Malalignment and subchondral bone turnover in contralateral knees of overweight/obese women with unilateral osteoarthritis: implications for bilateral disease

Is single-stage bilateral medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy advisable?

PURPOSE

To validate the safety and clinical results of single-stage bilateral versus unilateral medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO).

METHODS

A propensity-matched cohort study was performed from March 2020 to March 2021 in our medical center. Data were prospectively collected. Including 34 patients who underwent single-stage bilateral medial opening HTO(SSBHTO), and 68 cases in the unilateral group. Propensity-matched ration was 2:1 based on age, sex, and body mass index using R software. Comparisons of the length of hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, postoperative adverse events, 90-day readmission rate, conversion to TKA rate, self-reported VAS and WOMAC scores were made to investigate the safety and clinical results of bilateral HTO.

RESULTS

The mean length of hospital stay was 7.36 ± 2.23 days for SSBHTO and 7 days (IQR, 3 days; range, 4 to 23 days) for the unilateral group (P = 0.219). The mean operative time was 144 ± 47 min for bilateral HTO and 105(37.5) mins for a unilateral OWHTO (P < 0.001). The mean blood loss was 150(100) ml for SSBHTO and 100(50) ml for unilateral OWHTO (P < 0.001). There were no significant difference of the adverse events and 90-day readmission rate between two groups. No failed HTO or conversion to knee arthroplasty were observed at the end of follow-up. VAS, pain, stiffness, and functional scores of the WOMAC scale were essentially comparable of two groups one year after surgery (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A single-stage bilateral medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy is advisable for patients with knee osteoarthritis. Patients benefit from avoiding secondary anesthesia, postoperative complications, and substantial cost savings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

Using bilateral data in controls and patients with bilateral and unilateral pathology requires increased scrutiny

In many aspects of human research, capturing multiple measures from the same participant is common due to the symmetric nature of the human body (e.g., two eyes, ten fingers, two legs, etc.). This has established a concerning paradox in biomedical and clinical research. When the same condition exist bilaterally (controls or bilateral pathology), researchers often blindly include both (or multiple) measures into the statistical analysis. This assumes that measures between the two sides are statistically independent (uncorrelated). However, there are certain inherent factors within an individual (e.g., age, sex, physical activity, gait pattern, tissue characteristics, hormonal status, pain thresholds, etc.) that would point to a statistical dependence between bilateral measures. Conversely, in unilateral pathology, it is common practice to use the contralateral side as the comparator. This assumes the exact opposite, that sans pathology, bilateral measures are perfectly correlated without bias. Both of these assumptions can lead to errors in the study conclusions. Few studies have explored the statistical dependence between multiple measures from the same participant. Thus, the purpose of this perspective is to explore the statistical considerations associated with analyzing multiple measures from the same participant and provide recommendations for navigating the use of multiple, non-temporal, data points from the same participant. To give context for these recommendations, an example dataset involving patellofemoral kinematics is provided. Due to the prevalent use of bilateral data in the current literature and the resulting potential for invalid study conclusions, we recommend that future research use caution when using multiple measures from the same participant and apply proper statistical analysis (e.g., generalized estimating equations) when these measures are not independent. If the contralateral limb is used as a comparator in unilateral pathology, strong evidence must exist that the underlying pathology has not altered the measures of interest in this contralateral limb.

Comparison of the Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Single- and Two-Stage Bilateral Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

PURPOSE

This study compared the functional and radiological outcomes and complications of single- (SS) and two-stage (TS) bilateral high tibial osteotomy (HTO).

METHODS

From 2014 to 2018, 48 patients underwent bilateral HTO surgery for osteoarthritis. The outcomes of SS in 28 knees and TS in 32 knees were compared using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) as functional outcomes, and the medial proximal tibial (MPTA), hip-knee-ankle (HKA), tibial slope (TSA) angles, and mechanical axis deviation (MAD) as radiological outcomes. We also evaluated the estimated blood loss (EBL).

