3D Bioprinting in Otolaryngology: A Review

A Comprehensive Literature Review on Advancements and Challenges in 3D Bioprinting of Human Organs: Ear, Skin, and Bone

The field of 3D bioprinting is rapidly emerging within the realm of regenerative medicine, offering significant potential in dealing with the issue of organ shortages. Despite being in its early stages, it has the potential to replicate tissue structures accurately, providing new potential solutions for reconstructive surgery. This review explores the diverse applications of 3D bioprinting in regenerative medicine, pharmaceuticals, and the food industry, specifically focusing on ear, skin, and bone tissues due to their unique challenges and implications in the field. Significant progress has been made in cartilage and bone scaffold fabrication in ear reconstruction, yet challenges in functional maturation persist. Recent advancements highlight the potential for patient-specific ear substitutes, emphasizing the need for extensive clinical trials. In skin regeneration, 3D bioprinting addresses limitations in existing models, offering opportunities for improved wound healing and realistic skin models. While challenges exist, progress in biomaterials and in-situ bioprinting holds promise. In bone regeneration, 3D bioprinting presents personalized solutions for defects, but scaffold design refinement and addressing regulatory and ethical considerations are crucial. The transformative potential of 3D bioprinting in the field of medicine holds the promise of redefining therapeutic approaches and delivering personalized treatments and functional tissues. Interdisciplinary collaboration is essential for fully realizing the capabilities of 3D bioprinting. This review provides a detailed analysis of current methodologies, challenges, and prospects in 3D bioprinting for ear, skin, and bone tissue regeneration.

3D printed ventilation tubes and their effect on biological models

BACKGROUND

Acute otitis media (AOM) causes inflammation and hearing loss. Ventilation tubes are key in treatment. 3D printing improves prostheses in otorhinolaryngology, offering precision and greater adaptability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An experimental study was conducted with Wistar rats from July to December 2020. 3D tympanostomy tube models were designed, with technical specifications and tests performed on inexpensive 3D printers. The tympanostomy tube was inserted endoscopically.

RESULTS

Procedures were performed on five rats with implants in both ears. Pre-intervention pathologies, such as atical retraction and glue ear, were found. The PLA-printed tympanostomy tube showed improvement after adjustments. Histopathological results revealed significant middle and inner ear damage.

CONCLUSION

In our study, the design and 3D printing of implants fulfilled the desired functions when modified, with a height of 5 mm. Complications included PLA degradation and ear damage. There were no adverse events during observation, highlighting the need for further research on 3D-printed implants.

[Research progress of three-dimensional bioprinting technology in auricle repair and reconstruction]

Objective

To review the research progress on the application of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology in auricle repair and reconstruction.

Methods

The recent domestic and international research literature on 3D printing and auricle repair and reconstruction was extensively reviewed, and the concept of 3D bioprinting technology and research progress in auricle repair and reconstruction were summarized.

Results

The auricle possesses intricate anatomical structure and functionality, necessitating precise tissue reconstruction and morphological replication. Hence, 3D printing technology holds immense potential in auricle reconstruction. In contrast to conventional 3D printing technology, 3D bioprinting technology not only enables the simulation of auricular outer shape but also facilitates the precise distribution of cells within the scaffold during fabrication by incorporating cells into bioink. This approach mimics the composition and structure of natural tissues, thereby favoring the construction of biologically active auricular tissues and enhancing tissue repair outcomes.

Conclusion

3D bioprinting technology enables the reconstruction of auricular tissues, avoiding potential complications associated with traditional autologous cartilage grafting. The primary challenge in current research lies in identifying bioinks that meet both the mechanical requirements of complex tissues and biological criteria.

An overview of nasal cartilage bioprinting: from bench to bedside

Nasal cartilage diseases and injuries are known as significant challenges in reconstructive medicine, affecting a substantial number of individuals worldwide. In recent years, the advent of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has emerged as a promising approach for nasal cartilage reconstruction, offering potential breakthroughs in the field of regenerative medicine. This paper provides an overview of the methods and challenges associated with 3D bioprinting technologies in the procedure of reconstructing nasal cartilage tissue. The process of 3D bioprinting entails generating a digital 3D model using biomedical imaging techniques and computer-aided design to integrate both internal and external scaffold features. Then, bioinks which consist of biomaterials, cell types, and bioactive chemicals, are applied to facilitate the precise layer-by-layer bioprinting of tissue-engineered scaffolds. After undergoing in vitro and in vivo experiments, this process results in the development of the physiologically functional integrity of the tissue. The advantages of 3D bioprinting encompass the ability to customize scaffold design, enabling the precise incorporation of pore shape, size, and porosity, as well as the utilization of patient-specific cells to enhance compatibility. However, various challenges should be considered, including the optimization of biomaterials, ensuring adequate cell viability and differentiation, achieving seamless integration with the host tissue, and navigating regulatory attention. Although numerous studies have demonstrated the potential of 3D bioprinting in the rebuilding of such soft tissues, this paper covers various aspects of the bioprinted tissues to provide insights for the future development of repair techniques appropriate for clinical use.

