Clinical profile of autoimmune nodopathy with anti-neurofascin 186 antibody

An Unusual Case of Neurofascin 186 Neuropathy

Among the diverse array of neuropathies, autoimmune neuropathy stands out as a distinctive subset, where the body's immune system mistakenly attacks its nerve tissues, triggering inflammation and nerve damage. NF 186, also known as neurofascin 186, is a cell adhesion molecule crucial for the integrity and functioning of the peripheral nervous system. This case report highlights the clinical presentation specific to NF 186-positive autoimmune neuropathy and also the treatment modalities.

Semiquantitative assessment of preganglionic nerves for chronic immune-mediated neuropathies using brachial plexus magnetic resonance imaging

Background

Brachial plexus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important noninvasive supplementary diagnostic method of chronic immune peripheral neuropathies, but few MRI studies on the preganglionic nerves have been conducted. This retrospective cross-sectional study aimed to establish a reliable assessment for brachial plexus preganglionic nerve thickness and to use this method to assess and compare nerve characteristics in various types of peripheral neuropathies.

Methods

Hospitalized patients diagnosed as positive for anti-neurofascin-155 (NF155)-positive autoimmune nodopathy (AN) (NF155+), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), or multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) at Huashan Hospital of Fudan University in Shanghai, China, who underwent brachial plexus MRI between October 2011 and August 2023 were consecutively recruited for this study. We also recruited participants who underwent brachial plexus MRI during this period with no history of trauma, inflammation, tumors, compression, or degenerative conditions as healthy controls. According to our self-developed semiquantitative assessment of preganglionic nerves, we assessed the bilateral preganglionic C5-C8 nerves individually and scored the enlargement degree from 0 to 4 points. Furthermore, a sum score ≥20 was defined as definite enlargement.

Results

A total of 122 participants were enrolled, including 28 with NF155+, 40 with CIDP, 15 with MMN, and 39 healthy controls. In the comparison of the single-nerve scores, we found that there was a significant difference distribution among the four groups (χ2 test; P<0.001), with the patients with NF155+ exhibiting the highest scores in each of the bilateral C5-C8 nerves. In the comparison of the sum scores, a descending tendency was observed in patients NF155+, CIDP, and MMN, with median scores of 11, 4, and 0 points, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis test; P=0.003, P<0.001, and P=0.005, respectively for NF155+ vs. CIDP, NF155+ vs. MMN, and CIDP vs. MMN). The proportion of definite enlargement in those with NF155+ was greater than that in healthy controls (21% vs. 0%; χ2 test; P=0.004), and the sum score at 0 points was lower in the NF155+ group than in CIDP, MMN, and healthy control groups (7% vs. 37%, 87%, and 41%, respectively; χ2 test; P<0.001).

Conclusions

This semiquantitative assessment can be a valuable tool for measuring preganglionic nerve enlargement, which was found to be decreased, respectively, in those with NF155+, CIDP, and MMN. Presence of definite enlargement could be a strong indicator of NF155+ in clinic.

Insights into refractory chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a comprehensive real-world study

Background

Refractory chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a challenging subset of CIDP. It does not respond well to immune therapy and causes substantial disability. A comprehensive understanding of its clinical profile, electrophysiological characteristics and potential risk factors associated with refractoriness remains to be further elucidated.

Methods

Data in this cross-sectional study was collected and reviewed from the Huashan Peripheral Neuropathy Database (HSPN). Included patients were categorized into refractory CIDP and non-refractory CIDP groups based on treatment response. The clinical and electrophysiological characteristics were compared between refractory and non-refractory CIDP groups. Potential risk factors associated with refractory CIDP were explored with a multivariate logistic regression model.

Results

Fifty-eight patients with CIDP were included. Four disease course patterns of refractory CIDP are described: a relapsing-remitting form, a stable form, a secondary progressive form and a primary progressive form. Compared to non-refractory CIDP patients, refractory CIDP exhibited a longer disease duration (48.96 ± 33.72 vs. 28.33 ± 13.72 months, p = 0.038) and worse functional impairment (MRC sum score, 46.08 ± 12.69 vs. 52.81 ± 7.34, p = 0.018; mRS, 2.76 ± 0.93 vs. 2.33 ± 0.99, p = 0.082; INCAT, 3.68 ± 1.76 vs. 3.03 ± 2.28, p = 0.056, respectively). Electrophysiological studies further revealed greater axonal impairment (4.15 ± 2.0 vs. 5.94 ± 2.77 mv, p = 0.011, ulnar CMAP) and more severe demyelination (5.56 ± 2.86 vs. 4.18 ± 3.71 ms, p = 0.008, ulnar distal latency, 7.94 ± 5.62 vs. 6.52 ± 6.64 ms, p = 0.035, median distal latency; 30.21 ± 12.59 vs. 37.48 ± 12.44 m/s, p = 0.035, median conduction velocity; 58.66 ± 25.73 vs. 42.30 ± 13.77 ms, p = 0.033, median F-wave latency), compared to non-refractory CIDP. Disease duration was shown to be an independent risk factor for refractory CIDP (p < 0.05, 95%CI [0.007, 0.076]).

