New classification-oriented treatment strategy for portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy

Risk Factors and Management of Portal Vein Thrombosis after Hepatectomy: A Single-Center Experience

Objective

This study investigated the risk factors and management of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after hepatectomy.

Background

PVT after hepatectomy can cause liver dysfunction and portal hypertension, and may be fatal. However, it has not been sufficiently investigated.

Methods

The study included 1403 consecutive patients who underwent elective hepatectomy at our department from January 2010 to July 2022. The patients were divided into PVT and non-PVT groups based on the presence or absence of PVT, and relevant risk factors were analyzed. The management and prognosis of patients with PVT were investigated.

Results

Among the 1403 patients, PVT occurred in 33 cases, giving a frequency of 2.4%. In univariate analyses, female sex (P = 0.03), portal vein reconstruction (P = 0.01), and left lateral sectionectomy (P < 0.001) were significant risk factors for PVT. On multivariate analysis, portal vein reconstruction (P = 0.01) and left lateral segmentectomy (P < 0.001) remained significant risk factors for PVT. The management options for PVT were thrombectomy, antithrombotic therapy, and observation. With antithrombotic therapy, 96.4% of patients achieved PVT resolution. Among patients who underwent hepatectomy with portal vein reconstruction, the PVT site was the main trunk of the portal vein in all 3 cases, and thrombectomy was performed in 2 cases. No perioperative mortality was observed.

Conclusions

In the present study, portal vein reconstruction and left lateral sectionectomy were identified as risk factors for PVT after hepatectomy. As PVT can be fatal, early detection and appropriate treatment according to the status of PVT are important.

Impact of MASLD on Portal Vein Thrombosis Following Hepatectomy for Liver Cancer

Background: Due to the increasing global prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which is closely linked to metabolic disorders, there has been a rise in the number of patients with NAFLD undergoing hepatectomy. The metabolic disorders, as well as NAFLD, increase venous thrombotic risk. NAFLD was recently updated to a new concept of hepatic steatosis: metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). We aimed to investigate the impact of MASLD on post-hepatectomy portal vein thrombosis (PH-PVT). Methods: A total of 106 patients who underwent hepatectomy for liver cancer were included. Steatotic liver disease (SLD) was diagnosed using a CT L/S ratio of <1.1. SLD was classified as follows: MASLD, SLD associated with metabolic factors without alcohol consumption; MetALD, SLD with metabolic factors and moderate alcohol consumption; Other SLD, alcohol or other specific etiology of SLD; and No SLD, no hepatic steatosis. Results: PH-PVT was detected in 12/106 patients (11.3%); MASLD, 7/20 (35%); MetALD, 1/5 (20%); Other SLD, 1/13 (8%); and No SLD, 3/68 (4.4%). Multivariate analysis showed that the MASLD group (including MASLD and MetALD) (odds ratio [OR], 9.27) and left lateral sectionectomy (OR, 6.22) were significant independent risk factors for PH-PVT. Additionally, the incidence of PH-PVT was significantly higher in patients with MASLD than in those without SLD, along with metabolic factors, excluding alcohol consumption. Conclusions: MASLD and MetALD were identified as independent and significant risk factors for PH-PVT. Consideration was given to the idea that hepatic steatosis and metabolic dysfunction play synergistic roles in PH-PVT development.

Portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis, management, and endpoints for future clinical studies

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) refers to the development of a non-malignant obstruction of the portal vein, its branches, its radicles, or a combination. This Review first provides a comprehensive overview of all aspects of PVT, namely the specifics of the portal venous system, the risk factors for PVT, the pathophysiology of portal hypertension in PVT, the interest in non-invasive tests, as well as therapeutic approaches including the effect of treating risk factors for PVT or cause of cirrhosis, anticoagulation, portal vein recanalisation by interventional radiology, and prevention and management of variceal bleeding in patients with PVT. Specific issues are also addressed including portal cholangiopathy, mesenteric ischaemia and intestinal necrosis, quality of life, fertility, contraception and pregnancy, and PVT in children. This Review will then present endpoints for future clinical studies in PVT, both in patients with and without cirrhosis, agreed by a large panel of experts through a Delphi consensus process. These endpoints include classification of portal vein thrombus extension, classification of PVT evolution, timing of assessment of PVT, and global endpoints for studies on PVT including clinical outcomes. These endpoints will help homogenise studies on PVT and thus facilitate reporting, comparison between studies, and validation of future studies and trials on PVT.

