Subtotal stomach in esophageal reconstruction surgery achieves an anastomotic leakage rate of less than 1%

Comparison of the subtotal and narrow gastric conduit for cervical esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Several reports have compared narrow gastric conduit (NGC) with subtotal gastric conduit (SGC) for cervical esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy; however, whether which one is more beneficial in terms of postoperative complications remains unclear. To determine the optimal gastric conduit type, we retrospectively investigated and compared the postoperative complications between NGC and SGC used in cervical circular-tapered esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy through a propensity score-matched analysis.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2022, 577 consecutive esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy and cervical circular-stapled esophagogastrostomy were enrolled in this study.

RESULTS

Of the 577 patients, 77 were included each in the SGC and NGC groups, after propensity score matching. Clinical characteristics did not differ between the two groups. The anastomotic leakage rate was significantly lower in the SGC group than in the NGC group (5% vs. 22%, p < 0.01). The anastomotic stenosis rate was significantly higher in the SGC group (16% vs. 5%, p = 0.03). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that NGC, subcutaneous route, and age were significant independent factors associated with anastomotic leakage (odds ratios, 8.58, 6.49, and 5.21; p < 0.01, < 0.01 and 0.03, respectively) and that SGC was a significant independent factor associated with anastomotic stricture (odds ratios, 4.91; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In cervical circular-stapled esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy, SGC was superior to NGC in terms of reducing the risk of anastomotic leakage, although the risk of anastomotic stricture needs to be resolved.

Comparison of wide and narrow gastric conduit in esophageal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

Gastric conduit is most widely used method for esophageal reconstruction. Despite its popularity, certain complications, such as anastomotic leakage and strictures, remain to be resolved. In the present study, we reviewed the outcomes of narrow gastric conduit compared to wide gastric conduit reconstruction.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 493 patients with esophageal cancer who received esophagectomy with reconstruction in Taichung Veteran General Hospital, Taiwan between January 2010 and December 2019. We performed gastric conduit reconstruction with two different methods, narrow gastric conduit made of multistaples (more than four staples) and wide gastric conduit made of two or three staples. Among the 493 patients, 170 patients underwent wide gastric conduit formation and 323 patients underwent narrow gastric conduit. After propensity score matching, 140 patients from each group were matched by 1:1.

RESULTS

The average anastomotic leakage rate is 80 of 493 (16.23%). The leakage rate, length of hospital stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and ICU stay were significantly lower in the narrow gastric conduit group than in the wide gastric conduit group. The need for postoperation dilatation was significantly higher in wide gastric conduit group (19.41% vs 11.76%, p = 0.0217), and the time to first dilatation was similar in both groups ( p = 0.9808). Similar results were observed even after propensity score matching. In univariate analysis, the narrow gastric conduit, circular stapler, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and laparoscopic surgery were associated with a reduced risk of anastomotic leakage. However, these factors are not statistically significant in a multivariate logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

The narrow gastric conduit is not inferior to the wide gastric conduit and can be considered an alternative option for gastric conduit preparation.

Impact of zero anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy followed by whole stomach reconstruction for esophageal cancer: prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The stomach is the most common organ which is used for reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. It is controversial which is better narrow gastric tube reconstruction or whole stomach reconstruction to prevent anastomotic leakage.

METHODS

From August 2022 to March 2023, we started a prospective cohort study of whole stomach reconstruction after esophagectomy. Until then (from January 2018 to July 2022), narrow gastric tube reconstruction was performed as a standard reconstruction.

RESULTS

Narrow gastric tube reconstruction and whole stomach reconstruction were performed in 183 patients and 20 patients, respectively. The patient's characteristics were not significantly different between the narrow gastric tube group and the whole stomach group. In particular, for all patients in the whole stomach reconstruction group, retrosternal route and esophagogastrostomy by hand sewn were applied. There were no occurrences of AL through the continuous 20 cases in the whole stomach group, otherwise 42 (22.9%) patients in the narrow gastric group (P = 0.016). Postoperative hospital stays were significantly shorter in the whole stomach group than in the narrow gastric group (21 days vs. 28 days, P < .001). Blood perfusions were evaluated by indocyanine green for all cases, which had very good blood perfusion in all cases. Additionally, quantitative blood perfusion was examined by SPY-QP (Stryker, USA) for one case. Even the edge of the fornix showed more than 90% blood perfusion levels when the antrum was fixed as the reference point.

