Predictors of unsuccessful hydroxychloroquine tapering and discontinuation: Can we personalize decision-making in systemic lupus treatment?

Management of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic literature review informing the 2023 update of the EULAR recommendations

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the new evidence (2018-2022) for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) to inform the 2023 update of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations.

METHODS

Systematic literature reviews were performed in the Medline and the Cochrane Library databases capturing publications from 1 January 2018 through 31 December 2022, according to the EULAR standardised operating procedures. The research questions focused on five different domains, namely the benefit/harm of SLE treatments, the benefits from the attainment of remission/low disease activity, the risk/benefit from treatment tapering/withdrawal, the management of SLE with antiphospholipid syndrome and the safety of immunisations against varicella zoster virus and SARS-CoV2 infection. A Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome framework was used to develop search strings for each research topic.

RESULTS

We identified 439 relevant articles, the majority being observational studies of low or moderate quality. High-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) documented the efficacy of the type 1 interferon receptor inhibitor, anifrolumab, in non-renal SLE, and belimumab and voclosporin, a novel calcineurin inhibitor, in lupus nephritis (LN), when compared with standard of care. For the treatment of specific organ manifestations outside LN, a lack of high-quality data was documented. Multiple observational studies confirmed the beneficial effects of attaining clinical remission or low disease activity, reducing the risk for multiple adverse outcomes. Two randomised trials with some concerns regarding risk of bias found higher rates of relapse in patients who discontinued glucocorticoids (GC) or immunosuppressants in SLE and LN, respectively, yet observational cohort studies suggest that treatment withdrawal might be feasible in a subset of patients.

CONCLUSION

Anifrolumab and belimumab achieve better disease control than standard of care in extrarenal SLE, while combination therapies with belimumab and voclosporin attained higher response rates in high-quality RCTs in LN. Remission and low disease activity are associated with favourable long-term outcomes. In patients achieving these targets, GC and immunosuppressive therapy may gradually be tapered. Cite Now.

Recent findings about antimalarials in cutaneous lupus erythematosus: What dermatologists should know

Antimalarials (AMs), particularly hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ), are the cornerstone of the treatment for both systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). HCQ and CQ are recommended as first-line oral agents in all CLE guidelines. Initially thought to have potential therapeutic effects against COVID-19, HCQ has drawn significant attention in recent years, highlighting concerns over its potential toxicity among patients and physicians. This review aims to consolidate current evidence on the efficacy of AMs in CLE. Our focus will be on optimizing therapeutic strategies, such as switching from HCQ to CQ, adding quinacrine to either HCQ or CQ, or adjusting HCQ dose based on blood concentration. Additionally, we will explore the potential for HCQ dose reduction or discontinuation in cases of CLE or SLE remission. Our review will focus on the existing evidence regarding adverse events linked to AM usage, with a specific emphasis on severe events and those of particular interest to dermatologists. Last, we will discuss the optimal HCQ dose and the balance between preventing CLE or SLE flares and minimizing toxicity.

Right ventricular dyssynchrony for the prediction of prognosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus-aaociated pulmonary arterial hypertension: a study with two-dimensional speckle tracking

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a common complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and PAH can cause right ventricle (RV) remodel and dyssynchrony. The aim of this study was to explore the value of RV dyssynchrony in predicting adverse clinical events in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus-aaociated pulmonary arterial hypertension (SLE-PAH) using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE). A total of 53 patients with SLE-PAH were enrolled in this study. The dyssynchrony of the RV (RV-SD6) was evaluated by 2D-STE. The clinical data of all participants were collected, and routine cardiac function parameters were measured by two-dimensional echocardiography, and analyzed for their correlation with RV-SD6. The predictive value of RV-SD6 in clinical adverse event was evaluated. RV-SD6 was negatively correlated with RV-FLS, RV-FAC, and TAPSE (r = - 0.788, r = - 0.363 and r = - 0.325, respectively, all P < 0.01), while the correlation with RV-FLS was the strongest. linear regression analysis showed that RV-FLS was an independent risk factor for RV-SD6 (β = - 1.40, 95% CI - 1.65 ~ - 1.14, P < 0.001). Cox regression analysis showed that RV-SD6 was a predictor with clinical adverse events (HR = 1.03, 95% CI 1 ~ 1.06, P < 0.05). RV-SD6 was highly discriminative in predicting clinical adverse events (AUC = 0.764), at a cutoff of 51.10 ms with a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 68.3%. RV-FLS was negatively correlated with RV-SD6 and was an independent risk factor for it. RV-SD6 can serve as an indicator for predicting the occurrence of adverse clinical events in SLE-PAH patients, with high sensitivity and specificity.

EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus: 2023 update

OBJECTIVES

To update the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) based on emerging new evidence.

METHODS

An international Task Force formed the questions for the systematic literature reviews (January 2018-December 2022), followed by formulation and finalisation of the statements after a series of meetings. A predefined voting process was applied to each overarching principle and recommendation. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned, and participants finally provided their level of agreement with each item.

RESULTS

The Task Force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 13 recommendations, concerning the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), glucocorticoids (GC), immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs) (including methotrexate, mycophenolate, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide (CYC)), calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, voclosporin) and biologics (belimumab, anifrolumab, rituximab). Advice is also provided on treatment strategies and targets of therapy, assessment of response, combination and sequential therapies, and tapering of therapy. HCQ is recommended for all patients with lupus at a target dose 5 mg/kg real body weight/day, considering the individual's risk for flares and retinal toxicity. GC are used as 'bridging therapy' during periods of disease activity; for maintenance treatment, they should be minimised to equal or less than 5 mg/day (prednisone equivalent) and, when possible, withdrawn. Prompt initiation of ISDs (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate) and/or biological agents (anifrolumab, belimumab) should be considered to control the disease and facilitate GC tapering/discontinuation. CYC and rituximab should be considered in organ-threatening and refractory disease, respectively. For active lupus nephritis, GC, mycophenolate or low-dose intravenous CYC are recommended as anchor drugs, and add-on therapy with belimumab or CNIs (voclosporin or tacrolimus) should be considered. Updated specific recommendations are also provided for cutaneous, neuropsychiatric and haematological disease, SLE-associated antiphospholipid syndrome, kidney protection, as well as preventative measures for infections, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSION

The updated recommendations provide consensus guidance on the management of SLE, combining evidence and expert opinion.

Hydroxychloroquine Dose and Risk for Incident Retinopathy : A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Hydroxychloroquine is recommended for all patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and is often used for other inflammatory conditions, but a critical long-term adverse effect is vision-threatening retinopathy.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the long-term risk for incident hydroxychloroquine retinopathy and examine the degree to which average hydroxychloroquine dose within the first 5 years of treatment predicts this risk.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

U.S. integrated health network.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients aged 18 years or older who received hydroxychloroquine for 5 or more years between 2004 and 2020 and had guideline-recommended serial retinopathy screening.

MEASUREMENTS

Hydroxychloroquine dose was assessed from pharmacy dispensing records. Incident hydroxychloroquine retinopathy was assessed by central adjudication of spectral domain optical coherence tomography with severity assessment (mild, moderate, or severe). Risk for hydroxychloroquine retinopathy was estimated over 15 years of use according to hydroxychloroquine weight-based dose (>6, 5 to 6, or ≤5 mg/kg per day) using the Kaplan-Meier estimator.

RESULTS

Among 3325 patients in the primary study population, 81 developed hydroxychloroquine retinopathy (56 mild, 17 moderate, and 8 severe), with overall cumulative incidences of 2.5% and 8.6% at 10 and 15 years, respectively. The cumulative incidences of retinopathy at 15 years were 21.6% for higher than 6 mg/kg per day, 11.4% for 5 to 6 mg/kg per day, and 2.7% for 5 mg/kg per day or lower. The corresponding risks for moderate to severe retinopathy at 15 years were 5.9%, 2.4%, and 1.1%, respectively.