Classification and Management of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhotic Patients: A Narrative Review

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) poses significant therapeutic challenges due to its complex pathophysiology and diverse clinical presentations. Recent advancements have spurred the development of new therapeutic approaches to enhance treatment efficacy and safety. This review synthesized emerging therapies for PVT based on a comprehensive literature search across major databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, among others, focusing on studies published in the last decade. Anticoagulation therapy, particularly with novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), emerged as beneficial in personalized treatment regimens. Innovative surgical techniques and improved risk stratification methods were identified as crucial in the perioperative management of PVT. Additionally, advances in cell therapy and medical treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma in the context of PVT were explored. Promising outcomes were observed with modalities such as Yttrium 90 and liver transplantation combined with thrombectomy, particularly in complex PVT cases associated with hepatocellular carcinoma, albeit on a limited scale. The reviewed literature indicates a shift towards individualized treatment approaches for PVT, integrating novel anticoagulants, refined risk assessment tools, and tailored interventional strategies. While these emerging therapies show potential for enhanced efficacy and safety, further research is essential to validate findings across broader patient populations and establish standardized treatment protocols.

Analysis of Related Influencing Factors of Portal Vein Thrombosis After Hepatectomy

Purpose: To analyze the related factors of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after hepatectomy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was made on 1029 patients who underwent partial hepatectomy in the first affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from March 2018 to March 2023, including PVT group (n = 24) and non-PVT group (n = 1005). The general and clinical data of the two groups were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the clinical information of the two groups. Result: The proportion of preoperative hepatitis B, liver cirrhosis, ascites, intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative hemostatic drugs, preoperative prothrombin time, intraoperative portal occlusion time, operation time, international standardized ratio of prothrombin time on the first day after operation, D-dimer on the first day after operation, fibrin degradation products on the first day after operation and postoperative hospital stay in the PVT group were all higher than those in the control group (P < .05). The preoperative platelet and albumin in the PVT group were lower than those in the control group. Intraoperative blood transfusion, liver cirrhosis, ascites, international standardized ratio of postoperative prothrombin time, postoperative fibrin degradation products, hilar occlusion time and albumin were independent risk factors for PVT. Conclusion: There are many influencing factors of PVT after hepatectomy. Clinical intervention should be taken to reduce PVT. Clinical Registration Number: K2023-348.

Early portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Incidence, risk factors, and management

AIM

To study the incidence, risk factors and management of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC).

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Single-center retrospective analysis of 86 consecutive patients who underwent major hepatectomy for PHCC, between 2012 and 2019, with comparison of the characteristics of the groups with (PVT+) and without (PVT-) postoperative portal vein thrombosis.

RESULTS

Seven patients (8%) presented with PVT diagnosed during the first postoperative week. Preoperative portal embolization had been performed in 71% of patients in the PVT+ group versus 34% in the PVT- group (P=0.1). Portal reconstruction was performed in 100% and 38% of PVT+ and PVT- patients, respectively (P=0.002). In view of the gravity of the clinical and/or biochemical picture, five (71%) patients underwent urgent re-operation with portal thrombectomy, one of whom died early (hemorrhagic shock after surgical treatment of PVT). Two patients had exclusively medical treatment. Complete recanalization of the portal vein was achieved in the short and medium term in the six survivors. After a mean follow-up of 21 months, there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between the two groups.

FINDINGS

Post-hepatectomy PVT for PHCC is a not-infrequent and potentially lethal event. Rapid management, adapted to the extension of the thrombus and the severity of the thrombosis (hepatic function, signs of portal hypertension) makes it possible to limit the impact on postoperative mortality. We did not identify any modifiable risk factor. However, when it is oncologically and anatomically feasible, left±extended hepatectomy (without portal embolization) may be less risky than extended right hepatectomy, and portal vein resection should only be performed if there is strong suspicion of tumor invasion.

A feasible and safe approach for repeat laparoscopic liver resection and patient selection based on standardized preoperative prediction of surgical difficulty

PURPOSE

This study was performed to propose a strategy for repeat laparoscopic liver resection (RLLR) and investigate the preoperative predictive factors for RLLR difficulty.

METHODS

Data from 43 patients who underwent RLLR using various techniques at 2 participating hospitals from April 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical outcomes, short-term outcomes, and feasibility and safety of the proposed techniques were evaluated. The relationship between potential predictive factors for difficult RLLR and perioperative outcomes was evaluated. Difficulties associated with RLLR were analyzed separately in two surgical phases: the Pringle maneuver phase and the liver parenchymal transection phase.

RESULTS

The open conversion rate was 7%. The median surgical time and intraoperative blood loss were 235 min and 200 mL, respectively. The Pringle maneuver was successfully performed in 81% of patients using the laparoscopic Satinsky vascular clamp (LSVC). Clavien-Dindo class ≥III postoperative complications were observed in 12% of patients without mortality. An analysis of the risk factors for predicting difficult RLLR showed that a history of open liver resection was an independent risk factor for difficulty in the Pringle maneuver phase.

CONCLUSION

We present a feasible and safe approach to address RLLR difficulty, especially difficulty with the Pringle maneuver using an LSVC, which is extremely useful in RLLR. The Pringle maneuver is more challenging in patients with a history of open liver resection.