CONCLUSION

Whole stomach reconstruction with excellent blood perfusion is considered to be safe and has the possibility to prevent from occurring AL after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer patients.

Different gastric tubes in esophageal reconstruction during esophagectomy

Esophagectomy is currently the mainstay of treatment for resectable esophageal carcinoma. Gastric grafts are the first substitutes in esophageal reconstruction. According to the different tailoring methods applied to the stomach, gastric grafts can be classified as whole stomach, subtotal stomach and gastric tube. Gastric-tube placement has been proven to be the preferred method, with advantages in terms of postoperative complications and long-term survival. In recent years, several novel methods involving special-shaped gastric tubes have been proposed, which have further decreased the incidence of perioperative complications. This article will review the progress and clinical application status of different types of gastric grafts from the perspectives of preparation methods, studies of anatomy and perioperative outcomes, existing problems and future outlook.

What is the best reconstruction procedure after esophagectomy? A meta-analysis comparing posterior mediastinal and retrosternal approaches

Thoracic esophagectomy is a particularly invasive and complicated surgical procedure, with a reconstruction of the gastrointestinal tract, such as the stomach, jejunum, or colon. The posterior mediastinal, retrosternal, and subcutaneous routes are the three possible esophageal reconstruction routes. Each route has advantages and disadvantages, and the optimal reconstruction route after esophagectomy remains controversial. Additionally, the best anastomotic techniques after esophagectomy in terms of location (Ivor Lewis or McKeown) and suturing (manual or mechanical) are debatable. Our meta-analysis investigating postoperative complications after esophagectomy between the posterior mediastinal and retrosternal routes revealed that the posterior mediastinal route was associated with a significantly lower anastomotic leakage rate than the retrosternal route (odds ratio = 0.78, 95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.87, p < 0.0001). Conversely, pulmonary complications (odds ratio = 0.80, 95% confidence interval: 0.58-1.11, p = 0.19) and mortality between the posterior mediastinal and retrosternal routes (odds ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval: 0.56-1.12, p = 0.19) were not significantly different. However, the incidence of pneumonia may be lower when using the retrosternal route rather than the posterior mediastinal route for performing minimally invasive esophagectomy. The McKeown procedure is oncologically necessary for tumors located above the carina to dissect upper mediastinal and cervical lymph nodes; however, the Ivor Lewis procedure offers perioperative and oncological safety for tumors located under the carina. An individualized treatment strategy for selecting the optimal reconstruction procedure can be proposed in future studies based on oncological and patient risk factors considering mid- to long-term quality of life.

A case of advanced hypopharyngeal cervical esophageal cancer treated by curative resection with management of tracheoesophageal fistula

Advanced esophageal cancer with tracheal invasion is fatal due to airway narrowing and the possibility of tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) formation during the treatment process. If a TEF develops, palliative care is often chosen. It is very rare that curative treatment is performed including with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or surgery in such cases. A 71-year-old man presented with dysphagia. He was diagnosed as having hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal cancer with severe airway stenosis (cT4b [main bronchus, thyroid] N3 M0 cStage IIIC), and we initially created a tracheostomy. Second, we chose induction chemotherapy to avoid fistula formation by CRT, but after one course of chemotherapy, he developed a TEF due to remarkable tumor shrinkage. We strictly managed both his airway and nutrition by continuous suctioning over the cuff of the tracheal cannula and prohibiting swallowing of saliva and enteral nutrition via nasogastric tube. After three courses of chemotherapy were administered, we performed pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient remains alive and recurrence free at 9 years postoperatively. In cases of upper TEF caused by advanced hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal cancer, radical treatment may be possible by effective induction chemotherapy combined with strict airway and nutritional management after prior tracheostomy.

Surgical outcomes of reconstruction using the gastric tube and free jejunum for cervical esophageal cancer: analysis using the National Clinical Database of Japan

BACKGROUND

Cervical esophageal cancer accounts for a small proportion of all esophageal cancers. Therefore, studies examining this cancer include a small patient cohort. Most patients with cervical esophageal cancer undergo reconstruction using a gastric tube or free jejunum after esophagectomy. We examined the current status of postoperative morbidity and mortality of cervical esophageal cancer based on big data.

