A meta-analysis comparing first-line immunosuppressants in neuromyelitis optica

Traditional first-line treatment failure rates in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder patients included in the Argentinean registry (RelevarEM)

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressive therapies as azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and rituximab (RTX) are widely prescribed as first-line treatment to prevent relapses in NMOSD. However, the rate of response to these traditional therapies is unknown in Argentina. We aimed to describe and compare treatment failure rates in NMOSD patients included in the Argentinean MS and NMOSD registry (RelevarEM, NCT03375177).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in NMOSD patients included in RelevarEM (a nationwide, longitudinal, observational, non-mandatory registry of MS and NMOSD in Argentina). NMOSD patients were defined based on validate diagnostic criteria. Only NMOSD patients who received AZA or MMF for at least 6 months or RTX for at least 1 month were included. Patients who were receiving AZA, MMF, or RTX and then switched to another 1 of these 3 therapies were included if the above-mentioned criteria for each drug were fulfilled. Data on patient demographics, clinical, neuroradiological findings, and treatments administered were collected. Treatment failure was defined as any new attack/relapse that occurred despite immunosuppressive treatment.

RESULTS

We included 139 NMOSD patients who were receiving AZA (n = 105), MMF (n = 5) or RTX (n = 29) with a mean follow-up time of 41.3 ± 11.4 months and median of EDSS at treatment initiation of 3. We observed a reduction in the annualized relapse rate from pre-treatment to post-treatment of 51.1 %, 48.4 %, and 79.1 % respectively with a Hazard Risk relative to RTX (95 % CI) of 1.67 (1.34-3.54, p = 0.01) for AZA and 2.01 (1.86-4.43, p = 0.008) for MMF. AZA, MMF and RTX failure was observed in 45/105 (42.8 %), 2/5 (40 %) and 3/29 (10.3 %) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment failure rates were higher for AZA and MMF than RTX in Argentinean NMOSD patients in a real-world setting. High-efficacy treatment increases the opportunity to prevent attacks of NMOSD.

Impact of rituximab treatment regime on time to relapse in aquaporin-4 antibody positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

BACKGROUND

Aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody associated neuromyelitis optica (NMOSD) requires long-term immunosuppression. Rituximab is increasingly used worldwide, however the optimal regime is not established.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined different rituximab regimens in AQP4-NMOSD. Standard monotherapy (SM; 6 monthly infusions), SM plus oral steroids (SM+S), extended interval dosing (EID; guided by CD19 repopulation) and EID with oral steroids (EID+S) were compared. The primary outcome was time to first clinical relapse. Potential confounders including age, gender, number of previous relapses, and onset phenotype were included.

RESULTS

77 patients were included: 67 females, median onset age 35.6, median DSS at rituximab initiation 5.0. 39 were on SM+S, 20 SM, 6 EID, and 12 EID+S. 25/77 patients relapsed during a median follow-up of 44.0 months. No significant difference in time to first relapse was observed between any rituximab regimen. Pooled analyses to compare regimens that use standard monotherapy (SM and SM+S) against those that use extended interval dosing (EID and EID+S) showed no significant difference. Pooled analysis of regimens using steroids with those not using steroids also showed no significant difference. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard model revealed no significant difference between rituximab regimens or influence of demographic factors. 9 significant adverse events were recorded, 5 in the SM group and 4 in SM+S.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides some basis for further exploring EID as a viable option for long term treatment of AQP4-NMOSD. This may improve patient experience and consolidate use of hospital resources.

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders and Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Disease

For over two centuries, clinicians have been aware of various conditions affecting white matter which had come to be grouped under the umbrella term multiple sclerosis. Within the last 20 years, specific scientific advances have occurred leading to more accurate diagnosis and differentiation of several of these conditions including, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease. This new understanding has been coupled with advances in disease-modifying therapies which must be accurately applied for maximum safety and efficacy.