LIMITATION

Possible misclassifications of dose due to nonadherence to filled prescriptions.

CONCLUSION

In this large, contemporary cohort with active surveillance retinopathy screening, the overall risk for hydroxychloroquine retinopathy was 8.6% after 15 years, and most cases were mild. Higher hydroxychloroquine dose was associated with progressively greater risk for incident retinopathy.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institutes of Health.

Reduktion oder Abbruch einer HCQ-Therapie birgt Risiken für SLE-Patienten

Eine dauerhafte Einnahme von Hydroxychloroquin (HCQ) kann Krankheitsschübe bei einem systemischen Lupus erythematodes (SLE) stark reduzieren. Auf Expertenseite gibt es jedoch Bedenken wegen der Toxizität für die Netzhaut, zudem sind SLE-Patienten oft ungewiss über Risiken und Nutzen einer Langzeitbehandlung. Almeida-Brasil et al. ermittelten die Ausgangsfaktoren, die mit schlechten Behandlungsergebnissen nach Absetzen des HCQ assoziiert sind.

Hydroxychloroquine on the Pulmonary Vascular Diseases in Interstitial Lung Disease: Immunologic Effects, and Virus Interplay

To investigate the effects of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) drug use on the risk of pulmonary vascular disease (PVD) in an interstitial lung disease cohort (ILD cohort, ILD+ virus infection), we retrospectively enrolled the ILD cohort with HCQ (HCQ users, N = 4703) and the ILD cohort without HCQ (non-HCQ users, N = 4703) by time-dependence after propensity score matching. Cox models were used to analyze the risk of PVD. We calculated the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PVD after adjusting for sex, age, comorbidities, index date and immunosuppressants, such as steroids, etc. Compared with the HCQ nonusers, in HCQ users, the aHRs (95% CIs) for PVD were (2.24 (1.42, 3.54)), and the women’s aHRs for PVD were (2.54, (1.49, 4.35)). The aHRs based on the days of HCQ use for PVD of 28−30 days, 31−120 days, and >120 days were (1.27 (0.81, 1.99)), (3.00 (1.81, 4.87)) and (3.83 (2.46, 5.97)), respectively. The medium or long-term use of HCQ or young women receiving HCQ were associated with a higher aHR for PVD in the ILD cohort. These findings indicated interplay of the primary immunologic effect of ILD, comorbidities, women, age and virus in the HCQ users.

Prevalence and factors associated with long-term remission in cutaneous lupus: a longitudinal cohort study of 141 cases

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the prevalence and factors associated with long-term remission in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prevalence, the factors associated with remission and long-term remission with and without treatment during CLE.

METHODS

Longitudinal cohort study including biopsy proven CLE patients seen between November 1st, 2019, and April 30th, 2021, with at least 6 months of follow-up after diagnosis. Demographic data, CLE subtypes, remission status and treatments were recorded. Remission was defined by a Cutaneous LE Disease Area and Severity Index activity (CLASI-A) score of 0. Long-term remission was defined by remission > 3 years.

RESULTS

Among 141 patients included (81% of women), 93 (66%) were in remission at last follow-up with a median duration since diagnosis of 11.4 years (IQR 4.2-24.7). Long-term remission was observed in 22 (19%) of 114 patients with at least 3 years of follow-up, including 5 (4.4%) with no systemic treatment. Active smoking (OR: 0.22 [95%CI: 0.05-0.97], p=0.04) and DLE lesions (OR: 0.14 [95%CI: 0.04-0.48], p=0.004) were associated with a lower risk of long-term remission.

LIMITATIONS

Partial retrospective data collection and tertiary center population.

CONCLUSION

Long-term remission is rare in CLE and negatively associated with active smoking and DLE.