Differential expression of the two delta-crystallin genes in lens and non-lens tissues: shift favoring delta 2 expression from embryonic to adult chickens

Patterns of Crystallin Gene Expression in Differentiation State Specific Regions of the Embryonic Chicken Lens

Purpose

Transition from lens epithelial cells to lens fiber cell is accompanied by numerous changes in gene expression critical for lens transparency. We identify expression patterns of highly prevalent genes including ubiquitous and enzyme crystallins in the embryonic day 13 chicken lens.

Methods

Embryonic day 13 chicken lenses were dissected into central epithelial cell (EC), equatorial epithelial cell (EQ), cortical fiber cell (FP), and nuclear fiber cell (FC) compartments. Total RNA was prepared, subjected to high-throughput unidirectional mRNA sequencing, analyzed, mapped to the chicken genome, and functionally grouped.

Results

A total of 77,097 gene-specific transcripts covering 17,450 genes were expressed, of which 10,345 differed between two or more lens subregions. Ubiquitous crystallin gene expression increased from EC to EQ and was similar in FP and FC. Highly expressed crystallin genes fell into three coordinately expressed groups with R² ≥ 0.93: CRYAA, CRYBB2, CRYAB, and CRYBA2; CRYBB1, CRYBA4, CRYGN, ASL1, and ASL; and CRYBB3 and CRYBA1. The highly expressed transcription factors YBX1, YBX3, PNRC1, and BASP1 were coordinately expressed with the second group of crystallins (r² > 0.88).

Conclusions

Although it is well known that lens crystallin gene expression changes during the epithelial to fiber cell transition, these data identify for the first time three distinct patterns of expression for specific subsets of crystallin genes, each highly correlated with expression of specific transcription factors. The results provide a quantitative basis for designing functional experiments pinpointing the mechanisms governing the landscape of crystallin expression during fiber cell differentiation to attain lens transparency.

Gene duplication and the evolution of moonlighting proteins

Gene duplication is a recurring phenomenon in genome evolution and a major driving force in the gain of biological functions. Here, we examine the role of gene duplication in the origin and maintenance of moonlighting proteins, with special focus on functional redundancy and innovation, molecular tradeoffs, and genetic robustness. An overview of specific examples-mainly from yeast-suggests a widespread conservation of moonlighting behavior in duplicate genes after long evolutionary times. Dosage amplification and incomplete subfunctionalization appear to be prevalent in the maintenance of multifunctionality. We discuss the role of gene-expression divergence and paralog responsiveness in moonlighting proteins with overlapping biochemical properties. Future studies analyzing multifunctional genes in a more systematic and comprehensive manner will not only enable a better understanding of how this emerging class of protein behavior originates and is maintained, but also provide new insights on the mechanisms of evolution by gene duplication.

Transparency and non-refractive functions of crystallins--a proposal

Based on the premise that all crystallins have cellular and metabolically relevant catalytic activities, we propose that aberrant changes in non-crystallin (non-refractive) functions presage the appearance of cataractous pathologies in an otherwise highly stable edifice of transparency. This proposal is based on accumulating evidence from developmental, molecular and genetic studies that have established that crystallins are more than inanimate building blocks of the transparent lens fiber mass. The published work does not support the perceived dichotomy in the relevance of crystallin function (as essential) and non-crystallin function (as either of secondary importance or not essential at all), to the emergence and maintenance of the phenotype of transparency. A number of crystallin mutations have stage-specific phenotypes at developmental times when their concentrations have not reached 'crystallin' (high) proportions. There is heterogeneity in the cataract phenotypes associated with similar or identical mutations in different populations; the cataracts have disparate phenotypes even when the mutations are in the same gene. These data suggest that non-crystallin function is not merely a non-lens activity of a crystallin but an essential requirement within the lens itself.