Treatment access and satisfaction on disease-modifying therapies of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder patients in China: a cross-sectional survey

Background

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare and debilitating disease that has become more widely recognized in China. Legislative measures have been implemented by the government to improve treatment access for rare diseases.

Objectives

To investigate the diagnostic journey, treatment status, treatment accessibility, and treatment satisfaction of the NMOSD patients on disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in China.

Design

A patient online survey.

Methods

This cross-sectional online survey was conducted between November 2022 and January 2023. Patients over 18 years old and diagnosed with NMOSD were included. The questionnaire consisted of five sections covering demographics, diagnostic and treatment experiences, DMTs availability, cost and affordability, and treatment satisfaction using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (version II). Patient opinions and demands were also collected at the end of the survey.

Results

A total of 375 patients diagnosed with NMOSD were recruited, of which 321 patients used DMTs. It required 1.22 ± 3.22 years and 3.58 ± 4.24 hospital visits for a definitive diagnosis. One-third of the patients still needed to travel for over 2 h to access DMTs. The total treatment expenditure was estimated to be CNY 59,827.00 (USD 8315.95) a year. Drug expenses alone accounted for 52.22% of the average annual household income. The most common challenges perceived were the inability to afford treatment and a lack of effective options. No significant difference was found in treatment satisfaction among DMTs, except that rituximab scored lowest in convenience compared to other DMTs. Patients' age and travel time required to obtain medications were negatively associated with global treatment satisfaction.

Conclusion

In China, patients with NMOSD face challenges in obtaining proper treatment due to diagnostic difficulties, distant medication access, and high costs. Policies should prioritize improving disease education and alleviating financial burdens for the patients.

Efficacy and safety of low- and ultralow-dose rituximab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

BACKGROUND

Rituximab effectively targets B cells and reduces relapses in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). But the ideal dosage and treatment intervals remain unanswered. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of low and ultralow-dose rituximab in NMOSD.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of NMOSD patients treated with rituximab at two Chinese tertiary hospitals. Patients received either a low-dose regimen (500 mg reinfusion every 6 months) or an ultralow-dose regimen: 100 to 300 mg rituximab based on CD19+B cells (100 mg for 1-1.5% of peripheral blood mononuclear cells, 200 mg for 1.5-5%, and 300 mg for over 5%).

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 136 patients (41 in the low-dose group, 95 in the ultralow-dose group) with median follow-up durations of 43 and 34.2 months, respectively. Both groups exhibited similar sex distribution, age at disease onset, annual relapse rate, and baseline disease duration. Survival analysis showed that ultralow-dose rituximab was noninferior to low-dose rituximab in preventing relapses. Infusion reactions occurred in 20 of 173 (11.6%) low-dose treatments and 9 of 533 (1.7%) ultralow-dose treatments. B-cell re-emergence was observed in 137 of 236 (58.1%) monitors in the low-dose group and 367 of 1136 (32.3%) monitors in the ultralow-dose group.

CONCLUSION

Ultralow dose rituximab was noninferior to low-dose rituximab in preventing NMOSD relapses. A randomized controlled trial is essential to validate these findings.

Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) - revised recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Part II: Attack therapy and long-term management

This manuscript presents practical recommendations for managing acute attacks and implementing preventive immunotherapies for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), a rare autoimmune disease that causes severe inflammation in the central nervous system (CNS), primarily affecting the optic nerves, spinal cord, and brainstem. The pillars of NMOSD therapy are attack treatment and attack prevention to minimize the accrual of neurological disability. Aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G antibodies (AQP4-IgG) are a diagnostic marker of the disease and play a significant role in its pathogenicity. Recent advances in understanding NMOSD have led to the development of new therapies and the completion of randomized controlled trials. Four preventive immunotherapies have now been approved for AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD in many regions of the world: eculizumab, ravulizumab - most recently-, inebilizumab, and satralizumab. These new drugs may potentially substitute rituximab and classical immunosuppressive therapies, which were as yet the mainstay of treatment for both, AQP4-IgG-positive and -negative NMOSD. Here, the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS) provides an overview of the current state of knowledge on NMOSD treatments and offers statements and practical recommendations on the therapy management and use of all available immunotherapies for this disease. Unmet needs and AQP4-IgG-negative NMOSD are also discussed. The recommendations were developed using a Delphi-based consensus method among the core author group and at expert discussions at NEMOS meetings.

