Very early onset of coronary artery aneurysm in a 3-month infant with Kawasaki disease: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Kawasaki disease (KD) is a medium vessel vasculitis, of unknown etiology, typically presenting in children younger than 5 years of age. Prolonged fever (at least five days) is a major clinical criterion of KD, while cardiac involvement may occur in up to 25% of patients, generally in the second week of the disease.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe the case of KD developing in a 3-month infant, with an early occurrence of coronary artery aneurysm after only 3 days of fever, complicated by thrombosis, requiring aggressive treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Time of development of cardiac complications can be different in young infants with KD and both diagnostic criteria and treatment indications should be individualized in this class of age.

High-Dose or Low-Dose Aspirin Application in the Initial Phase of Kawasaki Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

The initial dose of aspirin for Kawasaki disease (KD) is controversial to a great extent. In order to compare the efficacy of high-dose and low-dose aspirin in the treatment of KD, this study included articles containing information on the treatment of KD with aspirin before August 2021, which were collected from public databases. The results of different studies were summarized and weighted by an inverse variance model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the Q-test and I2. A meta-analysis of 12258 patients from nine retrospective studies was conducted. In general, no significant differences between high-dose and low-dose groups were found in the incidence of coronary artery abnormality (CAA) (RR = 1.154; 95% CI = 1.027–1.316) and the incidence of intravenous immunoglobulin (RR = 0.926; 95% CI = 0.594–1.441). But high-dose aspirin might be linked to the shortened duration of fever (RR = −0.134; 95% CI = −0.203–0.064) as well as hospitalized stay (RR = −1.263; 95% CI = −1.392–1.122). Conclusion. For the treatment of the acute phase of KD, low-dose aspirin plus intravenous immunoglobulin could be as effective as high-dose aspirin in preventing CAA. Nonetheless, high-dose aspirin might be related to reducing fever time and hospitalization time.

[Pediatric expert consensus on the application of aspirin in Kawasaki disease]

Kawasaki disease (KD) is one of the common acquired heart diseases in children aged <5 years and is an acute systemic vasculitis. After nearly 60 years of research, intravenous immunoglobulin combined with oral aspirin has become the first-line treatment for the prevention of coronary artery lesion in acute KD; however, there are still controversies over the role and optimal dose of aspirin. The consensus was formulated based on the latest research findings of KD treatment in China and overseas and comprehensive discussion of pediatric experts in China and put forward recommendations on the dose, usage, and course of aspirin treatment in the first-line treatment of KD.

Cytokine Cascade in Kawasaki Disease Versus Kawasaki-Like Syndrome

Kawasaki disease (KD) is a medium vessel systemic vasculitis that predominantly occurs in children below five years of age. It is an acute febrile condition in which coronary artery aneurysms and myocarditis are the most common cardiovascular complications. It is most often characterized by hypercytoki-nemia. The etiopathogenesis of KD is not fully understood. The present review synthesizes the recent advances in the pathophysiology and treatment options of KD. According to different studies, the genetic, infections and autoimmunity factors play a major role in pathogenesis. Several susceptibility genes (e.g. caspase 3) and cytokines (e.g. IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ and TNF-α) have been identified in KD. Patients with high cytokine levels are predisposed to KD shock syndrome. The importance of respiratory viruses in the pathogenesis of the disease is unclear. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may induce in children and adults an abnormal systemic inflammatory response. This syndrome shares characteristics with KD. It has been called by many terms like MIS-C (Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children), PIMS-TS (pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2), hyperinflammatory shock syndrome, cytokine storm (cytokine release syndrome) or simply, Kawasaki-like syndrome. The cytokine’s role in the development of KD or Kawasaki-like syndrome being triggered by COVID-19 is controversial. The presences of the antiendothelial cell autoantibodies (AECAs) together with the newly developed hypothesis of immunothrombosis are considered potential pathogenic mechanisms for KD. In consequence, the diagnosis and treatment of KD and Kawasaki-like syndrome, one of the most common causes of acquired heart disease in developed countries, are challenging without a clearly defined protocol.