METHODS

Based on the Japan National Clinical Database, 807 surgically treated patients with cervical esophageal cancer were enrolled between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. Surgical outcomes were retrospectively reviewed for each reconstructed organ using gastric tubes and free jejunum.

RESULTS

The incidence of postoperative complications related to reconstructed organs was higher in the gastric tube reconstruction (17.9%) than in the free jejunum (6.7%) for anastomotic leakage (p < 0.01), but not significantly different for reconstructed organ necrosis (0.4% and 0.3%, respectively). The incidence rates of overall morbidity, pneumonia, 30-day reoperation, tracheal necrosis, and 30-day mortality using these reconstruction methods were 64.7% and 59.7%, 16.7% and 11.1%, 9.3% and 11.4%, 2.2% and 1.6%, and 1.2% and 0.0%, respectively. Only pneumonia was more common in the gastric tube reconstruction group (p = 0.03), but was not significantly different for any other complication.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of overall morbidities and reoperation, especially anastomotic leakage after gastric tube reconstruction, suggested a necessity for further improvement. However, the incidence of fatal complications, such as tracheal necrosis or reconstructed organ necrosis, was low for both reconstruction methods, and the mortality rate was acceptable as a means of radical treatment.

Risk Factors of Benign Stricture of Anastomotic Stoma after Esophagectomy and Therapeutic Effect of Stent Implantation

With the increase in the number of patients and prolongation of their lives after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, the quality of life after surgery has attracted more and more attention. Although anastomotic stenosis is a common complication, it seriously affects the quality of life and psychological state of patients or even threatens their lives. At present, the exact independent influencing factors of anastomotic stenosis after esophageal cancer surgery have not been determined, and relevant treatment options are still controversial. Here, we analyzed the independent risk factors leading to good postoperative anastomotic stenosis, in order to provide a basis for late prevention. At the same time, we deeply discussed the advantages and safety of stent implantation in the treatment of anastomotic stenosis.

Right top pulmonary vein is a venous anomaly of which surgeons should be aware in subcarinal dissection for thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a case report and literature review

Background

A right top pulmonary vein (RTPV) that crosses behind the right main or intermediate bronchus is a variation of the superior posterior pulmonary vein in the right upper lobe. Damage or ligation of this abnormal vessel can lead to massive intraoperative bleeding and serious complications, such as congestion of the posterior segment of the right upper lobe and cardiac tamponade. Subcarinal lymph node dissection is mandatory in radical thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, and the RTPV is an anomalous vessel of which thoracic surgeons should be aware.

Case presentation

A 70-year-old man underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (T3N1M0). An anomaly of the superior posterior pulmonary vein in the right lobe was recognized on preoperative computed tomography imaging. With simulation and intraoperative navigation using three-dimensional imaging of the same view as that observed during the operation, radical subcarinal dissection could be performed with preservation of the RTPV.

Conclusion

In our review of the relevant literature, the incidence of RTPV ranged from 0.28 to 9.3%, and its mean vascular diameter was 7.0 mm at the maximum and 2.2 ± 0.72 mm at the minimum, with the right superior pulmonary vein being a relatively common inflow site. Our case in which the RTPV ran dorsal to the right main bronchus is very rare. In radical subcarinal dissection of thoracoscopic esophagectomy, it is important to recognize the posterior pericardial plane and release the ventral fixation of these lymph nodes to free space for the back side. This is also true in the case of RTPV, which should be noted to avoid injury. In cases involving an RTPV larger than 4.5 mm, ligation should be avoided, and preoperative recognition of the exact run of this abnormal vessel using three-dimensional imaging can be very useful.