Overlap syndrome of anti-aquaporin-4 positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review of individual patient data

BACKGROUND

Neurological involvement can occur in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) due to co-existing neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). The symptoms can mimic those of neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE. Pathogenic anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibodies, commonly found in NMOSD, are responsible for the neuroinflammatory response and secondary demyelinating lesions. These anti-AQP4 antibodies can be the drivers of neuroinflammatory process in SLE patients, which is distinct from the immunopathogenesis seen in traditional neuropsychiatric SLE. The clinical course is often a relapsing one and is managed differently. In this review, we describe and outline the clinical course and outcomes of AQP4+ NMOSD/SLE overlap cases.

METHODS

To investigate the co-existence of SLE with AQP4+NMOSD, we conducted a systematic review of individual patient data from case reports and case series reported in major databases. The study extracted clinic-demographic features, imaging and laboratory profiles, treatment approaches, and outcomes of these patients. Inclusion criteria for the review required patients to have positivity for AQP4 or NMO in the blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and exhibit at least one manifestation of both NMOSD and SLE.

RESULTS

In this overlap between SLE and AQP4+NMOSD, a high female preponderance was observed, with 42 out of 46 patients (91.3%) being female. Nearly half of the NMOSD cases (47.8%) had onset after lupus, with a median of 5 years between the two diagnoses. Hematological manifestations were seen in the majority of patients (63%), as well as longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (87%), and brainstem involvement on imaging (29.6%). Cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed a dominantly lymphocytic pleocytosis, with oligoclonal bands being reported scarcely. Although cyclophosphamide was the most common steroid sparing agent used for maintenance, robust evidence for both efficacy and safety in AQP4+NMOSD is available for mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and rituximab. The majority of reported cases showed a relapsing course, while one patient had a monophasic course.

CONCLUSION

AQP4+NMOSD in SLE patients is a relapsing and neurologically disabling disorder that can mimic neuropsychiatric manifestations, frequently occurs after the onset of lupus or may predate, responds to immunosuppressants, and necessitates indefinite treatment.

Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder patients, A seven years follow-up study from Iran

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) is a rare neuroinflammatory disease characterized by recurrent relapses. The most common signs are myelitis and optic neuritis. It can also present by cerebral or brain stem syndromes. There are still many challenges in its diagnosis and treatment, and long-term follow-up studies are needed to see the disease course over time.

METHODS

We established an electronic registration system of NMOSD patients starting from October 2015 in Kashani hospital, Isfahan, Iran. Every suspected patient was documented and included in the follow-up system to survey their disease course. Anti-aquaporine 4 (AQP4) antibody checked for all by cell-based assay method. All information such as demographic and clinical data and laboratory and MRI findings were documented. Participants were followed up for any relapses, new paraclinical tests and drug changes. This study is based on the definite NMOSD cases (according to the 2015 criteria) characteristics and clinical course during 7 years of registration.

RESULTS

The study included 173 NMOSD cases and 56 ones were seropositive for AQP4 Ab. Their mean age was 40.02±11.11 years (45.78 in the seropositive group). The mean age at disease onset was about 30.16 years. The mean time of follow-up by our registration system is 55.84 ± 18.94 months (54.82 months in seropositive ones). The annual relapse rate is estimated as 0.47±0.36. Long extended transvers myelitis (LETM) was present in the baseline MRI of 77 patients (44.5%), while 32 of them did not show any related clinical symptoms. 124 patients revealed an abnormality in the first brain MRI. 27 individuals suffer hypothyroidism as the most common comorbid disease. The disease seems to be more prevalent in the west and southwest areas of Isfahan province.

