Functional dystonia: A case-control study and risk prediction algorithm

Biomarkers and Rehabilitation for Functional Neurological Disorder

Functional neurological disorder, or FND, is widely misunderstood, particularly when considering recent research indicating that the illness has numerous biological markers in addition to its psychiatric disorder associations. Nonetheless, the long-held view that FND is a mental illness without a biological basis, or even a contrived (malingered) illness, remains pervasive both in current medical care and general society. This is because FND involves intermittent disability that rapidly and involuntarily alternates with improved neurological control. This has in turn caused shaming, perceived low self-efficacy, and social isolation for the patients. Until now, biomarker reviews for FND tended not to examine the features that are shared with canonical neurological disorders. This review, in contrast, examines current research on FND biomarkers, and in particular their overlap with canonical neurological disorders, along with the encouraging outcomes for numerous physical rehabilitation trials for FND. These findings support the perspective endorsed here that FND is unquestionably a neurological disorder that is also associated with many biological markers that lie outside of the central nervous system. These results suggest that FND entails multiple biological abnormalities that are widely distributed in the body. General healthcare providers would benefit their care for their patients through their improved understanding of the illness and recourses for support and treatment that are provided in this review.

Pain and functional neurological disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Functional neurological disorder (FND) is characterised by neurological symptoms, such as seizures and abnormal movements. Despite its significance to patients, the clinical features of chronic pain in people with FND, and of FND in people with chronic pain, have not been comprehensively studied.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO for studies of chronic pain in adults with FND and FND in patients with chronic pain. We described the proportions of patients reporting pain, pain rating and timing, pain-related diagnoses and responsiveness to treatment. We performed random effects meta-analyses of the proportions of patients with FND who reported pain or were diagnosed with pain-related disorders.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and fifteen articles were screened and 64 were included in the analysis. Eight case-control studies of 3476 patients described pain symptoms in a higher proportion of patients with FND than controls with other neurological disorders. A random effects model of 30 cohorts found that an estimated 55% (95% CI 46% to 64%) of 4272 patients with FND reported pain. Random effects models estimated diagnoses of complex regional pain syndrome in 22% (95% CI 6% to 39%) of patients, irritable bowel syndrome in 16% (95% CI 9% to 24%) and fibromyalgia in 10% (95% CI 8% to 13%). Five studies of FND diagnoses among 361 patients with chronic pain were identified. Most interventions for FND did not ameliorate pain, even when other symptoms improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain symptoms and pain-related diagnoses are common in FND. Classification systems and treatments should routinely consider pain as a comorbidity in patients with FND.

Rehabilitation for Functional Dystonia: Cases and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Functional dystonia (FD) is a common subtype of functional movement disorder. FD can be readily diagnosed based on positive signs and is potentially treatable with rehabilitation. Despite this, clinical outcomes remain variable and a gold standard approach to treatment is lacking.

CASES

Here we present four cases of axial and limb functional dystonia who were treated with integrated rehabilitation and improved. The therapy approach and clinical outcomes are described, including videos.

LITERATURE REVIEW

A literature review evaluated the published treatment strategies for the treatment of functional dystonia. Out of 338 articles, 25 were eligible for review and included mainly case reports and case series. Most patients received more than one treatment modality. Non-invasive therapies, commonly physiotherapy and psychological approaches were mostly associated with positive outcomes. Multiple treatments commonly used in dystonia were used, including botulinum toxin injections, pharmacotherapy and surgery, leading to variable outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Therapy should be personalized to the clinical presentation. In challenging cases, initiation of a multidisciplinary approach may provide benefit regardless of etiology. Pharmacotherapy should be used judiciously, and surgical therapy should be avoided.

Neurosurgical and pharmacological management of dystonia

Dystonia characterizes a group of neurological movement disorders characterized by abnormal muscle movements, often with repetitive or sustained contraction resulting in abnormal posturing. Different types of dystonia present based on the affected body regions and play a prominent role in determining the potential efficacy of a given intervention. For most patients afflicted with these disorders, an exact cause is rarely identified, so treatment mainly focuses on symptomatic alleviation. Pharmacological agents, such as oral anticholinergic administration and botulinum toxin injection, play a major role in the initial treatment of patients. In more severe and/or refractory cases, focal areas for neurosurgical intervention are identified and targeted to improve quality of life. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targets these anatomical locations to minimize dystonia symptoms. Surgical ablation procedures and peripheral denervation surgeries also offer potential treatment to patients who do not respond to DBS. These management options grant providers and patients the ability to weigh the benefits and risks for each individual patient profile. This review article explores these pharmacological and neurosurgical management modalities for dystonia, providing a comprehensive assessment of each of their benefits and shortcomings.

