The new prognostic score for unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer treated with nivolumab: A multi-institutional cohort study

The real-world data of immune-checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy for unresectable or metastatic esophageal cancer: a multi-institutional cohort study

BACKGROUND

The real-world efficacy, feasibility, and prognostic factors of immune-checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy for unresectable or metastatic esophageal cancer are not fully established.

METHODS

This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study evaluated 71 consecutive patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy for esophageal cancer between March 2021 and December 2022. We assessed tumor response, safety, and long-term survival.

RESULTS

In patients with measurable lesions, the response rate was 58%, and the disease control rate for all enrolled patients was 80%. Five patients (7.0%) underwent successful conversion surgery. Grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events occurred in 13% of patients, and one patient (1.4%) died due to cholangitis. Median progression-free survival was 9.7 (95% confidence interval: 6.5-not reached). C-reactive protein levels and performance status were identified as significant predictors of progression-free survival through Cox proportional hazards analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Immune-checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy for esophageal cancer demonstrated comparable tumor response, safety, and long-term survival to previous randomized clinical trials. Patients with good performance status and low C-reactive protein levels may be suitable candidates for this treatment.

Molecular Classifications in Gastric Cancer: A Call for Interdisciplinary Collaboration

Gastric cancer (GC) is a heterogeneous disease, often diagnosed at advanced stages, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 20%. Despite notable technological advancements in cancer research over the past decades, their impact on GC management and outcomes has been limited. Numerous molecular alterations have been identified in GC, leading to various molecular classifications, such as those developed by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG). Other authors have proposed alternative perspectives, including immune, proteomic, or epigenetic-based classifications. However, molecular stratification has not yet transitioned into clinical practice for GC, and little attention has been paid to alternative molecular classifications. In this review, we explore diverse molecular classifications in GC from a practical point of view, emphasizing their relationships with clinicopathological factors, prognosis, and therapeutic approaches. We have focused on classifications beyond those of TCGA and the ACRG, which have been less extensively reviewed previously. Additionally, we discuss the challenges that must be overcome to ensure their impact on patient treatment and prognosis. This review aims to serve as a practical framework to understand the molecular landscape of GC, facilitate the development of consensus molecular categories, and guide the design of innovative molecular studies in the field.

Clinical Effect of the C-Reactive Protein to Serum Albumin Ratio in Patients with Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Treated with Trifluridine/Tipiracil

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an oral anticancer agent used as a third- or later-line treatment for patients with metastatic gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer (mGC/GEJC). The C-reactive protein-to-serum albumin ratio (CAR) is an inflammation-based prognostic marker in gastric cancer. This retrospective study evaluated CAR's clinical significance as a prognostic factor in 64 patients with mGC/GEJC administered FTD/TPI as a third- or later-line therapy. Patients were categorized into high- and low-CAR groups based on pre-treatment blood data. This study evaluated associations between CAR and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), clinicopathological features, treatment efficacy, and adverse events. The high-CAR group had significantly worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, a higher prevalence of patients administered with a single course of FTD/TPI, and a higher rate of patients not administered chemotherapy after FTD/TPI therapy than the low-CAR group. Median OS and PFS were significantly poorer in the high-CAR group than in the low-CAR group (113 vs. 399 days; p < 0.001 and 39 vs. 112 days; p < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, high CAR was an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. The overall response rate was not significantly different between the high- and low-CAR groups. Regarding adverse events, the high-CAR group had a significantly lower incidence of neutropenia and a higher incidence of fatigue than the low-CAR group. Therefore, CAR may be a potentially useful prognostic factor for patients with mGC/GEJC treated with FTD/TPI as third- or later-line chemotherapy.

Nivolumab versus irinotecan as third- or later-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: a multi-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of nivolumab (NIVO) and irinotecan (IRI) and to identify clinical factors that facilitate treatment selection.

METHODS

Patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) who underwent NIVO or IRI treatment between November 2016 and June 2018 at three institutions were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed gastric/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma pretreated with fluoropyrimidines and taxanes, no previous NIVO or IRI treatment, and adequate organ function. Main outcome measures were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Interaction between treatment groups and clinical factors regarding OS were tested using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for relevant variables.

RESULTS

Both NIVO (n = 71) and IRI (n = 61) groups had similar baseline characteristics, except for sex distribution. NIVO and IRI groups had ORR of 20% and 6%, median PFS of 1.6 and 1.8 months, and median OS of 6.4 and 6.4 months, respectively. Interaction analysis did not reveal any significant interaction between NIVO and IRI related to OS for various factors. NIVO group tended to have fewer ≥ grade 3 adverse events than IRI group, especially neutropenia (3% vs. 28%) and febrile neutropenia (1% vs. 8%). In the NIVO group, one patient developed pneumonitis, and four patients developed skin reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Although no remarkable differences in efficacy were found between IRI and NIVO for AGC, NIVO had a better safety profile compared to IRI. We found no clinical markers that can assist treatment decisions.

