Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study

Cancer-specific survival in non-mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinomas after local resection versus right hemicolectomy: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database study

BACKGROUND

Adenocarcinomas of the appendix are rare cancers for which no National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines exist, and for patients who undergo resection with curative intent, there is a paucity of data on prognostic factors affecting long-term cancer-specific survival. We aimed to compare the cancer-specific survival outcomes in adult patients with appendiceal non-mucinous adenocarcinoma undergoing either local resection versus right hemicolectomy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results of patients who underwent curative resection over a 15-year period (2004-2019) for primary appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Out of 16,699 patients, 14,945 were excluded (exclusion criteria were non-adenocarcinoma histological types and patients with regional or distant metastasis as per National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results stage). Effects of factors (age, race, tumor biology [mucinous versus non-mucinous tumors], the extent of resection of the primary lesion, and lymph nodes) on cancer-specific long-term survival were studied. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival outcomes were reported as mean survival (months).

RESULTS

Of 1,754 patients, 827 (47.1%) were women, and 927 (52.1%) were men. The mean age in years (± standard deviation) was 62.43 ± 14.3. The racial distribution was as follows: Black 237 (13.5%), White 1,398 (79.7%), and Other 119 (6.8%). A total of 771 (44.6%) underwent local resection (appendectomy or segmental resection of colon without lymph node resection), and 983 (55.4%) underwent hemicolectomy with lymph node resection. Favorable survival prognosticators were age <50 years, White race, and well-differentiated histology. Patients with mucinous tumors experienced better survival. Patients who underwent right hemicolectomy with lymph node resection experienced better survival compared with those who had an appendectomy or segmental colonic resection for non-mucinous tumors rather than mucinous tumors.

CONCLUSION

We report novel demographic, tumor-related, and operative prognostic factors impacting long-term cancer-specific survival in patients who undergo resection for appendiceal adenocarcinoma. The extent of resection of the primary lesion with draining lymph nodes determines long-term cancer-specific survival in non-mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinomas.

Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm: What Is the Best Treatment?

BACKGROUND

Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) is an uncommon tumor of the appendix that is usually diagnosed incidentally after surgery. Although LAMN may be asymptomatic, it can rupture and seed mucin and neoplastic epithelium into the peritoneum, causing pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 53 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Age, sex, tumor size, margin status, peritoneal carcinomatosis index, surgical procedures, postoperative results with histologic diagnosis, T stage, recurrence, and mortality of the patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

Appendectomy was performed in 37 patients, right hemicolectomy in nine patients, cytoreductive surgery in one patient, and cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in six patients. Recurrence occurred in four patients. Of the patients who developed recurrence, one patient had stage T4a disease, and the other three patients had T4b disease (p<0.001). Eighteen patients had acellular mucin in the serosa and four of these patients developed recurrence (p=0.004). Twelve patients had appendix perforation, and three of these patients had PMP on exploration (p<0.001). The mean survival time was 93.3 months in patients without recurrence and 32 months in patients with recurrence (p=0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are rare appendiceal tumors. The appropriate management of this tumor is controversial. T stage, appendix perforation, presence of acellular mucin on the serosa, and surgical margins are risk factors for the development of PMP. Appendectomy is considered sufficient when there are no risk factors for Tis (LAMN) and T3 disease. Right hemicolectomy may be sufficient if there are no risk factors for T4a disease, but cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy seem to be the most appropriate treatments in the presence of the stated risk factors for T4b disease.

Prognostic significance of acellular mucin in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for appendiceal neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

Appendiceal neoplasms have a propensity for peritoneal dissemination. The standard of care for select individuals is CRS/HIPEC. In the current 8^th AJCC Staging system, a finding of only intraperitoneal acellular mucin (M1a) is classified as Stage IVa. There is concern that the current AJCC system may over-stage patients.

METHODS

This was a single-institution retrospective review of 164 cases of mucinous appendiceal neoplasm. Patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC with M1a disease were compared to patients with peritoneal deposits containing tumor cells (well-differentiated adenocarcinoma; low-grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei-M1b,G1). Overall and recurrence-free survival were assessed.

RESULTS

Median age was 51 years, 70% were female, and 75% White. Sixty-four patients had M1a disease and 100 M1b,G1 disease. M1a disease had a lower median PCI score (11 vs. 20, p = .0001) and a higher rate of complete CRS (62% vs. 50%, p = .021). Median follow-up was 7.6 years (IQR 5.6-10.5 years). For M1a disease, there were no recurrences and only one patient died during the study interval. In comparison, for M1b disease, 66/100 (66%) recurred with a 5-year RFS of 40.5% (HR 8.0, 95% CI 4.9-15.1, p < .0001), and 31/100 (31%) died with a 5-year OS of 84.8% (HR 4.5, 95% CI 2.2-9.2, p < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Acellular mucin (M1a disease) after CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal neoplasm is associated with longer OS and RFS compared to M1b, G1 disease. Current AJCC staging does not accurately reflect the differing outcomes of these two patient populations. The presence of acellular mucin in the peritoneal cavity should not be perceived as a metastatic equivalent.

