Strokes after intravenous gamma globulin: thrombotic phenomenon in patients with risk factors or just coincidence?

A serious thrombotic event in a patient with immune thrombocytopenia requiring intravenous immunoglobulin: a case report

BACKGROUND

Immune thrombocytopenia is an acquired autoimmune disease. Recently, there has been evidence of thrombotic risk in patients with immune thrombocytopenia, but the mechanism is still inconclusive. Intravenous immunoglobulin infusion therapy is considered an efficient treatment; however, it still is associated with adverse events of fever, chills, and hypotension, as well as serious complications such as thrombosis. We report a case a patient with relapsed immune thrombocytopenia who developed ischemic stroke after an intravenous immunoglobulin infusion.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 49-year-old Thai woman with relapsed/refractory immune thrombocytopenia came to our hospital with a large hematoma at the right buttock, and her platelet was decreased to 3 × 10⁹/L. She was admitted to our hospital for intravenous immunoglobulin administration. One hour after completion of intravenous immunoglobulin infusion, the patient's sister complained that the patient was unconscious and could not move both legs and arms. Emergency computed tomography of the brain showed no abnormal findings, such as brain edema, intracranial hemorrhage, or infarction. One day later, repeat computed tomography of the brain displayed extensive acute ischemic changes and loss of gray-white differentiation of bilateral cerebral hemispheres.

CONCLUSIONS

We performed an extensive literature review to determine the possible causes of serious thrombotic events in immune thrombocytopenia between the predictive factors of the disease and intravenous immunoglobulin. Although intravenous immunoglobulin is an effective treatment, thrombotic complications can occur. We emphasize that in patients with atherosclerosis risk factors or thrombophilia, the appropriateness of administering an intravenous immunoglobulin infusion should be carefully evaluated.

Intravenous Immunoglobulin-Induced Pulmonary Embolism: It Is Time to Act!

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common clinical problem affecting 600,000 patients per year in the United States. Although the diagnosis can be easily confirmed by imaging techniques, such as computed tomographic angiography of the chest, the identification of underlying mechanism leading to PE is important for appropriate duration of anticoagulation, and prevention of subsequent episodes. The differential diagnosis of underlying mechanism is broad and must include careful review of medication history. Drug-related thromboembolic disease can be easily missed and may have catastrophic consequences. The identification of the culprit drug is important for prevention of subsequent episodes and choosing appropriate duration of anticoagulation. We report a case of a middle-aged man who developed PE after administration of intravenous immunoglobulin.

[Treatments with immunoglobulin and thrombotic adverse events]

Treatments with intravenous or subcutaneous immunoglobulin (Ig) are used in a broad variety of disorders. Tolerance of Ig is usually good but adverse events, including some serious ones, have been reported and may differ among different Ig preparations. Thrombotic complications occur in 0.6 to 13% of cases and can involve arterial or venous circulation, rarely both. Deep venous thrombosis with or without pulmonary embolism, stroke or myocardial infarction remained the most frequent thrombotic complications. Some risk factors have been identified, mainly old age, multiple cardiovascular risk factors, and past history of thrombo-embolic manifestations. Several mechanisms are suggested to explain this increased risk of thrombotic complications. Indeed, Ig treatments increase the plasma viscosity, increase and activate platelets, can trigger the coagulation cascade through the presence of activated factor XI in some Ig preparations, and release vasoactive molecules responsible for vasospasm. Patients have to be carefully monitored and risk factors to be identified as soon as possible. The role of antiplatelets or anticoagulation is not well determined but should probably be proposed to patients with high risk.

Intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired immune-mediated inflammatory disorder that targets the myelin sheaths of the peripheral nervous system. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is a blood product containing immunoglobulin G pooled from many human donors. In fall 2008, CIDP became an approved indication for IVIg in the United States and Canada.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of IVIg for the treatment of CIDP through a systematic review of published randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE (1996-2009, including in-process and other non-indexed citations), Embase (1996-2009) and other databases through the Ovid interface. We applied a methodological filter to limit retrieval to controlled clinical trials, meta-analyses and systematic reviews, and health technology assessments. Retrieval was limited to studies involving humans, and no language restrictions were employed. We pooled extracted data to estimate the effect size of IVIg treatment based on the random-effects model.