Albumin-derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Score as a Marker of Nivolumab Treatment Sensitivity in Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Establishment of powerful and easy-to-evaluate biomarkers that can predict immune checkpoint inhibitor sensitivity in patients with gastric cancer (GC) would be highly useful. The albumin-derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (Alb-dNLR) score reportedly is an excellent measure of both immunity and nutritional status. However, the association between nivolumab treatment sensitivity and Alb-dNLR in GC has also not been adequately investigated. This multicenter retrospective study was designed to evaluate the association of Alb-dNLR with therapeutic sensitivity of nivolumab in GC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective multicenter study with patients from five sites. The data from 58 patients who received nivolumab for postoperative recurrent or unresectable advanced GC between October 2017 and December 2018 were analyzed. Blood tests had been performed before nivolumab administration. We analyzed the correlation between the Alb-dNLR score and clinicopathological factors, including best overall response.

RESULTS

Of the 58 patients, 21 (36.2%) comprised the disease control (DC) group and 37 (63.8%) comprised the progressive disease (PD) group. The nivolumab treatment responses were subjected to receiver operating characteristic analysis. The cutoff value was set to 2.90 g/dl for Alb and to 3.55 for dNLR. All eight patients in the high Alb-dNLR group had PD (p=0.0049). The low Alb-dNLR group had significantly better overall survival (p=0.0023) and progression-free survival rates (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The Alb-dNLR score was a very simple and sensitive predictor of nivolumab therapeutic sensitivity and has very good biomarker properties.

The association between albumin levels and survival in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The albumin levels may potentially be used as a prognostic biomarker in patients with cancertreated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) due to its close relationship with nutritional and inflammatory status. However, the available data is limited with heterogeneous patient cohorts, sample sizes and variable cut-offs. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between survival outcomes and albumin levels in patients treated with ICIs. Methods: We conducted a systematic review using the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases to filter the published studies up to 1 June 2022. The meta-analyses were performed with the generic inverse-variance method with a random-effects model due to the high degree of heterogeneity. The primary outcome measure was hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The study protocol was registered with the PROSPERO registry (Registration Number: CRD42022337746). Results: Thirty-six studies encompassing 8406 cancer patients with advanced disease were included in the meta-analyses. Almost half of the studies were conducted in NSCLC cohorts (n = 15), and 3.5 gr/dL was the most frequently used albumin cut-off in the included studies (n = 20). Patients with lower albumin levels had a significantly increased risk of death (HR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.52-1.80, p < 0.0001) than patients with higher albumin levels. Subgroup analyses for study location, sample size, tumor type and albumin cut-off were demonstrated consistent results. Furthermore, in the subgroup analysis of eight studies using albumin levels as a continuous prognostic factor, every 1 gr/dL decrease in albumin levels was associated with significantly increased risk of death by a factor of 10% (HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05-1.16, p = 0.0002). Similar to analyses with overall survival, the patients with lower albumin levels had an increased risk of progression or death compared to patients with higher albumin levels (HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.40-2.21, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The available evidence demonstrates that albumin levels may be a prognostic biomarker in advanced cancer patients treated with ICIs. Further research is needed to delineate the role of albumin levels in patients treated with ICIs in the adjuvant setting, as well as the possible benefit of therapeutic approaches to improve hypoalbuminemia.

Nutritional index for immune-checkpoint inhibitor in patients with metastatic gastro-esophageal junction/gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Nutritional status is strongly associated to prognosis in metastatic gastrooesophageal junction (mGOJ)/gastric cancer (GC) patients. The aim of the present study was to develop an immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-specific nutritional index (NI).

METHODS

Ten serum and anthropometric nutritional markers derived from blood tests or CT scans were analyzed at baseline in patients treated with second-line ICI and correlated with overall survival (OS). An ICI-specific NI (the NUTRIICI) was developed with its specificity assessed in an independent group of patients treated with standard second-line chemotherapy.

RESULTS

From June 2014 to December 2018, 57 mGOJ/GC patients (14 females, 43 males) with a median(m) age of 61 years (range 29-85) received ICI as second-line therapy (Pembrolizumab n=26, Nivolumab n=16, Avelumab n=15). Among the 10 analyzed variables, Onodera's prognostic NI (PNI) ≤33 and waist-to-hip (WHR) <1 were independent predictors of OS and used to build the NUTRIICI. Patients with both favorable factors (i.e., PNI >33 and WHR ≥1, comparator group) had a mOS of 18.0 vs. 6.7 months of patients with one unfavorable factor (either PNI ≤33 or WHR <1, Hazard Ratio, HR 3.06), vs. 1.3 months of patients with both unfavorable factors (HR 17.56), overall P<0.0001. In the independent group of patients treated with standard chemotherapy NUTRIICI was not associated with prognosis (P=0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

NUTRIICI is the first ICI-specific NI for mOGJ/GC patients receiving second-line ICI. A validation in larger cohorts is strongly encouraged.