Diagnostic accuracy of clinical signs and investigations for functional weakness, sensory and movement disorders: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Patients with functional neurological disorders (FND) present with weakness, sensory or movement disorder without corresponding brain pathology. The current classificatory systems suggest an inclusionary approach to diagnose FND. Hence, there is a need to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of clinical signs and electrophysiological investigations in view of the lack of gold standard tests to diagnose FND.

METHODS

PubMed and SCOPUS databases were searched for studies published from Jan 1950 to Jan 2022 which reported the diagnostic accuracy of clinical signs and electrophysiological investigations in patients with FND. The Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies (727 cases and 932 controls), of which 16 reported clinical signs and, five reported electrophysiological investigations, were included in the review. Two studies were of good quality, 17 of moderate quality, and two of poor quality. We identified 46 clinical signs (24 in weakness, 3 in sensory, and 19 in movement disorders) and 17 investigations (all in movement disorders). Specificity values for signs and investigations were comparatively high compared to the wide variance in sensitivity values.

CONCLUSION

Electrophysiological investigations appear to have a promising role in diagnosing FND, particularly functional movement disorders. The combined use of individual clinical signs and electrophysiological investigations may support and improve diagnostic certainty of FND. Future research can focus on improving the methodology and validating the existing clinical signs and electrophysiological investigations to enhance the validity of the composite diagnostic criterias for FND diagnosis.

The Dystonias

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article discusses the most recent findings regarding the diagnosis, classification, and management of genetic and idiopathic dystonia.

RECENT FINDINGS

A new approach to classifying dystonia has been created with the aim to increase the recognition and diagnosis of dystonia. Molecular biology and genetic studies have identified several genes and biological pathways involved in dystonia.

SUMMARY

Dystonia is a common movement disorder involving abnormal, often twisting, postures and is a challenging condition to diagnose. The pathophysiology of dystonia involves abnormalities in brain motor networks in the context of genetic factors. Dystonia has genetic, idiopathic, and acquired forms, with a wide phenotypic spectrum, and is a common feature in complex neurologic disorders. Dystonia can be isolated or combined with another movement disorder and may be focal, segmental, multifocal, or generalized in distribution, with some forms only occurring during the performance of specific tasks (task-specific dystonia). Dystonia is classified by clinical characteristics and presumed etiology. The management of dystonia involves accurate diagnosis, followed by treatment with botulinum toxin injections, oral medications, and surgical therapies (mainly deep brain stimulation), as well as pathogenesis-directed treatments, including the prospect of disease-modifying or gene therapies.

Functional dystonia: A pitfall for the foot and ankle surgeon

Functional dystonia represents a condition where psychological distress is being expressed as involuntary muscle contractions. In the foot and ankle, it most commonly presents as a sudden onset of a painful fixed ankle/hindfoot deformity in a female patient with a history of trivial trauma or surgery. The "fixed deformity" found on clinical examination is usually correctable under general anesthesia. Less commonly, it can present in the toes or may present as paroxysmal muscle movements rather than a fixed deformity. CRPS may occur concurrently with the dystonia. Failure to consider the diagnosis leads to a long delay in appropriate diagnosis, patient distress and unnecessary or even harmful surgery. A better approach to this clinical syndrome is to define it as fixed abnormal posturing that is most commonly psychogenic. Early referral to a movement disorder clinic is recommended. The prognosis is generally poor as less than a quarter of patients report subjective long-term improvement even when managed in a movement disorder clinic. Foot and ankle surgeons should, whenever possible, avoid operating on patients with functional dystonia in order to avoid symptomatic deterioration.

‘Tricked’ sensory trick: a geste antagoniste in functional dystonia

A sensory trick, or geste antagoniste, is a manoeuvre used by patients with dystonia to ameliorate their dystonic movements or posturing. Typically, a sensory trick is a confirmatory clue indicating an organic nature of the dystonia. In this report, we present an extremely rare case of a sensory trick in a patient with functional dystonia.