Efficacy and Safety of NSAIDs in Infants: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature of the Past 20 Years

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used in infants, children, and adolescents worldwide; however, despite sufficient evidence of the beneficial effects of NSAIDs in children and adolescents, there is a lack of comprehensive data in infants. The present review summarizes the current knowledge on the safety and efficacy of various NSAIDs used in infants for which data are available, and includes ibuprofen, dexibuprofen, ketoprofen, flurbiprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, ketorolac, indomethacin, niflumic acid, meloxicam, celecoxib, parecoxib, rofecoxib, acetylsalicylic acid, and nimesulide. The efficacy of NSAIDs has been documented for a variety of conditions, such as fever and pain. NSAIDs are also the main pillars of anti-inflammatory treatment, such as in pediatric inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Limited data are available on the safety of most NSAIDs in infants. Adverse drug reactions may be renal, gastrointestinal, hematological, or immunologic. Since NSAIDs are among the most frequently used drugs in the pediatric population, safety and efficacy studies can be performed as part of normal clinical routine, even in young infants. Available data sources, such as (electronic) medical records, should be used for safety and efficacy analyses. On a larger scale, existing data sources, e.g. adverse drug reaction programs/networks, spontaneous national reporting systems, and electronic medical records should be assessed with child-specific methods in order to detect safety signals pertinent to certain pediatric age groups or disease entities. To improve the safety of NSAIDs in infants, treatment needs to be initiated with the lowest age-appropriate or weight-based dose. Duration of treatment and amount of drug used should be regularly evaluated and maximum dose limits and other recommendations by the manufacturer or expert committees should be followed. Treatment for non-chronic conditions such as fever and acute (postoperative) pain should be kept as short as possible. Patients with chronic conditions should be regularly monitored for possible adverse effects of NSAIDs.

Intravenous Immunoglobulin Nonresponse in Pediatric Patients Treated for Kawasaki Disease at a US Hospital

OBJECTIVE

Kawasaki disease (KD) is an acute febrile childhood vasculitis with a predilection for the coronary arteries treated with IVIG. In the United States, scoring systems to identify children at high-risk of persistent fever after initial IVIG treatment are lacking. Our study attempts to identify variables associated with IVIG non-response.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients ages 0 to 18 admitted to an US academic children's hospital between August 1, 2010, and August 31, 2019, with the diagnosis of acute KD who received IVIG during hospitalization.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients were included, 73% male and 66% Caucasian with a mean age of 3.67 ± 3.35 years. Forty-eight patients (75%) received 1 dose of IVIG, and 16 (25%) received 2 doses of IVIG. The groups did not differ significantly at baseline. None had coronary artery aneurysms detected during hospitalization. Older age, female sex, Caucasian compared with African American race, leukocytosis, and hyponatremia were associated with a higher likelihood of IVIG non-response but none reached statistical significance. Patients who received ibuprofen (n = 26) were more likely to be IVIG non-responsive (p < 0.05). Aspirin dosing varied but was not predictive of IVIG non-response.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, risk factors to predict IVIG non-response in patients treated for KD were not identified. IVIG non-response was significantly more common in those receiving ibuprofen during the acute treatment phase. Larger studies are needed to validate the association of ibuprofen administration and IVIG non-response in patients with KD.

Treatment of Kawasaki Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis of Four Dosage Regimens of Aspirin Combined With Recommended Intravenous Immunoglobulin

Aspirin was once believed to reduce the mortality of Kawasaki disease (KD) due to its effect on the thrombotic occlusion of coronary arteries. However, conflicting evidence has been found regarding aspirin treatment and its benefit in patients with acute KD. We compared the efficacy of different aspirin doses in acute KD. A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify studies comparing different doses of aspirin for acute KD. The primary outcome of interest was coronary artery lesions (CAL). We used random-effects network meta-analysis. Six retrospective studies, including 1944 patients receiving aspirin in doses of 0, 3-5, 30-50, or 80-100 mg/kg/day, were selected. The risks of CAL were not significantly different for the various doses of aspirin compared to the placebo: odds ratio (OR) was 1.10 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70-1.71] for patients with aspirin 3-5 mg/kg/day; OR = 1.23 (95% CI: 0.67-2.26) for aspirin 30-50 mg/kg/day, and OR = 1.59 (95% CI: 0.74, 3.421) for 80-100 mg/kg/day. The P-score ranged from 0.76 for placebo to 0.19 for aspirin 80-100 mg/kg/day. The different doses of aspirin exhibited no significant difference with regard to the efficacy of CAL or with the secondary outcomes of intravenous immunoglobulin resistance or hospital stays for acute KD. Therefore, we found that treatment without any aspirin is not inferior to other doses of aspirin and can also slightly reduce the risk of CAL.

