Role of Metrology in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Does It Provide Unique Information in Assessing Patients and Predicting Outcome? Results From the British Society for Rheumatology Biologic Register for Ankylosing Spondylitis

Diagnosis, monitoring, and management of axial spondyloarthritis

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic condition predominantly affecting the spine and sacroiliac joints. This article provides an in-depth overview of the current approaches to diagnosing, monitoring, and managing axSpA, including insights into developing terminology and diagnostic difficulties. A substantial portion of the debate focuses on the challenging diagnostic procedure, noting the difficulty of detecting axSpA early, particularly before the appearance of radiologic structural changes. Despite normal laboratory parameters, more than half of axSpA patients experience symptoms. X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are essential for evaluating structural damage and inflammation. MRI can be beneficial when there is no visible structural damage on X-ray as it can help unravel bone marrow edema (BME) as a sign of ongoing inflammation. The management covers both non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches. Lifestyle modifications, physical activity, and patient education are essential components of the management. Pharmacological therapy, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), are explored, emphasizing individualized treatment. To effectively manage axSpA, a comprehensive and well-coordinated approach is necessary, emphasizing the significance of a multidisciplinary team. Telehealth applications play a growing role in axSpA management, notably in reducing diagnostic delays and facilitating remote monitoring. In conclusion, this article underlines diagnostic complexities and emphasizes the changing strategy of axSpA treatment. The nuanced understanding offered here is designed to guide clinicians, researchers, and healthcare providers toward a more comprehensive approach to axSpA diagnosis and care.

Use of the Oswestry Disability Index in ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

The Oswestry Disability Index is considered the gold standard in the evaluation of disability in patients with chronic mechanical back pain. The aim of this study was to assess the applicability of Oswestry Disability Index in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and its relationship with disease assessment parameters for ankylosing spondylitis.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients diagnosed with ankylosing spondylitis were included in the study group. The control group consisted of 50 individuals with nonspecific low back pain. The Oswestry Disability Index and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index were applied to both groups. In addition, the Visual Analog Scale, the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score C-Reactive Protein, the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index, and the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life scales were applied in the study group. the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, C-Reactive Protein levels, and HLA-B27 analysis were noted as laboratory markers in ankylosing spondylitis patients.

RESULTS

The scores of Oswestry Disability Index had a significant correlation with scores of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index in ankylosing spondylitis patients (r=0.543) and in the control group (r=0.401). There was a significant correlation between the scores of Oswestry Disability Index and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (r=0.544), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (r=0.317), the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (r=0.723), the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (r=0.501), the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score C-Reactive Protein (r=0.530), Visual Analog Scale-Rest (r=0.476), and Visual Analog Scale-Activity (r=0.441) values in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of Oswestry Disability Index in conjunction with Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index may warn the physician to interpret high Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index scores in the context of mechanical pain. Therefore, the use of Oswestry Disability Index in patients with ankylosing spondylitis will be beneficial.

Worse scores but similar patterns of disease activity: interpreting outcomes in women with axial spondyloarthropathy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of sex on disease activity in axial spondylitis (axSpA).

METHOD

Data were extracted from the Ankylosing Spondylitis Registry of Ireland (ASRI). In this cross-sectional study, patients were analysed on the basis of sex, with a series of comparison analyses performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 886 participants were enrolled in the ASRI [232 (26.2%) women, 644 (72.6%) men]. Females recorded significantly worse Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (4.57 vs 3.83, p < 0.01) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life questionnaire (ASQoL) (7.51 vs 6.12, p < 0.01) scores than males. There was a stronger correlation in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional and Metrology Indices (BASFI and BASMI) in females (r_s = 0.619, p < 0.01) than in males (r_s = 0.572, p < 0.01). Analysis of factors in BASDAI revealed that the higher total scores in females compared to males were due not to any single component, but to worse scores in all six components of the BASDAI combined. Ranking of components by severity between sexes revealed identical ranking in four of the six components of the BASDAI.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with axSpA reported significantly worse disease activity, quality of life, and functional ability than men. However, the BASDAI capturedsimilar patterns of disease activity. Limitation of spinal mobility in women with axSpA corresponded to greater impairment in functional ability. Further evaluation of disease monitoring tools is required to ensure that disease activity is accurately captured in men and women with axSpA.