Fibromyalgia and the Prediction of Two-Year Changes in Functional Status in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Frequency of fibromyalgianess in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: A multicenter study of Turkish League Against Rheumatism (TLAR) network

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of fibromyalgianess, fibromyalgia syndrome (FS), and widespread pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and their relationship with clinical and demographic parameters.

Patients and methods

This cross-sectional multicenter trial was performed in 14 centers across Türkiye between June 2018 and November 2019. Out of 685 patients recruited from the accessible population, 661 patients (342 RA, 319 AS; 264 males, 397 females; mean age: 48.1±12.9 years; range, 17 to 88 years) met the selection criteria. In these cohorts, those who did not meet the criteria for FS and had widespread pain (widespread pain index ≥7) were evaluated as a separate group. Clinical status and demographic parameters of patients in both cohorts were evaluated as well as the evaluations of RA and AS patients with widespread pain (widespread pain index ≥7) and RA and AS patients with FS groups. In addition, correlations between polysymptomatic distress scale (PSD) scores and Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and Disease Activity Score using 28 joint counts for RA patients and VAS, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) for AS patients were analyzed.

Results

Frequencies of patients with FS and patients who had PSD scores ≥12 were 34.1% and 44.4% in all RA patients, respectively. Moreover, FS and PSD scores ≥12 were found in 29.2% and 36.9% of all AS patients, respectively. PSD scores of RA patients with FS were higher than all RA patients and RA patients with widespread pain. SDAI and CDAI scores of RA patients with FS were higher than all RA patients and RA patients with widespread pain. Similarly, PSD scores of AS patients with FS were higher than all AS patients and AS patients with widespread pain. ASDAS-erythrocyte sedimentation rate and BASDAI scores of AS patients with FS were found higher than all AS patients and AS patients with widespread pain.

Conclusion

Disease activity scores, including pain in RA and AS, were higher in the presence of FS or fibromyalgianess. It may be related to clinical parameters, but cohort studies with long-term follow-up are needed to reveal causality. Additionally, to avoid overtreatment, coexistence of fibromyalgianess should be kept in mind in patients who have inflammatory diseases such as RA and AS, particularly with intractable widespread pain.

Is the relationship between deprivation and outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis mediated by body mass index? A longitudinal cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To understand the relationships between deprivation and obesity with self-reported disability and disease activity in people with RA, and to determine whether BMI mediates the relationship between area-level deprivation and these outcomes.

METHODS

Data came from the Rheumatoid Arthritis Medication Study (RAMS), a 1-year multicentre prospective observational cohort of people with RA recruited from rheumatology centres across England commencing MTX for the first time. A total of 1529 and 1626 people were included who had a baseline and at least one follow-up measurement at 6 or 12 months of HAQ-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and DAS in 28 joints (DAS28), respectively. Linear mixed models estimated the associations of deprivation and obesity with repeated measures HAQ-DI and DAS28. Causal mediation analyses estimated the mediating effect of BMI on the relationship between deprivation and RA outcomes.

RESULTS

Higher deprivation and obesity were associated with higher disability [adjusted regression coefficients highest vs lowest deprivation fifths 0.32 (95% CI 0.19, 0.45); obesity vs no obesity 0.13 (95% CI 0.06, 0.20)] and higher disease activity [adjusted regression coefficients highest vs lowest deprivation fifths 0.34 (95% CI 0.11, 0.58); obesity vs no obesity 0.17 (95% CI 0.04, 0.31)]. BMI mediated part of the association between higher deprivation and self-reported disability (14.24%) and DAS (17.26%).

CONCLUSIONS

People with RA living in deprived areas have a higher burden of disease, which is partly mediated through obesity. Weight-loss strategies in RA could be better targeted towards those living in deprived areas.

The role of ultrasonographic synovial assessment in rheumatoid arthritis patients with concomitant fibromyalgia

Objectives

This study aimed to compare the prevalence and musculoskeletal ultrasonography (US) findings of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with concomitant fibromyalgia (FM) according to the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) FM classification criteria or the 2016 ACR FM diagnostic criteria.

Patients and methods

This cross-sectional study included 63 patients (17 males, 46 females; mean age: 48.2±7.1 years; range, 18 to 62 years) with RA. Medical history and laboratory data were obtained from electronic records. Clinical examination, composite disease activity measures, functional status, and the German 7-joint ultrasound score were assessed to evaluate disease activity and synovial inflammation. The patients were divided into three groups: patients who met only the 2016 ACR criteria, patients who met only the 1990 ACR criteria, and patients who met both criteria.

Results

In patients with RA, concomitant FM prevalence was 34.9% according to the 2016 ACR FM diagnostic criteria versus 23.8% according to the 1990 ACR FM classification criteria. Rheumatoid arthritis patients with FM had high tender joint count and disease activity scores, while musculoskeletal US findings were similar. Patients who met only the 2016 ACR FM diagnostic criteria had significantly higher gray-scale US and power Doppler US synovitis scores than patients who satisfied only ACR 1990 FM classification criteria (p=0.03 and p=0.02, respectively).