Post-hepatectomy liver failure prediction and prevention: Development of a nomogram containing postoperative anticoagulants as a risk factor

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a serious complication after hepatectomy, and its effective methods for preoperative prediction are lacking. Here, we aim to identify predictive factors and build a nomogram to evaluate patients' risk of developing PHLF.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of a training cohort, including 199 patients who underwent hepatectomy at the Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, was conducted. Independent risk variables for PHLF were identified using multivariate analysis of perioperative variables, and a nomogram was used to build a predictive model. To test the predictive power, a prospective study in which a validation cohort of 71 patients was evaluated using the nomogram. The prognostic value of this nomogram was evaluated by the C-index.

RESULTS

Independent risk variables for PHLF were identified from perioperative variables. In multivariate analysis of the training cohort, tumor number, Pringle maneuver, blood loss, preoperative platelet count, postoperative ascites and use of anticoagulant medications were determined to be key risk factors for the development of PHLF, and they were selected for inclusion in our nomogram. The nomogram showed a 0.911 C-index for the training cohort. In the validation cohort, the nomogram also showed good prognostic value for predicting PHLF. The validation cohort was used with similarly successful results to evaluate risk in two previously published study models with calculated C-indexes of 0.718 and 0.711.

CONCLUSION

Our study establishes for the first time a novel nomogram that can be used to identify patients at risk of developing PHLF.

Prospective validation to prevent symptomatic portal vein thrombosis after liver resection

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after liver resection is rare but can lead to life-threatening liver failure. This prospective study evaluated patients using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (E-CT) on the first day after liver resection for early PVT detection and management.

AIM

To evaluate patients by E-CT on the first day after liver resection for early PVT detection and immediate management.

METHODS

Patients who underwent liver resection for primary liver cancer from January 2015 were enrolled. E-CT was performed on the first day after surgery in patients undergoing anatomical resection, multiple resections, or with postoperative bile leakage in the high-risk group for PVT. When PVT was detected, anticoagulant therapy including heparin, warfarin, and edoxaban was administered. E-CT was performed monthly until PVT resolved.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of PVT was 1.57% (8/508). E-CT was performed on the first day after surgery in 235 consecutive high-risk patients (165 anatomical resections, 74 multiple resections, and 28 bile leakages), with a PVT incidence of 3.4% (8/235). Symptomatic PVT was not observed in the excluded cohort. Multivariate analyses revealed that sectionectomy was the only independent predictor of PVT [odds ratio (OR) = 12.20; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.22-115.97; P = 0.003]. PVT was found in the umbilical portion of 75.0% (6/8) of patients, and sectionectomy on the left side showed the highest risk of PVT (OR = 14.10; 95%CI: 3.17-62.71; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Sectionectomy on the left side should be chosen with caution as it showed the highest risk of PVT. E-CT followed by anticoagulant therapy was effective in managing early-phase PVT for 2 mo without adverse events.

Recurrent acute portal vein thrombosis with severe abdominal infection after right hemihepatectomy in a patient with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A case report and literature review

Introduction and importance

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a serious complication after hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery. There have been few studies on recurrent PVT after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 66-year-old woman who was diagnosed with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and treated with right hemihepatectomy. On the sixth day, the patient developed acute portal vein thrombosis, and emergency portal vein incision and surgical thrombectomy were performed. On the seventh day after thrombectomy, the patient developed acute portal vein thrombosis again, and portal vein thrombectomy+portal vein bridging was performed again. There was still thrombosis after the operation. The patient was then treated with superior mesenteric arteriography + indirect portal vein catheterization thrombolysis and local thrombolysis + anticoagulation and systemic anticoagulation therapy. The patient had a complicated abdominal infection. The total hospital stay was 84 days. There was no thrombosis in the portal vein at discharge.

Clinical discussion

Although the procedure was carefully performed with a preoperative plan and fine intraoperative vascular anastomosis, postoperative PVT occurred. There are many factors of portal vein thrombosis, and there are many treatment methods.

Conclusion

PVT often develops in patients with liver cirrhosis postoperatively and after liver transplantation. Recurrent PVT after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is a rare complication.

•

Recurrent PVT after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is rare.

•

Artificial blood vessels can avoid portal vein angulation.

•

Surgery combined with interventional therapy and drug therapy are available.

•

The final outcome of the patient is usually good.

Prediction of portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) following hepatectomy is potentially life-threatening. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of PVT after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma and identify coagulation and fibrinolytic factors that could predict early-stage postoperative PVT.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 65 hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent radical hepatectomy. The risk factors for postoperative PVT were identified based on univariate and multivariate analyses, and the levels of coagulation and fibrinolytic factors were measured during the perioperative period.

RESULTS

The incidence of PVT after hepatectomy was 20.0%. The patients were divided into two groups: those with PVT (n=13; PVT group) and those without PVT (n=52; no-PVT group). The frequency of the use of the Pringle maneuver during surgery was higher in the PVT group than in the no-PVT group, and the postoperative/preoperative ratios of thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT) and of D-dimer were significantly higher in the PVT group.

CONCLUSION

A high incidence of PVT was found in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy. The frequency of the Pringle maneuver is a potential risk factor for postoperative PVT, and the postoperative/preoperative TAT and D-dimer ratios may be used as early predictors of PVT after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.