Evaluation of clinical outcomes with propensity-score matching for colorectal cancer presenting as an oncologic emergency

Emergency surgery influences oncological outcome in small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (siNETs) frequently present emergently due to bowel ischemia or bowel obstruction. The influence of emergency surgery on the prognosis of siNET remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between type of presentation (emergency/elective) and oncological outcome.

METHODS

Clinicopathological data of patients who underwent bowel resection and were treated due to siNET at the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 165 patients underwent bowel resection for siNET. Of these, 22.4% (n = 37) were emergency and 77.6% (n = 128) were elective procedures. A preoperative known diagnosis was less common in patients with emergency surgery (48.6% vs 85.2%; p < 0.001) and complete resections of all tumor manifestations were performed less often (32.4% vs 50.8%; p = 0.049), while more completion operations had to be performed (24.3% vs 11.1%; p = 0.049). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of emergently operated patients were reduced (5-year OS: 85.2% vs 89.5% (p = 0.023); 5-year PFS: 26.7% versus 52.5% (p = 0.018)). In addition, emergency surgery was negatively associated with OS after multivariable regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Emergency surgery in siNET patients is associated with adverse oncological outcomes including shorter OS and PFS. Prevention of emergency conditions should be emphasized in advanced disease.

Comparison of postoperative prognoses for resectable colorectal cancer with vs. without oncologic emergency using propensity score‑matched analyses: A single-center retrospective observational study

While oncological emergencies in colorectal cancer present distinct challenges, existing literature offers conflicting evidence regarding long-term outcomes. Therefore, the present study compared the postoperative prognoses between patients with and without oncological emergencies. A retrospective evaluation was conducted on patients who had undergone radical surgery for pathological stages II and III colorectal cancer at a single center between January 2012 and December 2020. Patients were classified into the non-emergency and oncological emergency groups. The status of oncologic emergency was divided into obstruction and perforation. The outcomes were compared using propensity score matching. The primary objective was to compare the postoperative prognoses between non-emergency and oncological emergency situations. The secondary objectives included comparing prognoses between obstruction and perforation, identifying the type of recurrence depending on the status of oncologic emergency, and assessing the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy for oncologic emergencies. This study included 524 patients. After propensity score matching, the prognoses of oncological emergencies were worse compared with those without any emergency, whereas those of obstruction and perforation did not significantly differ. Regarding the type of recurrence, peritoneal dissemination in obstruction and local recurrence in perforation was more common compared with that in non-emergency cases. Adjuvant chemotherapy improved the recurrence-free survival for cases with oncological emergencies. The prognoses in cases with oncological emergencies could be worse compared with those without any emergency, whereas obstruction and perforation outcomes can be comparable. The administration of adjuvant chemotherapy should be strongly considered for oncological emergencies.