A novel mutation of the beta-globin gene promoter (-102 C>A) and pitfalls in family screening

Borderline HbA2 levels: Dilemma in diagnosis of beta-thalassemia carriers

There is inconsistency in the exact definition of diagnostic levels of HbA₂ for β thalassemia trait. While many laboratories consider HbA₂ ≥4.0 % diagnostic, still others consider HbA₂ ≥3.3 % or HbA₂ ≥3.5 % as the cut-off for establishing β thalassemia carrier diagnosis. This is because, over the years, studies have described β thalassemia carriers showing HbA₂ levels that lie above the normal range of HbA₂ but below the typical carrier range of β thalassemia. These, "borderline HbA₂ levels", though not detrimental to health, are significant in β thalassemia carrier diagnosis because they can lead to misinterpretation of results. In this review, we have evaluated the prevalence of borderline HbA₂ levels and discussed the causes of borderline HbA₂ values. We have also compiled an extensive catalogue of β globin gene defects associated with borderline HbA₂ levels and have discussed strategies to avoid misdiagnosing borderline HbA₂ β thalassemia carriers. Our analysis of studies that have delineated the cause of borderline HbA₂ levels in different populations shows that 35.4 % [626/1766] of all individuals with borderline HbA₂ levels carry a molecular defect. Among the positive samples, 17 % [299/1766] show β globin gene defects, 7.7 % [137/1766] show α thalassemia defects, 2.7 % [49/1766] show KLF1 gene mutations, 2.3 % [41/1766] show the co-inheritance of β and α thalassemia, 2.0 % [37/1766] show the co-inheritance of β and δ thalassemia and 1.8 % [32/1766] show α globin gene triplication. It appears that a comprehensive molecular work up of the β globin gene is the only definite method to detect borderline HbA₂ β thalassemia carriers, especially in populations with a high prevalence of the disease. The presence of associated genetic or acquired determinants may subsequently be assessed to identify the cause of borderline HbA₂.

The regulation of human globin promoters by CCAAT box elements and the recruitment of NF-Y

CCAAT boxes are motifs found within the proximal promoter of many genes, including the human globin genes. The highly conserved nature of CCAAT box motifs within the promoter region of both α-like and β-like globin genes emphasises the functional importance of the CCAAT sequence in globin gene regulation. Mutations within the β-globin CCAAT box result in β-thalassaemia, while mutations within the distal γ-globin CCAAT box cause the Hereditary Persistence of Foetal Haemoglobin, a benign condition which results in continued γ-globin expression during adult life. Understanding the transcriptional regulation of the globin genes is of particular interest, as reactivating the foetal γ-globin gene alleviates the symptoms of β-thalassaemia and sickle cell anaemia. NF-Y is considered to be the primary activating transcription factor which binds to globin CCAAT box motifs. Here we review recruitment of NF-Y to globin CCAAT boxes and the role NF-Y plays in regulating globin gene expression. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Nuclear Factor Y in Development and Disease, edited by Prof. Roberto Mantovani.

The β-globin promoter -71 C>T mutation is a β+ thalassemic allele

A novel β-globin gene promoter (-71 C>T) nucleotide change was recently posted to the HbVar database (ID 2701) without precision on phenotype and ethnicity. We found the same change in compound heterozygosity with Hb S [β6(A3)Glu>Val] in an Omani family with almost equal expression of Hb A and Hb S. This suggested that the -71 C to T mutation may be a mild β-thalassemic allele. Subsequent search found three other independent cases with the same atypical Hb A:Hb S ratio, further confirming the mild thalassemic feature of this mutation. In addition, molecular screening of a set of subjects (with only Hb A) with borderline Hb A(2) or MCV values revealed the presence of -71 C>T change in heterozygous state, altogether assigning the mutation as a mild β(+) thalassemic allele. In a region such as Oman, where several genetic conditions of the red blood cell coexist (α- and β-thalassemia, Hb S, Hb D, Hb E) in significant frequencies, it is crucial to decipher the molecular basis of these atypical forms of β(+) thalassemias, especially in a genetic counseling setting.

The significance of the hemoglobin A(2) value in screening for hemoglobinopathies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The inherited hemoglobinopathies are a large group of disorders that include thalassemias and hemoglobin variants. Accurate determination of the carrier phenotype is essential for detecting couples at risk for producing offspring with hemoglobinopathy. Heterozygous beta-thalassemia is usually silent at the clinical level. His phenotype is characterized by microcytosis and hypochromia with increased hemoglobin A(2) (HbA(2)) value. Therefore, HbA(2) determination plays a key role in screening programs for hemoglobinopathy. The aim of this review is to address and suggest an approach for reducing or abolishing hemoglobinopathy screening mistakes.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Quantitative methods for HbA(2) value determination, comment on the accuracy of the test and on the interpretation of data were discussed. The most probable diagnostic conclusion based on the HbA(2) level, hemoglobin pattern, hematological parameters and iron markers was suggested in this review.

RESULTS

Hemoglobinopathies are the only genetic disease where it is possible to detect carriers using hematological findings rather than DNA analysis. However, hematological diagnosis is sometimes presumptive, and in these cases, DNA analysis becomes necessary. Complete screening is based on the detection of red cell indices, HbA(2), HbF and hemoglobin variant values. In particular, HbA(2) determination plays a key role in screening programs for beta-thalassemia because a small increase in this fraction is one of the most important markers of beta-thalassemia heterozygous carriers.

CONCLUSION

Genetic factors both related and unrelated to the beta- and alpha-globin gene clusters, iron metabolism, endocrinological disorders, and some types of anemia, together with intra- and inter-laboratory variations in HbA(2) determination, may cause difficulties in evaluating this measurement in screening programs for hemoglobinopathies. Therefore, knowledge of all these issues is important for reducing or eliminating the risk of mistakes in screening programs for hemoglobinopathies.