Functional neurological disorder: new subtypes and shared mechanisms

Functional neurological disorder is common in neurological practice. A new approach to the positive diagnosis of this disorder focuses on recognisable patterns of genuinely experienced symptoms and signs that show variability within the same task and between different tasks over time. Psychological stressors are common risk factors for functional neurological disorder, but are often absent. Four entities-functional seizures, functional movement disorders, persistent perceptual postural dizziness, and functional cognitive disorder-show similarities in aetiology and pathophysiology and are variants of a disorder at the interface between neurology and psychiatry. All four entities have distinctive features and can be diagnosed with the support of clinical neurophysiological studies and other biomarkers. The pathophysiology of functional neurological disorder includes overactivity of the limbic system, the development of an internal symptom model as part of a predictive coding framework, and dysfunction of brain networks that gives movement the sense of voluntariness. Evidence supports tailored multidisciplinary treatment that can involve physical and psychological therapy approaches.

The use of rhythmic auditory stimulation for functional gait disorder: A case report

BACKGROUND: Functional gait disorders (FGD) are a common and disabling condition. Consensus-based rehabilitation techniques for treating FGD and other functional neurological disorder presentations at large utilize a variety of therapeutic strategies, including distraction, novel approaches to movement, entrainment, stress/hypervigilance modulation, and psychotherapy. CASE REPORT: Here we present a case of a 24-year-old woman with a complex history of anxiety, depression, left frontal astrocytoma, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and FGD. During a multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation stay for FGD, the patient underwent rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) delivered by a neurologic music therapist in conjunction with physical therapy, occupational therapy, and psychotherapy. RESULTS: The RAS intervention appeared to play a significant role in symptom resolution for this patient. Improvement in the patient’s truncal displacement, foot dragging, and well as overall gait speed occurred following serial RAS trials performed over a single treatment session. Benefits persisted immediately following the intervention and upon subsequent reassessment. Although at four-year follow-up the patient’s FGD symptoms remained resolved, fatigue continued to limit her ambulatory capacity and overall endurance. CONCLUSION: RAS represents a unique therapeutic approach for treating FGD, complementary to existing consensus-based rehabilitation recommendations, and may warrant further consideration by the field.

Prognosis in functional and recognised pathophysiological neurological disorders - a shared basis

OBJECTIVE

To compare self-reported outcomes, clinical trajectory and utility of baseline questionnaire responses in predicting prognosis in functional and recognised pathophysiological neurological disorders.

METHODS

Baseline data on 2581 patients included health-related quality of life, psychological and physical symptoms, illness perceptions, consultation satisfaction and demographics. The prospective cohort included neurology outpatients classified with a functional (reporting symptoms 'not at all' or 'somewhat explained' by 'organic disease'; n = 716) or recognised pathophysiological disorder ('largely' or 'completely explained'; n = 1865). Logistic regression and deep neural network models were used to predict self-reported global clinical improvement (CGI) at 12-months.

RESULTS

Patients with functional and recognised pathophysiological disorders reported near identical outcomes at 12-months with 67% and 66% respectively reporting unchanged or worse CGI. In multivariable modelling 'negative expectation of recovery' and 'disagreement with psychological attribution' predicted same or worse outcome in both groups. Receipt of disability-related state benefit predicted same or worse CGI outcome in the functional disorder group only (OR = 2.28 (95%-CI: 1.36-3.84) in a group-stratified model) and was not related to a measure of economic deprivation. Deep neural network models trained on all 92 baseline features predicted poor outcome with area under the receiver-operator curve of 0.67 in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Those with functional and recognised pathophysiological neurological disorder share similar outcomes, clinical trajectories, and poor prognostic markers in multivariable models. Prediction of outcome at a patient level was not possible using the baseline data in this study.

Sudden Onset, Fixed Dystonia and Acute Peripheral Trauma as Diagnostic Clues for Functional Dystonia

Background

The differentiation of functional dystonia from idiopathic dystonia may be clinically challenging.

Objective

To identify clinical features suggestive of functional dystonia to guide physicians to distinguish functional dystonia from idiopathic dystonia.

Methods

Patient data were extracted from the Italian Registry of Functional Motor Disorders and the Italian Registry of Adult Dystonia. Patients with functional and idiopathic dystonia were followed up at the same clinical sites, and they were similar in age and sex.

Results

We identified 113 patients with functional dystonia and 125 with idiopathic dystonia. Sudden onset of dystonia, evidence of fixed dystonia, and acute peripheral trauma before dystonia onset were more frequent in the functional dystonia group. No study variable alone achieved satisfactory sensitivity and specificity, whereas a combination of variables yielded 85% sensitivity and 98% specificity. A diagnostic algorithm was developed to reduce the risk of misclassifying functional dystonia.

Conclusion

Our findings extend the current diagnostic approach to functional dystonia by showing that clinical information about symptom onset, fixed dystonia, and history of peripheral trauma may provide key clues in the diagnosis of functional dystonia.