Conclusion

Synovial inflammation is a prominent sign in RA patients diagnosed with FM according to the 2016 ACR FM diagnostic criteria. The higher disease activity seen in the presence of FM in RA patients is associated with FM rather than synovitis.

Predicting Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis With the Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire: Does the Severity of Fibromyalgia Symptoms Matter?

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the degree of baseline fibromyalgia (FM) symptoms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as indicated by the Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire (FSQ) score, predicts RA disease activity after initiation or change of a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD).

METHODS

One hundred ninety-two participants with active RA were followed for 12 weeks after initiation or change of DMARD therapy. Participants completed the FSQ at the initial visit. The Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) was measured at baseline and follow-up to assess RA disease activity. We evaluated the association between baseline FSQ score and follow-up DAS28-CRP. As a secondary analysis, we examined the relationship between the 2 components of the FSQ, the Widespread Pain Index (WPI) and Symptom Severity Scale (SSS), with follow-up DAS28-CRP. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed, adjusting for clinical and demographic variables.

RESULTS

In multiple linear regression models, FSQ score was independently associated with elevated DAS28-CRP scores 12 weeks after DMARD initiation (B = 0.04, P = 0.01). In secondary analyses, the WPI was significantly associated with increased follow-up DAS28-CRP scores (B = 0.08, P = 0.001), whereas the SSS was not (B = -0.03, P = 0.43).

CONCLUSION

Higher levels of FM symptoms weakly predicted worse disease activity after treatment. The primary factor that informed the FSQ's prediction of disease activity was the spatial extent of pain, as measured by the WPI.

[Validation of the Pollard' s classification criteria (2010) for rheumatoid arthritis patients with fibromyalgia]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of Pollard' s classification criteria(2010) for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients withfibromyalgia (FM) in Chinese patients, and to assess the clinical features and psychological status of RA-FM patients in a real-world observational setting.

METHODS

Two hundred and two patients with rheumatoid arthritis were enrolled from the outpatients in Rheumatology and Immunology Department in Peking University People' s Hospital. All the patients were evaluated whether incorporating fibromyalgia translation occured using the 1990 American College of Rheumatolgy (ACR)-FM classification criteria. Forty two RA patients were concomitant with FM, while the other one hundred and sixty RA patients without FM were set as the control group.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in general demography between the two groups (P>0.05). In this study, the Pollard' s classification criteria (2010) for RA-FM in Chinese patients had a high sensitivity of 95.2% and relatively low specificity of 52.6%. Compared with those patients without FM, RA patients with FM (RA-FM patients) had higher Disease Activity Scale in 28 joints (DAS-28) score (5.95 vs. 4.38, P=0.011) and much more 28-tender joint counts (TJC) (16.5 vs.4.5, P < 0.001).RA-FM patients had worse Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score (1.24 vs. 0.66, P < 0.001) and lower SF-36 (28.63 vs. 58.22, P < 0.001). Fatigue was more common in RA-FM patients (88. 1% vs. 50.6%, P < 0.001) and the degree of fatigue was significantly increased in RA-FM patients (fatigue VAS 5.55 vs. 3.55, P < 0.001). RA-FM patients also had higher anxiety (10 vs.4, P < 0.001) and depression scores (12 vs.6, P < 0.001). erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), morning stiffness time and 28-swollen joint counts (SJC) showed no difference between these two groups.

CONCLUSION

The Pollard' s classification criteria (2010) for RA-FM are feasible in Chinese rheumatoid arthritis patients. The Pollard' s classification criteria is highly sensitive in clinical application, while the relativelylow specificity indicates that various factors need to be considered in combination. RA patients with FM result in higher disease activity, worse function aland psychological status. RA patients with FM also have poorer quality of life. DAS-28 scores may be overestimated in RA patients with FM. In a RA patient thatdoes not reach remission, the possibility of fibromyalgia should be con-sidered.

Fibromyalgianess and glucocorticoid persistence among patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Over one-third of patients with RA exhibit evidence of fibromyalgianess, which is associated with higher rates of disability and inadequate responsiveness to RA treatment. Patients with RA often remain on glucocorticoids long-term, despite the known risk of dose-dependent morbidity. We undertook this study to examine the relationship between fibromyalgianess and glucocorticoid persistence among RA patients.

METHODS

We followed participants with active RA on oral prednisone for ∼3 months after initiating a new DMARD. Fibromyalgianess was measured using the Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire (FSQ), previously shown to correlate with key FM features often superimposed upon RA. Severity of fibromyalgianess was stratified as follows: FSQ <8 low, FSQ 8-10 moderate and FSQ >10 high/very high. The association between baseline fibromyalgianess and glucocorticoid persistence, defined as prednisone use at 3-month follow-up visit after DMARD initiation, was assessed using multiple logistic regression adjusted for baseline demographics, RA duration, serostatus and inflammatory activity assessed using swollen joint count and CRP.