RESULTS

No significant differences in the pre- and postoperative mean OKS and KOOS were found between the groups. There was a significant difference between the groups in the last postoperative HKA angle (- 0.9 ± 3.9 and 1.8 ± 4.3°, respectively). In SS and TS, the respective total mean surgical time was 108 ± 28 and 143 ± 36 min (p < 0.001). The mean calculated EBL was 612 ± 267 and 544 ± 357 mL, respectively, (p = 0.5), and the mean length of stay (LOS) was 2.2 ± 0.83 and 3.5 ± 1.0 days, respectively, (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

SS bilateral HTO is a safe reasonable option for certain patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis because it involves a single hospitalization, one-time exposure to anesthesia risks, accelerated rehabilitation, earlier return to expected life status, reduced total hospital stay, and a likely decrease in total cost.

Association of the joint line orientation angle of the contralateral limb with the alignment change of the unilateral and bilateral opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate and compare unilateral and bilateral open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) using mid-term serial assessment of clinical and radiological outcomes, especially focussing on coronal lower extremity alignment.

METHODS

Serial radiological assessments were performed in 40 patients (80 knees) with bilateral OWHTO and 49 patients (49 knees) with unilateral OWHTO. Both groups were further divided into four subgroups to compare each limb (unilateral involved and non-involved limbs and bilateral primarily and secondarily treated limbs). Radiological and clinical outcomes were evaluated and compared among the four groups. For the alignment change assessment, the pelvic tilt angle (PTA), weight-bearing line ratio (WBLR), joint line orientation angle (JLOA), medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), distal tibia articular angle (DTAA), and talar inclination (TI) were measured pre- and postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Student's t-test, one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance, and correlation analysis were used to compare the groups.

RESULTS

Patients in the unilateral and bilateral OWHTO groups had similar postoperative radiological and clinical outcomes. Each unilaterally involved limb and primarily treated bilaterally involved limb were negatively affected by the contralateral limb with respect to increased JLOA during the postoperative period (unilateral OWHTO group: r = -0.350, p = 0.023; bilateral OWHTO group: r = -0.520, p = 0.005). The correction change of the ankle parameters in the secondarily treated limb showed greater varus alignment than the primarily treated limb after bilateral OWHTO (DTAA (0.1 ± 3.0 vs. -0.5 ± 3.8°, p = 0.014) and TI (0.9 ± 3.2° vs. -0.3 ± 2.9, p = 0.001)).

CONCLUSION

Unilateral and bilateral OWHTOs shared similar postoperative radiological and clinical outcomes. Alignment changes of the unilateral OWHTO and the primarily treated limb of the bilateral OWHTO were associated with the JLOA of the contralateral limb.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Cohort study; Level III.

Comparison of 8-year knee osteoarthritis progression in 2 siblings: a case-based review

Because the pathophysiology of knee osteoarthritis is poorly understood, optimal evidence-based clinical management is uncertain. Sibling comparison studies can help inform a clinical model to guide preventive care. We compared the 8-year clinical outcomes in 2 sisters with a family history of osteoarthritis, normal BMI, and absence of knee pain at baseline. Both patients had Kellgren–Lawrence grade 1 in the affected knee at the time of twisting knee injuries leading to osteoarthritis diagnoses at age 50 (patient 1) and 51 (patient 2). Patient 1 developed a chronic right knee effusion, and progressed to Kellgren–Lawrence grade 3 bilaterally by the time she had a right total knee replacement at age 58. Patient 2 had subchondral fractures of the right knee with transient effusion, which healed after 1 year of partial weight-bearing with crutches and subsequent daily use of knee sleeves. Patient 2 had Kellgren–Lawrence grade 0 bilaterally upon surveillance imaging at age 58. The terms “osteoarthritis and knee and diagnostic imaging and subchondral bone and pathophysiology” were searched in the PubMed database to identify original research articles to inform a clinical model consistent with the patients’ outcomes. A fluid model of osteoarthritis was the best explanatory model for the discordant clinical trajectories of the age-matched siblings. Patient recommendations are presented based on these findings.

