Effect of a Nationwide Real-Time Drug Utilization Review System on Duplicated Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drug Prescriptions in Korea

Clinical and Cost-Saving Effects of the Drug Utilization Review Modernization Project in Inpatient and Outpatient Settings in Korea

OBJECTIVES

Korea's national health insurance authority introduced a drug utilization review modernization pilot project in which health professionals provided follow-up services to monitor adverse drug events. We aimed to evaluate the effects of the project on clinical and economic outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted difference-in-differences analysis using National Health Insurance claims data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. We calculated the number of adverse drug events and allergic reactions as a clinical indicator and medical costs incurred to manage these events as an economic indicator. Absolute difference in each outcome measure was defined as the value after the project minus the value before the project. Difference-in-differences was defined as a difference in absolute differences between the intervention group and the control group.

RESULTS

Overall, difference-in-differences were -43 and -826 for the number of drug-related adverse events and allergic reactions and -$198,700 and $53,318 for medical costs in the inpatient and outpatient settings, respectively. For outpatients, the monthly number of adverse drug events and allergic reactions has grown higher for the control group than for the intervention group after implementation of the pilot project.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the pilot project lowered the number of adverse drug events and allergic reactions in the inpatient and outpatient setting. The project also lowered medical costs incurred to manage these events in the inpatient setting only. Based on our findings, we recommend that the pilot project be expanded on a nationwide level at least in the inpatient setting.

Potentially Inappropriate Drug Duplication in a Cohort of Older Adults with Dementia

BACKGROUND

Concurrent use of 2 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, loop diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or anticoagulants is considered potentially inappropriate by Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions and Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment criteria.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to examine drug duplication in a cohort of older adults with dementia.

METHODS

Cohort entry for Nova Scotia Seniors' Pharmacare Program beneficiaries was the date an International Classification of Diseases ninth edition or 10th edition code for dementia was recorded in accessed databases between March 1, 2005, and March 31, 2015. Medication dispensation and sociodemographic data were captured from the Nova Scotia Seniors' Pharmacare Program database between April 1, 2010, and March 31, 2015. Duplication was considered when 2 drugs from the same class were dispensed such that the supply in the patient's possession could overlap for more than 30 days. We reported number of cases of duplication and duration of overlap. Sex differences in drug duplication were assessed with bivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

In the cohort of 28,953 Nova Scotia Seniors' Pharmacare Program beneficiaries with dementia, we documented concurrent use in 101 (1.7%) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs users (mean duration = 75.6 days), 95 (1.0%) selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors users (mean duration = 146.6 days), 5 (0.07%) loop diuretic users (mean duration = 530.6 days), 183 (2.0%) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor users (mean duration = 123.9 days), and 160 (3.5%) anticoagulant users (mean duration = 63.6 days). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug pairs were most commonly celecoxib with naproxen or diclofenac. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors duplication was most commonly sertraline with citalopram. No sex differences in risk for drug duplication were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug duplication was identified in a cohort of older adults with dementia and is a feasible target for intervention. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2021; 82:XXX-XXX).

Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Changes in Zolpidem Use Due to Media Broadcasts

Media has become a major source of information on health and plays a role in the decision-making process on health topics. We aimed to evaluate the association between zolpidem use and media broadcasts that reported the suicide risk. We obtained the data of adult outpatients who have been prescribed zolpidem or other hypnotics from the National Patient Sample database (2015–2017). We evaluated the change in zolpidem or other hypnotic prescription trends based on the prescription rate and average daily prescribed dose before and after July 2016, using interrupted time series analysis. A total of 129,787 adult patients had at least one zolpidem prescription in 3 years. The prescription rate of zolpidem after the broadcast decreased significantly by 0.178% (95% confidence interval (CI): −0.214, −0.142), whereas that of other hypnotic users did not differ from that before the broadcast (−0.020%, 95% CI: −0.088, 0.047). However, the trends in the prescription rate before and after the broadcast did not differ for zolpidem and other hypnotics. Broadcasting medication safety through major public media could have an effect on medication use. After broadcasting about the suicide risk of zolpidem, its overall prescription rate decreased immediately, but the trend was not changed.

Concomitant Use of NSAIDs or SSRIs with NOACs Requires Monitoring for Bleeding

PURPOSE

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are widely used in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) because of their effectiveness in preventing stroke and their better safety, compared with warfarin. However, there are concerns for an increased risk of bleeding associated with concomitant use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) with NOACs. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the risk of bleeding events in individuals taking concomitant NSAIDs or SSRIs with NOACs after being diagnosed with AF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A nested case-control analysis to assess the safety of NSAIDs and SSRIs among NOAC users with AF was performed using data from Korean National Health Insurance Service from January 2012 to December 2017. Among patients who were newly prescribed NOACs, 1233 cases hospitalized for bleeding events were selected, and 24660 controls were determined.

RESULTS

The risk of bleeding events was higher in patients receiving concomitant NSAIDs [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-1.61] or SSRIs (aOR 1.92; 95% CI 1.52-2.42) with NOACs, compared to no use of either drug, respectively. The risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding was higher in patients receiving concomitant NSAIDs or SSRIs without proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (NSAIDs: aOR 2.47; 95% CI 1.26-4.83, SSRI: aOR 10.8; 95% CI 2.41-2.48) compared to no use.

CONCLUSION

When NSAIDs or SSRIs are required for NOAC users with AF, physicians need to monitor bleeding events and consider the use of PPIs, especially for combined use of both drugs or when initiating NOACs treatment.