RESULTS

We identified 9 unique randomized controlled trials. Of these, 3 compared IVIg therapy with an active comparator (plasma exchange, plasma exchange using extracorporeal immunoadsorption, oral prednisolone, respectively); the other 6 trials had placebo controls. No incremental benefit was seen in terms of primary outcomes for comparisons of IVIg therapy and an active comparator. Data from 4 of the 6 placebo-controlled trials were included in a meta-analysis. A significant improvement in disability (i.e., reduction in disability score) was found, with a standardized mean difference of 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23 to 1.08) in favour of IVIg. A pooled analysis of the proportion of patients with a response to treatment, as defined by the investigators of each of the trials, resulted in a risk ratio of 2.74 (95% CI 1.80 to 4.15) favouring IVIg.

INTERPRETATION

IVIg therapy was statistically superior to placebo in reducing disability and impairment among patients with CIDP. The effectiveness of IVIg was similar to that of the alternative treatment strategies of plasma exchange and oral prednisolone.

Analysis of thromboembolic risk related to high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin treatment: a preliminary clinical study of 10 patients with autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases

BACKGROUND

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment is a well-known treatment that has been used successfully in a broad spectrum of autoimmune diseases. Currently no data are available in the literature about the role of IVIg in the pathogenesis of thromboembolic events in patients with autoimmune blistering diseases refractory to conventional immunosuppressive treatment.

AIM

To determine the relationship between IVIg and thromboembolism in patients with autoimmune blistering diseases and to establish a protocol to deal with the thromboembolic risk.

METHODS

In our preliminary clinical study, 10 patients with autoimmune blistering diseases underwent IVIg cycles to a total of 133 cycles in all (total number of infusions in the patient group: 399), at a standard dose of 2 g/kg/infusion accompanied by an accurate and a complete clinical and laboratory screening for thromboembolism. Preventive measures, such as hydration before and after IVIg, and administration of 100 mg of acetyl salicylic acid (aspirin) or 1000 IU of subcutaneous heparin calcium per day for 3 weeks, were introduced to reduce the thromboembolic risk.

RESULTS

Throughout the 2 years of IVIg treatment, no patient developed a superficial and/or deep venous or arterial thrombosis, even though some of the patients had underlying thromboembolic risk factors and had tested positive for some congenital and acquired thrombophilia markers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that thromboembolic events are uncommon, despite the presence of risk factors. However, as these disorders are very rare and the percentage of nonresponder patients is very low, further investigations are needed to better understand whether IVIg alone is able to trigger these fatal events in blistering disorders.

Intravenous immunoglobulins induce CD32-mediated platelet aggregation in vitro

BACKGROUND

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) and cytomegalovirus immunoglobulins (CMVIg) are currently finding increased acceptance in clinical states of high immune activity and in transplant recipients. A rare side-effect of their application is intravascular thrombosis, which is thought to be related to pre-existing hyperviscosity. In a previous study we have shown that rabbit antithymocyte globulin causes platelet aggregation in vitro via the Fc IgG receptor (CD32).

OBJECTIVES

To investigate if IVIg and CMVIg have the potential to cause CD32-dependent platelet aggregation.

METHODS

The influence of CMVIg or IVIg on platelets pre-incubated with or without monoclonal antibody AT10 was studied in an aggregometer. Expression of platelet surface activation marker CD62P was determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis and presence of soluble CD40L (sCD40L) was evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All in vitro experiments were performed using platelet concentrates from the blood bank, at therapeutic concentrations of immunoglobulins. Results Incubation of platelets with CMVIg and IVIg markedly induced platelet aggregation, and increased expression of CD62P and secretion of sCD40L. The capacity of CMVIg and IVIg to induce platelet aggregation was completely abrogated by adding the blocking antibody AT10 directed against the low-affinity Fc IgG receptor (CD32).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that CMVIg and IVIg solutions with activating Fc domains are able to bind CD32 on platelets and cause platelet aggregation in vitro. These results indicate a mechanism by which in vivo intravascular thrombosis may be explained and suggest caution with concomitant use of packed platelets and IVIg in autoimmune diseases in the clinical setting.