Kawasaki Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Benefits and Harms of Common Treatments

Objective

Kawasaki disease (KD) is a self‐limited vasculitis affecting medium‐sized vessels with a predilection for the coronary arteries. Although treatment reduces the likelihood of developing of coronary artery aneurysms, 5% of patients still develop aneurysms despite treatment, making KD the leading cause of acquired heart disease in children in the United States. Consequently, there is a great deal of interest in optimizing treatment regimens, particularly for higher‐risk patients, to decrease morbidity. The aim of this systematic review is to support the development of the American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation for the diagnosis and management of KD, focusing on the more complex scenarios in which rheumatologists may become involved, such as high‐risk and refractory disease.

Methods

Eighty‐nine articles were considered for full review in this systematic literature review to address 16 Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome questions related to KD. Data were abstracted in hierarchical fashion. Randomized control trials (RCTs) were considered first; if none were identified or if they contained insufficient information, comparative observational studies were then viewed, followed by single‐arm observational studies/single arms from comparative studies. Only observational studies with more than 10 subjects with vasculitis were included.

Results

Eight RCTs and 28 observational studies that addressed the questions were identified. Two questions were addressed by RCTs, seven questions had at least some comparative observational studies, three questions were only addressed by single‐arm data, and four questions had no relevant studies.

Conclusion

This systematic review evaluates the benefits and harms of treatments for KD beyond first‐line therapy.

Low-dose or no aspirin administration in acute-phase Kawasaki disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of low-dose or no aspirin with conventional high-dose aspirin for the initial treatment in the acute-phase of Kawasaki disease (KD).

DESIGN

A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomised control trials and cohort studies.

METHODS

All available articles that compared different dosage of aspirin in the acute-phase of KD published until 20 September 2019 were included from the databases of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Central without language restrictions. Extracted data from eligible studies were reviewed by two authors independently and analysed by using RStudio software.

RESULTS

Nine cohorts with a total of 12 182 children were enrolled. We found that low-dose (3-5 mg/kg/day) or no aspirin in the acute-phase KD was associated with reducing the risk of coronary artery lesions (CALs, OR=0.81, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.95). No differences were observed in intravenous immunoglobulin resistance, length of hospital stay and fever days after admission (OR=1.35, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.98; standard mean difference (SMD)=0.17, 95% CI -1.07 to 1.4; SMD=0.3, 95% CI -1.51 to 2.11) in the low-dose/no aspirin subgroup compared with the high-dose (≥30 mg/kg/day) aspirin subgroup. We did not identify any potential factors affecting the homogeneity of CAL risk as well as clinical important effects in all included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescribing low-dose or no aspirin in the acute-phase of KD might be associated with a decreased incidence of CAL. However, additional well-designed prospective trials are required to support the theory.

What dose of aspirin should be used in the initial treatment of Kawasaki disease? A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The use of IVIG plus high- or low-dose aspirin for the initial treatment of Kawasaki disease remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of IVIG plus high-dose aspirin compared with IVIG plus low-dose aspirin in the treatment of Kawasaki disease.

METHODS

Studies related to aspirin therapy for Kawasaki disease were selected by searching the databases of Medline (PubMed), Embase and the Cochrane Library before March 2019. Statistical analyses were performed by using a Review Manager Software package and STATA v.15.1.