Comparison of the outcome between unilateral and bilateral open wedge high tibial osteotomy in the bilateral varus knees

INTRODUCTION

Bilateral open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) can be performed in a staged manner to enable the healing and rehabilitation of each limb separately after surgery. However, the effects of staged bilateral OWHTO on the pattern of recovery and changes over time for each limb have not been established. Additionally, there is a lack of information regarding the optimal timing for staged surgery.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients (44 knees) in the bilateral OWHTO group and 42 patients (42 knees) in the unilateral OWHTO group were analyzed. Clinical and radiological results were evaluated and compared between the two groups. For the alignment change assessment, the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle and weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio were measured preoperatively and at postoperative 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.

RESULTS

The correction loss of HKA angle in the bilateral OWHTO group was significantly larger than that in the unilateral OWHTO group (0.5° ± 1.4° vs 1.3° ± 2.0°, p = 0.049). The correction loss of WBL ratio was significantly greater in the patients with staged bilateral OWHTO within a 3-month interval compared to those with staged bilateral OWHTO in an interval longer than 3 months (WBL ratio; 7.5% vs 2.1%, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the clinical scores and range of motion at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The smaller loss of correction in the unilateral OWHTO group occurred compared to the bilateral OWHTO group. Additionally, surgeons should keep in mind that the amount of correction loss may be greater if staged bilateral OWHTO is performed at intervals of 3 months or less.

Effect and safety of early weight-bearing on the outcome after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of early weight-bearing by comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between early and traditional delayed weight-bearing after OWHTO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A rigorous and systematic approach was used. The methodological quality was also assessed. Results that are possible to be compared in two or more than two articles were presented as forest plots. A 95% confidence interval was calculated for each effect size, and we calculated the I ² statistic, which presents the percentage of total variation attributable to the heterogeneity among studies. The random-effects model was used to calculate the effect size.

RESULTS

Six articles were included in the final analysis. All case groups were composed of early full weight-bearing within 2 weeks. All control groups were composed of late full weight-bearing between 6 weeks and 2 months. Pooled analysis was possible for the improvement in Lysholm score, but there was no statistically significant difference shown between groups. Other clinical results were also similar between groups. Four studies reported mechanical femorotibial angle (mFTA) and this result showed no statistically significant difference between groups in the pooled analysis. Furthermore, early weight-bearing showed more favorable results in some radiologic results (osseointegration and patellar height) and complications (thrombophlebitis and recurrence).

CONCLUSION

Our analysis supports that early full weight-bearing after OWHTO using a locking plate leads to improvement in outcomes and was comparable to the delayed weight-bearing in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes. On the contrary, early weight-bearing was more favorable with respect to some radiologic parameters and complications compared with delayed weight-bearing.

Staged medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for bilateral varus gonarthrosis: biomechanical and clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

(1) To evaluate the effect of staged bilateral medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) on established biomechanical risk factors for disease progression and on validated measures of pain and function and (2) To compare outcomes in patients having the second surgery staged within or beyond 12 months of the first surgery.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with bilateral varus alignment and medial compartment osteoarthritis underwent staged bilateral medial opening wedge HTO (21 within and 16 beyond 12 months). Patients underwent full-limb standing anteroposterior radiographs to determine frontal plane alignment (mechanical axis angle) and three-dimensional gait analysis to estimate the distribution of load across the tibiofemoral compartments (external knee adduction moment). Patients also completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Scores (KOOS), the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, the Short Form Health Survey and the six-minute walk test (6MWT). Patients (both limbs) were evaluated before and approximately 6, 12 and 24 months after each surgery.