Tissue engineering in otology: a review of achievements

Tissue engineering application in otology spans a distance from the pinna to auditory nerve covered with specialized tissues and functions such as sense of hearing and aesthetics. It holds the potential to address the barriers of lack of donor tissue, poor tissue match, and transplant rejection through provision of new and healthy tissues similar to the host and possesses the capacity to renew, to regenerate, and to repair in-vivo and was shown to be a bypasses for any need to immunosuppression. This review aims to investigate the application of tissue engineering in otology and to evaluate the achievements and challenges in external, middle and inner ear sections. Since gaining the recent knowledge and training on use of different scaffolds is essential for otology specialists and who look for the recovery of ear function and aesthetics of patients, it is shown in this review how utilizing tissue engineering and cell transplantation, regenerative medicine can provide advancements in hearing and ear aesthetics to fit different patients' needs.

3D Bioprinting: An Important Tool for Tumor Microenvironment Research

The tumor microenvironment plays a crucial role in cancer development and treatment. Traditional 2D cell cultures fail to fully replicate the complete tumor microenvironment, while mouse tumor models suffer from time-consuming procedures and complex operations. However, in recent years, 3D bioprinting technology has emerged as a vital tool in studying the tumor microenvironment. 3D bioprinting is a revolutionary biomanufacturing technique that involves layer-by-layer stacking of biological materials, such as cells and biomaterial scaffolds, to create highly precise 3D biostructures. This technology enables the construction of intricate tissue and organ models in the laboratory, which are utilized for biomedical research, drug development, and personalized medicine. The application of 3D bioprinting has brought unprecedented opportunities to fields such as cancer research, tissue engineering, and organ transplantation. It has opened new possibilities for addressing real-world biological challenges and improving medical treatment outcomes. This review summarizes the applications of 3D bioprinting technology in the context of the tumor microenvironment, aiming to explore its potential impact on cancer research and treatment. The use of this cutting-edge technology promises significant advancements in understanding cancer biology and enhancing medical interventions.

Biomaterial Material Applications in Postoperative Surgical Fields of Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty: A Comparative Study

This retrospective study compared the effectiveness of different materials used in Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) for snoring or obstructive sleep apnea treatment, focusing on the impact on bleeding control, pain control, and healing ability. The study population comprised 213 patients who underwent UPPP at Wan-Fang Hospital between July 2018 and October 2022 divided into four groups based on the postoperative material used: No Material Use Group, Tissue Glue Group, Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Group, and Polyglycolic Acid (PGA) Sheet Group. Results showed significant differences in operation time and intraoperative bleeding amount among the groups, with the Tissue Glue Group demonstrating the shortest operation time. While no significant differences in postoperative pain at 24 h were observed, PRP and PGA Sheet groups exhibited lower average pain scores in cases with higher pain levels. Postoperative complications and emergency room visits due to pain or bleeding varied among the groups, with the No Material Use Group having the highest incidence, although no statistical significance was achieved. This study provides insights into the potential benefits of using advanced materials in UPPP, guiding future research and clinical practice to improve patient care and outcomes.

Recent Advances in Decellularized Extracellular Matrix-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting in Tissue Engineering

In recent years, three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has been widely utilized as a novel manufacturing technique by more and more researchers to construct various tissue substitutes with complex architectures and geometries. Different biomaterials, including natural and synthetic materials, have been manufactured into bioinks for tissue regeneration using 3D bioprinting. Among the natural biomaterials derived from various natural tissues or organs, the decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) has a complex internal structure and a variety of bioactive factors that provide mechanistic, biophysical, and biochemical signals for tissue regeneration and remodeling. In recent years, more and more researchers have been developing the dECM as a novel bioink for the construction of tissue substitutes. Compared with other bioinks, the various ECM components in dECM-based bioink can regulate cellular functions, modulate the tissue regeneration process, and adjust tissue remodeling. Therefore, we conducted this review to discuss the current status of and perspectives on dECM-based bioinks for bioprinting in tissue engineering. In addition, the various bioprinting techniques and decellularization methods were also discussed in this study.