CONCLUSION

The mean age of onset is higher than Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients, but there are notable pediatric cases too. It should also be noticed that cervical LETM can be asymptomatic at first. Brain MRI abnormalities are frequently observed. The disease is more prevalent in the geographical areas where showing high MS prevalence.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder with AQP4-IgG presenting as area postrema syndrome and progressing to myelitis: A rare case report

Key Clinical Message

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders can less commonly present with area postrema syndrome progressing to myelitis. Management involves intravenous glucocorticoids, plasma exchange, and preventive immunotherapy.

Abstract

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders can less commonly present with area postrema syndrome progressing to myelitis. The majority of patients have positive AQP4-Ab. Diagnosis is based on clinical and imaging findings. These patients can be treated with intravenous glucocorticoids, plasma exchange, and preventive immunotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibody therapy in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Introduction

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a devastating inflammatory CNS demyelinating disease. Two groups of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are used to prevent disease relapse, i.e., Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved mAbs (e.g., eculizumab satralizumab, inebilizumab), and off-label mAb drugs (e.g., rituximab and tocilizumab). The FDA-approved mAbs have high efficacy but more expensive compared to the off-labels, and thus are less accessible. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was to assess the efficacy and safety of both classes of mAbs compared to the current standard treatments.

Methods

Systematically searches were conducted in MEDLINE and SCOPUS from inception until July 2021. Randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible if they compared any pair of treatments (mAbs, immunosuppressive drugs, or placebo) in adult patients with NMOSD. Studies with AQP4-IgG positive or negative were used in the analysis. Probability of relapse and time to event were extracted from the Kaplan-Meier curves using Digitizer. These data were then converted into individual patient time-to-event data. A one-stage mixed-effect survival model was applied to estimate the median time to relapse and relative treatment effects using hazard ratios (HR). Two-stage NMA was used to determine post-treatment annualized relapse rate (ARR), expanded disability status score (EDSS) change, and serious adverse events (SAE). Risk of bias was assessed using the revised cochrane risk of bias tool.

Results

A total of 7 RCTs with 776 patients were eligible in the NMA. Five of the seven studies were rated low risk of bias. Both FDA-approved and off-label mAbs showed significantly lower risk of relapse than standard treatments, with HR (95% CI) of 0.13 (0.07, 0.24) and 0.16 (0.07, 0.37) respectively. In addition, the FDA-approved mAbs had 20% lower risk of relapse than the off-label mAbs, but this did not reach statistical significance. The ARRs were also lower in FDA-approved and off-label mAbs than the standard treatments with the mean-difference of−0.27 (-0.37,−0.16) and−0.31(-0.46,−0.16), respectively.

Conclusion

The off-label mAbs may be used as the first-line treatment for improving clinical outcomes including disease relapse, ARR, and SAEs for NMOSD in countries where resources and accessibility of the FDA-approved mAbs are limited.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=283424, identifier: CRD42021283424.

Origins and immunopathogenesis of autoimmune central nervous system disorders

The field of autoimmune neurology is rapidly evolving, and recent discoveries have advanced our understanding of disease aetiologies. In this article, we review the key pathogenic mechanisms underlying the development of CNS autoimmunity. First, we review non-modifiable risk factors, such as age, sex and ethnicity, as well as genetic factors such as monogenic variants, common variants in vulnerability genes and emerging HLA associations. Second, we highlight how interactions between environmental factors and epigenetics can modify disease onset and severity. Third, we review possible disease mechanisms underlying triggers that are associated with the loss of immune tolerance with consequent recognition of self-antigens; these triggers include infections, tumours and immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapies. Fourth, we outline how advances in our understanding of the anatomy of lymphatic drainage and neuroimmune interfaces are challenging long-held notions of CNS immune privilege, with direct relevance to CNS autoimmunity, and how disruption of B cell and T cell tolerance and the passage of immune cells between the peripheral and intrathecal compartments have key roles in initiating disease activity. Last, we consider novel therapeutic approaches based on our knowledge of the immunopathogenesis of autoimmune CNS disorders.

