Neuroimaging evolution of ischemia in men and women: an observational study

Toward a Better Understanding of Sex- and Gender-Related Differences in Endovascular Stroke Treatment: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

There are many unknowns when it comes to the role of sex in the pathophysiology and management of acute ischemic stroke. This is particularly true for endovascular treatment (EVT). It has only recently been established as standard of care; therefore, data are even more scarce and conflicting compared with other areas of acute stroke. Assessing the role of sex and gender as isolated variables is challenging because they are closely intertwined with each other, as well as with patients' cultural, ethnic, and social backgrounds. Nevertheless, a better understanding of sex- and gender-related differences in EVT is important to develop strategies that can ultimately improve individualized outcome for both men and women. Disregarding patient sex and gender and pursuing a one-size-fits-all strategy may lead to suboptimal or even harmful treatment practices. This scientific statement is meant to outline knowledge gaps and unmet needs for future research on the role of sex and gender in EVT for acute ischemic stroke. It also provides a pragmatic road map for researchers who aim to investigate sex- and gender-related differences in EVT and for clinicians who wish to improve clinical care of their patients undergoing EVT by accounting for sex- and gender-specific factors. Although most EVT studies, including those that form the basis of this scientific statement, report patient sex rather than gender, open questions on gender-specific EVT differences are also discussed.

Virtual monoenergetic dual-energy CT reconstructions at 80 keV are optimal non-contrast CT technique for early stroke detection

BACKGROUND

Virtual monoenergetic (VM) dual-energy computed tomography (DE-CT) enables grey-to-white matter contrast-to-noise ratio optimization, potentially increasing ischaemic brain oedema visibility. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of VM and standard DE-CT reconstructions for early stroke detection.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with non-contrast DE-CT of the brain scanned within 12 h of stroke symptom onset were prospectively included in the study. Patients with other significant brain pathology were excluded. Two radiologists jointly evaluated standard and VM reconstructions (from 40 to 190 keV at increments of 10 keV) for early stroke signs on a four-point Likert scale: (a) stroke definitely present, (b) stroke probably present, (c) probably no stroke, and (d) definitely no stroke. Follow-up imaging and clinical data served as the standard of reference. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Stroke incidence among 184 patients was 76%. In 64 patients follow-up imaging served as the standard of reference: ischemic brain oedema detection was significantly more accurate on VM reconstructions at 80 keV compared with standard DE-CT reconstructions (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.821 vs. AUC = 0.672, p = 0.002). The difference was most prominent within the first 3 h after symptom onset (at 11%, AUC = 0.819 vs. AUC = 0.709, p = 0.17) and in patients with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale above 16 (at 37.5%, AUC = 1 vs. AUC = 0.625, p = 0.14).

CONCLUSION

VM DE-CT reconstructions at 80 keV appear to be the optimal non-contrast CT technique for diagnosing early ischaemic stroke, particularly within the first 3 h after symptom onset and in severely ill patients.

Frequency of thrombolytic targets in stroke patients presenting in an extended time window

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of stroke patients presenting in an extended time window who have a thrombolytic treatment target.

BACKGROUND:

Patients presenting up to 24 h after stroke onset have been found to have penumbral tissue on multimodal imaging. Stroke patients presenting in this extended time window without a large vessel occlusion (LVO) may benefit from reperfusion therapy using thrombolysis.

METHODS:

Patients seen at our institutions from 2011 through 2015 were reviewed to identify those who presented >4 h and <24 h from last seen normal (LSN) and did not receive acute treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were used to dichotomize patients using a diffusion–perfusion mismatch ratio of 1.2.

RESULTS:

During the study period, 3469 patients were evaluated by our stroke service, with 893 seen 4–24 h from LSN who were not treated. MRI was performed with diffusion and perfusion imaging in 439 patients, of whom 26 were excluded due to hemorrhage and 37 were excluded due to LVO. This left 376 patients who potentially could have been treated with thrombolysis in an extended time window and were included in the analysis. Of these, 156 (42%) demonstrated a mismatch ratio >1.2. Patients with a mismatch presented earlier (P = 0.012), were more likely to be female (P = 0.03), and had higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Almost half of the patients presenting 4–24 h from LSN had a target for thrombolysis in our study. Multimodal imaging may be able to expand the population of treatable stroke patients given the results of recent clinical trials.