Conclusion

This study provided a comprehensive description of refractory CIDP, addressing its clinical features, classification of clinical course, electrophysiological characteristics, and prognostic factors, effectively elucidating its various aspects. These findings contribute to a better understanding of this challenging subset of CIDP and might be informative for management and treatment strategies.

Nodal-paranodal antibodies in HIV-immune mediated radiculo-neuropathies: Clinical phenotypes and relevance

BACKGROUND

The frequency of nodal-paranodal antibodies in HIV-infected patients with chronic immune-mediated radiculo-neuropathies (IMRN) has not been previously described.

METHODS

HIV-infected patients who met the inclusion criteria for chronic IMRN were screened for immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies directed against nodal (neurofascin (NF)186) and paranodal (NF155, contactin-1 (CNTN1) and contactin-associated protein(Caspr1)) cell adhesion molecules, using a live, cell-based assay. To explore potential pathogenicity, binding of human IgG to myelinated co-cultures was assessed by incubation with patients' sera positive for nodal or paranodal antibodies. Normal human serum was added as a source of complement to assess for complement activation as a mechanism for myelin injury.

RESULTS

Twenty-four HIV-infected patients with IMRN were included in the study, 15 with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), 4 with ventral root radiculopathies (VRR), and 5 with dorsal root ganglionopathies (DRG). Five patients with CIDP had combined central and peripheral demyelination (CCPD). Three patients (12.7%) tested positive for neurofascin IgG1 antibodies in the following categories: 1 patient with VRR was NF186 positive, and 2 patients were NF155 positive with DRG and mixed sensory-motor demyelinating neuropathy with optic neuritis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of nodal-paranodal antibodies is similar among IMRN regardless of HIV status. Interpretation of the results in the context of HIV is challenging as there is uncertainty regarding pathogenicity of the antibodies, especially at low titres. Larger prospective immune studies are required to delineate pathogenicity in the context of HIV, and to establish a panel of antibodies to predict for a particular clinical phenotype.

[The significance of autoantibodies against nodal and paranodal proteins in autoimmune nodopathies]

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is recognized as a syndrome caused by multiple pathologies. Since the 2010s, it has been clarified that autoantibodies against membranous proteins localized in the nodes of Ranvier and paranodes are positive in subsets of CIDP patients, leading to proposing a new disease concept called autoimmune nodopathies, which is independent of CIDP, in the revised international CIDP guidelines. This article reviews the significance of these autoantibodies, especially anti-neurofascin 155 and anti-contactin 1 antibodies, which have been the most prevalent and achieved a higher degree of consensus.

Pan-Neurofascin autoimmune nodopathy - a life-threatening, but reversible neuropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Autoimmune nodopathies are immune-mediated neuropathies associated with antibodies targeting the peripheral node of Ranvier. Recently, antibodies against all neurofascin-isoforms (pan-neurofascin) have been linked to a clinical phenotype distinct from previously described autoimmune nodopathies. Here, we aim at highlighting the molecular background and the red flags for diagnostic assessment and provide treatment and surveillance approaches for this new disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Neurofascin-isoforms are located at different compartments of the node of Ranvier: Neurofascin-186 at the axonal nodal gap, and Neurofascin-155 at the terminal Schwann cell loops at the paranode. Pan-neurofascin antibodies recognize a common epitope on both isoforms and can access the node of Ranvier directly. Depending on their subclass profile, antibodies can induce direct structural disorganization and complement activation. Affected patients present with acute and immobilizing sensorimotor neuropathy, with cranial nerve involvement and long-term respiratory insufficiency. Early antibody-depleting therapy is crucial to avoid axonal damage, and remission is possible despite extended disease and high mortality. The antibody titer and serum neurofilament light chain levels can serve as biomarkers for diagnosis and therapy monitoring.

SUMMARY

Pan-neurofascin-associated autoimmune nodopathies has unique molecular and clinical features. Testing should be considered in severe and prolonged Guillain-Barré-like phenotype.