Bernstein EJ, Gordon JK, Spiera RF, Huang WT, Horn EM, Mandl LA. Comparison of change in end tidal carbon dioxide after three minutes of step exercise between systemic sclerosis patients with and without pulmonary hypertension.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016;
56:87-94. [PMID:
28028158 DOI:
10.1093/rheumatology/kew365]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2016] [Revised: 09/06/2016] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with SSc. The submaximal heart and pulmonary evaluation (step test) is a non-invasive, submaximal stress test that could be used to identify SSc patients with PH. Our aims were to determine whether change in end tidal carbon dioxide ([Formula: see text]) from rest to end-exercise, and the minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production ratio ([Formula: see text]), both as measured by the step test, differ between SSc patients with and without PH. We also examined differences in validated self-report questionnaires and potential PH biomarkers between SSc patients with and without PH.
METHODS
We performed a cross-sectional study of 27 patients with limited or dcSSc who underwent a right heart catheterization within 24 months prior to study entry. The study visit consisted of questionnaire completion; history; physical examination; step test performance; and phlebotomy. [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], self-report data and biomarkers were compared between patients with and without PH.
RESULTS
SSc patients with PH had a statistically significantly lower median (interquartile range) [Formula: see text] than SSc patients without PH [-2.1 (-5.1 to 0.7) vs 1.2 (-0.7 to 5.4) mmHg, P = 0.035], and a statistically significantly higher median (interquartile range) [Formula: see text] [53.4 (39-64.1) vs 36.4 (31.9-41.1), P = 0.035]. There were no statistically significant differences in self-report data or biomarkers between groups.
CONCLUSION
[Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] as measured by the step test are statistically significantly different between SSc patients with and without PH. [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] may be useful screening tools for PH in the SSc population.
Collapse