Effectiveness and Safety of Immunosuppressive Drug Therapy for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: An Overview of Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to provide an overview of meta-analyses and systematic reviews on the effectiveness and safety of immunosuppressive drug therapy for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) by evaluating the methodological quality and reporting quality of reviews.

METHODS

The Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Data, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched to collect systematic reviews or meta-analyses on the effectiveness and safety of immunosuppressive therapy for NMOSD from inception to December 2, 2021. Two researchers independently screened reviews and extracted data. Any differences in the procession of review assessment between the two researchers were re-evaluated, and the disagreement was resolved by discussion with other researchers. The following data were extracted: author, year of publication, the country where the study was conducted, study type, the number of included studies, sample size, risk bias tools, medication of immunosuppressive therapy, and main outcomes. Then, the AMSTAR-2, which is a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews (2nd edition), and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) were used to evaluate the methodological quality and reporting quality of evidence. A comprehensive analysis was conducted on the outcomes for all included reviews.

RESULTS

A total of 15 reviews were included. Of the included reviews, 3 were systematic reviews, 7 were meta-analyses, and 5 were systematic reviews and meta-analyses. According to the AMSTAR-2 criteria, 6 studies had high quality, 1 study had moderate quality, 4 studies had low quality, and 4 studies had critically low quality. Based on the GRADE, neither evidence quality for effectiveness nor safety was high.

CONCLUSION

Immunosuppressive drug therapy is effective for patients with NMOSD, but its safety is controversial. Due to the poor quality of evidence, reliability needs to be considered. Thus, large sample, multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled studies are still needed in the future.

An update on biologic treatments for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

INTRODUCTION

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system mediated by antibodies targeting the aquaporin-4 (AQP4) water channel expressed on astrocytes. The binding of specific antibodies to AQP4 causes complement-dependent cytotoxicity, leading to inflammation and demyelination. Several recent phase 2 and 3 randomized placebo-controlled trials showed the efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibody therapies targeting B-cells, interleukin-6 receptor, and complement.

AREAS COVERED

Current biologic treatments for NMOSD and developments therein, and unresolved issues in NMOSD treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

New biologic treatments demonstrate high efficacy and good safety for patients with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD. The optimal therapeutics for seronegative NMOSD, pediatric patients, and female patients who are pregnant or wish to be are unclear, and further research is needed. Also, real-world studies of new biological agents and the data on the durability of their beneficial effects and their long-term safety are required. Effective rescue therapy for an acute attack is critical given permanent disability in NMOSD is attack-related, and biologic agents that treat acute attack are emerging. If such treatments are to become widely applied, studies on the most cost-effective treatment strategies are needed.

Different doses of Rituximab for the therapy of Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disease(NMOSD) is an autoimmune neurological disease that primarily affects the spinal cord, optic nerve, and periventricular organs. Rituximab plays an important role in the prevention of relapse in NMOSD. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of different doses of the anti-monoclonal antibody rituximab in NMOSD.

OBJECTS

Our study aimed to implement a meta-analysis to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of different doses of rituximab in the treatment of NMOSD.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov for relevant studies evaluating rituximab for NMOSD up to March 2022. Data were assessed using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 14 softwares. Means and standard deviations(SD) were analyzed using random effects models with continuous outcomes. Risk radio was analyzed using random effects models with dichotomous outcomes.

