluminum, and its removal resulted in a 0.0022 CU (median) reduction in the pixel value of BPTi artifact-free relative to BPTi in the metal-affected region. Moreover, the mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) decreased from 0.0050 CU and 0.0063 CU to 0.0034 CU and 0.0040 CU, respectively (vs. BPmetal-free ).

CONCLUSION

Metal implants increase the errors in back-projected two-dimensional entrance fluences, and metals with higher electron densities cause more errors. For high-electron-density metal implants that produce severe metal artifacts (e.g., titanium), removing metal artifacts from the CT images can improve the accuracy of the two-dimensional entrance fluences reconstructed by back-projection algorithms.