1
|
Foeldvari I, Torok KS, Antón J, Blakley M, Constantin T, Cutolo M, Denton CP, Fligelstone K, Hinrichs B, Li SC, Maillard S, Marrani E, Moinzadeh P, Orteu CH, Pain CE, Pauling JD, Pilkington C, Rosser F, Smith V, Furst DF. Best clinical practice in the treatment of juvenile systemic sclerosis: expert panel guidance - the result of the International Hamburg Consensus Meeting December 2022. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2024; 20:387-404. [PMID: 38149621 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2023.2298354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Juvenile systemic sclerosis (jSSc) is an orphan disease with a prevalence of 3 in 1,000,000 children. Currently there is only one consensus treatment guideline concerning skin, pulmonary and vascular involvement for jSSc, the jSSc SHARE (Single Hub and Access point for pediatric Rheumatology in Europe) initiative, which was based on data procured up to 2014. Therefore, an update of these guidelines, with a more recent literature and expert experience, and extension of the guidance to more aspects of the disease is needed. AREAS COVERED Treatment options were reviewed, and opinions were provided for most facets of jSSc including general management, some of which differs from adult systemic sclerosis, such as the use of corticosteroids, and specific organ involvement, such as skin, musculoskeletal, pulmonary, and gastroenterology. EXPERT OPINION We are suggesting the treat to target strategy to treat early to prevent cumulative disease damage in jSSc. Conclusions are derived from both expert opinion and available literature, which is mostly based on adult systemic sclerosis (aSSc), given shared pathophysiology, extrapolation of results from aSSc studies was judged reasonable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Foeldvari
- Hamburg Centre for Pediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology, Schön Klinik Hamburg Eilbek, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kathryn S Torok
- University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jordi Antón
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology. Hospital Sant Joan de Déu and Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael Blakley
- Riley Hospital for Children at IU Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Tamás Constantin
- Unit of Pediatric Rheumatology, Tűzoltó Street Department, Pediatric Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Maurizio Cutolo
- Laboratory of Experimental Rheumatology and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology-Department of Internal Medicine and Specialties, University of Genoa and IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Kim Fligelstone
- Scleroderma & Raynaud's United Kindgom (SRUK) (Research Subcommittee, Patient Research Partner), FESCA, London, UK
| | - Bernd Hinrichs
- Children's pulmonology, Asklepios Klinik Nord - Heidberg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Suzanne C Li
- Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | | | - Edoardo Marrani
- Pediatric Rheumatology Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
| | - Pia Moinzadeh
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Catherine H Orteu
- UCL Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare E Pain
- Alder Hey Children's Foundation NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - John D Pauling
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Unit for Molecular Immunology and Inflammation, VIB Inflammation Research Center (IRC), Ghent, Belgium and ERN ReCONNET
| | | | - Franziska Rosser
- University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Vanessa Smith
- University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniel F Furst
- Division of Rheumatology Fellow, Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California in Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Wissen M, Gademan M, Vliet Vlieland T, Straathof B, Teuwen M, Peter WF, van den Ende C, van Weely S. Physical therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis: the patients' perspective. Scand J Rheumatol 2023; 52:609-618. [PMID: 37139785 DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2023.2195726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the duration, frequency, and content of individual physical therapy (PT) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHOD In this cross-sectional study, an electronic questionnaire aimed at people with RA and axSpA was distributed through various communication channels of the Dutch Arthritis Foundation. It comprised questions on sociodemographic and health characteristics, received PT (currently and/or in the past year) and, if applicable, its duration, frequency, and content (active exercises, manual treatment, physical modalities, and/or counselling/education). RESULTS The study included 257 and 94 patients with self-reported diagnoses of RA and axSpA, of whom 163 (63%) and 77 (82%) currently or had recently received individual PT. The duration of individual PT was long-term (> 3 months) in 79% of RA and 83% of axSpA patients, with an average frequency of once per week in most. Although active exercises and counselling/education were each reported by ≥ 73% of the patients with RA and axSpA who received long-term individual PT, passive treatment modalities were also often offered (≥ 89%), in particular massage, kinesiotaping, and/or passive mobilization. The same pattern was seen in patients receiving short-term PT. CONCLUSION The majority of patients with RA and axSpA received PT currently or in the past year, usually individually, long-term, and at a frequency of once a week. Although active exercises and education are recommended in guidelines, passive treatment options that are not advised were relatively often reported. An implementation study to identify barriers and facilitators regarding adherence to clinical practice guidelines seems warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mat van Wissen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mgj Gademan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tpm Vliet Vlieland
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - B Straathof
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mmh Teuwen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - W F Peter
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Chm van den Ende
- Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sfe van Weely
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|