Two-in-one method: Novel pancreaticojejunostomy technique for the bifid pancreas

Incidence and Clinical Implications of Anatomical Variations in the Pancreas and Its Ductal System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review analyzes the anatomical variants in the pancreas and its ductal system to report on their association with pancreatic pathologies.

METHODS

We conducted a search of the MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and LILACS databases from their inception to July 2023. The methodological quality was assessed with the Anatomical Quality Assessment (AQUA) tool. Finally, the pooled prevalence was estimated using a random effects model.

RESULTS

55 studies were found that met the eligibility criteria. The overall prevalence of pancreas divisum (PD) was 18% (95% CI = 15-21%). The prevalence of PD associated with pancreatitis was 30% (95% CI = 1-61%).

CONCLUSIONS

An anatomical variant of the pancreas such as PD may be the cause of bile duct obstruction, resulting in various clinical complications, such as pancreatitis. Hence, knowing this variant is extremely important for surgeons, especially for those who treat the gastroduodenal region.

Pancreas bifidum: an extremely rare cause of acute pancreatitis

A wide spectrum of anomalies of the pancreas, the pancreatic ductal system and the biliary tree are commonly encountered at radiologic evaluation. Pancreas bifidum, also known as bifid pancreas or fish-tail pancreas, is an extremely rare congenital branching anomaly of the main pancreatic duct characterized by its duplication. These 2 separate ducts are laid from the pancreatic tail to neck and they generally join at the pancreas body-tail draining via the major papilla; the pancreatic parenchyma is also bifurcated with separated dorsal and caudal buds. The clinical impact of this condition is not well established: although some authors sustained that probably does not cause or contribute to abdominal pain or overt pancreatic diseases, others argued that could be considered as a possible cause of acute pancreatitis.

We herewith describe the case of a 51-year-old woman presenting to our hospital with epigastric pain, nausea, and vomiting. Biochemical tests were suspicious for acute pancreatitis. Ultrasound examination was negative. MRI, including MR cholangiopancreatography revealed bifid pancreas characterized by duplication of the main pancreatic duct with 2 separate ducts that join at the pancreas head and draining via the minor papilla. On T2-weighted images the ventral bud of the pancreas was enlarged and characterized by slightly hyperintensity without peripancreatic fluid collections. The MRI findings were consistent with acute pancreatitis limited to the ventral bud of a bifid pancreas. Patient was treated with intravenous fluid resuscitation, pain control and institution of early enteral nutrition and discharged on the seventh day after admission.

Incidence of bifid pancreatic duct in pancreaticoduodenectomy and its impact on clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula

Objectives

This study aimed to examine the incidence of bifid pancreatic duct (BPD) in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and clarify its impact on clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF).

Background

Until now, all the literature about BPD during PD are published as case reports, and the incidence of BPD in PD and its impact on CR-POPF remain unknown.

Results

A total of 438 consecutive PDs were divided into two groups: the former year group and the latter year group. The former year group included 215 consecutive PDs, while the latter year group included 223. In the latter year group, we found 16 BPDs during PD (O-BPD); the incidence of O-BPD is 7.17%. Of them, there were eight patients who had BPD in the preoperative imaging (I-BPD). All the I-BPDs are O-BPDs; which means that 50% of O-BPDs were a single pancreatic duct in the preoperative imaging (I-SPD). There were 17 I-BPDs in the 438 consecutive PDs; the incidence of I-BPD is 3.88%. In the former year group, the rate of severe complications of I-BPD and I-SPD is 77.78% and 27.18%, respectively (p = 0.003); the rate of CR-POPF of I-BPD is higher than I-SPD, 55.56% vs. 27.18%, but there were no statistically significant differences. In the latter year group, the rate of severe complications of O-BPD and O-SPD is 50% and 18.36%, and the rate of CR-POPF of O-BPD and O-SPD is 37.5% and 22.22%, respectively; both of them have statistically significant differences, and the p-value is 0.003 and 0.006, respectively. In the subgroup analysis, both the rate of severe complications and the rate of CR-POPF of I-BPD were higher than O-BPD, 77.78% vs. 50%, and 55.56% vs. 37.5%, but there were no statistically significant differences in both of them; the p-value is 0.174 and 0.434, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that BPD was an independent risk factor of CR-POPF.

Conclusions

The incidence of O-BPD in PD is 7.17%, 50% of O-BPDs were I-SPD, and the incidence of I-BPD is 3.88%. BPD is an independent risk factor of CR-POPF. The suture closure method may be a simple, safe, and effective method in dealing with BPD in PD.