RESULTS

Eight retrospective cohort studies, characterizing 12 176 patients, were analysed. Overall, no significant difference was found in the incidence of coronary artery abnormalities between the high- and low-dose aspirin groups [relative risk (RR) 1.15; 95% CI: 0.93, 1.43; P = 0.19; random-effects model]. The patients treated with high-dose aspirin had slightly faster resolution of fever [mean difference (MD) -0.30; 95% CI: -0.58, -0.02; P = 0.04; random-effects model]. but the rates of IVIG resistance (RR, 1.26; 95% CI: 0.55, 2.92; P = 0.59; random-effects model) and days in hospital (MD, 0.22; 95% CI: -0.93, 1.37; P = 0.71; random-effects model) were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose aspirin plus IVIG might be as effective as high-dose aspirin plus IVIG for the initial treatment of Kawasaki disease. Considering that high-dose aspirin may cause more adverse reactions than low-dose aspirin, low-dose aspirin plus IVIG should be recommended as the first-line therapy in the initial treatment of Kawasaki disease.

Effect of different doses of aspirin on the prognosis of Kawasaki disease

BACKGROUND

Kawasaki disease (KD) is the leading cause of acquired heart disease in children, and is steadily increasing in prevalence in East Asia. KD is often complicated by coronary artery damage, including dilatation and/or aneurysms. Aspirin is used with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) to prevent coronary artery abnormalities in KD. However, the role and optimal dose of aspirin remain controversial. Identifying the dose of aspirin in the acute phase will facilitate development of a more appropriate treatment strategy in improving the outcome of KD.

METHODS

A total of 2369 patients with KD were retrospectively analyzed and divided into three groups according to the aspirin dose: 510 in group 1 (20-29 mg/kg/day), 1487 in group 2 (30-39 mg/kg/day), and 372 in group 3 (40-50 mg/kg/day). The differences in laboratory data, rate of IVIG resistance and coronary artery damage were compared among the groups.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the incidence of coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3 (2 weeks of illness: 2.94% vs. 1.90% vs. 3.36%; 3-4 weeks of illness: 1.94% vs. 2.32% vs. 2.65%). The risk for developing CAA was not reduced at 2 weeks of illness onset in groups 2 and 3 compared with group 1 (adjusted OR = 1.05, 95% confidence interval: 0.34-3.18; aOR = 1.81, 95% CI: 0.42-7.83). Furthermore, the risk for developing CAA was not reduced at 3-4 weeks of illness onset in groups 2 and 3 (aOR = 2.63, 95% CI: 0.61-11.28; aOR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.03-9.54). There was no significant difference in the rate of IVIG resistance among the groups. Platelet levels after IVIG treatment in group 1 were significantly lower than those in groups 2 and 3 (522.29 × 10⁹/L, 544.69 × 10⁹/L, and 557.77 × 10⁹/L, p = 0.013). C reactive protein of the 30-40 mg/kg*day group was slightly higher than the other two groups. (7.76, 8.00, and 7.01 mg/L, p = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin at the dose of 20-29 mg/kg/day dose not increase the risk of coronary artery damage and IVIG resistance compared with the dose of 30-50 mg/kg/day. This low dose may have a lower risk for a potential effect on liver function.

Comparison of Risk of Recrudescent Fever in Children With Kawasaki Disease Treated With Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Low-Dose vs High-Dose Aspirin

IMPORTANCE

Timely initiation of intravenous immunoglobulin plus aspirin is necessary for decreasing the risk of recrudescent fever and coronary artery abnormalities in children with Kawasaki disease (KD). The optimal dose of aspirin, however, remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether initial treatment with low-dose compared with high-dose aspirin in children with KD is associated with an increase in fever recrudescence.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective cohort study of 260 children with KD at Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Indiana, between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2018, was conducted. Children aged 0 to 18 years with a first episode of KD, identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision diagnosis codes treated within 10 days of symptom onset with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin plus aspirin were eligible. Patients who received an alternative diagnosis, experienced a second episode of KD, did not receive intravenous immunoglobulin plus aspirin for initial treatment, were not treated within 10 days of symptoms, or had incomplete records were excluded.