RESULTS

We collected 576 patients from 17 studies. The endpoint of efficacy was the change in annual recurrence rate(ARR), expanded disability status scale (EDSS), and the number of patients free of relapse between pre-treatment and post-treatment of rituximab. We found that rituximab reduced ARR and EDSS, with a significant reduction in ARR(MD= -1.79, 95% CI: -3.18 ∼ -0.39, P= 0.01) and EDSS(MD= -1.35, 95% CI: -1.5 ∼ -1.19, P < 0.00001) at 100 mg intravenous infusion per week for 3 consecutive weeks, meanwhile making the number of patients free of relapse increased (RR= 24.61 [5.11, 118.55], P<0.0001) and being relatively safe and without serious adverse events(SAEs). In terms of safety, we compared and summarised the adverse events(AEs) and SAEs from 17 studies.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we found rituximab to be relatively safe and efficacious in the treatment of NMOSD, particularly at a dose of 100mg intravenous infusion per week for 3 consecutive weeks.

The role of complement and complement therapeutics in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

INTRODUCTION

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are characterized in the majority of cases by the presence of IgG1 autoantibodies against aquaporin 4 (AQP4) and myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG), both capable of activating complement.

AREAS COVERED

We review evidence of complement involvement in NMOSD pathophysiology from pathological, in vitro, in vivo, human studies, and clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

In AQP4 NMOSD, complement deposition is a prominent pathological feature, while in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated complement-dependent pathogenicity of AQP4 antibodies. Consistent with these studies, the anti-C5 monoclonal antibody eculizumab was remarkably effective and safe in a phase 2/3 trial of AQP4-NMOSD patents leading to FDA-approved indication. Several other anti-complement agents, either approved or in trials for other neuro-autoimmunities, like myasthenia, CIDP, and GBS, are also relevant to NMOSD generating an exciting group of evolving immunotherapies. Limited but compelling in vivo and in vitro data suggest that anti-complement therapeutics may be also applicable to a subset of MOG NMOSD patients with severe disease. Overall, anticomplement agents, along with the already approved anti-IL6 and anti-CD19 monoclonal antibodies sartralizumab and inebilizumab, are rapidly changing the therapeutic algorithm in NMOSD, a previously difficult-to-treat autoimmune neurological disorder.

Adverse Events in NMOSD Therapy

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are rare neurologic autoimmune diseases that have a poor prognosis if left untreated. For many years, generic oral immunosuppressants and repurposed monoclonal antibodies that target the interleukin-6 pathway or B cells were the mainstays of drug treatment. Recently, these drug treatments have been complemented by new biologics developed and approved specifically for NMOSD. In principle, all of these drugs are effective, but treatment recommendations that take this into account are still pending. Instead, the choice of a drug may depend on other criteria such as drug safety or tolerability. In this review, we summarise current knowledge on the adverse effects of azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab, tocilizumab, eculizumab, satralizumab, and inebilizumab in NMOSD. Infections, cytopenias, and infusion-related reactions are most common, but the data are as heterogeneous as the manifestations are diverse. Nevertheless, knowledge of safety issues may facilitate treatment choices for individual patients.

Hope for patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders - from mechanisms to trials

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare inflammatory CNS disease that primarily manifests as relapsing episodes of severe optic neuritis and myelitis. Diagnosis of NMOSD is supported by the detection of IgG autoantibodies that target the aquaporin 4 (AQP4) water channel, which, in the CNS, is an astrocyte-specific protein. AQP4 antibody binding leads to AQP4 internalization, complement-dependent and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, and water channel dysfunction. Cumulative attack-related injury causes disability in NMOSD, so the prevention of attacks is expected to prevent disability accrual. Until recently, no regulator-approved therapies were available for NMOSD. Traditional immunosuppressant therapies, including mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine and rituximab, were widely used but their benefits have not been assessed in controlled studies. In 2019 and 2020, five phase II and III randomized placebo-controlled trials of four mechanism-based therapies for NMOSD were published and demonstrated that all four effectively prolonged the time to first relapse. All four drugs were monoclonal antibodies: the complement C5 antibody eculizumab, the IL-6 receptor antibody satralizumab, the B cell-depleting antibody inebilizumab, which targets CD19, and rituximab, which targets CD20. We review the pathophysiology of NMOSD, the rationale for the development of these mechanism-based drugs, the methodology and outcomes of the five trials, and the implications of these findings for the treatment of NMOSD.