Evaluation and correlation of patient movement during online adaptive radiotherapy with CBCT and a surface imaging system

Unlocking the adaptive advantage: correlation and machine learning classification to identify optimal online adaptive stereotactic partial breast candidates

Objective.Online adaptive radiotherapy (OART) is a promising technique for delivering stereotactic accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), as lumpectomy cavities vary in location and size between simulation and treatment. However, OART is resource-intensive, increasing planning and treatment times and decreasing machine throughput compared to the standard of care (SOC). Thus, it is pertinent to identify high-yield OART candidates to best allocate resources.Approach.Reference plans (plans based on simulation anatomy), SOC plans (reference plans recalculated onto daily anatomy), and daily adaptive plans were analyzed for 31 sequential APBI targets, resulting in the analysis of 333 treatment plans. Spearman correlations between 22 reference plan metrics and 10 adaptive benefits, defined as the difference between mean SOC and delivered metrics, were analyzed to select a univariate predictor of OART benefit. A multivariate logistic regression model was then trained to stratify high- and low-benefit candidates.Main results.Adaptively delivered plans showed dosimetric benefit as compared to SOC plans for most plan metrics, although the degree of adaptive benefit varied per patient. The univariate model showed high likelihood for dosimetric adaptive benefit when the reference plan ipsilateral breast V15Gy exceeds 23.5%. Recursive feature elimination identified 5 metrics that predict high-dosimetric-benefit adaptive patients. Using leave-one-out cross validation, the univariate and multivariate models classified targets with 74.2% and 83.9% accuracy, resulting in improvement in per-fraction adaptive benefit between targets identified as high- and low-yield for 7/10 and 8/10 plan metrics, respectively.Significance.This retrospective, exploratory study demonstrated that dosimetric benefit can be predicted using only ipsilateral breast V15Gy on the reference treatment plan, allowing for a simple, interpretable model. Using multivariate logistic regression for adaptive benefit prediction led to increased accuracy at the cost of a more complicated model. This work presents a methodology for clinics wishing to triage OART resource allocation.

Improved Dosimetry and Plan Quality for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy: A Single Institutional Study

Purpose

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an attractive treatment modality for eligible patients as it has been shown to result in similar local control and improved cosmetic outcomes compared with whole breast radiation therapy. The use of online adaptive radiation therapy (OART) for APBI is promising as it allows for a reduction of planning target volume margins because breast motion and lumpectomy cavity volume changes are accounted for in daily imaging. Here we present a retrospective, single-institution evaluation on the adequacy of kV-cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) OART for APBI treatments.

Methods and Materials

Nineteen patients (21 treatment sites) were treated to 30 Gy in 5 fractions between January of 2022 and May of 2023. Time between simulation and treatment, change in gross tumor (ie, lumpectomy cavity) volume, and differences in dose volume histogram metrics with adaption were analyzed. The Wilcoxon paired, nonparametric test was used to test for dose volume histogram metric differences between the scheduled plans (initial plans recalculated on daily CBCT anatomy) and delivered plans, either the scheduled or adapted plan, which was reoptimized using daily anatomy.

Results

Median (interquartile range) time from simulation to first treatment was 26 days (21-32 days). During this same time, median gross tumor volume reduction was 16.0% (7.3%-23.9%) relative to simulation volume. Adaptive treatments took 31.3 minutes (27.4-36.6 minutes) from start of CBCT to treatment session end. At treatment, the adaptive plan was selected for 86% (89/103) of evaluable fractions. In evaluating plan quality, 78% of delivered plans met all target, organs at risk, and conformity metrics evaluated, compared with 34% of scheduled plans.

Conclusions

Use of OART for stereotactic linac-based APBI allowed for safe, high-quality treatments in this cohort of 21 treatment courses. Although treatment delivery times were longer than traditional stereotactic body treatments, there were notable improvements in plan quality for APBI using OART.