EXPOSURES

High-dose (≥10 mg/kg/d) or low-dose (<10 mg/kg/d) aspirin therapy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was recrudescent fever necessitating retreatment of KD. The secondary outcomes were coronary artery abnormalities and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

Among the 260 patients included, the median (interquartile range) age was 2.5 (1.6-4.3) years, 103 (39.6%) were girls, 166 (63.8%) were non-Hispanic white, 57 (21.9%) were African American, 22 (8.5%) were Asian, 11 (4.2%) were Hispanic, and 4 (1.5%) were of unknown race/ethnicity. One hundred-forty-two patients (54.6%) were treated with low-dose aspirin. There was no association between recrudescent fever and aspirin dose, with 39 children (27.5%) having recrudescent fever in the low-dose group compared with 26 children (22.0%) in the high-dose group (odds ratio [OR], 1.34; 95% CI, 0.76-2.37; P = .31), with similar results after adjusting for potential confounding variables (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 0.89-2.97; P = .11). In a subset analysis of 167 children with complete KD, however, there was nearly a 2-fold difference in the odds of recrudescent fever with low-dose aspirin (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 0.82-4.23; P = .14), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. In addition, no association was identified between treatment group and coronary artery abnormalities (low-dose, 7.4% vs high-dose, 9.4%; OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.48-1.55; P = .62) or median (interquartile range) length of stay (3 [3-5] days for both groups; P = .27).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, low-dose aspirin for the initial treatment of children with KD was not associated with fever recrudescence or coronary artery abnormalities. Given the potential benefits, further study of low-dose aspirin to detect potentially clinically relevant outcome differences is warranted to inform treatment decisions and guideline development.

Efficacy between low and high dose aspirin for the initial treatment of Kawasaki disease: Current evidence based on a meta-analysis

Background

Kawasaki disease (KD) is now the leading cause of acquired heart disease in children in developed countries. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and aspirin were considered as the standard initial treatment of KD for decades. However, the optimal dose of aspirin has remained controversial. In recent years, many studies compared the efficacy of low-dose with high-dose aspirin in the acute phase of KD, but the results have not always been consistent. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose aspirin compared with high-dose for the initial treatment of KD.

Methods

Studies related to aspirin therapy for KD were selected from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Google scholar through Mar 25^th, 2019. Data were analyzed using STATA Version 15.1. Additionally, publication bias and sensitivity analysis were also performed by STATA version 15.1.

Results

Six studies were included in our analysis of the rate of coronary artery lesion (CAL), five reports for IVIG-resistant KD (rKD), and four for the duration of fever and hospitalization. However, no significant differences were found between low-dose and high-dose aspirin groups in the incidence of CAL (risk ratio (RR), 0.85; 95%CI (0.63, 1.14); P = 0.28), the risk of rKD (RR, 1.39; 95%CI (1.00, 1.93); P = 0.05), and duration of fever and hospitalization (the mean standard deviation (SMD), 0.03; 95%CI (-0.16, 0.22); P = 0.78).

Conclusion

Low-dose aspirin (3–5 mg·kg^-1·d^-1) may be as effective as the use of high-dose aspirin (≥30 mg·kg^-1·d^-1) for the initial treatment of KD. Further well-designed randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose aspirin for the initial treatment of KD.

Duration of high-dose aspirin therapy does not affect long-term coronary artery outcomes in Kawasaki disease

BackgroundHigh-dose aspirin (HDA) is used with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in Kawasaki disease (KD). Practice regarding HDA varies, and it is unclear whether HDA duration affects the long-term course.MethodsWe retrospectively studied KD patients at our hospital for over 10 years. Patients were categorized as having received HDA for 0, 1-7, or >7 days. Primary outcome was the maximum coronary Z-score at diagnosis and follow-up; secondary outcomes included inflammatory markers.ResultsOne hundred and three patients had HDA duration documented, of which 35 patients had coronary artery abnormalities (CAAs) at diagnosis. There was no difference in demographics or inflammatory markers between the HDA groups, and no difference in HDA duration between patients with or without CAAs. Seventeen patients received no HDA; they had longer illness and defervescence duration before diagnosis, and were less likely to receive IVIg. For CAAs, multivariate regression revealed that HDA duration did not predict the coronary Z-score at 9-15 months. Higher Z-score at diagnosis was associated with higher Z-score at 9-15 months.ConclusionThe only factor associated with coronary Z-score at 9-15 months was the Z-score at diagnosis. At our institution, longer illness and defervescence duration and the lack of IVIg administration were associated with not administering HDA. HDA duration did not affect the clinically relevant outcomes, particularly CAA persistence.