RESULTS

Of the 97 participants on prednisone at baseline, 65% were still taking prednisone at follow-up. Fifty-seven percent of participants with low baseline fibromyalgianess had persistent glucocorticoid use, compared with 84% of participants with high or very high fibromyalgianess. After adjustment for non-inflammatory factors and inflammatory activity, participants with high/very high baseline fibromyalgianess were more likely to be taking prednisone at follow-up relative to those with low fibromyalgianess [odds ratio 4.99 (95% CI 1.20, 20.73)].

CONCLUSION

High fibromyalgianess is associated with persistent glucocorticoid use, independent of inflammatory activity.

Why It Hurts: The Mechanisms of Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Pain is a near-universal feature of rheumatoid arthritis, but peripheral joint inflammation may not suffice to explain the etiology of pain in all patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis releases several algogens that may generate pain. Also, central nervous system processes may play a crucial role in the regulation and perpetuation of pain. Several methods for assessing pain in rheumatoid arthritis exist, and recently the role of assessing therapeutics in treating specific etiologies of pain has gained interest.

Fibromyalgia interferes with disease activity and biological therapy response in inflammatory rheumatic diseases

Fibromyalgia is one of the numerous comorbidities that may accompany inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Concomitant fibromyalgia in inflammatory rheumatic conditions can interfere with symptomatology, disease activity and overall management plan. The aim of the present narrative review article was to discuss the current evidence on (i) the prevalence/frequency of comorbid fibromyalgia in inflammatory rheumatic conditions, (ii) the role of fibromyalgia on disease activity, (iii) the impact of concomitant fibromyalgia on biological disease-modifying antirheumatic treatment outcomes and (iv) potential effectiveness of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs on fibromyalgia-related symptoms among patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. A literature search was conducted through PubMed/MEDLINE Cochrane and Web of Science databases by using relevant keywords and their combinations. Studies representing different geographical areas of the world revealed that frequency rates of fibromyalgia are higher in inflammatory rheumatic diseases than those in the general population. Comorbid fibromyalgia interferes not only with the disease activity scores but also with the treatment outcomes and management plan. Further evidence is warranted in order to determine the potential benefits of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs on fibromyalgia-related symptoms in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Performance of 2016 revised fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a common comorbidity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Recently, there were several updates for the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) FM criteria. To assess the performance of the 2016 revised ACR FM criteria in patients with RA in comparison to 1990 criteria and to study the relation to composite disease measures. This study included 130 adult RA patients fulfilling the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for RA. Patients were evaluated according to 2016 and 1990 ACR criteria for FM. Kappa agreement between the two criteria was determined. Spearman's correlation between the polysymptomatic distress scale (PSD) and selected variables including disease activity score-28 with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS-28 ESR), clinical disease activity index (CDAI), patient global assessment (PGA), and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain was evaluated. Of the 130 RA patients, 52 patients (40%) satisfied the 2016 criteria and 40 (31.5%) the 1990 criteria. The Kappa agreement between the two criteria was 0.733. RA patients with FM had higher DAS28-ESR, CDAI, PGA, and VAS compared with those without FM. A significant positive correlation was found between the polysymptomatic Distress scale (PSD) and DAS28-ESR, CDAI, and PGA (r_s 0.481, 0.516, 0.511, respectively, P < 0.001). FM coexists in a substantial number of RA patients according to the 2016 revised criteria and associated with high composite disease activity measures. Therefore, assessment of FM should be considered in RA patients with persistently high disease activity.

Is a Fundamental Change in the Interpretation of Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Necessary?

Disease Activity Score (DAS) composite models are moderately precise and robust measures of disease severity when they are used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cohorts. They are less so when used for individual patients. This is because subjective components, patient global assessment of well-being and tender joint count, modified by factors other than RA biological disease activity, often obfuscate interpretation of disease activity. Comorbidities, especially distress, can disproportionately inflate these components. Fibromyalgia, essentially synonymous with distress, pain augmentation, and depression, is a common comorbidity. Its presence and severity can be determined by the Polysymptomatic Distress Scale (PSD). The differential effects of distress and fibromyalgia syndrome on the DAS can be demonstrated by manipulating information already there: the arithmetic differences or ratios of the tender joint count and swollen joint count and comparison of the modified disease activity score with 28 joints to the disease activity score with 28 joints-patient (DAS28-derived indices that measure the contribution of the relatively objective or relatively subjective components, respectively). The potentially more objective multibiomarker disease activity might also be used to test the severity of biological RA disease activity. These tools may be used to elucidate disproportionate values for subjective DAS model components, which then should facilitate identification of the underlying process factors, including depression, for potential treatment.