Subtotal esophagectomy followed by subtotal gastric reconstruction for Boerhaave's syndrome: Case report with literature review

INTRODUCTION

Boerhaave's syndrome, or spontaneous esophageal rupture, is a potentially fatal disease requiring prompt diagnosis and effective treatment. We report Boerhaave's syndrome in a patient who underwent subtotal esophagectomy and temporary cervical esophagostomy for esophageal perforation to the right thoracic cavity, followed by subtotal gastric reconstruction as the second step.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 70-year-old man with diarrhea and vomiting as chief complaints had underlying disease of reflux esophagitis. He experienced frequent hematemesis. Computed tomography (CT) at another hospital revealed right pleural effusion and abnormal mediastinal air and fluid retention around the esophagus, and he was transferred to our hospital. From the CT findings, he was diagnosed as having Boerhaave's syndrome with esophageal perforation into the right thoracic cavity. He was in shock, and emergency right thoracotomy was performed, revealing a severely purulent thoracic cavity, ruptured parietal pleura, and 5-cm perforation in the right front middle esophageal wall that was surrounded by mucosal necrosis. Subtotal esophagectomy, temporal cervical esophagostomy, and enteral feeding tube insertion were performed. After hospital discharge, he underwent subtotal gastric reconstruction 43 days postoperatively. His course was good, and he was transferred to another hospital for rehabilitation 36 days after reconstruction.

DISCUSSION

In Boerhaave's syndrome, depending on the size of the perforation and fragility of the esophageal wall, subtotal esophagectomy may be feasible.

CONCLUSION

Two-step reconstruction following esophageal rupture is possible after sufficient local infection control, and anastomosis can be performed if the patient's general condition is good, but only under conditions that guarantee no anastomotic leakage.

The Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients with Pathological Positive Lymph Nodes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Esophagectomy: a Single Institute Retrospective Analysis

The need for adjuvant therapy after radical resection for patients with stage II–III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has not been determined. Since recurrence can occur after radical resection and since the prognosis is still poor, it is necessary to consider additional treatment strategies, including adjuvant chemotherapy. We retrospectively investigated the significance of adjuvant therapy after NAC followed by radical resection for TESCC. Between 2008 and 2018, 115 patients with clinical stage II–III underwent radical subtotal esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. Among them, 62 were analyzed, excluding patients with T4 tumors and patients who had undergone R plus resection or who were receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy. We compared patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy with those who only received observation; we examined overall survival (OS) and recurrence rates. Twenty-nine patients (46.7%) had lymph node metastasis, 12 of whom received adjuvant chemotherapy (41.3%). The recurrence rates for patients with and without lymph node metastasis were 55.1 % and 15.1%, respectively (p = 0.0022). Among patients with lymph node metastasis, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate (p = 0.9270) or OS (p = 0.5416) based on the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, in 15 patients with two or more positive lymph nodes, adjuvant chemotherapy increased OS (p = 0.0404). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in clinical stage II–III TESCC patients with two or more pathological positive lymph nodes after NAC followed by radical surgery.

Subtotal stomach in esophageal reconstruction surgery achieves an anastomotic leakage rate of less than 1%

Aim

The objective of this retrospective, single‐institution study was to assess the safety and feasibility of reconstruction using subtotal stomach (SS) with esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer (EC). Although several different gastric‐tube‐making and anastomotic methods have been reported, the incidence rate of anastomotic leakage with EC surgery is generally reported over 10%. Complications should be avoided, and patient quality of life (QOL) should be maintained postoperatively. We have used SS reconstruction and hand‐sutured cervical esophagus‐subtotal gastric anastomosis at the neck wound in EC surgery. Short‐ and long‐term outcomes in cases using SS are not well known.

Methods

Between January 2008 and September 2019, 300 patients underwent esophagectomy for EC and reconstruction using SS. The primary endpoint was the rate of anastomotic leakage. Secondary endpoints were postoperative morbidities, QOL, and changes in patients’ body weight and skeletal muscle weight.

Results

Anastomotic leakage was observed in two patients (0.67%), and pneumonia was observed in nine patients (3.0%). Fifteen patients (5.0%) had an anastomotic stenosis requiring a bougie. Nausea occurred in 11 patients (3.7%), and dumping syndrome occurred in seven patients (2.3%). Dysphagia and early feeling of abdominal fullness scores tended to be high after surgery but gradually decreased after 6 months. Good results were obtained for reflux feeling scores. Body weight changed with an average decrease of −2 ± 3.71 kg (P = .071) over 5 years.

Conclusion

Reconstruction using SS resulted in an extremely low rate of anastomotic leakage and good QOL postoperatively in patients with EC.