Clinical Significance of Lymph Node Dissection and Lymph Node Metastasis in Primary Appendiceal Tumor Patients After Curative Resection: a Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Due to its rarity and biological heterogeneity, guidelines for primary appendiceal tumor (PAT) are based on scarce evidence, resulting in no strong recommendations. The present study explored prognosis-related factors, including the timing of lymph node dissection (LND), in PAT patients after curative resection (CR) to determine the optimal surgical therapies.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected and analyzed data from 404 patients with PATs who underwent CR at 43 tertiary hospitals from 2000 to 2017. This manuscript is based on revised manuscript during review process. Please, change the bold characters to normal characters in the manuscript.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, there were no marked differences in the recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) between the primary and secondary LND groups (P = 0.993 and 0.728). A multivariate analysis showed that lymph node metastasis (LNM) was an independent factor for the RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-6.13; P = 0.031) and OS (HR 4.70; 95% CI 1.40-15.76; P = 0.012). There were significant associations between the LNM rates and tumor depth (P < 0.0001) and the histological type (P = 0.006). There was no LNM in patients with low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) or well-differentiated mucinous adenocarcinoma (G1) or patients with any Tis or T1 PATs.

CONCLUSIONS

LNM was an independent prognostic predictor in PATs after CR with LND. Tumor depth and histological type were not prognostic predictors but were LNM predictors. Secondary LND based on the pathological findings of resected specimens is considered an acceptable surgical management without a worse prognosis than primary LND, and it may be omitted in LAMN+G1 or in any Tis and T1 PATs.

Clinicopathological Characteristics of Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm

INTRODUCTION

Recently, "low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms" (LAMNs) have been proposed as one subtype of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms, characterized by a villous or flat proliferation of mucinous epithelium with low-grade cytologic atypia. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinicopathological characteristics of LAMN.

METHODS

In this multi-institutional cohort study, we retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics in appendiceal neoplasms patients who underwent treatment from 2000 to 2017.

RESULTS

In total, 922 patients were enrolled, with 279 (30.3%) cases of LAMN, and 93 (10.1%) cases of non-LAMN disease. In comparison with patients with non-LAMN disease, those with LAMN had significantly lower levels of CA19-9 (p = 0.045), a lower frequency of T4 tumors (p < 0.0001), a lower frequency of lymph node metastasis (p < 0.0001), and a lower frequency of distant metastasis (p < 0.0001). Survival analysis revealed that patients with LAMN had a significantly better prognosis than did those with non-LAMN disease (p < 0.001). Among the patients with distant metastasis, those with LAMN had a significantly better prognosis than did those with non-LAMN disease (p = 0.0020), but among the patients without distant metastasis, the difference between the 2 groups was not significant (p = 0.26). However, among patients who underwent complete resection, the difference in prognosis between the 2 groups was not significant (p = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

A multicenter retrospective study revealed that the clinicopathological characteristics of LAMN was different from those of non-LAMN.

Open versus laparoscopic surgery for primary appendiceal tumors: a large multicenter retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study in Japan

BACKGROUND

The feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for primary appendiceal tumors compared to that of open surgery has not been demonstrated to date because primary appendiceal tumors are rare. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgeries for primary appendiceal tumors.

METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, the data of patients who had been histologically diagnosed with primary appendiceal tumors at 43 tertiary hospitals in Japan between 2000 and 2017 were analyzed. In total, 922 patients were assessed, and 679 cases were eligible for analysis. Using propensity scores, the baseline characteristics were matched for 114 open surgery cases and 114 laparoscopic surgery cases. The primary endpoints were recurrence-free survival (excluding patients with stage IV disease with distant metastasis) and overall survival.

RESULTS

The rate of conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery was 1.5%. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 80.4% (95% confidence interval: 71.0-89.7) and 78.2% (95% confidence interval: 69.0-87.3) in the laparoscopic and open surgery groups, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.57). No significant difference was observed in the 5-year overall survival rates between the laparoscopic [83.5% (95% confidence interval: 74.4-92.7)] and open surgery [72.7% (95% confidence interval: 62.3-83.0); p = 0.09] groups. In multivariate analysis, laparoscopic surgery was not identified as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival [hazard ratio: 0.49 (95% confidence interval: 0.23-1.06), p = 0.0707].

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery is comparable to open surgery and can be considered a treatment option for primary appendiceal tumors.