RESULTS

There were statistically and clinically significant changes in both limbs that were of similar magnitudes and that remained relatively stable over time postoperatively. Mean (95% CI) improvements in outcomes were as follows. Mechanical axis angle: 9.4° (8.4°, 10.4°) (i.e. average change of both limbs), peak knee adduction moment: -1.7%BW*Ht (-2.1, -1.4 %BW*Ht) (i.e. average change of both limbs), 6MWT: 36.7 m (19.4, 54.0 m), SF-12 Physical Component Summary: 12.0 (8.5, 15.5) and KOOS Pain: 25.4 (19.6, 31.2). Other than the shorter time period to reach maximum benefit of both surgeries, there were no remarkable differences at final assessment between patients having surgeries staged within or beyond 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings demonstrate that patients with bilateral varus gonarthrosis experience marked improvements in established biomechanical risk factors for disease progression bilaterally (mechanical axis angles and external knee adduction moments), as well as clinically important improvements in patient-important outcomes, after staged medial opening wedge HTO. Current findings suggest no difference in outcomes for patients who have the second surgery staged within or beyond 12 months of the first surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Musculoskeletal pain in overweight and obese children

This review seeks to provide a current overview of musculoskeletal pain in overweight and obese children. Databases searched were Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, Medline, Proquest Health and Medical Complete, Scopus, Google Scholar, SPORTDiscuss and Trove for studies published between 1 January 2000 and 30 December 2012. We used a broad definition of children within a 3- to 18-year age range. The search strategy included the following terms: obesity, morbid obesity, overweight, pain, musculoskeletal pain, child, adolescent, chronic pain, back pain, lower back pain, knee pain, hip pain, foot pain and pelvic pain. Two authors independently assessed each record, and any disagreement was resolved by the third author. Data were analysed using a narrative thematic approach owing to the heterogeneity of reported outcome measures. Ninety-seven records were initially identified using a variety of terms associated with children, obesity and musculoskeletal pain. Ten studies were included for thematic analysis when predetermined inclusion criteria were applied. Bone deformity and dysfunction, pain reporting and the impact of children being overweight or obese on physical activity, exercise and quality of life were the three themes identified from the literature. Chronic pain, obesity and a reduction in physical functioning and activity may contribute to a cycle of weight gain that affects a child's quality of life. Future studies are required to examine the sequela of overweight and obese children experiencing chronic musculoskeletal pain.

An OA phenotype may obtain major benefit from bone-acting agents

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis (OA) joints display relevant microstructure alterations associated to an increase in remodeling at subchondral bone, which supports its crucial role in OA pathogenesis. Despite this, the treatment of knee OA patients with antiresorptive drugs has given discordant results, suggesting the existence of a particular patient subset with good response to halting high subchondral remodeling.

OBJECTIVE

To identify an OA phenotype that may obtain major benefit from therapy with bone-acting agents.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching the Medline and PubMed databases from 1990 to April 2013 using the following keywords: subchondral bone, articular cartilage, and osteoarthritis in various combinations with bone agents, bone mineral density, and scintigraphy.

RESULTS

Early animal and human studies provided the rationale for the beneficial use of bone agents on OA cartilage damage. Several bone-acting agents have reduced low back pain and likely spondylosis progression. Recently, strontium ranelate has been reported to exert both structural and clinical benefits in knee OA patients with radiological progression. However, other antiresorptives have shown divergent results. Human studies suggest that these contradictory results may be due to the lack of well-defined OA phenotypes and an accurate methodology to recruit and follow up these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A particular subset of postmenopausal patients with high remodeling and/or low subchondral bone density may benefit from the treatment with bone-acting agents hindering OA progression. This OA population could be identified with the simultaneous use of subchondral bone dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and scintigraphy.

High tibial osteotomy: evolution of research and clinical applications--a Canadian experience

PURPOSE

This narrative review describes experiences at the Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic (FKSMC) with high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for patients with varus gonarthrosis, with particular focus on research published from the unit that has guided practice.