Lens-preferred activity of chicken delta 1- and delta 2-crystallin enhancers in transgenic mice and evidence for retinoic acid-responsive regulation of the delta 1-crystallin gene

There are two tandemly linked delta-crystallin genes [5' delta 1 -delta 2 3'] in the chicken, with the delta 1-crystallin gene being expressed much more highly (50-100-fold) in the embryonic lens than the delta 2-crystallin gene. Previous transfection experiments have shown that a lens-preferred enhancer exists in the third intron of each chicken delta-crystallin gene. In the present investigation we have used transgenic mice to establish that both the chicken delta 1- and delta 2-crystallin enhancers are preferentially active in the mouse lens in combination with their homologous promoter and the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene. The promoter/ CAT constructs lacking the enhancers were inactive in the transgenic mice. In one case, a truncated delta 2-crystallin promoter (-308/+24) in combination with the enhancer was also active in the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum of the transgenic mice, which could prove useful in future experiments. Finally, retinoic acid receptors (RAR beta) activated the delta 1-crystallin, but not the delta 2-crystallin enhancer in teh recombinant plasmids in cotransfected embryonic chicken lens epithelial cells treated with retinoic acid. This activation did not occur when using the care enhancer (fragment B4) lacking surrounding flanking sequences (fragment B3 and B5) of the enhancer. Together these experiments show that the chicken delta-crystallin enhancers show lens-preference in transgenic mice despite the absence of delta-crystallin in this species and add retinoic acid nuclear receptors to the growing list of transcription factors (including Pax-6, Sox-2, and delta EF3) that directly or indirectly contribute to the high expression of the delta 1-crystallin gene in the lens.

Up-regulation of crystallin mRNAs in form-deprived chick eyes

Form-deprivation of chicks during early postnatal development results in ocular enlargement and great myopic refractive error (form-deprivation myopia). Previous studies have indicated that the retina, RPE and choroid play important roles in ocular enlargement in form-deprivation myopia. We aimed to isolate genes up-regulated in the retina-RPE-choroid of form-deprived chick eyes. A suppression subtractive hybridization method was used to compare mRNA expression in the retina-RPE-choroid of form-deprived and control eyes. One up-regulated cDNA was isolated and identified as part of chick delta1-crystallin cDNA. Northern blot and RT-PCR analyses demonstrated that delta1-crystallin mRNA was up-regulated in the retina-RPE at day 7 after form-deprivation treatment. Semi-quantitative RT-PCE analysis of the expression of several transcription factors indicated that Sox1 and Sox3 were upregulated in parallel with delta1-crystallin mRNA in form-deprived eyes. Northern blot analysis demonstrated that alphaA-, betaA3/A1-, betaB1-, and betaB2-crystallin mRNAs were also up-regulated in form-deprived eyes. Although the detailed mechanisms and functions of the crystallin family genes in the retina-RPE-choroid of form-deprived eyes remain unclear, results of our study suggests that form-deprivation affects the expression of these genes in chick eyes.

Characterization and enzyme activity of argininosuccinate lyase/delta-crystallin of the embryonic duck lens

Argininosuccinate lyase (ASL)/delta-crystallin, a major soluble protein of the transparent eye lens of birds and reptiles, is a mixture of tetramers comprising all possible combinations of two similar polypeptides (delta 1 and delta 2). Only the delta 2 polypeptide has ASL activity. In the present investigation we have purified each of the 5 major isoforms (delta A to delta E, pI 5.2 to 5.8) of delta-crystallin tetramers from the embryonic duck lens by isoelectric focussing and established by peptide sequencing that the delta 1 and delta 2 polypeptides are encoded in the previously identified, linked delta 1 and delta 2 genes, respectively. The relative amounts of the different tetramers in the 14-day-old embryonic lens were consistent with equal expression of the 2 delta-crystallin genes and no preference for assembly of the 2 delta polypeptides. The relative amount of ASL activity of the tetramers was a linear function of the relative amount of their delta 2 polypeptides, with delta A (only delta 1) lacking enzymatic activity altogether. delta B (3 delta 1:1 delta 2), delta C (2 delta 1:2 delta 2), delta D (1 delta 1:3 delta 2) and delta E (4 delta 2) all gave normal Michaelis-Menten kinetics for fumarate production from argininosuccinate at 40 degrees C and had a similar Km (average Km for mixture was 0.15 mM). delta E had a Km of 0.187 mM and a Vmax of 9 mumol/min per mg protein. Unlike bovine and like human ASL, both reported previously, embryonic duck ASL/delta-crystallin showed no evidence of cooperativity or activation by GTP. Each isoform had a similar far ultraviolet circular dichroism spectrum and thermal stability between 20 degrees C and 60 degrees C, with denaturation occurring at 65 degrees C. Our data suggest that gene duplication, structural modifications leading to greater thermal stability of the delta 1 and delta 2 polypeptides, and selective loss of ASL activity in the delta 1 polypeptide all occurred during the recruitment of ASL for a refractive role in the duck lens, resulting in the generation of ASL isoenzymes.