Case Report: Complete Remission of a Patient With Metastatic Gastric Cancer Treated With Nivolumab Combined With Chemotherapy After Palliative Surgery

Metastatic advanced gastric cancer, for which treatment strategies are extremely limited, has a poor prognosis. Complete remission is rare. Patients usually lose the opportunity of therapeutic surgery because the lesions cannot be completely removed, although it can greatly prolong their survival time. Palliative surgery usually suggests bad outcomes. In recent years, the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) nivolumab has shown significant efficacy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. However, its applicable conditions and optimal withdrawal time remain controversial owing to its low response rate and high incidence of immune-related adverse events. Herein, we introduce a 66-year-old male patient with advanced gastric cancer with multiple liver metastases who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy for acute gastric bleeding. The patient received eight cycles of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) and switched to eight cycles of SOX plus nivolumab combined regimen in a stable state, later achieving complete remission. There was no recurrence for 32 months after the surgery. This is the first reported case of gastric cancer with multiple liver metastases with long-term complete remission with nivolumab treatment after palliative surgery. The potential mechanism of complete remission was discussed through clinical, genomic, and immune characteristics. The patient had a history of psoriasis and was positive for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and the interaction of TP53 mutation and HER-2 (-) gene may be associated with complete remission.

Development of an alarm symptom-based risk prediction score for localized oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (VIOLA score)

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is a major contributor to global disease burden with poor prognosis even in resectable, regionally limited stages. Feasible prognostic tools are crucial to improve patient management, yet scarce.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Disease-related symptoms, patient, tumour, treatment as well as laboratory parameters at initial diagnosis and overall survival (OS) of patients with stage II and III gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, who were treated between 1990 and 2020 at the Medical University of Vienna, were evaluated in a cross-validation model to develop a feasible risk prediction score.

RESULTS

In total, 628 patients were included in this single-centre analysis. The final score ranked from 0 to 10 and included the factors sex (female +1), age, years (30-59 +1, >60 +2), underweight classified by body mass index (+2), location of the tumour (stomach +1), stage (III +2), stenosis in endoscopy (+1) and weight loss (+1). The score was grouped into low- (0-3), medium- (4-6) and high-risk (7+) subgroups. The median OS were 70.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 51.2-111.8], 23.4 (95% CI 21.2-26.7) and 12.6 (7.0-16.1) months, respectively. The 1-year survival probabilities were 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.93), 0.75 (95% CI 0.70-0.79) and 0.54 (95% CI 0.39-0.74), whereas the 5-year survival probabilities were 0.57 (95% CI 0.49-0.66), 0.24 (95% CI 0.20-0.28) and 0.09 (95% CI 0.03-0.28), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The VIennese risk prediction score for Oesophagogastric Localized Adenocarcinoma (VIOLA) risk prediction score poses a feasible tool for the estimation of OS in patients with regionally limited gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma and, thus, may improve patient management in clinical routine. Prospective analyses should be carried out to confirm our findings.

The Predictive Potential of the Baseline C-Reactive Protein Levels for the Efficiency of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The relationship between baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) level and the prognosis of cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to clarify whether baseline CRP level can serve as a biomarker to predict the efficiency of ICI therapy.

Methods

All associated articles published in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed databases from the inception of the database to December 30, 2021, were retrieved. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were meta-analyzed using the random-effects model and adjusted using the trim-and-fill method because of publication bias.

Results

Thirty-three studies (6,124 patients) conducted between 2013 and 2021 were identified. The pooled outcomes implied that high baseline CRP level patients had significantly worse OS (adjusted pooled value for univariate and multivariate analysis outcomes: HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.41-1.56; HR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.34-1.59) and PFS (adjusted pooled value for univariate and multivariate analysis outcomes: HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.15-1.45; HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.02-1.40) than low baseline CRP level patients, irrespective of cancer or ICI type. Further analysis indicated that 1 mg/dl was appropriate as a cutoff value for determining the low or high level of baseline CRP to predict the OS or PFS of cancer patients receiving ICI treatment (univariate analysis: HR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.24-1.97, P = 0.909; multivariate analysis: HR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.23-2.03, P = 0.521).

Conclusions

High baseline CRP level (>1 mg/dl) may be an indicator for worse OS and PFS of cancer patients treated with ICIs. More high-quality prospective studies are warranted to assess the predictive value of CRP for ICI treatment.