Scope and Consistency of Outcomes Reported in Trials of Patients With Systemic Sclerosis

Strategies to promote implementation of core outcomes for medication adherence trials in rheumatology: A report from the OMERACT-Adherence Group

OBJECTIVES

To identify barriers, facilitators, and strategies for future implementation of the OMERACT-Adherence Core Outcome Set (COS) in medication adherence trials for rheumatic conditions.

METHODS

Preliminary Delphi survey findings were discussed at OMERACT 2023, utilising the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 2 to identify implementation barriers, facilitators, and solutions.

RESULTS

Implementation strategies included simplifying the COS definitions, making it adaptabile for clinical practice and drug trials, adherence trial training workshops, and collaborating with key stakeholders such as payers and other COS developers.

CONCLUSION

Ongoing collaboration with individuals and organisations within and beyond rheumatology ensures broader applicability of OMERACT-Adherence COS.

A Narrative Review of Pathogenetic and Histopathologic Aspects, Epidemiology, Classification Systems, and Disease Outcome Measures in Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare systemic autoimmune disease, characterized by the presence of three main actors: vasculopathy, immune activation, and fibrosis. This pathologic process is then translated in a clinical picture with great variability among different patients in terms of type of organ involvement, disease severity and prognosis. This heterogeneity is a main feature of SSc, which, in addition to the presence of early phases of the disease characterized by mild symptoms, can explain the high difficulty in establishing classification criteria, and in defining patients' subsets and disease outcomes. The definition of disease outcomes is particularly relevant in the setting of clinical trials, where the aim is to provide reliable endpoints, able to measure the magnitude of the efficacy of a certain drug or intervention. For this reason, in the last years, increasing efforts have been done to design measures of disease activity, damage, severity, and response to treatment, often in the context of composite indexes. When considering disease outcomes, the experience of the patient represents a relevant and complementary aspect. The tools able to capture this experience, the patient-reported outcomes, have been increasingly used in the last years in clinical practice and in clinical trials, both as primary and secondary endpoints. This comprehensive narrative review on SSc will therefore cover pathogenetic and histopathologic aspects, epidemiology, classification systems, and disease outcome measures, in order to focus on issues that are relevant for clinical research and design of clinical trials.

Domains and outcome measures for the assessment of limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis: an international collaborative scoping review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to comprehensively identify instruments within relevant domains employed to assess lcSSc since the endorsement of its consensus definition in 1988. The overall objective is to inform the creation of a Combined Response Index for Scleroderma Trials Assessing lcSSc (CRISTAL).

METHODS

MEDLINE and Embase were searched using terms selected to comprehensively retrieve titles and abstracts mentioning both lcSSc and dcSSc, along with those only mentioning lcSSc, SSc sine scleroderma, limited SSc and/or CREST/CRST. Because our initial assessment of the literature revealed that very few studies included only lcSSc subjects, we also assessed literature that included both cutaneous subsets. A total of 3964 titles and abstracts were screened by two reviewers, and 270 articles were selected for data extraction.

RESULTS

We identified 27 domains encompassing 459 instruments. Instruments from 'Skin involvement', 'Pulmonary involvement' and 'Health-related quality of life and general functioning' were the most frequently retrieved. Among the 15 most represented instruments announced as primary end points in efficacy or effectiveness studies, 7 were clinician-reported outcomes (ROs), 7 were patient ROs, and one was a performance outcome (6 min-walk test). The mean proportion of lcSSc patients in studies of lcSSc, including studies that mention both lcSSc and dcSSc, was 56.4%, demonstrating that this subset is underrepresented in the literature, given that the prevalence of lcSSc ranges from 60% to 80% in national registries and international cohorts.

CONCLUSION

This scoping literature review provides a comprehensive identification of domains and outcomes used to assess lcSSc. Our results also highlight that lcSSc is underrepresented in the literature.

Assessment of disease outcome measures in systemic sclerosis

The assessment of disease activity in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is challenging owing to its heterogeneous manifestations across multiple organ systems, the variable rate of disease progression and regression, and the relative paucity of patients in early-phase therapeutic trials. Despite some recent successes, most clinical trials have failed to show efficacy, underscoring the need for improved outcome measures linked directly to disease pathogenesis, particularly applicable for biomarker studies focused on skin disease. Current outcome measures in SSc-associated interstitial lung disease and SSc skin disease are largely adequate, although advancing imaging technology and the incorporation of skin mRNA biomarkers might provide opportunities for earlier detection of the therapeutic effect. Biomarkers can further inform pathogenesis, enabling early phase trials to act as reverse translational studies through the incorporation of routine high-throughput sequencing.