Transcriptional regulation of genes for ornithine cycle enzymes

Images

Pax-6 and lens-specific transcription of the chicken delta 1-crystallin gene

The abundance of delta-crystallin in the chicken eye lens provides an advantageous marker for tissue-specific gene expression during cellular differentiation. The lens-specific expression of the delta 1-crystallin gene is governed by an enhancer in the third intron, which binds a positive (delta EF2) and negative (delta EF1) factor in its core region. Here we show by DNase I footprinting, electrophoretic mobility-shift assays, and cotransfection experiments with the delta 1-promoter/enhancer fused to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene that the delta 1-crystallin enhancer has two adjacent functional Pax-6 binding sites. We also demonstrate by DNase I footprinting that the delta EF1 site can bind the transcription factor USF, raising the possibility that USF may cooperate with Pax-6 in activation of the chicken delta 1- and alpha A-crystallin genes. These data, coupled with our recent demonstration that Pax-6 activates the alpha A-crystallin gene, suggest that Pax-6 may have been used extensively throughout evolution to recruit and express crystallin genes in the lens.

Linkage and expression of the argininosuccinate lyase/delta-crystallin genes of the duck: insertion of a CR1 element in the intergenic spacer

delta-Crystallin is the major component of the lenses of most birds and reptiles. In the chicken there are two closely linked, tandemly oriented genes. Almost all of the delta-crystallin of the embryonic chicken lens is produced by the 5' delta 1 gene. This high lens activity has been attributed to an enhancer in intron 3. The 3' delta 2 gene encodes the enzyme argininosuccinate lyase (ASL) which is expressed at a low level in the chicken lens. Both chicken delta-crystallin genes are also expressed slightly in heart and brain, with ASL/delta 2 predominating over delta 1. In the duck (Anas platyrhynchos), ASL/delta 2-crystallin serves as both enzyme and crystallin, resulting in very high levels of ASL activity in the lens. Here we show by genomic cloning that the ASL/delta- crystallin locus is highly conserved between duck and chicken, with the two duck delta-crystallin genes closely linked in tandem. The 4.6 kbp intergenic spacer in the duck locus is 79% identical to the 4 kbp chicken spacer, except for the existence of a 615 bp CR1 element, highly reiterated in the duck genome, 1.8 kbp upstream of the duck ASL/delta 2 gene. The CR1 sequence is a truncated LINE element containing the 3' half of an open reading frame for a retroviral pol-like reverse transcriptase. Sequence analysis revealed (i) that intron 3 of the duck ASL/delta 2 gene is very similar (80%) to intron 3 of the chicken delta 1 and ASL/delta 2 genes, especially in the region of the chicken delta 1 enhancer core (93% identical) and (ii) that the 3' boundary of exon 2 of the duck ASL/delta 2 gene has undergone a recent splice-site slippage event, resulting in a two amino acid insertion in the encoded polypeptide. Finally, reverse transcription/polymerase chain reaction experiments established that both delta-crystallin genes are equally expressed to a high level in the embryonic duck lens; by contrast, both delta-crystallin genes produce a low amount of mRNA in the heart and brain of the embryonic duck, with the enzymatically active ASL/delta 2 being preferentially expressed.

Puzzle of crystallin diversity in eye lenses

Crystallins have evolved by various mechanisms that are associated with high expression of their genes in the eye lens. The diversity and pattern of crystallins among different species indicate that independent events have occurred at the molecular level during the evolution of the lens in different invertebrates (jellyfish, squid, and octopus) and vertebrates. Although it is possible that different crystallins are needed to fulfill the specific needs of individual species, the unexpectedly large array of proteins that function as crystallins and their abundance in the lens raise the possibility that selective pressures optimizing the function of certain transcription factors in the lens contribute to the recruitment of crystallins.