Collagen-Tannic Acid Spheroids for β-Cell Encapsulation Fabricated Using a 3D Bioprinter

Preparation strategy of hydrogel microsphere and its application in skin repair

In recent years, hydrogel microsphere has attracted much attention due to its great potential in the field of skin repair. This paper reviewed the recent progress in the preparation strategy of hydrogel microsphere and its application in skin repair. In this review, several preparation methods of hydrogel microsphere were summarized in detail. In addition, the related research progress of hydrogel microspheres for skin repair was reviewed, and focused on the application of bioactive microspheres, antibacterial microspheres, hemostatic microspheres, and hydrogel microspheres as delivery platforms (hydrogel microspheres as a microcarrier of drugs, bioactive factors, or cells) in the field of skin repair. Finally, the limitations and future prospects of the development of hydrogel microspheres and its application in the field of skin repair were presented. It is hoped that this review can provide a valuable reference for the development of the preparation strategy of hydrogel microspheres and promote the application of hydrogel microspheres in skin repair.

Cellular adhesion and chondrogenic differentiation inside an alginate-based bioink in response to tailorable artificial matrices and tannic acid treatment

Many established bioinks fulfill important requirements regarding fabrication standards and cytocompatibility. Current research focuses on development of functionalized bioinks with an improved support of tissue-specific cell differentiation. Many approaches primarily depend on decellularized extracellular matrices or blood components. In this study, we investigated the combination of a highly viscous alginate-methylcellulose (algMC) bioink with collagen-based artificial extracellular matrix (aECM) as a finely controllable and tailorable system composed of collagen type I (col) with and without chondroitin sulfate (CS) or sulfated hyaluronan (sHA). As an additional stabilizer, the polyphenol tannic acid (TA) was integrated into the inks. The assessment of rheological properties and printability as well as hydrogel microstructure revealed no adverse effect of the integrated components on the inks. Viability, adhesion, and proliferation of bioprinted immortalized human mesenchymal stem cells (hTERT-MSC) was improved indicating enhanced interaction with the designed microenvironment. Furthermore, chondrogenic matrix production (collagen type II and sulfated glycosaminoglycans) by primary human chondrocytes (hChon) was enhanced by aECM. Supplementing the inks with TA was required for these positive effects but caused cytotoxicity as soon as TA concentrations exceeded a certain amount. Thus, combining tailorable aECM with algMC and balanced TA addition proved to be a promising approach for promoting adhesion of immortalized stem cells and differentiation of chondrocytes in bioprinted scaffolds.

Cell Encapsulation and 3D Bioprinting for Therapeutic Cell Transplantation

The promise of cell therapy has been augmented by introducing biomaterials, where intricate scaffold shapes are fabricated to accommodate the cells within. In this review, we first discuss cell encapsulation and the promising potential of biomaterials to overcome challenges associated with cell therapy, particularly cellular function and longevity. More specifically, cell therapies in the context of autoimmune disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, and cancer are reviewed from the perspectives of preclinical findings as well as available clinical data. Next, techniques to fabricate cell-biomaterials constructs, focusing on emerging 3D bioprinting technologies, will be reviewed. 3D bioprinting is an advancing field that enables fabricating complex, interconnected, and consistent cell-based constructs capable of scaling up highly reproducible cell-biomaterials platforms with high precision. It is expected that 3D bioprinting devices will expand and become more precise, scalable, and appropriate for clinical manufacturing. Rather than one printer fits all, seeing more application-specific printer types, such as a bioprinter for bone tissue fabrication, which would be different from a bioprinter for skin tissue fabrication, is anticipated in the future.