Skin involvement in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: an unmet clinical need

Diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) is associated with high mortality resulting from early internal-organ involvement. Clinicians therefore tend to focus on early diagnosis and treatment of potentially life-threatening cardiorespiratory and renal disease. However, the rapidly progressive painful, itchy skin tightening that characterizes dcSSc is the symptom that has the greatest effect on patients' quality of life, and there is currently no effective disease-modifying treatment for it. Considerable advances have been made in predicting the extent and rate of skin-disease progression (which vary between patients), including the development of techniques such as molecular analysis of skin biopsy samples. Risk stratification for progressive skin disease is especially relevant now that haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is a treatment option, because stratification will inform the balance of risk versus benefit for each patient. Measurement of skin disease is a major challenge. Results from clinical trials have highlighted limitations of the modified Rodnan skin score (the current gold standard). Alternative patient-reported and other potential outcome measures have been and are being developed. Patients with early dcSSc should be referred to specialist centres to ensure best-practice management, including the management of their skin disease, and to maximize opportunities for inclusion in clinical trials.

Symptom experience of limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis from the Patients' perspective: A qualitative study✰,✰✰,★,★★

OBJECTIVES

Limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (lcSSc) is the largest subgroup of people with SSc, but little is known about symptom experience from the patients' perspective. This study aimed to comprehensively identify domains and symptoms reported as bothersome by patients with lcSSc and to analyze themes and sub-themes capturing symptom experience in this population.

METHODS

Focus groups of patients with lcSSc were conducted using a structured guide. Patients were recruited based on an a priori purposive framework to include men and women with SSc. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, anonymized, and analyzed using the RADaR technique (rigorous and accelerated data reduction) combined with iterative, deductive and inductive approaches.

RESULTS

Four 2-hour Focus groups comprising participants with lcSSc were conducted (N = 26). Ninety-four symptoms were identified with 22 domains. Symptoms from the following domains were mentioned in all Focus groups: skin, musculoskeletal (MSK), cardiac, pulmonary, gastro-intestinal (GI) manifestations, fatigue, sleep, Raynaud's phenomenon (RP), pain, and digital ulcers. The three most cited domains in a pre-meeting survey were GI, RP and MSK. Seven themes defining symptom experience were identified: difficulty attributing symptoms to this complex systemic disease, influence of symptom temporality, impairment of emotional well-being, limitations in functioning (including several sub-themes of functioning), survival, symptoms management and uncertainty.

CONCLUSION

This study comprehensively identified domains and symptoms considered bothersome from the perspective of patients with lcSSc and summarized patient experience of lcSSc-related symptoms. This study is the first step in the design of a future combined response index dedicated to lcSSc that could foster specific research on this subpopulation of patients.

Considerations for a combined index for limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis to support drug development and improve outcomes

Systemic sclerosis (SSc; systemic scleroderma) is characterized by a heterogeneous range of clinical manifestations. SSc is classified into limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) and diffuse cutaneous subgroups (dcSSc) based on the extent of skin involvement. Randomized controlled trials in scleroderma have mainly focused on dcSSc partly because the measurement of skin involvement, critical for evaluating a therapeutic intervention is more dynamic in this subset. Nonetheless, lcSSc, the most common cutaneous subset (about 2/3), is also associated with significant morbidity and detrimental impact on health-related quality of life. The lack of interventional studies in lcSSc is partly due to a lack of relevant outcome measures to evaluate this subgroup. Combining several clinically meaningful outcomes selected specifically for lcSSc may improve representativeness in clinical trials and responsiveness of outcomes measured in randomized controlled trials. A composite index dedicated to lcSSc combining such relevant outcomes could advance clinical trial development for lcSSc by providing the opportunity to test and select among candidate drugs that could act as disease-modifying treatments for this neglected subgroup of SSc. This proposed index would include items selected by expert physicians and patients with lcSSc across domains grounded in the lived experience of lcSSc. This article reviews the reasons behind the relative neglect of lcSSc, discusses the current state of outcome measures for lcSSc, identifies challenges, and proposes a roadmap for a combined lcSSc-specific treatment response index.

Systemic sclerosis: Advances towards stratified medicine

Epidemiological studies reporting demographic, clinical and serological factors predictive of various outcomes in systemic sclerosis (SSc) range from the prediction of mortality to the development and progression of disease manifestations. However, predicting the disease trajectory in the individual patient is a challenging but important step towards a stratified approach to disease management. Recent technological advances provide the opportunity for new subgroupings of disease based on risk stratification, through the systematic analysis of high-dimensional clinical data combined with genes, their transcription products and their corresponding translated proteins. In addition, these variables offer a rich vein of research to identify non-invasive biomarkers for predicting organ involvement and to assess disease activity and response to therapy. Selection of patients with a clinical phenotype or molecular signature relevant to the therapy under study combined with recent efforts to standardise outcome measures, show promise for improving clinical trial design and the identification of effective targeted therapies.