METHODS

The goals of surgery are to improve alignment of the weight bearing axis of the lower limb to lessen the load on the medial tibiofemoral compartment and thereby decrease these important risk factors for disease progression. The overall aims are to improve knee function and delay or even prevent the eventual need for arthroplasty. To achieve these aims, a medial opening wedge osteotomy is utilised, deliberately avoiding an over correction of the lower limb, but tailoring the angle of correction to an individual patient's characteristics. With such an approach, patients with a broad range of characteristics (including age, BMI and lateral compartment involvement) can benefit from the procedure. In addition, the HTO can be used with concomitant procedures to address specific presentations, such as large deformities and instability.

RESULTS

The results suggest that correction to a slight valgus alignment produces approximately 50% reduction in medial compartment loads during gait with large, clinically important improvements in patient-reported outcomes at 2-years postoperatively. In patients with substantial bilateral varus deformity, unilateral surgery can lead to increased dynamic knee joint loads on the nonoperative limb after surgery. This means that such patients require the close monitoring of both limbs and consideration of a staged, bilateral procedure if necessary. In patients requiring bilateral surgery, similar results after bilateral HTO to those after unilateral surgery have been reported. For patients requiring large corrections, the need for a concomitant tibial tubercle osteotomy to reduce the potential for iatrogenic patella infera is considered. Finally, HTO procedures can also be used in patients with instability, either to alter both sagittal and coronal alignment to correct instability in complex ligament deficiencies or to undertake simultaneous HTO and ACL reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

HTO is being used both alone and in conjunction with concomitant procedures with good clinical results. While continued investigation into patient selection and outcomes are required, current research indicates that HTO offers at least a partial solution for the patient with varus gonarthrosis to prolong the life of their native knee joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Doxycycline for osteoarthritis of the knee or hip

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis is a chronic joint disease that involves degeneration of articular cartilage. Pre-clinical data suggest that doxycycline might act as a disease-modifying agent for the treatment of osteoarthritis, with the potential to slow cartilage degeneration. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of doxycycline compared with placebo or no intervention on pain and function in people with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2008, issue 3), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL up to 28 July 2008, with an update performed at 16 March 2012. In addition, we checked conference proceedings, reference lists, and contacted authors.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included studies if they were randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared doxycycline at any dosage and any formulation with placebo or no intervention in people with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data in duplicate. We contacted investigators to obtain missing outcome information. We calculated differences in means at follow-up between experimental and control groups for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for binary outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified one additional trial (232 participants) and included two trials (663 participants) in this update. The methodological quality and the quality of reporting were considered moderate. At end of treatment, clinical outcomes were similar between the two treatment groups, with an effect size of -0.05 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.22 to 0.13), corresponding to a difference in pain scores between doxycycline and control of -0.1 cm (95% CI -0.6 to 0.3 cm) on a 10-cm visual analogue scale, or 32% versus 29% improvement from baseline (difference 3%; 95% CI -5% to 10%). The effect size for function was -0.07 (95% CI -0.25 to 0.10), corresponding to a difference between doxycycline and control of -0.2 (95% CI -0.5 to 0.2) on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) disability subscale with a range of 0 to 10, or 24% versus 21% improvement (difference 3%; 95% CI -3% to 10%). The difference in changes in minimum joint space narrowing assessed in one trial was in favour of doxycycline (-0.15 mm; 95% CI -0.28 to -0.02 mm), which corresponds to a small effect size of -0.23 standard deviation units (95% CI -0.44 to -0.02). More participants withdrew from the doxycycline group compared with placebo due to adverse events (RR 2.28; 95% CI 1.06 to 4.90). There was no evidence that participants in the doxycycline group experienced more serious adverse events than those in the placebo group, but the estimate was imprecise (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.68 to 1.68).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this update, the strength of evidence for effectiveness outcomes was improved from low to moderate and we confirmed that the symptomatic benefit of doxycycline is minimal to non-existent, while the small benefit in terms of joint space narrowing is of questionable clinical relevance and outweighed by safety problems. The CIs of the summary estimates now exclude any clinically relevant difference in improvement of symptoms and the small benefit in terms of joint space narrowing does not outweigh the harms.