An autopsy case of drug-induced diffuse cerebral axonopathic leukoencephalopathy: the pathogenesis in relation to reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome

An autopsy case of diffuse axonopathic leukoencephalopathy induced by drug treatment is reported. A 70-year-old woman with multiple myeloma developed encephalopathy several days after completing a course of intravenous human immunoglobulin (IVIg) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), and died within I month. T2-weighted MRI demonstrated multifocal high-signal areas in the bilateral cerebral white matter, especially in the right frontal lobe. Neuropathologically, multifocal hydropic axonal swelling with a poor glial reaction was recognized diffusely in the bilateral deep cerebral white matter, being especially marked in the frontal lobe. The cortex, subcortical U-fibers, corpus callosum, and anterior commissure were spared. The cerebellar white matter also showed similar changes, albeit less marked, but the brainstem was spared. Microscopically, the myeloma involvement of the CNS was limited to the dura, and the cerebral arteries showed slight atherosclerosis, but neither thrombi nor angitis. This case, although ultimately fatal, neurologically and neuroradiologically resembled reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLS) induced by IVIg and/or G-CSF, and the nature and selective distribution of the neuropathological changes suggested that the pathogenesis involved vasospasm of the bilateral internal carotid artery and the main trunks of the cerebral arteries, due to unknown cause, inducing ischemia in the deep white matter, which is supplied by long nutrient arteries.

A case of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism after intravenous immunoglobulin therapy

Although high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is generally considered a safe medication for various immune-mediated diseases, thrombotic events have been reported as a complication of the therapy. We report a case who developed thrombotic complications after receiving IVIG. A 56-yr-old woman with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura received IVIG at a dose of 400 mg/kg/day for five days. Three days after the administration of IVIG, the patient developed painful edema in the left leg. Lower extremity doppler ultrasound revealed deep vein thrombosis in the left leg. Chest computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrated a filling defect indicating thromboembolism of the right pulmonary artery. After three weeks of enoxaparin therapy, her symptoms and pulmonary embolism on CT improved. This case suggests clinicians should be cautious in the development of thromboembolism by administration of IVIG, especially in patients with thrombophilia.

Intravenous immunoglobulin-associated arterial and venous thrombosis; report of a series and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

To date, the prevalence of intravenous immunoglobulin (IvIg)-related thrombotic complications has not been evaluated in patients with autoimmune disorders followed up in Departments of Internal Medicine.

OBJECTIVES

To assess prevalence and characteristics of IvIg-related thrombotic complications in patients with autoimmune disorders receiving IvIg therapy; to evaluate the predictive factors for onset of IvIg-related thrombotic manifestation in patients, and to detect patients at risk for these types of complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical records of 46 patients with autoimmune disorders who were given IvIg therapy at our Department of Internal Medicine between January 2002 and December 2004 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Among the 46 patients, nine exhibited IvIg-associated severe complications (19.6%). Six patients (13%) developed IvIg-related thrombotic complications. Thrombotic complications frequently occurred during IvIg infusion (50%), although they were also observed within 1-8 days following IvIg infusion in other patients. IvIg-related thrombotic complications consisted of: deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (n = 3), myocardial infarction (n = 2) and stroke (n = 1). The outcome of thrombotic complications was favourable in all patients, after appropriate therapy institution. Older age, history of associated arterial hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia were more common in the group of patients with IvIg-related thrombotic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that IvIg-related thrombotic arterial/venous complications are not uncommon in patients with autoimmune disorders (13% of patients). Nevertheless, patients, who are followed up in Departments of Internal Medicine often have concomitant disorders placing them at increased risk to develop IvIg-related thrombotic complications; the latter may also explain the high rate of IvIg-related thrombosis in our cohort. Our series further indicates that patients should be monitored closely for these types of adverse events during the whole period of IvIg therapy, as thrombotic manifestations occurred in patients who had received multiple IvIg infusions without exhibiting complications. In addition, our results suggest that it is questionable to initiate IvIg therapy in patients presenting with predictive factors of thrombotic complications; in this subgroup of patients, IvIg should be prescribed cautiously, after re-weighing risk-benefit considerations.